(Stillness in the Storm Editor) The following article is a glaring example of Deep State propaganda, as we’ll reveal in the following brief analysis.
Another term for it is disinformation, spin, or smearing.
The objective is to control the narrative, specifically by targeting your desire to feel included.
“If you can control what people think other people believe, say, and do, you can wield great power over the individual and society”
Psychologically, we have entire neurological systems designed to make us seek out social attachments. These operate at the personal, interpersonal, and global (societal) level.
Propagandists working for the Deep State understand this principle, and have used it for a very long time to steer public opinion in their favor.
The way they do this is by using language that subtly implies you’d be a fool not to believe what the status quo does. Or that you’re an idiot if you believe something not accepted by the herd. And if you aren’t apart of the status quo, the whole of society, you’re a reject, a loser, a thought-criminal—someone to be avoided, at all costs.
Another tactic is to make allusions as to criminal behavior, indecency, or taboo beliefs (think racism) while never actually providing any evidence of such.
For most people, the mere association of a social taboo to a figure, organization, or idea is enough to activate their social defense mechanisms, wherein they justify buying into the false narrative because “looking at the evidence isn’t needed—the experts have already decided.”
The following article, which is a smear piece by the Daily Dot, authored by Mike Rothschild, is filled with these social engineering tactics.
Buy Book How Propaganda Works
Here are a few examples:
Edge of Wonder wants people to believe in Q. But the well-funded channel hides its dark and violent culture.
What “dark and violent culture” is the author talking about? Sounds scary, right? So scary you might avoid Edge of Wonder all together, in case one of your friends, family, or co-workers will find out?
Did the author ever explain what he means? Nope.
In keeping with its parent company’s pro-Trump, anti-mainstream media stance, Edge of Wonder hosts Ben Chasteen and Rob Counts present a sanitized, scrubbed version of QAnon that bears little resemblance to the actual conspiracy theory, and reflects little of what QAnon believers actually think.
Here, the author claims Edge of Wonder presents “sanitized, scrubbed version of QAnon,” suggesting it “reflects little of what QAnon believers actually think.”
Firstly, if you review Q’s posts and what is presented in the Edge of Wonder videos, as compared to other synopsis style videos on the material, I would argue Ben and Rob’s presentations are highly credible. It cites actual Q drops, investigates what is presented therein, using established and proven journalistic methods, and even offers counter-arguments for Q’s claims, in an effort to maintain objectivity. Their videos are some of the best ones out there.
In comparison, a great many other Q videos are more loaded with opinion and proselytizing rhetoric—that is, other commenters rarely offer counter-arguments or substantiate their interpretations. This doesn’t make then bad, it just means that Ben and Rob’s videos are presented with more objectivity.
Given this, the claim that their videos “bare little resemblance to the actual conspiracy theory” is untrue.
Or perhaps, the author straw manned the whole topic, and the false narrative that the mainstream media pushed isn’t reflected in the Edge of Wonder videos. Therefore, according to the author’s ʼfalse and misinformed opinion, the videos don’t reflect what he thinks QAnon believers think. In either case, the author is wrong.
Secondly, how can the author claim the videos don’t reflect what Q Anon believers think?
Can the entire QAnon community be said to have the same beliefs, views, and opinions?
Here’s some homework.
Go find 20 Q Anon videos from 20 different commentators.
Go look at a forum wherein Q Anon posts are being discussed.
For those who’ve done this homework, likely you’ve concluded what many already have—that there is no cohesive “Q belief system” swirling around in the QAnon research community. As a matter of fact, the past two years have seen a great deal of division and disagreement about Q, ranging from some saying it’s a LARP, while other suggesting Q is JFK Jr.
Thus, in this instance, we have another glaringly false claim. But again, since the targets of this propaganda piece are those who’ll never confirm the facts in this article, it’s designed to trigger fear of social ostracization. And it works—but only on those who don’t do their own research.
Counts and Chasteen embrace QAnon completely, holding it up as a clockwork military operation preparing to wake up the slumbering public to a wave of mass arrests.
Actually, Ben and Rob don’t “embrace QAnon completely.” The author would have known this if he bothered to reach out for comment.
[the_ad id=”72703″]
I’ve had the pleasure of discussing Q with them in person, as well as watching the videos in question. They present what could be happening, what might be true, but they provide plenty of disclaimers that they don’t really know for sure.
In fact, the videos lean heavily on anti-Semitic conspiracy theories about George Soros and the Rothschild banking family controlling the world, presenting them as fact, rather than the discredited notions that have generated decades and centuries of violence.
Did you see it? Anti-semitic.
Think about how that word is used to socially ostracized people today. Now consider that the very same tactic of labeling someone a racist, anti-semite, or misogynist is being used to paint anyone with wrong-think as a bigot. One of the most glaring examples of these character assassination tactics is how the leftist media paints Trump as a racist, never citing valid evidence he believes one race is superior or inferior to another.
And, again, it works.
Most people blindly accept the claim Trump is a racist without any evidence whatsoever, likely because they don’t want to be left out of the socially reinforced hate machine of groupthink.
“FOMO is one hell of a drug.”
The author never states that there is an overwhelming body of mainstream evidence to suggest Soros and the Rothschilds are, in fact, engaged in globalist intervention and social engineering tactics.
On Ben and Rob’s part, citing this evidence has nothing, whatsoever, to do with antisemitism. The author uses a very loaded triggerable word to, you guessed it, trigger fear in the reader. If “everyone else” believes that anyone who considers Soros and Rothschild conspiracies is an anti-semite, then you better not even consider these things, or you might be one too.
And I could keep going.
You have enough examples to see the theme.
I’ll challenge you.
What other manipulative tactics can you see in this article?
Share your thoughts in the comments.
– Justin
Related Why #Qanon is Making the Deep State [Craps] their Pants – Jordan Sather [Part 2]
by Mike Rothschild, August 27th, 2019
Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?
The Deep State agenda requires total control of your sense of reality, what I have termed reality management. This is founded on the psychological principle that the environment affects behavior more than direct force. If you want to control someone so perfectly that they don’t know it and actually do what you want thinking it was their own choice, you need to control what someone thinks. Propaganda is a tool for the mass manipulation of perception, values, and life choices. The aim of propaganda is to use subtle techniques to influence your sense of reality, and by extension, your life choices. Lawfully, when a person or people refuse to discuss ideas and work with others, subtle techniques can be used to manage their behavior. Benevolent use of propaganda works to raise the individual up so that they can engage in worldly affair management as a direct agent. Malevolent propaganda seeks to dumb down the individual so they lack the competence to participate. The Deep State uses propaganda in the latter fashion. Understanding that biggest danger to the powers that be is your own mind, your ability to think critically, investigate honestly, and bravely consider new ideas without prejudice, empowers you to be a warrior for truth and justice. Our world needs active thinkers. Learning about these truths can be difficult to accept, but once you let your resentment for the imperfection of this world die, you can embrace the adulthood desire to make things better through your influence. That is the work we are all here to do. With this knowledge in hand, specifically knowledge of how the Deep State use propaganda against the people, you can develop the self-mastery skills needed to not only transcend such efforts but use them to train your warrior spirit. And once trained, you can join the ranks of well informed and educated world healers working tirelessly to free humanity and make the world a better place.
– Justin
Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools.
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Send an email to corrections@stillnessinthestorm.com, with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at sitsshow@gmail.com. Thank you for reading.
Source:
https://www.dailydot.com/layer8/edge-wonder-qanon-youtube/
There’s a very wise Hungarian saying: “It’s not what they say but who says it.” A rothschild? That talks for itself.
I’ve watched a lot of their videos, the production is very amateurish, sound problems, blue screen, bad presentations. So I doubt there’s a lot of money behind it.
As far as antisemitic; they do have very warped ideas about what is a Jew, who should call themselves Jewish, Zionism is bad, etc
When mentioning a perpetrator, if he’s Jewish, they make sure to mention that too. While it has nothing to do with the storyline. And the would never say, Catholic criminal so and so.
So yeah, I believe they have a very negative view of Jews.
Mentioning that someone is a Jew isn’t negative. Granted, they might hold personal views that are negative, but that fact isn’t communicated the way you mentioned. That kind of thinking is the same false racism that gets pushed by the radical left. I don’t blame you, or anyone for this, as we’ve been trained through culture to think this way. But it’s logically fallacious.