(Paul Joseph Watson) Claims he couldn’t sweat due to medical condition, but numerous photos show otherwise.
by Paul Joseph Watson, November 18th, 2019
Photos of a ‘sweaty’ Prince Andrew appear to contradict claims made by the royal during a BBC interview that was roundly condemned as a PR disaster.
The Duke of York was attempting to rebut allegations that his relationship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein included the provision of trafficked underage girls, including Virginia Roberts-Giuffre who was 17 at the time she alleges Prince Andrew had sex with her.
The royal attempted to debunk one of Roberts-Giuffre’s claims, that he was sweating profusely during a dance between the two at a London nightclub, by claiming that he had suffered a medical condition which prevented him from sweating.
“I didn’t sweat at the time because I had suffered what I would describe as an overdose of adrenalin in the Falkland’s War when I was shot at.”
Prince Andrew disputes claims he had a sweaty dance with a woman who made allegations against him https://t.co/gfKvOEFG9p #Newsnight pic.twitter.com/7ZKscPB5lX
— BBC Newsnight (@BBCNewsnight) November 16, 2019
Buy Book Sex in America: A Definitive Survey
“There’s a slight problem with the sweating because I have a peculiar medical condition which is that I don’t sweat or I didn’t sweat at the time…because I had suffered what I would describe as an overdose of adrenalin in the Falkland’s War when I was shot at and it was almost impossible for me to sweat,” said the prince.
However, several photos from the time clearly show the Duke of York sweating profusely, while others published by the Daily Mail contradict the royal’s claim that he rarely partied.
I don't remember dancing at a club. I was at home. Which I remember precisely. And I don't sweat. #PrinceAndrew pic.twitter.com/8ApnC5uQpY
— damo_war (Blue Tick Hidden) (@damo_war) November 16, 2019
https://twitter.com/OriginalKooLaLa/status/1195823076631629829
The royal also suggested that a photo of him with his arm around Roberts-Giuffre could have been faked because he rarely displayed physical affection, a claim which is again contradicted by numerous other photos.
Still shaking my head at the train wreck of an interview that was #PrinceAndrew. I don't sweat and I don't party or make public displays of affection pic.twitter.com/gIZP0z7Uz3
— CrazyMummaBear (@CrazyMummaBear1) November 18, 2019
#PrinceAndrew says:
– he doesn’t party
– he doesn’t sweat
– he is careful about when he takes public pictures
– he doesn’t remember meeting or having a photo with #VirginiaRoberts #maitlis #Newsnight pic.twitter.com/pVEBNSVJdD— Nomia Iqbal (@NomiaIqbal) November 16, 2019
Elsewhere in the interview, during his claim that he had no recollection of meeting Roberts-Giuffre, the Duke blinked no less than ten times in the space of ten seconds while making the denial.
Buy Book In Plain Sight: The Life and Lies of Jimmy Savile
According to numerous scientific studies, including one published by the Journal of Non-verbal Behaviour, rapid blinking is a reliable indicator that a person is lying.
https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet/status/1195755529269850112
The overwhelming consensus after the interview was that it was a PR disaster and had only resulted in Prince Andrew looking more guilty.
It has since emerged that the Duke’s PR adviser quit two weeks ago after warning him not to do the interview.
Buy Book TrafficKing: The Jeffrey Epstein Case
Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world, which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom. The news also serves as a social connection tool, as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do. With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand, the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper.
– Justin
Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools.
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Send an email to [email protected], with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected]. Thank you for reading.
Source:
Leave a Reply