(Richard Wexler) Scandal at a New York RTC illustrates how Congress managed to make the plight of sex-trafficking victims even worse
Related Exposing the Cabal’s Global Child Abuse Network — Who or What is the Whore of Babylon
by Richard Wexler,
The vastly overhyped “Family First Act” comes complete with a “presents for pimps” loophole. That will encourage more tragedies like the one at Hawthorne-Cedar Knolls.
Excerpts:
It’s always cause for celebration when a place that institutionalizes children is forced to close.
The residential treatment portion of Hawthorne-Cedar Knolls, an institution in Westchester County, north of New York City, is scheduled to shut down.
But don’t celebrate too much. A new federal law actually makes it easier to keep such institutions going, and set up new ones.
The shutdown of the residential treatment portion of Hawthorne-Cedar Knolls won’t happen because the agency that runs it, the Jewish Board Family and Children’s Services, had a crisis of conscience.
It will happen because the pressure from upset neighbors and state regulators became too much.
What was upsetting them?
Oh, just the usual: violence and sex trafficking.
Buy Book The Whistleblower: Sex Trafficking, Military Contractors, and One Woman’s Fight for Justice
The mere fact that an overwhelming body of research finds never seems to be enough in itself to shut these places down. Neither is the fact that almost none of the young people institutionalized in such places really need to be there.
There is nothing an RTC can do that can’t be done better with Wraparound programs, in which all the help a child needs is brought into the child’s own home or a foster home.
Further evidence for this can be found just by looking at what was done when Hawthorne-Cedar Knolls was forced to start shutting down, a process that started nearly a year ago. According to the Rockland / Westchester Journal News:
When it was announced Cedar Knolls would close, there were 54 youths staying there out of a capacity of 78. The youths were expected to go back to their families or be placed with foster families. The final six children are to be transferred a facility in New York City, a spokeswoman told The Journal News on Thursday. [Emphasis added.]
Which raises an obvious question: Why were they institutionalized in the first place?
To really understand this story, it’s worth taking a trip through time.
Buy Book Captive: A Mother’s Crusade to Save Her Daughter from a Terrifying Cult
1990: “Love knows no locksmith.”
The first time I read about Hawthorne-Cedar Knolls was when it and a sister institution, Linden Hill, were exposed as hellholes by New York Newsday. It was 1990, and reporter Michael Powell found that the institutions were
plagued by violence, unchecked sex, and poor supervision. … Said one counselor: “They have lost sight that the program is no longer safe to kids. It’s outrageous.”
When confronted, the institutions did what they so often do: They blamed the children.
In one case, a teenage boy with a history of aggressive sexual behavior allegedly forced a 14-year-old girl to have sex with another boy. The director of Linden Hill said the sex was consensual.
“Do you set up a situation that is locked down or do you allow kids to try their wings?” he said. “[You ask] how could it happen? Well, it’s almost inevitable. Love knows no locksmith.”
In a just world, the 1990 expose should have been enough to shut these places down.
Unfortunately, a few years later, in spite of such high-quality journalism, it was New York Newsday that actually shut down. Hawthorne-Cedar Knolls kept right on collecting hundreds of dollars per day per child to “treat” children, even though, as noted earlier, the evidence is overwhelming that .
Buy Book Untold Stories: How I Survived a Child Porn Ring
2017: All those runaways
Twenty-seven years after that first New York Newsday expose, the young people at Hawthorne- Cedar Knolls were “trying their wings” once again – running away in massive numbers; massive as in 73 percent of them in a single year.
The New York Times reported that though the institution supposedly was treating victims of sex trafficking, the fear was that the runaways were falling victim to sex traffickers.
Once again, the institution blamed the victims.
The Times’ explained the supposed “dilemma” for such places: They can’t “treat” people who keep running away, but if you make it harder for young people to run, then the places become more like jails – and people who have been victims of sex trafficking shouldn’t be treated like criminals.
The headline on the Times story was: “How Do You Care for Sex-Trafficking Victims if You Can’t Hold On to Them?”
But the story omitted the answer: You place them with people they want to hold on to – in other words, a family.
That, apparently is exactly what happened to most of the children at Hawthorne-Cedar Knolls, but only when the institution was pressured into closing.
Surely when 73 percent of the residents run away in a single year, it’s time to consider the possibility that the problem is the place they’re running from.
Buy Book In Plain Sight: The Life and Lies of Jimmy Savile
2018: A pipeline to prostitution
Now, the Times is back with a follow-up story. The fears were correct. As the story puts it:
On Thursday, the breadth of a pipeline carrying young women out of Hawthorne and into prostitution became clearer. Nineteen people were charged in a sex-trafficking ring that exploited young women and girls as young as 13 years old, federal prosecutors said.
At least 15 victims were in the child welfare system, including nine who were residents of Hawthorne, the prosecutors said. …“These were especially vulnerable victims,” the prosecutor, Elinor L. Tarlow, said. “They didn’t have stable residences. They didn’t have family support. They didn’t have guidance.”
She said the accused traffickers capitalized on that vulnerability. “They approached victims as if they had a romantic interest in them,” she said. “They offered them a place to stay and then they pushed them into prostitution.” [Emphasis added.]
Buy Book Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences the Red Queen and the Grand Scheme
The “presents for pimps” loophole
Anyone could have seen all this coming. Predators go where the prey is. The role of group homes and institutions in making sex trafficking easier has been documented over and over.
And that’s what makes the callousness and cynicism of America’s group home industry so breathtaking. They used the desperation of Members of Congress to pass the vastly overhyped so-called “Family First Act” to make tragedies such as this even more likely.
The law puts some very minor, easy-to-evade limits on when the federal government will help foot the enormous bill for institutionalizing children in group homes and residential treatment centers.
But the group home industry chafed at even these minor restrictions. So they added what should be called the “presents for pimps” loophole. The spigot of federal dollars stays open for:
A setting providing high-quality residential care and supportive services to children and youth who have been found to be, or are at risk of becoming, sex trafficking victims
Never mind that such settings are probably the worst possible place for such children and youth.
Read the full article at the National Coalition for Child Protection Reform.
Buy Book Invisible Heroes: Survivors of Trauma and How They Heal
Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Send an email to [email protected], with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected]. Thank you for reading.
Source:
Leave a Reply