Related Q Anon Updates


Barron’s
Shareholder Wants to Oust Zuckerberg as Facebook Chairman
Fortune
Facebook shareholders try to fire Mark Zuckerberg as chairman
Daily Mail
[DC moves slow]
Q


Do you understand what is happening?
Think optics.
Q


Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 00f66d No.2298430
>>2298410
How do you hide a message in clear sight?
Q
You’d be amazed how much is shared on /pol/.
Data exchange.
https://guardianproject.info/apps/pixelknot/

Q

Anonymous ID: ff90f2 No.2298410
>>2298388
i suspected this from the beginning.shops dont mean the post itself isnt real.
How do you hide a message in clear sight?
Q

Anonymous ID: 04e035 No.2298369
>>2298335Proven shop…
The author of the post…..
The face is never the author.
Direct comms come in many different forms.
Q


-Colossians 3:5
Your evil has no place in this world.
Q


What was the point of filing impeachment art if Ryan was going to reject?
Known beforehand?
Optics.
Think logically.
Could Sessions publicly challenge [RR] w/o creating a dilemma?
What events would immediately transpire if Sessions challenged [RR]?
Would it immediately demonstrate that Sessions must be aware of key Mueller facts?
Facts (or failure of duty) that he cannot possibly ‘know’ if recused?
Facts (a case) he is suppose to be recused from?
Think logically.
One challenge to [RR] would immediately trigger attacks to remove Sessions given his clear involvement in receiving information re: a case he is fully recused from.
Who does Huber [directly] report to?
Is it normal [RR] is side-stepped re: Huber CoC?
Why is this important?
Why did Sessions recuse?
Is the LEFT attacking Sessions?
What advantage(s) exist based on this setup?
POTUS publicly expresses his anger re: his recusal?
Do you believe POTUS would allow a complete takeover of his DOJ if nothing was being done behind the scenes to hold people accountable?
When POTUS states “the swamp is being drained” do you believe it?
When POTUS states “it’s happening” do you believe it?
Do you believe POTUS would allow Sessions & [RR] to run HIS DOJ if something wasn’t being done to his liking?
LOGICAL THINKING.
Clickbait derails logical thought.
Think for yourself.
Trust yourself.
Mueller investigating POTUS’ Tweets for obstruction?
You have a front row seat.
Enjoy the show.
Q

8228B754-8AF8-4416-ABB5-641D46415F65.jpeg

News unlocks.
Q

Anonymous ID: c37537 No.2287764
Something BIG is about to drop.
Q

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 77016b No.2287348
>>2287225
When did No Name travel to the UK?
Q
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 77016b No.2287348
>>2287225
When did No Name travel to the UK?
Q
>>2287348
What if the UK gov worked hand-in-hand w/ the Hussein admin to sabotage the 2016 election?
Data collection.
Voice.
Video.
Bugging.
Creation of fake intel dossier using ex spy.
Co-sponsor insurance policy re: POTUS election.
PS.
LP.
No Name.
Clapper.
Brennan.
Rice.
LL.
HRC.
BC.
Hussein.
+22
What if intel masked penetration(s) to frame Russia?
Crowdstrike?
Servers.
SR.
JA.
Why does the UK gov desperately want JA?
Think source files.
The more you know.
Q

Anonymous ID: 45607c No.2287225
>>2287098No Name in the redacted portion of FISA application?
When did No Name travel to the UK?
Q

6169C31C-A4BA-4CCD-8561-D900C8C16307.jpeg

Q

>>2286944
You’ll soon know why.
Q

Anonymous ID: ee4128 No.2286869
>>2286778
>>>/patriotsfight/66
>If RR is dirty, Mueller must also be dirty.
>If Mueller is dirty, RR must also be dirty.

Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Send an email to [email protected], with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected]. Thank you for reading.
Source:


Leave a Reply