(Emma Fiala) “Be a man, stand up for what you believe and what you’re saying is the truth and come forward.”
Related Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein Had ’13 Contact Numbers for His Friend Prince Andrew’
by Emma Fiala, December 5th, 2019
Five of Jeffrey Epstein’s accusers have said that the Duke of York was witness to the act of girls giving massages to adults at his various properties.
And now, the accusers’ lawyer plans to serve subpoenas to Prince Andrew to testify as a witness in their cases.
While the prince contends he didn’t witness or even suspect any activities for which Epstein has either been convicted or accused, the lawyer for the five women, David Boies, says the Duke of York may have important information related to their cases.
Boies explained:
“One of the things that we have tried is to interview Prince Andrew and to try to get what his explanation is. He was a frequent visitor. They ought to submit to an interview. They ought to talk about it.”
The subpoenas have been prepared but must be signed off by a judge after the prince sets foot on U.S. soil. He can then challenge the subpoenas in order to avoid providing evidence if he wishes.
[the_ad_group id=”3156″]
Spencer Kuvin, a lawyer who represents many of Epstein’s alleged victims and once questioned the billionaire a decade ago, has urged the prince to come forward, saying on BBC Radio 4’s Today:
“Be a man, stand up for what you believe and what you’re saying is the truth and come forward.”
While Kuvin isn’t planning to serve the prince a subpoena, he is urging the Duke to “step forward” if he “truly wants to help these victims.”
However, it appears helping, or even acknowledging his former friend’s victims is far from the forefront of Andrew’s mind.
Since Epstein’s alleged suicide in a Manhattan correctional facility, attention has slowly shifted to the billionaire’s friends and potential accomplices. The reason for the recent spotlight on Prince Andrew can be traced back to vocal Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre, formerly Roberts, who claims she was forced to have sex with the Duke three times. And in a 2011 testimony, Giuffre insisted the prince “knows the truth” about Epstein.
Buy Book TrafficKing: The Jeffrey Epstein Case
[the_ad_group id=”3117″]
During a recent interview for 60 Minutes Australia that took her to the steps of Epstein’s $56 million Manhattan mansion, Giuffre, who now lives in Australia, insisted Prince Andrew “should go to jail.” Giuffre says that she “was trafficked to other billionaires” and “to other politicians,” including the prince.
In that same interview, Giuffre held up the notorious photograph of Prince Andrew and herself (at the age of 17) together at Ghislaine Maxwell’s residence, saying “this is a real photo.” The prince continues to deny the authenticity of the photograph that was first published in 2011.
In a television interview in November, affectionately referred to as a “car-crash interview” that likely had the exact opposite effect the royal family was hoping for, the Duke frequently went on the offensive, showed multiple telltale signs of lying, and neglected to vocalize any remorse for the heinous acts his friend allegedly engaged in or offer any sympathy to his numerous accusers.
Watch a breakdown of Prince Andrew’s disastrous BBC Newsnight interview below:
Giuffre was also recently interviewed by the BCC and stands by her accusations.
Earlier this week Giuffre tweeted a Dropbox link to the interview, which has not yet been released by the network in full.
Buy Book Sexual Blackmail: A Modern History
[the_ad_group id=”3118″]
Lisa Bloom, another lawyer representing a handful of Epstein’s accusers, told ITV’s This Morning on Tuesday that she has a witness who reportedly “saw Prince Andrew with Virginia” at Tramp nightclub the same night that Giuffre said the pair first had sex.
Here’s the link to watch the BBC Panorama as I have had a lot of feedback asking to watch it. Again a million thank you’s to all of the people who have been supportive to the change that needs to happen. 🦋 https://t.co/DdJ9VjpeYw
— Virginia Giuffre (@VRSVirginia) December 3, 2019
The witness, who claims she was “feet away” from the pair on the dance floor, was reportedly inspired to come forward after watching Andrew’s disastrous interview.
Bloom explained:
“She says that in 2001 she was at the Tramp nightclub and recalls seeing Prince Andrew. It was pointed out to her by a member of her group.
The woman remembers it vividly. She had never seen a royal before or since. It was a very big moment for her—she stared at him.
She says he was with Virginia—who looked very young and not happy—but Andrew was smiling and seemed to be very much enjoying himself on the dance floor.
She remembered it all these years and when she saw Prince Andrew on television a few weeks ago denying he knew Virginia, she was very displeased about that.
We decided the best thing to do is to go to the FBI and Scotland Yard. I believe her to be credible.
She is not asking for any money or making a legal claim—she just wants to tell her story.
“She is very afraid but thinks speaking out is very important.”
Buy Book The Whistleblower: Sex Trafficking, Military Contractors, and One Woman’s Fight for Justice
[the_ad_group id=”3115″]
found on The Antimedia
Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world, which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom. The news also serves as a social connection tool, as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do. With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand, the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper.
– Justin
Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools.
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Send an email to [email protected], with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected]. Thank you for reading.
Source:
https://themindunleashed.com/2019/12/prince-andrew-must-testify-epstein-court-cases.html
why do you have a disclaimer a the beginning of this article stating “we’re just reporting the news, blah blah blah”??? its like you are trying to passively aggressively discredit the information presented. this is borderline pedo protecting. is this why they allow you to have an audience deschamps?? only allowed to talk about the pedos so much or else??
Yes and No. See, these people are the worst for the cases you do feel for. Did you notice their usual “Have you notice a typo” bull? These people are not the real journalists, they are using a web facility they claim to be owned by their worst enemy. I will not try to insinuate anything, but Justin, just like Mike Adams are at least too illiterate to not to notice misspelled surnames of well known politicians (I do giggle right now, honestly) Their asking for corrections is to get you listed because of interest which is confirmed by you noticing a “typo”. Who did guaranteed to you that those typos are not honeypots? It is not a real question, don’t bother to answer. These people started on a Google provided platform, changed names (via payment or services — I can’t prove it so not claiming to be in true knowledge) into what looks as independent dot-com… yet they are not. They just collect what is allowed by folks like Ben in a way of advertising and dissemination, yet they do not risk anything. Maybe loosing a bit of internet money to buy a piece of whatever they got addicted to, but can’t work a full time to provide it to themselves. By the way, whoever bought the gibberish from Cobra about some “80 % of a goal reached” should get a mental health practitioner to watch over their further development in this life. You do not have to buy any metal for the sake of humanity. G-O-D has NO MONEY.
It’s there because we consistently get people trying to associate what we report on with what we support and endorse.
No passive aggressiveness at all. Quite the contrary, I’m making it abundantly clear that you the reader shouldn’t assume our intentions or what we believe based on what we share. Make sense?