(Stillness in the Storm Editor) The following Vanity Fair article claims a purge is taking place, alluding to notions that Trump is attempting to remove those who suspect him of wrongdoing.
The article appears to be designed to read like a damning indictment against Trump, in which he is complicit in getting rid of people that don’t agree with him or his policies. But that’s yet another MSM conspiracy theory—unproven but not disproven.
I suspect there’s more going on here.
[the_ad id=”76743″]
Consider the Spygate scandal, wherein Trump claims the FBI used spies—”informants”— during his campaign under the alleged justification he was going to receive dirt on his opponents from foreign threats to the US (e.g. Russiagate).
Here’s how a former FBI agent describes Spygate:
Virtually all commentary that I’ve read focuses on the initiation by the FBI of a Full Investigation on July 31, 2016. Commentators who have constructed timelines of events — an excellent idea, in and of itself — then often argue that the use of informants or “spies” against the Trump campaign prior to July 31, 2016 — for which there is considerable evidence — violated the AGG, since the FBI would have been targeting informants without an open investigation. (Source)
Spygate was wrong because to use informants the FBI has to classify the investigation as having a factual basis in the public record before these more covert means can be employed. But by all accounts spying by the FBI was taking place well before any formal investigation was underway.
The details of Spygate are not represented in the media, washed away so as to paint Trump as a conspiracy theorist.
It seems, the following story is yet another attempt to further entrench in the American People’s mind that Trump is a tyrant, that he is purging staffers because he’s a criminal. But there is no evidence of this, which is why the Deep State-run media likely has to resort to false syllogistic comparisons as we see below.
Buy Book Spygate: The Attempted Sabotage of Donald J. Trump
A false syllogistic comparison is when an inference is drawn by highlighting two facts without proper or complete context, thereby implying something that doesn’t actually exist. In this case, no real evidence of Trump’s impropriety has been found, as Mueller confirmed after an over two-year investigation. So what does the Deep State media do? They imply there was wrongdoing, like this:
President Donald Trump has certainly made no secret of his dislike for government employees who haven’t gone full MAGA with their effusive praise of the president. And apparently some of his appointees feel the exact same way. A new report from the State Department’s Office of the Inspector General released Thursday chronicles rampant mismanagement and “mistreatment of career employees” at the department’s Bureau of International Organization Affairs by Assistant Secretary of State Kevin Moley and former senior adviser Mari Stull, who were both Trump appointees. The report found evidence of “disrespectful and hostile treatment of employees,” “retaliation associated with conflicts of interest,” taking personnel actions with “improper motives”—and, naturally, “harassment” of career employees who were not believed to be sufficiently loyal to Trump.
Notice the first statement, which suggests Trump just doesn’t like people “who haven’t gone full MAGA.” Later, they list complaints from these fired staffers, which implies that Trump was creating a hostile work environment to get rid of people that don’t agree with him. Furthermore, the article makes that suggestion more explicitly later on.
Could the inference be true?
Yes, it’s possible Trump is merely an egomaniac, getting rid of non-Trumpers using manipulation and emotional badgering. But what’s also possible, and I would argue more likely, is that Trump is purging Deep State assets, he’s getting rid of informants and spies, be they from the FBI or elsewhere. Of course, we can’t know that for sure at this point either. But given that we do know certain actors in the government were undoubtedly using their power to undermine the POTUS, it seems the latter interpretation will likely prove to be true in time.
Given all this, consider the following article.
In my view, it’s clearly a propaganda piece designed to appeal to the never-Trump anti-Trump crowd, a way to feed the anti-Trump conspiracy theorists who refuse to consider all the facts, by feeding them false syllogistic comparisons.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed below are not presented here because we agree with them. Nor are we suggesting you should believe them. It is data we consider valuable information as part of the grander effort to know ourselves, the world, so as to better take steps to make things better, for all.
– Justin
[the_ad id=”74482″]
by Alison Durkee, August 16th, 2019
Trump appointees reportedly harassed career employees at the Bureau of International Organization Affairs, accusing them of being “disloyal” “traitors” and part of the “Deep State.”
President Donald Trump has certainly made no secret of his dislike for government employees who haven’t gone full MAGA with their effusive praise of the president. And apparently some of his appointees feel the exact same way. A new report from the State Department’s Office of the Inspector General released Thursday chronicles rampant mismanagement and “mistreatment of career employees” at the department’s Bureau of International Organization Affairs by Assistant Secretary of State Kevin Moley and former senior adviser Mari Stull, who were both Trump appointees. The report found evidence of “disrespectful and hostile treatment of employees,” “retaliation associated with conflicts of interest,” taking personnel actions with “improper motives”—and, naturally, “harassment” of career employees who were not believed to be sufficiently loyal to Trump.
Per the I.G.’s findings, Stull and Moley were reportedly openly hostile to career employees who were holdovers from the Obama administration, making “inappropriate accusations of disloyalty.” Stull, employees told the Inspector General, would call employees “Obama holdovers,” “traitors,” or “disloyal,” and allegedly accused certain employees of “being part of the ‘Deep State.’” The two appointees reportedly based their opinions of employees on their “perceived political views,” with Stull allegedly only making positive comments about certain career employees “because they reportedly made contributions to Republican candidates.” And Stull wasn’t afraid to act when she believed employees didn’t share her political beliefs. In one example described in the report, Stull took away many of one employee’s job responsibilities after they accompanied members of the Congressional Black Caucus to the United Nations, seemingly largely because the delegation “consisted of only Democratic members.” Stull “accused the employee of trying to ‘thwart’ President Trump and undermine his agenda,” the report details.
Buy Book Exonerated: The Failed Takedown of President Donald Trump by the Swamp
In another instance, Stull allegedly cancelled a job selection process for a position seemingly because she believed the leading candidate was not “trustworthy,” due to their work with the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East and “relationship with the gay and lesbian community.” Shortly after that episode, Stull reportedly met with the Joint Executive Office and asked that “descriptions for all future vacancies should ‘reflect President Trump’s agenda’ and … ‘require conformance to the President’s beliefs.’” (The officials informed Stull that they “could not carry out her instructions.”)
Stull and Moley’s mismanagement went beyond their political biases. The report also describes them as having “frequently berated employees, raised their voices, and generally engaged in unprofessional behavior toward staff”—in one instance, Stull reportedly “called [an employee’s] work product ‘garbage’ and threw it at another employee”—and dismissed one employee without merit after they raised concerns about the officials’ behaviors. Stull also allegedly “retaliated” against career employees with whom she disputed in her previous position at the U.N.’s Food and Agriculture Organization. Though higher-up State Department officials raised concerns about Stull’s behavior after it was first reported by Foreign Policy and asked Moley in June 2018 to make certain reforms, the report notes “the hostile treatment and other conduct described above continued into the fall of 2018.”
The mismanagement led to a mass exodus of career staff at the bureau, with the report finding that 50 out of 300 domestic employees left since Moley was instated. “Nearly all” of the former employees the I.G.’s office interviewed “stated that poor leadership of the bureau contributed to their decision to depart.” Stull, who stepped down from her position in January, has yet to respond to the allegations, while Moley has disputed their accuracy. “The behavior attributed to me regarding raising my voice, berating employees and contributing to a hostile work environment does not represent who I am or who I have ever been,” Moley told NBC News.
Democrats have responded with outrage to the report’s findings, which House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. Elijah Cummings said “leaves no doubt that Trump Administration political appointees have mismanaged the Department and violated the public trust.” “Today’s report confirms what we feared: ‘disrespectful and hostile’ treatment of career employees at the State Department, including spurious accusations that public servants were ‘disloyal’ and improper retaliation against them,” House Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Rep. Eliot Engel said in a statement, calling on Moley to resign or be dismissed. A State Department official told the Hill that the department accepted the report’s recommendations, which call for a “corrective action plan” to address the mismanagement and for the State Department “to consider other appropriate action, including disciplinary action.”
The report comes amid a particular period of turmoil for career officials within the Trump administration. The president’s open preference for officials to be Trump lackeys recently forced the resignation of Deputy Director of National Intelligence Sue Gordon, a widely-respected career official whom Trump nevertheless refused to let replace departing DNI head Dan Coats. Trump’s U.S. Department of Agriculture, meanwhile, is currently facing a mass exodus of scientists and other career experts thanks to a controversial decision to move the department to Kansas City. Critics have derided the move as an effort to force out scientists—who aren’t exactly Trump’s biggest fans—and “drain the swamp.”
[the_ad id=”68922″]
Earlier in August, Chuck Park, a U.S. Foreign Service official at the State Department, resigned from the Trump administration with a Washington Post op-ed, in which he said that while Trump supporters may accuse career officials like him of being “Deep State,” he considered himself to be a part of the “Complacent State” instead. “The Complacent State sighs when the president blocks travel by Muslim immigrants; shakes its head when he defends Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman; averts its gaze from images of children in detention camps. Then it complies with orders,” Park wrote. “I let career perks silence my conscience. I let free housing, the countdown to a pension and the prestige of representing a powerful nation overseas distract me from ideals that once seemed so clear to me. I can’t do that anymore.”
Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?
The preceding information is a news update. In general, staying informed as to events taking place is essential as an individual because it helps you navigate the world, and socially because you can gain and maintain rapport with your fellows. This rapport can be used to share information that can help others and improve the conditions of humanity in general. However, one must learn how to exercise discernment and proper critical thinking so they can make effective use of information gained.
– Justin
Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools.
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Send an email to corrections@stillnessinthestorm.com, with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at sitsshow@gmail.com. Thank you for reading.
Source:
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/08/trump-state-department-report-deep-state-harassment
Leave a Reply