Updated – 1.29.2015 7:18pm – Someone was kind enough to share this ‘debunking’ of the law and it’s applicability to chemtrails on our facebook page. I want to take to the time to debunk the debunking.
Here is the debunking post. The debunking is centered around the concept it prevents weapon testing from being used on the public, without informed consent. The debunker goes on to provide that informed consent is similar to when we agree explicitly to have a medical procedure done in a Hospital. Which is one example, but this does not consider all the uses of the informed consent mechanism in legal codes.
As was mentioned below, our status as Agents of Government compel us to stay informed about all legal codes which are passed. Much like working for a company requires you to be aware of changes in company policy. As such, our consent is informed, because it is public ‘law’, and the burden of protest falls on us. We by our own negligence consent to the legal policy. The debunker failed to address this point with any substance.
Secondly, the bill specifically provides exceptions to Informed consent, one of which is: “(3) Any law enforcement purpose, including any purpose related to riot control.” Our status as citizens or civilians, is defined in the Trading with the Enemy Act, as enemies of the state. The government must defend itself from the public.
Finally, Geoengineering is continues under the auspices of protecting the public from ‘global warming.’ While this is not official public policy, if one can read in between the lines, the inference is clear.
Of course none of this is needed if you just trust your own eyes. Chemtrailing is happening, and it does contain all of the things mentioned in the cited ‘Law’, we maybe able to debate what law applies to, but the reality of Geoengineering is self evident.
Thank you Hans for sharing this with us!
The reality of Chemtrails is obvious to most people. But the ability of the general public to ignore reality is profound, as we have been trained from birth to believe what makes us feel better, instead of aligning ourselves with the truth. Hence the plethora of skeptics who reject any idea that counter’s their bias; without actually investigating it. A true skeptic, seeks out ALL data within the context of an idea, and then makes an educated determination about validity; acknowledging that validity is determined by supportive data not personal bias.
The follow is an analysis of U.S. “Law” describing the use of Biological Agents on the population. Since every Citizen of the USA is an agent of government (per their birth certificate and social security card, amongst other things) when a Legal code is passed it places the imperative of objection on each citizen. Failure to take action, and unconsent from the contract which allows the government to test biological agents, is consent; acquiescence. This can be clearly understood in the post Trust Law: How You Became A Commodity – The Creation of Constructive Trusts.
http://urlbam.com/ha/M002Y
To help raise awareness about this horrific law, please:
(1) Become a fan of our Facebook page located here: Official Facebook Page
(2) Send a link to this page to everyone you know. Here is a short-link directly to this page:http://urlbam.com/ha/M002Y
To send either of the above links in an email, just right-click on the link and select either “Copy Shortcut” or “Copy Link Location”. Then paste it directly into the body of your email message by right-clicking in the body and then clicking “Paste”.
U.S. Law Allows Testing of Chemicals and Biological Agents on “Civilian Population”
SEC. 1078. RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE OF HUMAN SUBJECTS FOR TESTING OF CHEMICAL OR BIOLOGICAL AGENTS.
(a) PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES.—The Secretary of Defense may notconduct (directly or by contract)
(1) any test or experiment involving the use of a chemical agent orbiological agent on a civilian population; or
(2) any other testing of a chemical agent or biological agent on human subjects.
(b) EXCEPTIONS.—Subject to subsections (c), (d), and (e), the prohibition in subsection (a) does not apply to a test or experiment carried out for any of the following purposes:
(1) Any peaceful purpose that is related to a medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity.
(2) Any purpose that is directly related to protection against toxic chemicals or biological weapons and agents.
(3) Any law enforcement purpose, including any purpose related to riot control.
So section (a) prohibits these cruel and inhumane chemical and biological tests on humans.
Then section (b) says that the prohibitions in section (a) do not apply to tests carried out for virtually any purpose. So section (b) completely negates the prohibitions of section (a).
In Other Words:
The U.S. government can test chemicals and biological agents on humans for nearly any purpose they desire.
The Following Should Also Be Noted
The term “biological agent” as stated above in (a)(1) is defined in (e) as follows:
‘‘biological agent’’ means any micro-organism (including bacteria,
viruses, fungi, rickettsiac, or protozoa), pathogen, or infectious substance,
and any naturally occurring, bioengineered, or synthesized
component of any such micro-organism, pathogen, or infectious substance,
whatever its origin or method of production, that is capable
of causing—
(1) death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a
human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism;
(2) deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or
materials of any kind; or
(3) deleterious alteration of the environment.
In Other Words:
The U.S. government can test chemicals and biological agents on humans that cause death, biological malfunction, and deleterious alteration of the environment. The term “deleterious alteration of the environment” brings chemtrails to mind.
Read about actual human chemical testing programs currently in operation:
http://herballure.com/chemtrails
Read the full text of this law here. Page 287 contains the above excerpt. The Section is 1078. This is placed in the US Code (UCS) at 50 USC 1520a:
Public Law 105-85
Informed Consent
Some argue that none of this activity can be conducted without “informed consent”, as stated in section (c), which reads:
may conduct a test or experiment described in subsection (b) only if informed consent to the testing was obtained from each human subject in advance of the testing on that subject.
Although section (c) seems to provide some protection for us in that it requires us to be notified “in advance” if this “testing” is to take place, in reality, it does not provide any protection at all.
Why not?
Because you’ve already been “informed in advance” and you’ve already given your “consent”.
Because this “law” is publicly available for everyone to read, you have been “informed”. Because you have not contested it (that’s what the courts are for), you have provided your “consent”.
This law is part of a contract between you and the government. When the terms of a contract are known and uncontested, it’s called “acquiescence”. Acquiescence essentially means that both parties are in agreement.
Acquiesce: “submit or comply silently or without protest”
So, when this law was published, you were “informed”. Because you have not challenged it in court, you have “consented”. By your own inaction, you have said, “Sure, go ahead and poison me, even if it causes death. I have no problem with it.”
Because this contract meets the judicial requirements of “remedy” and “recourse”, it is legally binding.
Judges like to say: “Ignorance of the law is no excuse”. They say this because you are expected to know all of the “law” because it is publicly available for you to read (despite the fact that this is humanly impossible).
So, in reality, section (c) is legally useless. It does not provide any additional protection, it only “seems” to. Section (c)’s only purpose for being included in this law is deception, nothing more.
Deception
Section (c) of this “law” is very deceptive because most people don’t understand the concepts of acquiescence in contract law, therefore, people mistakenly conclude that this “testing” will never happen to them unless they are informed about it.
The powers-that-be play upon public ignorance by inducing people into having a false sense of security. As a result, the public believes this activity could not be occurring because they believe that they would have personally heard about it. This false belief then provides insurance that this law will never be contested in court, and as long as this law remains uncontested, chemtrail spraying will continue unhindered.
The final result is that this craftily-written law has done its job. It has enabled chemtrail spraying to continue without being contested in court. Additionally, this law continually provides legal protection for those doing the spraying. After all, by your inaction you have given them your permission.
When you consider the incredibly dark nature of this deception and when you consider the fact that this law gives your public servants the self-appointed power to kill you, you should then consider what kind of people are running your country, or the world for that matter.
Supplement
This Public Law in The US Code: Title 50, 1520a
This May Also Interest You
Historical Examples of Biological Testing On Americans
This interesting documentary details some of the history of military testing against Americans.
Chemical Testing on U.K. Citizens: Zinc Cadmium Sulfide (video)
Another shocking video revealing military chemical testing programs on citizens.
The Smoking Tooth Video (video)
Watch mercury vapor coming off a “silver” dental fillings. The CDC says:
“Estimates of the amount of mercury released from dental amalgams range from 3 to 17 micrograms per day (μg/day). The mercury from dental amalgam may contribute from 0 to more than 75% of your total daily mercury exposure,…” —Centers for Disease Control, Toxicological Profile formercury, CAS# 7439-97-6, March 1999
Biological Warfare On the American People, Dr. Garth Nicolson (video)
Morgellons, fibromyalgia, Gulf War Syndrome: Are these all artificial diseases caused by military experimentation on living humans? This is a must-see video.
Dr. Hildegarde Staninger Interview On Morgellons Disease (video)
Dr. Staninger exposes the evidence linking chemtrails to Morgellons disease. Currently, over 1000 new people contract Morgellons in the U.S. each day. The highest rates of new cases are currently found in California, Texas, and Florida.
Does the Bible Talk About Chemtrails?
The Bible makes several references to the method used by the powerful global merchants (bankers/traders) of the Earth. It reveals what method they will use to deceive all of the people of the Earth.
Source:
http://globalskywatch.com/chemtrails/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=45&an=2#Post45
Thank you for any other wonderful article. Where else could
anybody get that kind of info in such an ideal means of writing?
I have a presentation subsequent week, and I
am on the search for such information.
You can search the site using the search bar for all sorts of content. :)
Justin