(B.K. House) Mitch McConnell said he won’t bring a Biden Supreme Court nominee to a vote if a vacancy occurs and the Republicans recapture the senate in 2022.
Related Majority Of House Republicans Who Voted To Impeach Trump Will Face America First Primary Challengers
by B.K. House, June 15th, 2021
McConnell made the remarks during an interview on the Hugh Hewitt show Monday morning. Mr. Hewitt commented on the movement among the radical left-wing of the democrat party, which is attempting to coerce Justice Stephen Breyer into retirement. Their plan is to shove the 82-year-old Breyer out, with Kamala Harris casting the tie-breaker on a new nominee if they can’t siphon off a few Rino votes.
Justice Breyer was nominated by Bill Clinton in 1994 and has served on the court for over 26 years. He is considered to be part of the liberal wing of the court. Breyer has already gained the ire of the lunatic left when he spoke out in April against expanding the court in a move known as court-packing. Mr. Breyer warned in an online lecture at Harvard Law School, that court-packing would undermine “the trust that the court has gradually built.”
The pressure is on and it’s already getting nasty.
Justice Breyer will have to reflect long and hard on pod boys’ demand that he resign just prior to most consequential SCOTUS term in his long and distinguished career, because, well, they know President Obama: https://t.co/RogvHspT9G
— Hugh Hewitt (@hughhewitt) June 15, 2021
Hewitt asked McConnell if he’d take the same course of action he took following the suspicious death of Justice Antonia Scalia in Obama’s final year, where he refused to bring Obama’s nominee, Merrick Garland, up for a vote. Their exchange went like this:
Hewitt: “Let me ask you, if you regain the majority in 2022 for the Republicans, and there’s a very good chance of that happening, …would the rule that you applied in 2016 to the Scalia vacancy apply in 2024 to any vacancy that occurred then?”
McConnell: “Well, I think in the middle of a presidential election, if you have a Senate of the opposite party of the president, you have to go back to the 1880s to find the last time a vacancy was filled. So I think it’s highly unlikely. In fact, no, I don’t think either party if it controlled, if it were different from the president, would confirm a Supreme Court nominee in the middle of an election. What was different in 2020 was we were of the same party as the president.”
10 times more effective than ribavirin against Herpes (HSV1, HSV2), Swine flu (H1N1), Bird flu (H1N4), Pox (cowpox). Studied by the DoD for the Bioshield program. Get your Agarikon biodefense from Ascent Nutrition, one of the most pure and potent in the industry. Save 10% and get free shipping with a subscription!“I felt like I was getting a cold, but Agarikon stopped it in its tracks.”
Organic AGARIKON fights Viruses & Bio-warfare, and much more!
Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world, which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom. The news also serves as a social connection tool, as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do. With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand, the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper.
– Justin
Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools.
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammatical mistake? Send an email to [email protected], with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected]. Thank you for reading.
Source:
Support our work! (Avoid Big Tech PayPal and Patreon)DIRECT DONATION
Leave a Reply