(Ulysses S. Tennyson) In a remarkable and unconstitutional display, Chief Justice John Roberts–a globalist Bush appointee, was the only Supreme Court justice to rule against free speech.
by Ulysses S. Tennyson, March 9th, 2021
Ever since his jaw-droppingly left-wing decision on Barrack Obama’s healthcare plan, Constitutional Americans have understood without any doubt that John Roberts is dishonest. In the past, however, he hid it better using constitutional language and more convoluted arguments to subvert the constitution. Now, the mask is completely off. Roberts, today positioned himself as the sole dissenter against free speech in a clear-cut case of discrimination based upon religious beliefs.
Today's 8-1 decision in Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski marks the first time Chief Justice John Roberts has ever been the sole dissenting justice during his entire tenure. https://t.co/6Ux9HvXiDL
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) March 8, 2021
Chief Justice John Roberts was the only dissenter in the U.S Supreme Court’s most recent ruling favoring a couple of Christian students who challenged their university for restricting when, where, and how they could speak about their faith and disseminate materials on campus.
Uzuegbunam et al. v. Preczewski et al. first materialized after Chike Uzuegbunam, a student at Georgia Gwinnett College, was stopped by campus police for handing out religious materials on campus, a reported violation of the school’s “Freedom of Expression Policy,” which limited distributions and other expressions to free speech zones only with permission from the administration. Even after Uzuegbunam moved to the designated areas with permission, however, campus police attempted to stop him from speaking and handing out religious literature, prompting him and another student, Joseph Bradford, to take legal action against the university for violating their First and 14th Amendment rights and seek nominal damages.
The students’ attempts to sue the school, however, were shot down by both a district court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit after Georgia Gwinnett College changed its “Freedom of Expression” policy to remove barriers on when and where students could speak on campus and filed a motion to dismiss the case as moot. The Supreme Court took up the case after Uzuegbunam and Bradford noted that their rights were still violated no matter what the university modified its policy to reflect and still required a ruling on nominal damages.
Justice Clarence Thomas authored the opinion of the court, agreeing with the students’ case.
“Applying this principle here is straightforward. For purposes of this appeal, it is undisputed that Uzuegbunam experienced a completed violation of his constitutional rights when respondents enforced their speech policies against him. Because ‘every violation [of a right] imports damage,’ Webb, 29 F. Cas., at 509, nominal damages can redress Uzuegbunam’s injury even if he cannot or chooses not to quantify that harm in economic terms,” Thomas concluded.
Thomas, as usual, is right. This is a straightforward simply case. But, Justice Roberts wants to virtue signal to globalist elites that he will play ball in their destruction of constitutional rule of law. And, he is letting American’s know, when even the easiest cases are brought before him by the ‘peasant’ class, he has no interest in concerning himself with such ‘moot’ trifles. Elites like Roberts are annoyed that normal people would believe they could ever have standing to step foot before him.
“Roberts, however, in his first solo dissent, wrote that the court was acting as “a moot court” in deciding this case and their ruling.
“When plaintiffs like Uzuegbunam and Bradford allege neither actual damages nor the prospect of future injury, an award of nominal damages does not change their status or condition at all. Such an award instead represents a judicial determination that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of the law is correct — nothing more,” Roberts stated.
Even the far-left justices like Sotomayor and Kagan still find some lawful truth in the First Amendment of the US Constitution. But, not Justice Roberts.
Roberts’ dissent amounts to a dodges. He seems to be putting the country on notice that he does not wish to rule on even the simplest cases when it does not suit him or a globalist agenda. So, he simply labels them ‘moot.’
This happened during the 2020 election as well. In order to dodge a controversial court decision, Roberts and several other SCOTUS justices ruled that neither Trump nor states–nor anyone else–had standing to challenge elections, even though both would have been affected by the allegedly fraudulent results if fraud occurred.
Is Roberts labeling this case moot, or the Constitution, the American Republic, and the people who still believe in them?
What do you think, readers?
Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world, which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom. The news also serves as a social connection tool, as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do. With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand, the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper.
– Justin
Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools.
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammatical mistake? Send an email to [email protected], with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected]. Thank you for reading.
Source:
Of course he did, he’s a bought and paid for democrat puppet. The second I heard a one judge decent, I KNEW immediately it was Roberts.
How convenient for the communist democrat party mafia to have the Chief Justice Roberts to rule for them, and to have him choose what cases he takes and what cases he ditches.
He is the dem’s best friend, their defender of all their treason, all defender of all their fraud, defender of all their voting fraud, and he blocks anything that is Constitutional.
Through Roberts, they will take away our 1st and 2nd Amendments, fundamentally transform our Christian culture into their communist islamic culture, destroy our sovereignty, hand us over to the communist UN globalists to give them absolute power and absolute control over us and our paychecks, so they will live in luxury for the rest of their lives in their communist dictatorship where we will be their chattel, their slaves that keeps them in trillions of dollars for their out of control spending as they destroy everything that WE THE PEOPLE built. This is OUR country, it does not belong expressly to them to do as they please with.
No one should be this powerful, and no one should be unaccountable for their corruption, from their treason, from their fraud, and above and exempt from our laws like the dems are. They make the laws for us to obey, yet they are above and exempt from all of them. This is what Hitler and Stalin, Moa, and all the dictators in the communist countries do. The dems are taking OUT of civilization and they are forcing us beyond the darkest ages we have ever known.
They have opened our borders to the most vile enemies in the world as they build the fortress around themselves with their fences and razor wires and vow to take our guns putting targets on our backs making us sitting ducks for those who come here to kill, rape, and take everything we own. And, with the laws that they are legislating, they are making their treason, ftheir fraud and their crimes legal so we won’t have a leg to stand on against them.
Does anybody out there have the intelligence to see this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?????
God help us, because HE is the only One who can save us.
“Moot,” hm… “of no significance or relevance” or should remain “undetermined.” Unfortunately, Roberts is not moot, as he is significantly determining against free speech even when the plaintiffs are following their school guidelines. For once, all the other justices were not swayed by him, a silver lining and hopefully bodes well for the future.
chief justices only job is to sit in on impeachments, try reading the corporate Constitution of the United States and its limits