(Stillness in the Storm Editor) The powers that be primarily work on influencing society by influencing the mind. Mind influence is a form of persuasion, which is the act of convincing someone to do something via logical argument or emotional appeal. Is the Deep State “selling” the idea of depopulation to the masses? Yes, this appears to be the case. The following article is an analysis of a New York Times piece essentially promoting a depopulation agenda, that the extinction of the human race isn’t all that bad because we’re destroying the planet.
The crazy thing is, a lot of “normal” people subscribe to this theory, who we might call suicidal environmentalists.
I won’t attempt to debate the possible merits of human-made climate change here.
I will say, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) promotes a CO2 dominant model, which is highly questionable.
Some geoengineering researchers, such as Dane Wigington, suggest that climate change is predominantly caused by aerosol spraying, also known as chemtrails.
Buy Book Chemtrails, HAARP, and the Full Spectrum Dominance of Planet Earth
Whether or not climate change is in fact caused by humans is debatable, but what can’t be debated is that the current relationship between nature and human society is not sustainable. Human beings are destroying the environment at a record pace.
Even though your average person generally feels that the environment should be protected, the technology people rely on to manage society is so dependent on destructive means, individual sentiment has little to no effect.
You can rage about McDonald’s or some other corporation that pollutes the environment, you can protest, but at the end of the day, little change comes about.
The guilty parties who are polluting the environment en masse are not regular people, by and large, they are governments and corporations. The people rely on society to create clean and effective systems. Governments and corporations have claimed the right to organize society, particularly related to logistics. The individual has almost no power to change a system-wide policy, even if that policy is environmentally destructive.
The people want better systems, they want truly sustainable environmentally beneficial technology—but the powers that be keep refusing to give it to them. And then they have the gall to blame humanity in general for the destruction of the environment. This is a fraud of epic proportions, and yet, most people are utterly that clueless solutions are being suppressed.
Buy Book Censored Science: The Suppressed Evidence
I contend, and I’m sure many agree, it’s foolish and insane to say that it’s good for the earth that human beings could go extinct. This bespeaks of the insanity of the powers that be, who, by all accounts, are mentally disturbed dynastic families hell bent on promoting an anti-life agenda.
Buy Book 1666 Redemption Through Sin: Global Conspiracy in History, Religion, Politics and Finance
The powers that be want you to believe human beings are stupid, ignorant animals that can’t be trusted with freedom—because look at the world we’ve created?
But the truth is, the sick society we live in is made possible due to the willing participation of people who don’t know any better. Thus, spreading awareness is arguably one of the best things we can do to solve the core problem.
Again, the average person generally feels that protecting the environment is a good thing. But they don’t know how to do so.
The New York Times and other humanity hating devotees falsely cite humanity as the cause of environmental destruction, that its human nature and we should just accept our inherent evil. But this is a lie. Yes, human beings make a lot of mistakes, arguably the biggest being to let psychopaths run society. But this ship can be turned around.
Humanity can change.
How does it change? I would argue, after reviewing history, psychology, philosophy, and law, that change occurs through the sharing of ideas.
Society is a human institution organized around mutually agreed upon truths.
What people agree exists determines the boundaries of society. Thus, if we don’t sit down and talk about how, as a people, to solve these problems, they won’t get solved. And the powers that be, who helped manufacture the problems that we’re speaking of now, can continue to maintain control over the population.
For far too long we’ve let insane and malicious criminals call the shots. When are we going to learn better? Do you really agree with what the NYT has to say?
Let us know your thoughts in the comments!
– Justin
Source – End of The American Dream
by
Would our planet be better off if humanity ceased to exist? That is quite a morbid question, but today an increasing number of intellectuals are bringing it up, because they are convinced that we are the source of everything that is wrong with our world. According to these zealots, humans are the primary source of climate change and if we do not alter our course the planet will be destroyed. But since humanity apparently lacks the will to end the behaviors which are destroying the planet, many of them also believe that it would be a good thing if we were to be completely wiped out somehow. Most normal people would never think this way, but these are the sorts of discussions that intellectuals and elitists are now having all the time, and sometimes this bleeds over into the mainstream media. For example, the New York Times just published a very long article by Clemson University professor of philosophy Todd May entitled “Would Human Extinction Be a Tragedy?” The following is a brief excerpt from that article…
To make that case, let me start with a claim that I think will be at once depressing and, upon reflection, uncontroversial. Human beings are destroying large parts of the inhabitable earth and causing unimaginable suffering to many of the animals that inhabit it. This is happening through at least three means. First, human contribution to climate change is devastating ecosystems, as the recent article on Yellowstone Park in The Times exemplifies. Second, increasing human population is encroaching on ecosystems that would otherwise be intact. Third, factory farming fosters the creation of millions upon millions of animals for whom it offers nothing but suffering and misery before slaughtering them in often barbaric ways. There is no reason to think that those practices are going to diminish any time soon. Quite the opposite.
Humanity, then, is the source of devastation of the lives of conscious animals on a scale that is difficult to comprehend.
Buy Book Climate of Corruption: Politics and Power Behind The Global Warming Hoax
The New York Times did not have to publish Professor May’s article, but they did.
So they must believe that this is a reasonable opinion.
Later in that same article, May suggests that “the elimination of the human species would be a good thing” if it wasn’t for humanity’s wonderful creative endeavors…
If this were all to the story there would be no tragedy. The elimination of the human species would be a good thing, full stop. But there is more to the story. Human beings bring things to the planet that other animals cannot. For example, we bring an advanced level of reason that can experience wonder at the world in a way that is foreign to most if not all other animals. We create art of various kinds: literature, music and painting among them. We engage in sciences that seek to understand the universe and our place in it. Were our species to go extinct, all of that would be lost.
But what about those cultures that are not engaged in such pursuits?
Should those that are not adding something of “value” to our world simply be eliminated?
That would seem to be the logical conclusion of such thinking.
There are many intellectuals today that are very much into promoting population control or population reduction, but Professor May doesn’t really see the need to take such measures. At this end of his article, he suggests that there is a very strong possibility that we are going to be the ultimate cause of “our own tragic end”…
It may also turn out that it is through our own actions that we human beings bring about our extinction, or at least something near it, contributing through our practices to our own tragic end.
Another elitist that is seemingly obsessed with climate change and population issues is Bill Gates.
Buy Book The Greatest Hoax: How the Global Warming Conspiracy Threatens Your Future
Just recently, Gates publicly stated that he believes that millions of people in poor countries will die by the end of this century as a result of climate change…
On the issue of climate change, Gates predicted that for countries like Africa — which are “completely dependent on the rain coming” — climate change presents a “threat to … survival.”
He also predicted “millions of deaths because of climate change between now and the end of the century.” He said a significant portion of that count will be in “very, very poor countries, because of the subsistence farming.”
So what must be done?
Well, since humans are the primary cause of climate change, reducing the human population is essentially equivalent to “saving the planet” according to their twisted way of thinking.
And perhaps that may explain why the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has been pouring such vast amounts of money into the development of a male contraceptive pill.
Most of us never think much about population issues, but for elitists such as Gates it can become something of an obsession. They truly believe that the human population is a ticking time bomb that will explode in the not too distant future.
Buy Book Age of Propaganda: The Everyday Use and Abuse of Persuasion
But the truth is that our planet could easily support a human population that was twice as large if our resources were managed properly and new technologies which already exist were allowed to flourish.
Sadly, those things are not happening, and instead humanity is being herded into incredibly overcrowded cities. And such overcrowding can have very negative consequences as a scientific study involving mice once demonstrated…
Scientist John B. Calhoun created mouse utopias in which the rodents had all the food, water and bedding they required.
But after several generations, the booming population descended into chaos with male mice becoming savagely violent and females failing to nurture their young.
The subsequent generation became known as the “beautiful ones” – non-violent but interested in little else other than grooming themselves.
Could it be possible that our own version of the “beautiful ones” is starting to emerge?
Today, we have millions of self-obsessed young adults that are continuously staying indoors, isolating themselves and spending endless hours on the Internet.
Buy Book Sworn in Secret: Freemasonry and the Knights Templar
In Japan, they actually have a term for this, and it is recognized as a national crisis…
And in densely-populated Japan, a disturbing trend dubbed “hikikomori” has gripped the younger generation, with an estimated half a million Japanese youth living as social recluses.
The Japanese government defines hikikomori as people who haven’t left their homes or interacted with others for six months or more.
Our world is changing, and not for the better.
Those that are suggesting human extinction as the answer are totally on the wrong track. Instead of giving up on life, we need to rediscover what makes life worth living in the first place.
Buy Berkey Water Filters (Best Water Filters for All Sources)
About The Author
Michael Snyder is a nationally-syndicated writer, media personality and political activist. He is the author of four books including Get Prepared Now, The Beginning Of The End and Living A Life That Really Matters. His articles are originally published on The Economic Collapse Blog, End Of The American Dreamand The Most Important News. From there, his articles are republished on dozens of other prominent websites. If you would like to republish his articles, please feel free to do so. The more people that see this information the better, and we need to wake more people up while there is still time.
Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Send an email to [email protected], with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected]. Thank you for reading.
Source:
Earth changes one person at a time.
Essentially, they’re right! BUT,
“humans are only doing with what they have”….
With THEIR PRODUCTS!! As everything that would really help,
is locked a-w-a-y in the U.S. Patent Office, as a “threat” to
National Security….
(Now numbering OVER 6,000 different working inventions!)
While 11 Corporations OWN, “ALL the products we eat & use”.
(Including “Eye – Sea – See”, who’s products, are of the 6,000!!!)
No its the GREEDMERCHANT ZIONIST CABAL that is killing the planet with their Weather Modification, there is NO Global Warming BS,its all Evil inhuman creation for gain and profit, these inhuman;’s are blinded by greed and power and will kill us all if we dont get rid of them.
Geoengineering, solar radiation management, chemtrails, weather manipulation are killing us. We are part of the planet earth. What exists in nature exists in us and vise versa. We are part of Nature, We have a beautiful World and it puzzles me why they want to destroy it. Crimes against Humanity!
Agreed that we are not destroying the planet, but the huge Illuminati corporations are the major polluters of our air, water and earth. They must be removed from power at once.