(Zero Hedge) The worst fears of Julian Assange’s legal team have just been realized.
Related Tusli Gabbard Says She’d Drop All Charges Against Assange And Snowden
by Zero Hedge, May 23rd, 2019
Just as Wikileaks’ editor in chief anticipated, the DoJ has revealed that a grand jury in Virginia has returned a new 18-count superseding indictment against Assange that includes violations of the Espionage Act stemming from his role in publishing the classified documents leaked by Chelsea Manning, as well as his original charge of conspiring to break into a government computer, per the New York Times.
The DOJ said with the indictment that Assange will face a maximum of 10 years for each of the 17 Espionage Act violations, plus the five-year penalty for his earlier hacking charge.
Buy Book Underground: The Julian Assange Story
In addition to significantly raising the punishment threshold (from a maximum of 5.5 years under the previous indictment to the prospect of a death sentence for violating the Espionage Act), the new charges will raise serious first amendment issues as Assange will become the first journalist charged under the Espionage Act.
Though it’s not a guarantee, Espionage Act violations have, in the past, carried the prospect of a death sentence, though Assange’s specific violations will likely spare him the possibility of such a fate (read more about Assange’s charges here).
For context, the Espionage Act of 1917 has been used to convict suspected spies – most famously Julius and Ethel Rosenberg. The Rosenbergs were famously put to death by electric chair in 1953.
The Justice Department’s decision to pursue Espionage Act charges signals a dramatic escalation under President Trump to crack down on leaks of classified information and aims squarely at First Amendment protections for journalists. Most recently, law enforcement officials charged a former intelligence analyst with giving classified documents to The Intercept, a national security news website.
Buy Book The Vatican Exposed: Money, Murder, and the Mafia
Legal scholars believe that prosecuting reporters over their work would violate the First Amendment, but the prospect has not yet been tested in court because the government had never charged a journalist under the Espionage Act.
Though he is not a conventional journalist, much of what Mr. Assange does at WikiLeaks is difficult to distinguish in a legally meaningful way from what traditional news organizations like The New York Times do: seek and publish information that officials want to be secret, including classified national security matters, and take steps to protect the confidentiality of sources.
Per the NYT, the Obama administration considered bringing the Espionage Act charges against Assange, but balked because it didn’t want to raise the First Amendment issue. While Wikileaks had warned of this possibility, they suspected that the US would wait until Assange was on American soil before bringing Espionage Act-related charges, since they would carry a much more severe penalty.
Wikileaks said the new charges were “madness” and that this would be “the end of national security journalism.”
Remember, the UK and Ecuador promised that no serious harm would befall Assange – ie that Assange wouldn’t be put to death, or face the possibility of rotting in prison for the rest of his life. Whether these new charges will help or hurt Assange’s chances of successfully battling extradition remains to be seen.
2019.05.23assangeindictment by on Scribd
Buy Book The Strange Death of Europe: Immigration, Identity, Islam
Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?
The preceding information is a news update. In general, staying informed as to events taking place is essential as an individual because it helps you navigate the world, and socially because you can gain and maintain rapport with your fellows. This rapport can be used to share information that can help others and improve the conditions of humanity in general. However, one must learn how to exercise discernment and proper critical thinking so they can make effective use of information gained.
– Justin
Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools.
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Send an email to [email protected], with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected]. Thank you for reading.
Source:
https://theantimedia.com/assange-death-penalty-17-espionage-act-charges/
I’m not an attorney, so please correct me if I’m wrong.
I don’t understand how the United States can convict Assange of Espionage when he’s not a U.S. citizen and said crimes did not take place in U.S. territory. Jurisdiction. Yes?
Also, he’s a journalist. Doesn’t this also protect him from prosecution?
Can the NYT be considered a credible witness even though they’ve been caught lying numerous times?
Didn’t BO sign an executive order saying the government cannot classify crimes or matters of embarrassment? This would make everything that Wikileaks publishes unclassified. Yes?
I believe this litigation maybe a smokescreen. He might be working with the DOJ for his testimony against the cabal. Trump did praise Assange during his campaign. If push comes to shove I hope Assange gets a presidential pardon.
Thoughts?
I am in total agreement with Hugh’s comments. I sense that Assange will get the protection he needs. In the end, however, it will always come down to one’s personal karma, as to whether one gets good or bad outcomes…
There is far too much second-guessing, doubt and fear-mongering going on as a general rule, even with alternate sites like this one. How can that be a good thing? We should know by now, that our thought forms have the power to create reality… what are we willing to affirm?