(Stillness in the Storm Editor) I almost didn’t post this article because it’s so wildly sensational. But on Thursday night I saw Fox News do a segment about almost all the items listed below in an effort to debunk them.
Usually, when the mainstream media gets involved in the conspiracy theory debunking business it means that (a) the story is gaining popularity and some kind of media spin is needed, and (b) there might be something to the theories.
One thing I noticed while watching the debates was the way color was used. Blue was the most prevalent color, which has the effect of lulling one into a state of acceptance and passivity—something that is a well known psychologically. Red has the polar opposite effect, acting as a stimulator. Clinton was wearing very bright red clothing, which seemed to be part of a subtle conditioning tactic to get people to think she is strong, safe, and secure, oppose to Donald who was wearing a blue tie. The powers that be know about these effects and this event seemed to be layered with subtle conditioning devices to get people to switch from Trump to Clinton.
For my part, I don’t think voting for either of them will do much but shuffle some chairs on a sinking ship. Regardless of who we vote for, the shadow government always wins. And the argument that we need to vote for one person so another person doesn’t get into power hasn’t been too effective.
Related The Government Doesn’t Represent You, so Why Vote for it? — Vote Nobody for President: Lead Yourself in 2016
Of course, as with all things, discernment is advisable. Leave a comment and let us know what you think.
“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. “ – Aristotle
by Dr. Reich, September 29th 2016
Many weird happenings follow the Clintons around everywhere they go. in this particular one she’s blatantly caught signaling debate moderator Lester Holt. She’s clearly got a wire on her back, and as far as I can tell she’s not supposed to have it. Her eyes go very wonky and there appears to be a sloppy edit done afterwards. Respect to my Removing the Shackles friends who found me an ear picture to compare against a younger Hillary. We’ll see if it matches.
Dr. Reich is an open-minded science PhD that investigates controversial content to uncover what what appears valid and what appears bogus. He blogs at www.steemit.com/@aggroed and can be found on youtube here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsaJ7pKncIORbzne_qmc6Lg
_________________________
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Do you think this article needs a correction or update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected]. Thank you for reading.
Leave a Reply