Stillness in the Storm

An Agent for Consciousness Evolution

President Trump Says No To Bill Gates’ Backed “COVAX” Vaccine Alliance

By Leave a Comment

Spread the love

() During the summer, US president Donald Trump “donated more to Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, to prevent the spread of infectious diseases worldwide.” He did so in a statement of support for Gavi at the public Gavi pledge conference, which was hosted by the United Kingdom, on June 4th. Bill and Melinda Gates co-founded the Gavi alliance in the year 2000, it’s a public-private partnership that claims to support “global health-system strengthening and vaccine deployment for infectious diseases worldwide.”  (source) Here’s a video clip of Trump talking about his decision.

Related Kamala Harris Goes Full Anti Vaccine, Leftists REFUSE Vaccine Due To Trump Derangement Syndrome (Video)

Source – Collective Evolution

by , September 4th, 2020

Now, it has come to our attention that president Trump and his administration will not participate in a collaborative global initiative to develop and distribute a coronavirus vaccine that’s headed by the COVAX initiative. The COVAX initiative is spearheaded by Gavi, and according to their website:

The ACT Accelerator is a ground-breaking global collaboration to accelerate the development, production, and equitable access to COVID-19 tests, treatments, and vaccines. COVAX is co-led by Gavi, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) and WHO. Its aim is to accelerate the development and manufacture of COVID-19 vaccines, and to guarantee fair and equitable access for every country in the world.

It’s not quite clear if president Trump is halting his initial payment to Gavi mentioned above, or simply choosing not to participate in the COVAX effort that is being led by the Gavi alliance.

Multiple media outlets are reporting that Trump is opting out OF THE COVAX effort because the organization is tied to the World Health Organization (WHO), who Trump and multiple other world ‘leaders’ have criticized for the way they’ve handled the Covid-19 pandemic.

Not only have some politicians been quite critical of the WHO during the pandemic, a number of scientists and doctors have been as well. For example, Michael Levitt, a Biophysicist and a professor of structural biology at Stanford University, criticized the WHO as well as Facebook for censoring different information and informed perspectives regarding the Coronavirus. YouTube is also actively banning any content that contradicts anything that the World Health Organization (WHO) with regards to the new coronavirus.

A documentary called “trustWHO” explores the influence that the pharmaceutical industry, among others, has on the World Health Organization. It was recently banned by Vimeo. The documentary has been fact-checked and approved by lawyers, experts in the medical field and even by key executives of the WHO itself. The documentary simply investigated how efficiency and transparency of the WHO are undermined by corporate influences. You can read more about that here.

I also recently published a piece about Wikileaks regarding recent posts they made pertaining to documents they released nearly a decade ago . The documents highlight the influence that pharmaceutical companies have on health policy set by the World Health Organization (WHO).

More than 500 German doctors & scientists have signed on as representatives of an organization called the “Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee” to investigate what’s happening on our planet with regards to COVID-19 because they are coming across information and data that also contradicts that of the WHO. You can read more about that story here.

The Bulgarian Pathology Association has taken the stance that the testing used to identify the new coronavirus in patients is “scientifically meaningless.” This comes after the president of the Bulgarian Pathology Association, Dr. Stoian Alexov, said that European pathologists haven’t identified any antibodies that are specific for  SARS-CoV-2.

Again, I just wanted to provide a few of many examples of what you never hear within the mainstream with regards to the WHO. These organizations are independent, they have no oversight and nobody is ‘watching’ and ‘auditing’ them. They hold a tremendous amount of power and influence and are portrayed as our most trusted body when it comes to global health matters. The issue for many is the fact that the modern day world of medicine and health care is now dominated by big pharmaceutical interests, money and profit often come before health, at least according to to my research.

Why would information coming from some of the world’s most respected scientists in the field be censored simply because it contradicts what we are getting from the WHO?

With such a lack of transparency on our planet, it’s hard to know what’s really going on.

Why This Is Important: Vaccines are often portrayed as a miracle medicine, but vaccines are not a one sized fits all product. This is evident by the fact that nearly  $4 billion has been paid out to families of vaccine injured children via the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA). As astronomical as the monetary awards are, they’re even more alarming considering that only an estimated 1% of vaccine injuries are even reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS).

There are multiple issues with different vaccines. For example, multiple lawsuits have been filed against Merck for their HPV vaccine. This vaccine has caused multiple disabilities and deaths, and according to the act mentioned above, it’s responsible for at least 64,000 adverse reactions in the United States alone. You can read more about that here.

As of 2/5/19, the cumulative raw count of adverse events from measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines alone was: 93,929 adverse events, 1,810 disabilities, 6,902 hospitalizations, and 463 deaths. (VAERS)

A 2010 HHS pilot study by the Federal Agency for Health Care Research (AHCR) found that 1 in every 39 vaccines causes injury, a shocking comparison to the claims from the CDC of 1 in every million. You can access that and read more about it here.

Big media also seems to portray the idea that the majority of doctors and scientists support vaccinations. This simply isn’t true either, as was emphasized at the World Health Organizations (WHO) conference on vaccine safety.

Professor Heidi Larson, a Professor of Anthropology and the Risk and Decision Scientist Director at the Vaccine Confidence Project emphasized at the conference that:The other thing that’s a trend, and an issue, is not just confidence in providers but confidence of health care providers, we have a very wobbly health professional frontline that is starting to question vaccines and the safety of vaccines.

You can access a link to that conference and read more about it here.

One study (of many) published in the journal EbioMedicine outlines this point, stating in the introduction:

Over the past two decades several vaccine controversies have emerged in various countries, including France, inducing worries about severe adverse effects and eroding confidence in health authorities, experts, and science (Larson et al., 2011). These two dimensions are at the core of the vaccine hesitancy (VH) observed in the general population. VH is defined as delay in acceptance of vaccination, or refusal, or even acceptance with doubts about its safety and benefits, with all these behaviors and attitudes varying according to context, vaccine, and personal profile, despite the availability of vaccine services (Group, 2014,Larson et al., 2014, Dubé et al., 2013). VH presents a challenge to physicians who must address their patients’ concerns about vaccines and ensure satisfactory vaccination coverage.

The Physicians for Informed Consent recently put out some excellent downloadable PDF’s with regards to the MMR vaccine. There are four of them that all present different points presenting information that, again, is real, factual and science based yet never presented to the masses.

  1. MEASLES: What Parents Need To Know
  2. MMR VACCINE: Is It Safer Than Measles? 
  3. Waning Immunity & The MMR Vaccine 
  4. FAQ’s: The MMR Vaccine versus the Measles

Why doesn’t anybody know about these things? When I ask this question to myself, this quote comes to mind:

Even the pharmaceutical companies have been able to purchase congress. They’re the largest lobbying entity in Washington D.C.. They have more lobbyists in Washington D.C. than there are congressman and senators combined. They give twice to congress what the next largest lobbying entity is, which is oil and gas… Imagine the power they exercise over both republicans and democrats. They’ve captured them (our regulatory agencies) and turned them into sock puppets. They’ve compromised the press… and they destroy the publications that publish real science. – Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (source)

When it comes to the new coronavirus vaccine, not much is known about it and apparently it is utilizing a new method, something that’s never been seen before. We already have a large lack of safety testing with the vaccines currently on the schedule, so we can’t expect much of that (safety testing) with a coronavirus vaccine. It’s going to be interesting to see what happens when it comes out.

The Takeaway: Why does mainstream media label those who question the safety of vaccines as “anti-vax conspiracy theorists” instead of actually addressing the concerns people have with vaccines? Why do they constantly use ridicule, hate and shame? Should we not be free to choose what we do with our own body and what we put into it, especially when the ‘medications’ being offered aren’t put through appropriate safety testing? What’s going on here? Why is there a digital fact checker going around the internet censoring information that doesn’t fit the frame?

About The Author

I joined the CE team in 2010 shortly after finishing university and have been grateful for the fact that I have been able to do this ever since :) There are many things happening on the planet that don’t resonate with me, and I wanted to do what I could to play a role in creating change. It’s been great making changes in my own life and creating awareness and I look forward to more projects that move beyond awareness and into action and implementation. So stay tuned :) [email protected]

Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?

The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world, which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom. The news also serves as a social connection tool, as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do. With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand, the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper. 

– Justin

Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools.

Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammatical mistake? Send an email to [email protected], with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected]. Thank you for reading.

Source:

https://www.collective-evolution.com/2020/09/04/president-trump-says-no-to-bill-gates-backed-covax-vaccine-alliance/

Notices and Disclaimers

We need $2000 per month to pay our costs. Help us one time or recurring. (DONATE HERE)

To sign up for RSS updates, paste this link (https://stillnessinthestorm.com/feed/) into the search field of your preferred RSS Reader or Service (such as Feedly or gReader).

Subscribe to Stillness in the Storm Newsletter

“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.” – Aristotle

This website is supported by readers like you.

If you find our work of value, consider making a donation. 

Stillness in the Storm DISCLAIMER: All articles, videos, statements, claims, views and opinions that appear anywhere on this site, whether stated as theories or absolute facts, are always presented by Stillness in the Storm as unverified—and should be personally fact checked and discerned by you, the reader. Any opinions or statements herein presented are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, or agreed to by Stillness, those who work with Stillness, or those who read Stillness. Any belief or conclusion gleaned from content on this site is solely the responsibility of you the reader to substantiate, fact check, and no harm comes to you or those around you. And any actions taken by those who read material on this site is solely the responsibility of the acting party. You are encouraged to think carefully and do your own research. Nothing on this site is meant to be believed without question or personal appraisal.

Content Disclaimer: All content on this site marked with “source – [enter website name and url]” is not owned by Stillness in the Storm. All content on this site that is not originally written, created, or posted as original, is owned by the original content creators, who retain exclusive jurisdiction of all intellectual property rights. Any copyrighted material on this site was shared in good faith, under fair use or creative commons. Any request to remove copyrighted material will be honored, provided proof of ownership is rendered. Send takedown requests to [email protected].

What is our mission? Why do we post what we do?

Our mission here is to curate (share) articles and information that we feel is important for the evolution of consciousness. Most of that information is written or produced by other people and organizations, which means it does not represent our views or opinions as managing staff of Stillness in the Storm. Some of the content is written by one of our writers and is clearly marked accordingly. Just because we share a CNN story that speaks badly about the President doesn’t mean we’re promoting anti-POTUS views. We’re reporting on the fact as it was reported, and that this event is important for us to know so we can better contend with the challenges of gaining freedom and prosperity. Similarly, just because we share a pro/anti-[insert issue or topic] content, such as a pro-second amendment piece or an anti-military video doesn’t mean we endorse what is said. Again, information is shared on this site for the purpose of evolving consciousness. In our opinion, consciousness evolves through the process of accumulating knowledge of the truth and contemplating that knowledge to distill wisdom and improve life by discovering and incorporating holistic values. Thus, sharing information from many different sources, with many different perspectives is the best way to maximize evolution. What’s more, the mastery of mind and discernment doesn’t occur in a vacuum, it is much like the immune system, it needs regular exposure to new things to stay healthy and strong. If you have any questions as to our mission or methods please reach out to us at [email protected].

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.