(Vox Day) A clinical lab scientist tests 1,500 positive Covid-19 samples and finds nothing but common influenza viruses.
by Staff Writer, February 19th, 2021
I’m a clinical lab scientist. I have a PhD in virology and immunology. I’m a clinical lab scientist and have tested 1500 “supposed” positive Covid 19 samples collected here in S. California. When my lab team and I did the testing through Koch’s postulates and observation under a SEM (scanning electron microscope), we found NO Covid in any of the 1500 samples.
What we found was that all of the 1500 samples were mostly Influenza A and some were influenza B, but not a single case of Covid, and we did not use the B.S. PCR test. We then sent the remainder of the samples to Stanford, Cornell, and a few of the University of California labs and they found the same results as we did, NO COVID. They found influenza A and B.
All of us then spoke to the CDC and asked for viable samples of COVID, which CDC said they could not provide as they did not have any samples. We have now come to the firm conclusion through all our research and lab work, that the COVID 19 was imaginary and fictitious.
If it looks like a hoax, and it smells like a hoax, and 1,500 lab samples determine that it’s a hoax, then Occam’s Razor strongly suggests that it’s a great big hoax.
I am no virologist, but as a competent logician, my inclination is to hypothesize that the C19 virus is a genetically modified version of the flu. This explanation would account for a) the unusual symptoms, b) the anomalies related to the viral samples, and c) the massive decline in conventional flu cases.
[the_ad_group id=”25840″]
Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world, which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom. The news also serves as a social connection tool, as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do. With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand, the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper.
– Justin
Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools.
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammatical mistake? Send an email to [email protected], with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected]. Thank you for reading.
Source:
http://voxday.blogspot.com/2021/02/imaginary-and-fictitious.html
I followed the links looking for the origin of this, and the closest I’ve been able to get is someone named Joe Rizoli, who posted it at joerizoliopinions.onlinegroups.net , on December 8th, and on December 28th added that he was not the original author and couldn’t find the original author “because a lot of these quotes came from Facebook and other places so to pinpoint the post is going to be difficult. ”
Your own article provides no credentials for the supposed author. While I would love this to be true, it seems unwise to toss future credibility out the window by throwing a Facebook hand-me-down repost on your site with zero citations, no author, no name of the laboratory s/he claims to be a PhD at, nothing. I can appreciate difficulties of sorting through large amounts of material to come up with new content, but this is hardly new– it was already unsourceable back in December. I think you do your very interesting site and your readers a disservice in this instance.
After giving these objections, let me finish by saying I am a relative newcomer to your site and have enjoyed it, for the most part.
I followed the links looking for the origin of this, and the closest I’ve been able to get is someone named Joe Rizoli, who posted it at joerizoliopinions.onlinegroups.net , on December 8th, and on December 28th added that he was not the original author and couldn’t find the original author “because a lot of these quotes came from Facebook and other places so to pinpoint the post is going to be difficult. ”
Your own article provides no credentials for the supposed author. While I would love this to be true, it seems unwise to toss future credibility out the window by throwing a Facebook hand-me-down repost on your site with zero citations, no author, no name of the laboratory s/he claims to be a PhD at, nothing. I can appreciate the difficulties of sorting through large amounts of material to come up with new content, but this is hardly new– it was already unsourceable back in December. I think you do your very interesting site and your readers a disservice in this instance.
After giving these objections, let me finish by saying I am a relative newcomer to your site and have enjoyed it, for the most part.
Thanks, Suzanne. Finding these things can be extremely difficult. This post might not be the best example but don’t let that be the extent of assessment here. The reduction of flu cases during the covid pandemic suggests manipluation. I’m curious to see where your studies take you here.
Left wing meme, if no natural crisis is available for exploitation, create one.