(Ethan Huff) Scientific “consensus” is a popular buzzword commonly used by climate fanatics to “prove” that man-made climate change is a real thing. But is there really even a consensus as these hysterics claim? Not even close.
Related Extinction Rebellion: Climate Change Protests Aim To Crash Global Economy To Usher In MMT
by Ethan Huff, November 14th, 2019
As it turns out, the climate lobby loves to pull its “facts” right out of thin air, including the newly minted fiction that “More than 11,000 scientists declare ‘climate emergency.’” While this regurgitated mainstream media headline is pretty cut and dry, the claim it makes is patently false, we’ve now learned.
Just like the Greta Thunberg hoax, the notion that more than 11,000 actual scientists are suddenly lamenting an impending “climate emergency” has absolutely no basis in reality.
In truth, these 11,000 “scientists” are actually just 11,000 ordinary people who were duped into believing that cow farts are destroying the planet, and subsequently responded by signing their names on some website.
According to radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh, some “buddies” of his over at the group Power Line were the first to discover that these 11,000 so-called “scientists” aren’t actually scientists at all, despite what fake news media outlets like NBC, CNN, The Guardian, and Al-Jazeera continue to claim.
“There was no study; there was just a press release,” Limbaugh explained on his program. “And it wasn’t 11,000 scientists; it was 11,000 random people who put their names on a website. This was a total managed lie. There was no study. There were no scientists.”
Buy Book The Greatest Hoax: How the Global Warming Conspiracy Threatens Your Future
In other words, the whole thing was contrived out of nowhere to push the lie that scientists have somehow reached a “consensus” about a so-called “climate emergency” that, in truth, doesn’t actually exist.
“People went on a Web page and asked others reading it to put their signature on it. That was then presented as a scientific paper,” Limbaugh went on to explain.
“It’s kind of like these two skeletons that put together Center for Science in the Public Interest that banned coconut oil, MSG. They weren’t scientists. They were just a couple people that didn’t want you to eat what you wanted so they created an icon, got a fax machine, got the media going. It was all made-up stuff.”
For more related news about the climate change hoax, be sure to check out Climate.news.
Facts: Coconut oil is healthy for you, and there is no “climate emergency”
Limbaugh brings up a good point about that whole coconut oil fiasco, which as you may recall similarly involved “scientists” vilifying this healthy fat as “dangerous” in order to push their own agenda.
Just like with climate change, the excuse of scientific “consensus” was used as evidence to falsely declare coconut oil as a public health menace.
It’s really important that people recognize what’s going on here with all of this, as “consensus” is what’s being used on multiple fronts to eliminate Americans’ freedoms and liberties.
In the case of the coconut oil fiasco, it’s about driving the public to consume unhealthy industrial chemicals instead of natural healing fats. In the case of climate change, it’s about micromanaging people’s lives down to the foods they choose to serve their families for dinner.
Buy Book Climate of Corruption: Politics and Power Behind The Global Warming Hoax
If the climate fanatics are successful – and they openly admit their scheme, including in this climate “study” that was endorsed by 11,000 “random people” – humans will no longer be allowed to eat meat. Everything in your meal regimen will need to be “plant-based.” You won’t be able to drive a gas-powered vehicle anymore. And most of your earnings will end up being stolen from you to pay for “carbon credits.”
“On the other hand, 31,500 climate and related fields scientists wrote and SIGNED their names to THEIR climate report to the UN’s IPCC, which REFUTED the IPCC and AGW religious fanatics, in 2012,” noted on WND commenter about how there’s actually a scientific consensus against the notion of man-made climate change.
Buy Book Thought Prison: The Fundamental Nature of Political Correctness
Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?
The preceding information and discussion reveal the widespread corruption and breach of trust within the institutions of science. Unbeknownst to most people, including scientists, presenting oneself as a purveyor of essential truth (objective knowledge) is an extremely sacred office and divine duty meant to be managed by an ecclesia (a body of dedicated individuals who have taken a solemn vow to seek for and share the truth along with protecting it). The powers that be use false reality paradigms and the false scientific institutions, as well as religious, to maintain control over the minds of the general population. With this false reality dispelled, individuals can begin to think for themselves and unfurl the false reality paradigm that keeps the masses dependent on the nefarious world powers.
– Justin
Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools.
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammatical mistake? Send an email to [email protected], with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected]. Thank you for reading.
Source:
https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-11-14-scientists-warning-climate-emergency-are-random-people.html
As soon as the words ‘EXPERT’ or ‘SCIENTIST’ are used you know it’s BS propaganda.., ever since they invented CONsensus, which is NOT the same as a body of people agreeing with the subject.with proof to prove the perpetrators claims.