Stillness in the Storm

An Agent for Consciousness Evolution

New Details DEBUNK Claims that President Trump “Incited” the Capitol Riots

By Leave a Comment

Spread the love

(We Love Trump) Like 95% of things reported by the mainstream media, the narrative surrounding the Capitol riots is FALSE!

Related Capitol Hill Police Officer Brian Sicknick Dies After Confrontation with Protesters in US Capitol

Source – We Love Trump

by Staff Writer, January, 12th, 2021

Verifiably false, at that.

So… what’s the narrative?

The current claim being made by Democrats is that President Trump incited an “uprising” or “insurrection” at Capitol Hill.

But there’s only one problem: the facts don’t support this claim.

Yet… the Democrats want to remove Trump from office with just a few days left until January 20th.

They tried to get Pence to invoke the 25th Amendment.

But now they’re trying impeachment 2.0.

So how exactly do the facts PROVE that President Trump did NOT “incite” the riots?

YouTuber “StateOfDaniel” broke it down in his latest video:

Below, I’ll outline the facts and TIMELINE of what happened.

First of all, President Trump encouraged his supporters to “peacefully” march to the Capitol Building.

How can he have possibly incited violence when urging for peace?

He used the word “peacefully” multiple times during his speech.

Furthermore, he encouraged the crowd to “make their voices heard.”

Watch the clip below:

https://twitter.com/krioli14/status/1348690768328859657?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1348690768328859657%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwelovetrump.com%2F2021%2F01%2F12%2Fnew-details-debunk-claims-that-president-trump-incited-the-capitol-riots%2F

 

So how can someone possibly “incite” violence if they called for peace and for people to make their VOICES heard?

But that’s not all.

President Trump called on his supporters to “cheer the Congress on.”

How is cheering on Congress violence?

We don’t know more about you, but that sounds more like a RALLY to us!

https://twitter.com/AbrahamOkolie/status/1348637571660869635?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1348637571660869635%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwelovetrump.com%2F2021%2F01%2F12%2Fnew-details-debunk-claims-that-president-trump-incited-the-capitol-riots%2F

 

So point #1…

President Trump called for PEACE… he called for VOICES to be heard… and he called for his supporters to CHEER Congress on.

That is NOT an incitement of violence.

Point #2…

The timeline does not MATCH at all!

President Trump’s speech ENDED at 1:11 pm EST.

Take note of that time: 1:11 pm.

NPR confirms that the speech ended at that time:

Here’s a timeline of how things unfolded:

1 p.m. ET A joint session of Congress begins to tally the Electoral College votes, with Vice President Pence presiding. As it begins, Pence releases a letter to Congress declaring that he does not have unilateral authority to overturn the election results.

1:11 p.m. President Trump’s speech to supporters on the Ellipse outside the White House ends. During the roughly hourlong speech, Trump urges his followers to march to the Capitol and says at one point, “You will never take back our country with weakness.” Trump says he will be there with them but never joins the crowd.

1:13 p.m. Arizona Rep. Paul Gosar files the first objection to state Electoral College certification, from his home state. Democrat Joe Biden won the state by 10,457 votes. The objection needs to be joined by a U.S. senator, which it is. The objection could then be debated for up to two hours. Republican House members and senators threaten to do this for up to half a dozen states. The tactic amounts to not more than a delay, however, as the end result will be President-elect Joe Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris being declared the winners — again.

So why does that matter?

The first wave of violence started at 12:40 pm.

In other words, violence was happening WHILE President Trump was still speaking.

How could these followers have been “incited” or “encouraged” by President Trump to commit violence if they weren’t even listening to the speech?

The Washington Post confirms that the violence first began at 12:40 pm:

The first wave of protesters arrived at the Capitol about 12:40 p.m.

“As soon as they hit the fence line, the fight was on,” Sund said. “Violent confrontations from the start. They came with riot helmets, gas masks, shields, pepper spray, fireworks, climbing gear — climbing gear! — explosives, metal pipes, baseball bats. I have never seen anything like it in 30 years of events in Washington.”

Using video footage from the Capitol and radio transmissions from his incident commanders, Sund could see his officers trying to hold the line. But the rioters immediately yanked the barricade fence out of the way and threw it at his officers’ heads.

“I realized at 1 p.m., things aren’t going well,” he said. “I’m watching my people getting slammed.”

Sund immediately called Contee, who sent 100 officers to the scene, with some arriving within 10 minutes. But at 1:09 p.m., Sund said he called Irving and Stenger, telling them it was time to call in the Guard. He wanted an emergency declaration. Both men said they would “run it up the chain” and get back to him, he said.

Minutes later, aides to the top congressional leaders were called to Stenger’s office for an update on the situation — and were infuriated to learn that the sergeants at arms had not yet called in the National Guard or any other reinforcements, as was their responsibility to do without seeking approval from leaders.

Aside from that…

The Ellipse, where President Trump spoke, is nearly 2 miles away from the Capitol Building.

Roads were closed because of the march, which means people would have had to walk instead of taking cars.

Because of the thick crowds, this could have taken anywhere from 30-45 minutes to cover by foot.

This means that anyone leaving Trump’s speech IMMEDIATELY after it ended (no milling around) at 1:11 pm would have gotten to the Capitol Building at 1:41 pm at the VERY earliest.

Most people would have realistically arrived after 2 pm.

And again… the violence started at 12:40 pm.

This means that the people who committed and incited the violence did not listen to Trump’s speech.

So how were they incited by it?

Especially when Trump called for protesters to “peacefully… make their voices heard.”

Please share this article with your friends and help us fight back against the fake news narrative!

Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?

The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world, which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom. The news also serves as a social connection tool, as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do. With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand, the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper.

– Justin

Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools.

Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammatical mistake? Send an email to [email protected], with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected]. Thank you for reading.

Source:

https://welovetrump.com/2021/01/12/new-details-debunk-claims-that-president-trump-incited-the-capitol-riots/

Notices and Disclaimers

We need $2000 per month to pay our costs. Help us one time or recurring. (DONATE HERE)

To sign up for RSS updates, paste this link (https://stillnessinthestorm.com/feed/) into the search field of your preferred RSS Reader or Service (such as Feedly or gReader).

Subscribe to Stillness in the Storm Newsletter

“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.” – Aristotle

This website is supported by readers like you.

If you find our work of value, consider making a donation. 

Stillness in the Storm DISCLAIMER: All articles, videos, statements, claims, views and opinions that appear anywhere on this site, whether stated as theories or absolute facts, are always presented by Stillness in the Storm as unverified—and should be personally fact checked and discerned by you, the reader. Any opinions or statements herein presented are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, or agreed to by Stillness, those who work with Stillness, or those who read Stillness. Any belief or conclusion gleaned from content on this site is solely the responsibility of you the reader to substantiate, fact check, and no harm comes to you or those around you. And any actions taken by those who read material on this site is solely the responsibility of the acting party. You are encouraged to think carefully and do your own research. Nothing on this site is meant to be believed without question or personal appraisal.

Content Disclaimer: All content on this site marked with “source – [enter website name and url]” is not owned by Stillness in the Storm. All content on this site that is not originally written, created, or posted as original, is owned by the original content creators, who retain exclusive jurisdiction of all intellectual property rights. Any copyrighted material on this site was shared in good faith, under fair use or creative commons. Any request to remove copyrighted material will be honored, provided proof of ownership is rendered. Send takedown requests to [email protected].

What is our mission? Why do we post what we do?

Our mission here is to curate (share) articles and information that we feel is important for the evolution of consciousness. Most of that information is written or produced by other people and organizations, which means it does not represent our views or opinions as managing staff of Stillness in the Storm. Some of the content is written by one of our writers and is clearly marked accordingly. Just because we share a CNN story that speaks badly about the President doesn’t mean we’re promoting anti-POTUS views. We’re reporting on the fact as it was reported, and that this event is important for us to know so we can better contend with the challenges of gaining freedom and prosperity. Similarly, just because we share a pro/anti-[insert issue or topic] content, such as a pro-second amendment piece or an anti-military video doesn’t mean we endorse what is said. Again, information is shared on this site for the purpose of evolving consciousness. In our opinion, consciousness evolves through the process of accumulating knowledge of the truth and contemplating that knowledge to distill wisdom and improve life by discovering and incorporating holistic values. Thus, sharing information from many different sources, with many different perspectives is the best way to maximize evolution. What’s more, the mastery of mind and discernment doesn’t occur in a vacuum, it is much like the immune system, it needs regular exposure to new things to stay healthy and strong. If you have any questions as to our mission or methods please reach out to us at [email protected].

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.