Julian and I have been posting data from any and all sources since the beginning of this blog in 2013. Our intent, as always, is not to hold a flag of truth, but to offer data and a perspective which can activate the inner process of critical thinking and truth discernment within each of us.
Due to pervasive conditioning, many people simply do not have time or the faculties to discern what is real for themselves, and rely on experts. The trap being, we could become the acolytes of the expert following them like a religious figure, instead of using them as a source for data we contemplate. Of course every piece of knowledge we gain comes from someone (including ourselves) who spent time and energy to understand it, so in this sense experts and scholars can be very helpful. But if we do not learn the specific details personally, we could fall into a dualistic mindset: “this person is true, and this other person is false.” However if we examine even the most obvious example of a ‘shill’ or ‘dis-info’ agent, there are many concepts offered which have truth in them. Fox News is widely regarded as a propaganda network by most aware people, yet when it was reported “the World Trade Center collapsed,” it does not mean this is untrue. Rarely, if ever, can we so easily cast someone into the category of absolute liar or shill; for a web of lies is woven with strands of truth, but the ideas can certainly be judged on their merits.
How can we separate the wheat from the chaff? Julian and I can hardly claim to be perfect truth discerners, but one guiding principle has helped us greatly in understanding where all the data points fit together.
With this process of discernment hopefully firmly in mind, we want to discuss the recent scuffle between Ken and Alfred Lambremont Webre.
“Elephants are grey, but not all grey things are elephants“
Source – Redefining God
The NWO and the New Age Mind-Screw: Part 1 – Alfred Lambremont Webre (Updates 1-3 – When in trouble, trot out the straw man)
Don’t be ashamed if you’ve ever fallen for some form of New Age BS…
…It is a highly-polished, massively-promoted, multi-billion dollar product that was scientifically formulated over decades by the brightest sellouts the globalists could buy. The only shame is in not listening to inner and outer warnings to move past it.
So Webre was responsible for dreaming up “alternative futures,” and he has used that experience to good effect in the “alternate timelines” mind-screw he is currently foisting upon the awakening public. Let’s have a look at the sh*t he’s been shoveling by examining a recent interview of him…
…Here is an overview offered by an associated news page…
…(according to the globalists’ plan, once the BRICS are seen to “take over” the IMF, both the IMF and SDR will get fresh new names to make a clean break from the past).
KEN BUSTED IN 3 STEPS! “KEN” NOBODY authors historically inaccurate poison pen piece to discredit Alfred Lambremont Webre, only to have KEN’s inaccurate article expose KEN as a fabricator and fraud
http://newsinsideout.com/2015/01/alfred-webre-positive-timeline-transforms-planned-2015-dollar-collapse-sovereignty-brics-golden-age/
KEN’s fabricated rant can be found at
http://redefininggod.com/2015/02/the-nwo-and-the-new-age-mind-screw-part-1-alfred-lambremont-webre/
Creating a Positive Future: Time Science Shows Our Earth is on a Positive Timeline in our Time Space Hologram
- “It’s time science, not rocket science that Earth is on a positive timeline.”
- Positive Future = Positive Timeline + Unity Consciousness
Maybe the problem with all the condemnation is that the condemners CAN’T IMAGINE A PERSON WITH INNER MORAL PRINCIPLES. That is what I think!
SEE:
“Proposed 1977 Carter Extraterrestrial Communication Study”
right to know and NASA’s need for candor.” Marcia Smith, a space
policy senior analyst at the Congressional Research Service in Washington, DC., as quoted by James Oberg
Determine what the relationship of this UFO phenomena might be to extraterrestrial intelligence.
Marcia Smith was at the time Analyst in Science and Technology, Science Research Division, at the Congressional Research Service. She was not ignorant about the field of UFOs, and classified research. Records show she had been involved in at least five UFO or SETI related investigations by the Congressional Research Service.
In 1975 and then in a 1978 update, Marcia Smith joined with Dr. George Gatewood, Director of the Allegheny Observatory and the NASA Ames research Center SETI Program office, to write a report for the Congressional Research Service called “Life Beyond Earth.” This paper (later turned into a book), was not about UFOs. “The paper is,” wrote Smith, “instead, a synthesis of past and current thought on the possibility that there is extraterrestrial life in the universe, together with discussions of the possible impacts of making contact with it.”
In 1976 Smith also co-authored a report called The UFO Enigma which was produced for the Congressional Research Service. The report was an overview of the U.S. government involvement in solving the UFO puzzle, and information that had been released under the Freedom of Information.”
In 1983 Smith produced an updated report by the same name updating the report with events that had occurred between 1976 and 1983.
STEP 3 – An independent reader of KEN’s distorted and historically inaccurate hit piece rant against Alfred submits a documented list of Alfred’s accomplishments, demonstrating Alfred is functionally is the OBVERSE of a NWO Illuminati operative.
To Alfred Lambremont Webre: A reader reminds us of all your positive efforts on behalf of us all . . my thanks for lending this perspective! Hugs, ~Jean
Sources:
http://redefininggod.com/2015/02/the-nwo-and-the-new-age-mind-screw-part-1-alfred-lambremont-webre/
Joe Renaud says
After digesting all this; "he said she said diatribe", it all seems to get down to nothing more than egos. All parties involved here are all claiming to be doing something positive or some good for the common peons.
I believe what we are witnessing here is what I've defined before in pervious comments. We are witnessing "variables" or "versions" of what people claim to be "the truth". As I keep saying; you can have 10 people witness a car accident and then ask them to describe what they experienced and you'll end up with 10 "versions" of the truth.
How can anyone else claim another's version is untruthful unless they have been there side by side with them throughout their life or at the very least throughout any given event? Is God not experiencing itself through us all simultaneously?
So unless one claims to be "the God", I suspect we will continue to get nothing more than "versions" of the "truth" from you-tube and article bloggers.
In the end alI I hear is same old, "I'm right and your wrong" scenario. Which is really nothing more than egos battling it out among themselves.
I suppose what we think about what others think about us, seems more important than the messages we bring to ourselves. To a large degree I believe this to be truthful. We still haven't gotten beyond not giving a shit about what others think about us, no matter what we say.
Having an opinion, is just that, it's an opinion. The fact that so many of us are still travelling in the same path or direction seems to be a moot point these days and we are more interested and consumed in "who's" path were willing to travel on.
Well seeing as nobody can possible know what it's like to be me or stand in my shoes, I choose to continue to be on my own one of a kind unique path, and it's all mine because no one else can own it.