(Stillness in the Storm Editor) Get your research hat on because there are lots of claims and rumors to examine below! The following is a compilation of links, videos, and graphics suggesting that various deep state actors at the recent George H.W. Bush funeral express behavior that indicates some have switched sides and are now working for the alliance.
The evidence provided to substantiate this perspective of deep state flippers is marginal at best.
There are no confessions, no secret audio recordings, or documents admitting shifts of allegiance. Instead, we have secret notes being passed around, body language suggesting shame and acceptance, and other subtle indicators.
From a discernment perspective, indeed something happened—we can clearly see notes being passed and body language displays—but what these things indicate remains unclear.
Obviously, the aware masses that buy into the alliance against the deep state narrative want this evidence to prove out that there are indeed major moves for good happening. But we just don’t know for sure if that is the case, yet.
As always, discern carefully.
I suggest you avoid blindly believing or dismissing anything for emotional reasons.
Instead, do your best to formulate a well-informed opinion and conclusion that is subject to change when better information becomes available.
TMR staff watched the live video of this part of the memorial service and couldn’t help but notice the two Secret Service agents. Their quite conspicuous and foreboding presence was unlike anything we had ever seen before on TV, especially at a state event.
To sign up for RSS updates, paste this link (https://stillnessinthestorm.com/feed/) into the search field of your preferred RSS Reader or Service (such as Feedly or gReader).
“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.” – Aristotle
This website is supported by readers like you.
If you find our work of value, consider making a donation.
Stillness in the Storm DISCLAIMER: All articles, videos, statements, claims, views and opinions that appear anywhere on this site, whether stated as theories or absolute facts, are always presented by Stillness in the Storm as unverified—and should be personally fact checked and discerned by you, the reader. Any opinions or statements herein presented are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, or agreed to by Stillness, those who work with Stillness, or those who read Stillness. Any belief or conclusion gleaned from content on this site is solely the responsibility of you the reader to substantiate, fact check, and no harm comes to you or those around you. And any actions taken by those who read material on this site is solely the responsibility of the acting party. You are encouraged to think carefully and do your own research. Nothing on this site is meant to be believed without question or personal appraisal.
Content Disclaimer: All content on this site marked with “source – [enter website name and url]” is not owned by Stillness in the Storm. All content on this site that is not originally written, created, or posted as original, is owned by the original content creators, who retain exclusive jurisdiction of all intellectual property rights. Any copyrighted material on this site was shared in good faith, under fair use or creative commons. Any request to remove copyrighted material will be honored, provided proof of ownership is rendered. Send takedown requests to [email protected].
What is our mission? Why do we post what we do?
Our mission here is to curate (share) articles and information that we feel is important for the evolution of consciousness. Most of that information is written or produced by other people and organizations, which means it does not represent our views or opinions as managing staff of Stillness in the Storm. Some of the content is written by one of our writers and is clearly marked accordingly. Just because we share a CNN story that speaks badly about the President doesn’t mean we’re promoting anti-POTUS views. We’re reporting on the fact as it was reported, and that this event is important for us to know so we can better contend with the challenges of gaining freedom and prosperity. Similarly, just because we share a pro/anti-[insert issue or topic] content, such as a pro-second amendment piece or an anti-military video doesn’t mean we endorse what is said. Again, information is shared on this site for the purpose of evolving consciousness. In our opinion, consciousness evolves through the process of accumulating knowledge of the truth and contemplating that knowledge to distill wisdom and improve life by discovering and incorporating holistic values. Thus, sharing information from many different sources, with many different perspectives is the best way to maximize evolution. What’s more, the mastery of mind and discernment doesn’t occur in a vacuum, it is much like the immune system, it needs regular exposure to new things to stay healthy and strong. If you have any questions as to our mission or methods please reach out to us at [email protected].
You guys have become the best aggregator of truth news around and I want to congratulate you on that . I also salute you for continuously pointing out the Lakoff evidence for certain pieces and trying to educate the ignorant masses on how to discern truth from nonsense. . You chicken your size with a lot of dubious old speculative stuff and your headlines for articles are completely tabloid in tone and integrity . This article that I read is a good example where the title is “Something Very BIG Just Happened at the Bush Memorial Service in D.C. “. when you yourself admit that it is extremely speculative . So why the headline proclaiming that something REALLY BIG happened? Sorry but a tacky move. While I’m on a roll I might as well say that you also make the ergonomics of reading your articles very difficult with those constant insertions of links blown up to a very big size . It’s very annoying . Otherwise, keep up the great work!
Brian. I understand where you’re coming from. Unfortunately, we’re in an information war and we have to use strategies that are effective. There’s nothing unethical or immoral about using a sensational headline—-people always have the right to discern for themselves, and should.
I pray that one day we can live in a world were people seek substance over flashy images and click-bait. Until then, we’ll continue to use strategies that are ethical and effective. Much love.
You guys have become the best aggregator of truth news around and I want to congratulate you on that . I also salute you for continuously pointing out the Lakoff evidence for certain pieces and trying to educate the ignorant masses on how to discern truth from nonsense. . You chicken your size with a lot of dubious old speculative stuff and your headlines for articles are completely tabloid in tone and integrity . This article that I read is a good example where the title is “Something Very BIG Just Happened at the Bush Memorial Service in D.C. “. when you yourself admit that it is extremely speculative . So why the headline proclaiming that something REALLY BIG happened? Sorry but a tacky move. While I’m on a roll I might as well say that you also make the ergonomics of reading your articles very difficult with those constant insertions of links blown up to a very big size . It’s very annoying . Otherwise, keep up the great work!
Brian. I understand where you’re coming from. Unfortunately, we’re in an information war and we have to use strategies that are effective. There’s nothing unethical or immoral about using a sensational headline—-people always have the right to discern for themselves, and should.
I pray that one day we can live in a world were people seek substance over flashy images and click-bait. Until then, we’ll continue to use strategies that are ethical and effective. Much love.