(Stillness in the Storm Editor) The golden age of YouTube is finally coming to an end. The media giant announced today that it would begin removing channels and videos that claim alternative interpretations of historical events, along with the removal of content that claims one race, group, or person is superior to another. If this policy was true to its word, we should see volumes of MSM fake news channels getting taken down, like CNN and Buzzfeed. But for those aware of the insidious thought-controllers of the Deep State, we know this means more justification to remove content that undermines the Deep State narrative.
In short, this isn’t about protecting people from bad ideas, it’s about ensuring only state-sponsored ideas see the light of day.
Information is dangerous to those in power, especially the truth. Clearly, not everything on YouTube that could be censored is truthful, and some of it is unquestionably hateful. But the price of censorship is the creation of an authority dependent population—where individuals are encouraged not to think for themselves, seeking to suppress any ideas that go against the grain.
Hate speech, for example, is easily dealt with when it is examined carefully, and any fallacious arguments are identified. Despite the volumes of psychological research seemingly supporting the idea that hate-speech suppression is effective, it doesn’t solve the problem, it just shields people from it. Censoring it prevents the very exposure that makes it less destructive to the individual by virtue of the fact one gains immunity through exposure.
In short, we all have an offense immune system, and it doesn’t get strong by sealing yourself off from the world.
Consider the case of Dyral Davis, who met with KKK members numerous times throughout his life, often brokering friendships and helping members to realize that racism isn’t the answer. How could Davis have done this if he only saw these people as “hate promoters?” He wouldn’t have. Davis chose not to indulge in victimhood, and instead, decided to offer compassion through exposure, giving him a tough skin that made him immune to hate-speech. In the end, he did far more for bridging the gap and healing the hate divide than all the censorship efforts in history combined (a claim I’m making here and now).
For the past 10 years or so, YouTube has been one of the places freethinkers and truth-seekers can go to find frank and honest opinions and ideas. But this time has now, apparently, come to an end.
For those with a zeal for awakening, we’ll need to find new places to get uncensored content, such as Bitchute, DailyMotion, or Medium, amongst a few alternatives.
Information is essential for the evolution of the individual and society. We who see this value would do well to work hard to ensure we have access to information, for ourselves and our children.
The good news is that more and more people, many who don’t consider themselves “awake” care deeply about censorship, and are taking a stand. We can unite with them to support our common values, even if we don’t agree on everything.
Buy Book Internet Censorship: Protecting Citizens or Trampling Freedom?
– Justin
(Kevin Roose and Kate Conger) Content “alleging that a group is superior in order to justify discrimination, segregation or exclusion,” and videos denying that violent incidents occurred will be removed, YouTube said Wednesday.CreditCreditDado Ruvic/Reuters
Related Beyond Censorship: Destroying Free Thought Online
by Kevin Roose and Kate Conger, June 5th, 2019
YouTube announced plans on Wednesday to remove thousands of videos and channels that advocate for neo-Nazism, white supremacy and other bigoted ideologies in an attempt to clean up extremism and hate speech on its popular service.
The new policy will ban “videos alleging that a group is superior in order to justify discrimination, segregation or exclusion,” the company said in a blog post. The prohibition will also cover videos denying that violent incidents, like the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut, took place.
YouTube did not name any specific channels or videos that would be banned.
“It’s our responsibility to protect that, and prevent our platform from being used to incite hatred, harassment, discrimination and violence,” the company said in the blog post.
The decision by YouTube, which is owned by Google, is the latest action by a Silicon Valley company to stem the spread of hate speech and disinformation on its site. A month ago, Facebook evicted seven of its most controversial users, including Alex Jones, the conspiracy theorist and founder of InfoWars. Twitter banned Mr. Jones last year.
The companies have come under intense criticism for their delayed reaction to the spread of hateful and false content. At the same time, President Trump and others argue that the giant tech platforms censor right-wing opinions, and the new policies put in place by the companies have inflamed those debates.
The tension was evident on Tuesday, when YouTube said that a prominent right-wing creator who used racial language and homophobic slurs to harass a journalist in videos on YouTube did not violate its policies. The decision set off a firestorm online, including accusations that YouTube was giving a free pass to some of its popular creators.
In the videos, that creator, Steven Crowder, a conservative commentator with nearly four million YouTube subscribers, repeatedly insulted Carlos Maza, a journalist from Vox. Mr. Crowder used slurs about Mr. Maza’s Cuban-American ethnicity and sexual orientation. Mr. Crowder said that his comments were harmless, and YouTube determined they did not break its rules.
“Opinions can be deeply offensive, but if they don’t violate our policies, they’ll remain on our site,” YouTube said in a statement about its decision on Mr. Crowder.
The back-to-back decisions illustrated a central theme that has defined the moderation struggles of social media companies: Making rules is often easier than enforcing them.
“This is an important and long-overdue change,” Becca Lewis, a research affiliate at the nonprofit organization Data & Society, said about the new policy. “However, YouTube has often executed its community guidelines unevenly, so it remains to be seen how effective these updates will be.”
YouTube’s scale — more than 500 hours of new videos are uploaded every minute — has made it difficult for the company to track rule violations. And the company’s historically lax approach to moderating extreme videos has led to a drumbeat of scandals, including accusations that the site has promoted disturbing videos to children and allowed extremist groups to organize on its platform. YouTube’s automated advertising system has paired offensive videos with ads from major corporations, prompting several advertisers to abandon the site.
The kind of content that will be prohibited under YouTube’s new hate speech policies includes videos that claim Jews secretly control the world, those that say women are intellectually inferior to men and therefore should be denied certain rights, or that suggest that the white race is superior to another race, a YouTube spokesman said.
Channels that post some hateful content, but that do not violate YouTube’s rules with the majority of their videos, may receive strikes under YouTube’s three-strike enforcement system, but would not be immediately banned.
The company also said that channels that “repeatedly brush up against our hate speech policies,” but don’t violate them outright, would be removed from YouTube’s advertising program, which allows channel owners to share in the advertising revenue their videos generate.
In addition to tightening its hate speech rules, YouTube announced it would also tweak its recommendation algorithm, the automated software that shows users videos based on their interests and past viewing habits. This algorithm is responsible for more than 70 percent of overall time spent on YouTube, and has been a major engine for the platform’s growth. But it has also drawn accusations of leading users down rabbit holes filled with extreme and divisive content, in an attempt to keep them watching and drive up the site’s usage numbers.
“If the hate and intolerance and supremacy is a match, then YouTube is lighter fluid,” said Rashad Robinson, president of the civil rights nonprofit Color of Change. “YouTube and other platforms have been quite slow to address the structure they’ve created to incentivize hate.”
In response to the criticism, YouTube announced in January that it would recommend fewer objectionable videos, such as those with 9/11 conspiracy theories and vaccine misinformation, a category it called “borderline content.” The YouTube spokesman said on Tuesday that the algorithm changes had resulted in a 50 percent drop in recommendations to such videos in the United States. He declined to share specific data about which videos YouTube considered “borderline.”
“Our systems are also getting smarter about what types of videos should get this treatment, and we’ll be able to apply it to even more borderline videos moving forward,” the company’s blog post said.
Other social media companies have faced criticism for allowing white supremacist content. Facebook recently banned a slew of accounts, including that of Paul Joseph Watson, a contributor to the conspiracy theory website Infowars, and Laura Loomer, a far-right activist. Twitter bans violent extremist groups but allows some of their members to maintain personal accounts — for instance, the Ku Klux Klan was banned from Twitter last August, while its former leader, David Duke, remains on the service. Twitter is currently studying whether the removal of content is effective in stemming the tide of radicalization online. A Twitter spokesman declined to comment on the study.
When Twitter banned the conspiracy theorist Alex Jones last year, Mr. Jones responded with a series of videos decrying the platform’s decision and drumming up donations from his supporters.
YouTube’s ban of white supremacists could prompt a similar cycle of outrage and grievance, said Joan Donovan, the director of the Technology and Social Change Research Project at Harvard. The ban, she said, “presents an opportunity for content creators to get a wave of media attention, so we may see some particularly disingenuous uploads.”
“I wonder to what degree will the removed content be amplified on different platforms, and get a second life?” Ms. Donovan added.
Watch Pre-Crime Documentary
Buy Folic Acid, USDA Certified & Vegetarian, Ultimate Prenatal Vitamin, 360 Tablets
Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?
Censorship of information is critically important for the Deep State to maintain their false reality paradigm, which is the foundation of the mind control system used to enslave the individual and society at large. The preceding information reveals one such method the powers that be are using to censor information. Properly understood, one can begin the process of liberating their mind from false conceptions of reality, particularly those incomplete bits of knowledge that if contemplated fully, would activate the truth-seeking urge and result in the development of mental autonomy—critical thinking and discernment skills.
– Justin
Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools.
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Send an email to [email protected], with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected]. Thank you for reading.
Source:
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/05/business/youtube-remove-extremist-videos.html
Leave a Reply