(Stillness in the Storm Editor) I wrote the following preamble to an update by Ken, and will include this in future posts as a disclaimer for his content.
I am sharing this article from Ken of Redefining God—as always—for your consideration.
He has many views and conclusions that are contrasted by those accepted by the awakening community. As such, reviewing his perspectives helps expand our own vision and facilitates greater discernment and comprehension.
Note: This is clearly marked in the About Us section of SITS, yet when posting these updates from Ken, I often receive feedback from readers who assume I wrote the article or that I am endorsing his views.
To be clear, I share information and data on this site from many different sources, and in some cases, there are conflicts with the information. Sometimes the articles are sensational or antagonistic but that doesn’t mean I personal support what is being said.
My goal is not to claim these items as true, merely to offer them for consideration—to think about them which stimulates consciousness and inspiration.
This being said the reader should not assume anything hosted on this site is my belief.
I can sometimes offer commentary in green but even this does not fully account for what I am personally concluding in relation to content shared on this site. And frankly, what I believe or think has no bearing on how you—the reader—processes and absorbs information. In short, ignore the messenger, focus on and think about the message.
In my understanding, the act of thinking about something is the process of expanding consciousness to further individual evolution. Whether or not the thing contemplated is reflective of reality isn’t as important as the act of considering it.
Meditate on the idea that a fable, myth or parable need not be true in order to impart wisdom. In this way, reviewing opposing perspectives is often a powerful way to gain greater clarity and insight into what we think is true; or it helps us let go of false beliefs we maintain because of our attachment to them.
Related Globalist Agenda Watch Updates
by Ken, March 13th, 2017
After I wrote about the Vindex Falls scenario in Update 5, I started wondering who would be the one to take Trump’s place after the counter-coup sweeps in to make arrests and “restore the republic.” This question was answered just a few days later when I saw this on the March 7 Drudge Report…
The second I saw it, I knew the globalists were using the Obamacare replacement debate to put Paul back in the public eye, thus positioning him to be Trump’s replacement should they opt for Vindex Falls. This impression was bolstered when I saw this Alex Jones video yesterday…
…From YouTube
The video talks about Senator John McCain’s outburst on the Senate floor in which he claimed Paul was working for Putin. McCain’s stunt thus served the purpose of positioning Paul as a clear opponent of his, which will make Paul look very good after McCain is arrested in the counter-coup and charged with all the evils Alex Jones attributes to him in the video. Alex also takes the time to personally plug Paul at the 2:24 mark of the video…
“…Rand Paul is a professional doctor – (he) isn’t screwing around, and he is VERY effective – not in his rhetoric so much but what he gets done. He’s one of the best senators we’ve seen in decades – and a patriot. Amazing. I wish he was part of the (Trump) administration.”
Now if you think about it, after the counter-coup takes place, America is going to need a president whom the whole country can trust and get behind (unlike Trump, whom half of the country viscerally despises), and who can work well with Congress to get the nation moving again. Can you see how the “genial, effective and vindicated” Rand Paul would fit the bill?
I will continue to expand and enhance this update over the course of the weekend, and in the next part, I’ll tell you how the globalists will use their pedophilia meme to clear out the government and open the way for Rand’s rise.
With love…
_________________________
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Do you think this article needs a correction or update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected] with the error, headline and url. Thank you for reading.
Leave a Reply