Stillness in the Storm

An Agent for Consciousness Evolution

Pro-Abortion Leftists Go All In on Eugenics

By 1 Comment

Spread the love

(William Sullivan) On the legal front, it appears that Roe v. Wade may soon suffer a calamitous defeat.  But its defenders continue to insist that Roe remains popular with the American people because they have already won American hearts and minds about the moral necessity for women to have the ability to “choose” to kill their unborn child in the womb.

Related BREAKING: Supreme Court To Hear “Challenge” To Roe v. Wade.

Source – American Thinker

by William Sullivan, May 22nd, 2022

In reality, they haven’t been faring any better in that regard.  Outside a small handful of the bluest states, which seem bent on enshrining protection for a mother to kill her child up to the point of birth (and sometimes beyond the point of birth), many states are legislating stricter limits on abortion.

This is an understandable outcome.  Roe has made the abortion issue a centerpiece of national debate, and that has magnified the easily understandable scientific and moral truths that contradict what the pro-abortion advocates have been selling for many decades.

The first unavoidable truth is that a child in his mother’s womb is a living human being.  A child in a mother’s womb is nourished, moves, and grows.  The child is, therefore, certainly alive in a scientific sense.  That living creature is not, we know, a tree, a dog, or a chimpanzee.  The child is a living human being, with human DNA that is unique only to that one human child, and no other human child on the planet before him.

This is a fact, and on this point, no serious person could disagree.  This introduces the ethical question about taking that child’s life while in the womb.  Even Margaret Sanger, the early-twentieth-century eugenicist who is often cited as a founder of Planned Parenthood, recognized the moral truth that contraception was always preferable to abortion because “no matter how early [the abortion] was performed, it was taking a life.”

Considering that the humanity of unborn children is a given, the vast majority of Americans feels that there should certainly be some limitations as to when, why, and how unborn children are killed by mothers and their doctors.  Thus, the unabashedly radical disposition of pro-abortion advocates today is met with a near-universal disgust by Americans.

Roughly twenty percent — arguably a fringe element — of Americans support elective abortion in the third trimester or up to the point of birth.  The idea is not only undesirable but repulsive to the vast majority of Americans.  Even the staunchest pro-abortion ideologues have difficulty defending their wicked propositions about killing children up to the point of birth.  For example, House Representative Mike Johnson (R-La.) recently asked a simple question to Aimee Arrambide, who is the executive director of the abortion “rights” group Avow Texas.

“What is the principal distinction,” Johnson queried, “between the human being that is two years old, or nine years old, or one week old, or an hour old and one that is eight inches further up the birth canal?”

Obviously flummoxed, this abortion cultist responded, “I trust people to determine what to do with their own bodies — full stop.”

But surely, we can find a compromise to limit abortion in America, can’t we?  After all, a compromise involving more restrictions on abortion should be possible in a nation that already has among the least restrictive abortion policies in the entire world, which was amusingly news to formerly left-wing but nowadays kinda-right-leaning comedian Bill Maher.

“If you are pro-choice,” Maher told his audience (who were assuredly as surprised as he was), “the modern countries of Europe are way more restrictive than we are. … If you are pro-choice, you’d like it a lot less in Germany, and Italy, and France, and Spain, and Switzerland.  Did you know that?  I didn’t know that.”

Yes, America is already a fringe radical when it comes to global abortion policy.  Yet the left’s push for ever more radical abortion policy continues apace.

The left abandoned whatever limiting principles had previously won it ground in the political debate around abortion, and public opinion is fast turning against it.  The politically measured suggestion from my teenage years that abortion should be “safe, legal, and rare” has given way to public campaigns demanding that women proudly “Shout Your Abortion!”  Some women have even gone so far as to publicly celebrate the special occasion with cake.

Naturally, many Americans started tuning out these horrific suggestions and turning against those making them.  In their desperation to remain broadly relevant, abortion advocates have returned to the same disgusting social engineering philosophy that drove the early-twentieth-century eugenics movement.

It’s unfair, perhaps, to morally paint Margaret Sanger alongside today’s abortion cultists in terms of depravity, as it’s hard to imagine that she would have supported the butchering of a fully developed child in utero.  But the ideological delusion she suffered from is precisely the same.

Abortion proponents are again suggesting, as Sanger and her fellow eugenicists did a hundred years ago, that if we don’t allow poor mothers and mothers who may be likely to have disabled kids, to kill their unborn children, then those children will grow up poor and needing government assistance, only to later become poor themselves and economic and social burdens to society.

In terms of Democrat party talking points, it’s no secret that black Americans are singled out as demographically poor and that black women have abortions at significantly higher rates than other American women.  In Democrat stump-speak, the words “poor” and “black” are practically synonyms.  If you don’t believe that, recall Joe Biden’s recent Freudian slip, suggesting that “poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids.”  In the Democrat party’s pro-abortion calculation, we have a moral imperative to ensure that black mothers in black neighborhoods have ample access to abortion so they may snuff out their black children before being born and becoming burdens that are too much for their parents or productive society to bear.

If you think any of this an unfair portrait of the progressive vision, consider the testimony of our current secretary of the Treasury, Janet Yellen, who just recently elucidated this racial component of the pro-abortion agenda in response to Senator Tim Scott of South Carolina, before she was leveled by his response:

Yellen: In many cases, abortions are of teenage women, particularly low-income and often Black, who aren’t in a position to care for children, have unexpected pregnancies, and it deprives them of the ability often to continue their education to later participate in the work force. … And it means that children will grow up in poverty and do worse themselves.

Scott: I’ll just simply say, as a guy raised by a Black woman in abject poverty, I am thankful to be here as a United States senator.

In America, a child slated to endure poverty is no less worthy of life, or having his life protected by law, than a child ostensibly slated to enjoy affluence.  And a child who is unwanted by his parents or society is no less worthy of life than a child who is wanted by his parents or society.

These are American ideas, of course.  An individual has potential and value granted by God and has a natural right to life which is to be protected.  That value is not determined, and that right cannot be revoked, by a government bureaucracy that sees in that individual no potential value to the collective, or even by a mother and her doctor who see that child as a burden in her life.

If you refuse to believe these simple, moral truths about humanity, then you are free to move to North Korea, China, or the state of New York, where the abortion allowances may all be quite similar even after the overturning of Roe v. Wade.  As for the rest of us living outside the radical abortion-loving fringe, the overturning of Roe v. Wade, and the path away from radical abortion policy, is nothing less than the healing of our national soul.

“I felt like I was getting a cold, but Agarikon stopped it in its tracks.”

Organic AGARIKON fights Viruses & Bio-warfare, and much more!

10 times more effective than ribavirin against Herpes (HSV1, HSV2), Swine flu (H1N1), Bird flu (H1N4), Pox (cowpox). Studied by the DoD for the Bioshield program. 

Get your Agarikon biodefense from Ascent Nutrition, one of the most pure and potent in the industry. 

Save 10% and get free shipping with a subscription!

Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?

The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world, which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom. The news also serves as a social connection tool, as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do. With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand, the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper.

– Justin

Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools.

Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammatical mistake? Send an email to [email protected], with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected]. Thank you for reading.

Source:

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/05/proabortion_leftists_go_all_in_on_eugenics.html

DIRECT DONATION

Support our work! (Avoid Big Tech PayPal and Patreon)

Notices and Disclaimers

We need $2000 per month to pay our costs. Help us one time or recurring. (DONATE HERE)

To sign up for RSS updates, paste this link (https://stillnessinthestorm.com/feed/) into the search field of your preferred RSS Reader or Service (such as Feedly or gReader).

Subscribe to Stillness in the Storm Newsletter

“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.” – Aristotle

This website is supported by readers like you.

If you find our work of value, consider making a donation. 

Stillness in the Storm DISCLAIMER: All articles, videos, statements, claims, views and opinions that appear anywhere on this site, whether stated as theories or absolute facts, are always presented by Stillness in the Storm as unverified—and should be personally fact checked and discerned by you, the reader. Any opinions or statements herein presented are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, or agreed to by Stillness, those who work with Stillness, or those who read Stillness. Any belief or conclusion gleaned from content on this site is solely the responsibility of you the reader to substantiate, fact check, and no harm comes to you or those around you. And any actions taken by those who read material on this site is solely the responsibility of the acting party. You are encouraged to think carefully and do your own research. Nothing on this site is meant to be believed without question or personal appraisal.

Content Disclaimer: All content on this site marked with “source – [enter website name and url]” is not owned by Stillness in the Storm. All content on this site that is not originally written, created, or posted as original, is owned by the original content creators, who retain exclusive jurisdiction of all intellectual property rights. Any copyrighted material on this site was shared in good faith, under fair use or creative commons. Any request to remove copyrighted material will be honored, provided proof of ownership is rendered. Send takedown requests to [email protected].

What is our mission? Why do we post what we do?

Our mission here is to curate (share) articles and information that we feel is important for the evolution of consciousness. Most of that information is written or produced by other people and organizations, which means it does not represent our views or opinions as managing staff of Stillness in the Storm. Some of the content is written by one of our writers and is clearly marked accordingly. Just because we share a CNN story that speaks badly about the President doesn’t mean we’re promoting anti-POTUS views. We’re reporting on the fact as it was reported, and that this event is important for us to know so we can better contend with the challenges of gaining freedom and prosperity. Similarly, just because we share a pro/anti-[insert issue or topic] content, such as a pro-second amendment piece or an anti-military video doesn’t mean we endorse what is said. Again, information is shared on this site for the purpose of evolving consciousness. In our opinion, consciousness evolves through the process of accumulating knowledge of the truth and contemplating that knowledge to distill wisdom and improve life by discovering and incorporating holistic values. Thus, sharing information from many different sources, with many different perspectives is the best way to maximize evolution. What’s more, the mastery of mind and discernment doesn’t occur in a vacuum, it is much like the immune system, it needs regular exposure to new things to stay healthy and strong. If you have any questions as to our mission or methods please reach out to us at [email protected].

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Jen says

    Stop rape and incest, then we’ll look at whether abortion is needed in our society. Stop fathers impregnating their 11 year old girls. Stop uncles from raping them. Stop kidnappers from pimping out 15 year old girls and stop rape creating unwanted children and permanently traumatized women who are incapable of rearing a child. Stop demanding a mother die on the delivery table, leaving a newborn and 5 other kids without a mother, stop demanding we traumatize and permanently , irreversibly damage our bodies leaving us disabled- then we’ll consider your demand to end abortion.

    My biggest question in all of this is “why do certain people want to believe women are inherently evil and would stop at nothing to wrecklessly snuff out a life that grows inside our body? Why do certain people view this decision and the women who make them, as degenerate criminals? Most importantly- why do they hate us? Why do they hate women to the point you would rather we die?”

    I think these folks need to watch Cider House Rules and get a grip on the sheer volume of RAPE and it’s impact the female community face from the moment we are born, just because we have a vagina.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.