by Adam Riva,
In a time when corporate interests control politics, finance, scientific studies, and public health, is it that hard to believe that the interests of the American people are seldom taken into account when billions of dollars are on the line?
Few health-related topics come close to fluoridation in regard to colossal misconceptions, widespread public ignorance, and controversy – even in comparison to vaccinations or genetically modified foods (GMOs). Also alarming is the amount of censorship on social media when individuals try to spread awareness of the dangers of fluoride. Big Tech is without a doubt steering the conversation.
Perhaps the most serious side effect of fluoride is that it calcifies the pineal gland. We will discuss what this means and the breakthrough herbal supplement that can reverse this damage later in the article.
[the_ad id=”69864″]
Natural or Synthetic?
The word “fluoride” is actually just a generic “industry term” that usually refers to “fluoride products.” Fluoride products are manmade fluorine-based chemicals added to a municipal water supply. The 4 most common fluoride products are hydrofluorosilicic acid, sodium fluorosilicate, hexafluorosilicic acid, and perhaps the most well-known, sodium fluoride.
Sodium fluoride is the chemical byproduct of both superphosphate fertilizer production and aluminum and steel smelting. According to the EPA, sodium fluoride is a hazardous waste. Therefore, these industries must capture this byproduct using air scrubbers in smokestacks so it does not pollute the environment.
These fluoride products are very different from calcium fluoride. Calcium fluoride naturally occurs in the human body and in many wells and aquifers, and has been shown to play a role in strengthening bones and teeth.
Just to summarize: there are synthetic forms of fluoride and there is a naturally-occurring form of fluoride.
Buy Fluoride Filter
Fluoride is Everywhere
Public ignorance regarding fluoride is due to a massive public relations campaign spearheaded by a conglomeration including, but not limited to, the American Dental Association (ADA), the American Medical Association (AMA), the World Health Organization (WHO), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). These agencies are the key players in this deliberate disinformation campaign aimed at perpetuating a reckless multi-decade experiment.
Fluoride is added to many products, not just municipal water supplies. Fluoride is still used in modern dentistry, it is used in pesticides, fungicides, and other biocides, it is added to bottled drinking water by companies like Nestle (13 bottled water brands add fluoride as of 2008), and it is even allowed into children’s toothpaste. Some lesser known sources of fluoride include antibiotics, bottled juices, chewing gum, pharmaceuticals, household cleaning products, mattresses, milk, instant teas, mouthwash, tranquilizers, Teflon, Kleenex tissues, soda, air fresheners, and vaccines.
According to the ADA, “Over 405 million people in more than 60 countries worldwide enjoy the benefits of water fluoridation.” This amounts to several million tons added to the US water supply annually at approximately 9 gallons per minute in larger cities, according to some estimates.
How did an EPA-recognized hazardous material become widely used in treatment of tooth decay? According to the FDA’s grand dictum that only a drug can treat, prevent, or cure an illness, how can it knowingly allow the drugging of tap water where there is no ability to regulate individual dosages? How can they ensure that people of different ages and sizes do not overdose?
Buy Safe and Effective Air Purifier (Remove Toxin Mold and Breath Clean Air)
“Water Treatment” vs. “Water Drugging”
There are many chemicals added to the water supply. All of which, with the exception of fluoride, are added to “treat” the water itself. Fluoride, however, is added to prevent or treat tooth decay of those who drink the water.
This is a program of mass medication and technically should not be the responsibility of the CDC. So what does the FDA have to say? The FDA considers sodium fluoride an “Unapproved New Drug”, yet it has been added to the water supply to treat a medical condition for more than 50 years.
In the clinical studies cited by the CDC, the dosage is closely regulated, but when added to the water supply there is no way to assess how much people are consuming. Do we know the real effects of sodium fluoride over long periods of time in unregulated doses? Are new mothers mixing baby formula with fluoridated water? If so, have studies been done to assess the safety of this practice?
[the_ad id=”69008″]
Convoluted History
In 1939, Gerald J. Cox, a scientist employed by the American Aluminum Company (ALCOA), the world’s largest producer of sodium fluoride at the time, was tasked with finding a use for the chemical so that the company could turn a loss into a profit. After all, the handling and disposal of industrial hazardous materials is quite costly. Cox found a loose correlation in lab rats between fluoride and dental health. However, in reports as early as 1930 there were serious concerns about the chemical causing mottled tooth enamel. (This mottled enamel is a condition known as dental fluorosis in humans and it is widely accepted that this condition is a direct result of water fluoridation.)
Since that time, there have been countless independent studies that categorically disprove the industry-funded studies. For instance, a study conducted by Harvard University and published in the July 2012 Environmental Health Perspectives, a U.S. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Journal, showed that “children in high fluoride areas had significantly lower IQs than those who lived in low fluoride areas.” Other studies show links to cancer, infertility, docility, and calcification of the pineal gland.
In 2006, the US National Research Council released a 500 page review, which took 12 scientists more than 3 years to produce. The findings of this study challenges the EPA’s “safe” standard of 4ppm. The report documents health concerns from fluoride exposure such as bone damage, brain damage, and risk to the endocrine system. According to Dr. Bob Carton, a former risk assessment scientist at the EPA, this report “should be the center piece of every discussion on fluoridation. It changes everything.”
Buy Book Poison Spring: The Secret History of Pollution and the EPA
Fluoride Harms the Pineal Gland
The pineal gland (otherwise known as the “master gland” or the “third eye”) is a part of the brain that produces melatonin, regulates your sleep cycle, plays a role in nighttime dreams, and regulates other glands in the body.
Fluoride, heavy metals, pesticides, and other toxins in our food supply, tap water, and the air we breathe have all adversely affected the pineal gland. In response to this attack, the pineal gland forms a calcium shell in order to protect itself. This inhibits blood flow to the pineal and eventually inhibits its function. Children as young as 5 have been shown to have calcified pineal glands.
Two of the most common dietary and environmental risk factors that affect the pineal gland are:
• Halides – fluoride, chloride, bromide, etc.
• Atrazine & Glyphosate – most commonly used pesticides
Symptoms Of Pineal Gland Calcification
• Disregulation of sleep cycle
• Inability to sleep or dream
• Disregulation of growth hormones
• Disregulation of endocrine system
• Disregulation of the adrenal response
The Solution
It is a common misconception that avoiding fluoride in your drinking water is enough to protect the pineal gland. Since the pineal gland lies outside the blood brain barrier, it is susceptible to any and all heavy metals that are found in our water, our food, and the air that we breath.
Thankfully, a company has finally developed the breakthrough herbal supplement that helps to support the function of the pineal gland and reverse the damage of fluoride. “Third Eye” is a myco-herbal blend that can be used by everyone and anyone looking to decalcify their pineal gland or regulate their sleep cycle.
[the_ad id=”75789″]
Properties Of Third Eye
Third eye is a collection of safe, yet powerful herbs and mushrooms that is quite versatile and covers many areas such as:
• Brain health
• Heart health
• Lung health
• Endocrine support
• Immune support
• DNA repair
• Heavy metal detoxification
• Combats inflammation
[the_ad id=”75788″]
Sources:
www.dauntlessdialogue.com/10-
Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?
The Deep State has weaponized healthcare in the sense that most people never learn the true methods of maintaining their health. The preceding information dispels this false reality that an individual cannot be healthy without the mainstream medical establishment. It offers information that the reader can use to make better choices, which are ultimately the primary contributors to an individual’s health estate. With health autonomy in hand, neuroticism decreases due to not fearing for the communication of diseases, resulting in the liberation of consciousness-energy that can be used to positively contribute to making the world a better place.
– Justin
Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools.
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Send an email to [email protected], with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected]. Thank you for reading.
Source:
Embedded Throughout the Article
Justin – while SITS isn’t the first to run paid advertorials, it’s disappointing they aren’t labeled as such and doubly so given the likelihood you receive a percentage of each bottle sold via the link with the SITS discount at the end of the ad.
It feels squicky, and somewhat dishonest, upon discovering I’ve been misled into reading a sales pitch rather than an actual article.
Given the addition a while back of your thoughts on why you’ve chosen to reblog something, it would be beneficial to include a brief snippet at the beginning of paid advertorials, such as this, informing readers of the fact the piece they’re about to read is, in fact, an ad for the product linked at the end rather than the misleading “breakthrough supplement” headline.
Other ads on the page note they’re “promoted content” so why isn’t the main ad given the same notation?
Come on. It’s an excellent, factual read. That a product is the central feature of the story is featured in the headline. Why so sensitive to being introduced to a solution in this way? “Thou dost protesteth too much” methinks. Calcified pineal gland,.perhaps?
Sound respond LG. Thanks.
Melissa. I understand your concern. We do label all promo content with the tag “SITS PROMO”. This label is at the bottom of the articles. But we don’t post it in the headline or at the top because most people completely ignore it as soon as they see it’s promotional. Sadly, a great many people miss out for this reason.
Its not misleading to label it a breakthrough because it is a breakthrough. That said, I specifically chose headlines that are enticing to encourage the reader to read. Ideally, I’d love to live in a world where the substance of an article could be listed in the headline. But the reality is most people won’t read past the headline unless you make it enticing.
My mission on Stillness is to share information for the evolution of consciousness, and this often involves using ethical persuasion techniques, of which, the methods used in this article are in alignment with that. I’d be happy to dial-in on any specific rebuttals you have in this regard.
If content is entirely promotional, we’ll label it as such. But I specifically chose a campaign that was educational as a the primary focus, with suggested product links.
Cheers
Fantastic article. I am skittish about sharing this before reading all the sources, but I really liked it and will be educating myself further.
I really wish there was some evidence for the “reverse the damage of fluoride” claim about the Third eye product.