(William Sullivan) On the legal front, it appears that Roe v. Wade may soon suffer a calamitous defeat. But its defenders continue to insist that Roe remains popular with the American people because they have already won American hearts and minds about the moral necessity for women to have the ability to “choose” to kill their unborn child in the womb.
Related BREAKING: Supreme Court To Hear “Challenge” To Roe v. Wade.
by William Sullivan, May 22nd, 2022
In reality, they haven’t been faring any better in that regard. Outside a small handful of the bluest states, which seem bent on enshrining protection for a mother to kill her child up to the point of birth (and sometimes beyond the point of birth), many states are legislating stricter limits on abortion.
This is an understandable outcome. Roe has made the abortion issue a centerpiece of national debate, and that has magnified the easily understandable scientific and moral truths that contradict what the pro-abortion advocates have been selling for many decades.
The first unavoidable truth is that a child in his mother’s womb is a living human being. A child in a mother’s womb is nourished, moves, and grows. The child is, therefore, certainly alive in a scientific sense. That living creature is not, we know, a tree, a dog, or a chimpanzee. The child is a living human being, with human DNA that is unique only to that one human child, and no other human child on the planet before him.
This is a fact, and on this point, no serious person could disagree. This introduces the ethical question about taking that child’s life while in the womb. Even Margaret Sanger, the early-twentieth-century eugenicist who is often cited as a founder of Planned Parenthood, recognized the moral truth that contraception was always preferable to abortion because “no matter how early [the abortion] was performed, it was taking a life.”
Considering that the humanity of unborn children is a given, the vast majority of Americans feels that there should certainly be some limitations as to when, why, and how unborn children are killed by mothers and their doctors. Thus, the unabashedly radical disposition of pro-abortion advocates today is met with a near-universal disgust by Americans.
Roughly twenty percent — arguably a fringe element — of Americans support elective abortion in the third trimester or up to the point of birth. The idea is not only undesirable but repulsive to the vast majority of Americans. Even the staunchest pro-abortion ideologues have difficulty defending their wicked propositions about killing children up to the point of birth. For example, House Representative Mike Johnson (R-La.) recently asked a simple question to Aimee Arrambide, who is the executive director of the abortion “rights” group Avow Texas.
“What is the principal distinction,” Johnson queried, “between the human being that is two years old, or nine years old, or one week old, or an hour old and one that is eight inches further up the birth canal?”
Obviously flummoxed, this abortion cultist responded, “I trust people to determine what to do with their own bodies — full stop.”
But surely, we can find a compromise to limit abortion in America, can’t we? After all, a compromise involving more restrictions on abortion should be possible in a nation that already has among the least restrictive abortion policies in the entire world, which was amusingly news to formerly left-wing but nowadays kinda-right-leaning comedian Bill Maher.
Support this site so we can continue to tell you the truth.DONATE HERE
Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world, which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom. The news also serves as a social connection tool, as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do. With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand, the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper.
– Justin
Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools.
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammatical mistake? Send an email to [email protected], with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected]. Thank you for reading.
Source:
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/05/proabortion_leftists_go_all_in_on_eugenics.html
Support our work! (Avoid Big Tech PayPal and Patreon)DIRECT DONATION
Stop rape and incest, then we’ll look at whether abortion is needed in our society. Stop fathers impregnating their 11 year old girls. Stop uncles from raping them. Stop kidnappers from pimping out 15 year old girls and stop rape creating unwanted children and permanently traumatized women who are incapable of rearing a child. Stop demanding a mother die on the delivery table, leaving a newborn and 5 other kids without a mother, stop demanding we traumatize and permanently , irreversibly damage our bodies leaving us disabled- then we’ll consider your demand to end abortion.
My biggest question in all of this is “why do certain people want to believe women are inherently evil and would stop at nothing to wrecklessly snuff out a life that grows inside our body? Why do certain people view this decision and the women who make them, as degenerate criminals? Most importantly- why do they hate us? Why do they hate women to the point you would rather we die?”
I think these folks need to watch Cider House Rules and get a grip on the sheer volume of RAPE and it’s impact the female community face from the moment we are born, just because we have a vagina.