Stillness in the Storm

An Agent for Consciousness Evolution

Quantum Equation Suggests The Big Bang Never Occurred – The Universe Has No Beginning

By 2 Comments

Spread the love

The term Science is often used to convey an idea which suggests it is verifiable or true, but what is a truth? What is a truth vs the truth, what is theory vs observation? These are the essential questions every human being will face in their lives, to understand the difference between a popular belief, and an verified description of reality. 

A truth is an analog, a model or representation of an observed event. For example, “the sky is clear” is a statement, when heard by a mind, can be decoded to create an image representative of the observed event; a clear sky. The Truth, on the other hand, is the objective reality. The difference seems trivial, but it is absolutely essential to understand for developing clear perception of reality. It is the difference between Objective Reality and our Subjective Experience of it, and in our modern world, subjective theories (the analog or model which someone creates to represent reality) are offered as observations of reality itself; a serious logical error. Just because a theory seems to fit observation, does not mean it is an accurate reflection of reality (The Truth), and this crucial distinction is missed by most of the greatest minds of our age. What we imagine, the ideas we hold to be true, are only ever reflections in our minds. A photograph of a sunrise is not the real thing, and never will be, but it does represent the event; it is a symbol. 

Photograph by Julian Robles 

If we took a poll of a population of people, asking them about modern day theories of the universe: The Standard Model, Quantum Physics, General Relativity, etc. How many people would be able to differentiate between theory and reality? Odds are most people have no process for understanding the difference. And society at large offers up theories as facts, enticing us to ‘not bother doing our homework and just accept what the experts tell us is truth.’ All of the aforementioned successes of modern day physics are theories masquerading as 100% fact; but are not completely verified or accurate. If one was to dig into these doctrines with a critical eye, staggering number of inaccuracies and errors will be discovered.

Dewey B Larson was an engineer during the early part of the 20th century, at a time when many conflicting theories of the Universe were beginning to gain popularity. Despite being labeled an outcast for questioning Scientific Dogma he, and his team, investigated the whole of Physical Science over a 40 year period. Discovering that there were many inaccurate assumptions plaguing modern science. This had the effect of preventing a true and accurate theory being developed to explain the Universe as a whole, which Larson and his team did; Reciprocal Systems Theory.

The below article is one point, in a tapestry of data points, supporting the notion that science has lost its way. Thankfully, the truth – reality – can be known, and all that one needs to do is begin the process of discovering it for themselves. Growing the eyes to see reality and to know the difference between theory vs observation. 

– Justin

Source – Collective Evolution

When it comes to the science regarding the true nature of our reality, you won’t find a shortage of theories, or a shortage of criticisms of each theory. We are like a race with amnesia, trying to discover and search for an answer that most probably exists, but has yet to be discovered. How did the universe begin?
According to new research, there might not have been a big bang. Instead, the universe might have existed forever. The theory was derived from the mathematics of general relativity, and compliment Einstein’s theory of general relativity.
“The Big Bang singularity is the most serious problem of general relativity because the laws of physics appear to break down there.”  – Ahmed Farag Ali, Benha University, Co-Author of the study. (source)
The big bang theory postulates that everything in existence resulted from a single event that launched the creation of the entire universe and that everything in existence today was once part of a single infinitely dense point, also known as the “singularity.”
Here is a good picture representing what the big bang theory is referring to.

So the big bang, again, postulates that the universe started out as an infinitely small point in space called a singularity, then exploded and created space where there was no space before, and that it is continually expanding. One big question regarding that expansion is; how did it happen? As you can see in the picture, “who is that guy?!”
According to Nassim Haramein, the Director of Research for the Resonance Project
“For every action there is an equal opposite reaction.” is one of the most foundational and proven concepts in all of physics. Therefore, if the universe is expanding then “the guy” (or whatever “he” is), who is blowing up that balloon, has to have some huge lungs that are contracting to be able to blow it up. This a concept that Nassim Haramein began exploring when creating an alternative unified field theory to explain the universe.” (source)
This is one out of many criticisms regarding the big bang theory. There are many considerations to be pondered. Can something come from nothing? What about quantum mechanics and the possibility that there is no moment of time at which the universe did not exist?
Again, so many considerations to be pondered.
According to Phys.org:
“The scientists propose that this fluid might be composed of gravitons—hypothetical massless particles that mediate the force of gravity. If they exist, gravitons are thought to play a key role in a theory of quantum gravity.In a related paper, Das and another collaborator, Rajat Bhaduri of McMaster University, Canada, have lent further credence to this model. They show that gravitons can form a Bose-Einstein condensate (named after Einstein and another Indian physicist, Satyendranath Bose) at temperatures that were present in the universe at all epochs.” (source)
The theory also suggests (obviously) that there are no singularities or dark matter, and that the universe is filled with a “quantum fluid.” These scientists are suggesting that this quantum fluid is filled with gravitons.
According to Phys.org:
“In a related paper, Das and another collaborator, Rajat Bhaduri of McMaster University, Canada, have lent further credence to this model. They show that gravitons can form a Bose-Einstein condensate (named after Einstein and another Indian physicist, Satyendranath Bose) at temperatures that were present in the universe at all epochs.”
As you can see, when quantum mechanics is thrown into the equation things appear to be far different. Again, this new theory is suggesting that the universe could have always existed, that it never was what we perceive to be as “the  beginning.” Perhaps it was just an event that did occur that we perceive as the beginning, perhaps the event occurred not from nothing, but something. Again, who is that guy blowing on the balloon in the picture? There is something there that has yet to be discovered.
“As far as we can see, since different points in the universe never actually converged in the past, it did not have a beginning. It lasted forever. It will also not have an end, in other words, there is no singularity. The universe could have lasted forever. It could have gone through cycles of being small and big. or it could have been created much earlier.” –  Saurya Das at the University of Lethbridge in Alberta, Canada, Co-Author of the study. (source)

What We Know Is Often Just Theory

To conclude, it’s clear that we do not yet have a solid explanation regarding what happened during the Big Bang, or if it even happened at all. This new theory is combining general relativity with quantum mechanics, and at the end of the day these are all just theories.
Not to mention the fact that theories regarding multiple dimensions, multiple universes and more have to be considered. When looking for the starting point of creation, our own universe might not even be the place to start. It might be hard given the fact that we cannot yet perceive other factors that have played a part in the make up of what we call reality. What is even harder is the fact that quantum physics is showing that the true nature and make up of the universe is not a physical material thing!
We just don’t know yet, and there are still new findings in modern day physics that delve into non-materialistic science that many mainstream materialistic scientists have yet to grasp and acknowledge.
I’ll leave you with a quote that might give you something to think about:
“A fundamental conclusion of the new physics also acknowledges that the observer creates the reality. As observers, we are personally involved with the creation of our own reality. Physicists are being forced to admit that the universe is a “mental” construction. Pioneering physicist Sir James Jeans wrote: “The stream of knowledge is heading toward a non-mechanical reality; the universe begins to look more like a great thought than like a great machine. Mind no longer appears to be an accidental intruder into the realm of matter, we ought rather hail it as the creator and governor of the realm of matter.” (R. C. Henry, “The Mental Universe”; Nature 436:29, 2005)
“Despite the unrivaled empirical success of quantum theory, the very suggestion that it may be literally true as a description of nature is still greeted with cynicism, incomprehension and even anger. (T. Folger, “Quantum Shmantum”; Discover 22:37-43, 2001)
Sources:

_________



Source:

http://www.collective-evolution.com/2015/02/11/quantum-equation-suggests-the-big-bang-never-occurred-the-universe-has-no-beginning/

Notices and Disclaimers

We need $2000 per month to pay our costs. Help us one time or recurring. (DONATE HERE)

To sign up for RSS updates, paste this link (https://stillnessinthestorm.com/feed/) into the search field of your preferred RSS Reader or Service (such as Feedly or gReader).

Subscribe to Stillness in the Storm Newsletter

“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.” – Aristotle

This website is supported by readers like you.

If you find our work of value, consider making a donation. 

Stillness in the Storm DISCLAIMER: All articles, videos, statements, claims, views and opinions that appear anywhere on this site, whether stated as theories or absolute facts, are always presented by Stillness in the Storm as unverified—and should be personally fact checked and discerned by you, the reader. Any opinions or statements herein presented are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, or agreed to by Stillness, those who work with Stillness, or those who read Stillness. Any belief or conclusion gleaned from content on this site is solely the responsibility of you the reader to substantiate, fact check, and no harm comes to you or those around you. And any actions taken by those who read material on this site is solely the responsibility of the acting party. You are encouraged to think carefully and do your own research. Nothing on this site is meant to be believed without question or personal appraisal.

Content Disclaimer: All content on this site marked with “source – [enter website name and url]” is not owned by Stillness in the Storm. All content on this site that is not originally written, created, or posted as original, is owned by the original content creators, who retain exclusive jurisdiction of all intellectual property rights. Any copyrighted material on this site was shared in good faith, under fair use or creative commons. Any request to remove copyrighted material will be honored, provided proof of ownership is rendered. Send takedown requests to [email protected].

What is our mission? Why do we post what we do?

Our mission here is to curate (share) articles and information that we feel is important for the evolution of consciousness. Most of that information is written or produced by other people and organizations, which means it does not represent our views or opinions as managing staff of Stillness in the Storm. Some of the content is written by one of our writers and is clearly marked accordingly. Just because we share a CNN story that speaks badly about the President doesn’t mean we’re promoting anti-POTUS views. We’re reporting on the fact as it was reported, and that this event is important for us to know so we can better contend with the challenges of gaining freedom and prosperity. Similarly, just because we share a pro/anti-[insert issue or topic] content, such as a pro-second amendment piece or an anti-military video doesn’t mean we endorse what is said. Again, information is shared on this site for the purpose of evolving consciousness. In our opinion, consciousness evolves through the process of accumulating knowledge of the truth and contemplating that knowledge to distill wisdom and improve life by discovering and incorporating holistic values. Thus, sharing information from many different sources, with many different perspectives is the best way to maximize evolution. What’s more, the mastery of mind and discernment doesn’t occur in a vacuum, it is much like the immune system, it needs regular exposure to new things to stay healthy and strong. If you have any questions as to our mission or methods please reach out to us at [email protected].

Reader Interactions

Comments

  2. Joe Renaud says

    The Big Bang theory relies heavily on the assumption that the Doppler effect which is also known as the "red shift" shows generally all objects are moving away from each other. However certain scientists and physicists have broken away from that belief in light of their physical discoveries of objects in the same place but displaying very different speeds pulling away from us. These are not just slightly smaller anomalies but really big ones that shouldn't be there.

    The "Peculiar" galaxy is one (of several), examples this is happening within. This galaxy has 4 separate objects (main galaxy, smaller galaxy in one of it's arms and two quasars in between both galaxies), that are displaying seriously different rates of speed and yet are part of the same galaxy that radio telescopes prove are all part of the same galactic system.

    So why do they have such varying degrees of speeds if they are all part of the same galaxy? Should not all for object be travelling at around the same speed if they are all part of the same system?That's the problem, no one knows but the results are undeniable. They all show drastically different speeds.

    So this gives rise to a problem with the Doppler effect, and that the red shift is very flawed due to these unanswered anomalies and there are other galaxies showing the same problems.

    This would imply that the Doppler effect is no longer reliable and cannot be used as the explanation of an expanding universe.

    Nissam Haramein has an alternative view to explain as to why we think the universe is expanding and it has to do with the universe being a double torus type donut shaped universe instead of the standard model of it being an explosion from one center and expanding out from that central point.

    A double torus system always feeds back into itself forever creating an endless energy cycle, so red shifted object don't really need to apply to this model. If you start off travelling in what is conceived as a straight line you will eventually end up where you started.

    Back at the zero point.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.