Hi Ben,
I’m a follower of your work with the Dragon families and even administer a group on Facebook dedicated to your weekly updates along with the fight against the cabal. I have a concern, however. You appear to be sounding increasingly prejudiced toward the LGBT community (and you have many people who support you from within that community, many of whom are GOOD people.)
So my question is: are you homophobic? I have noticed you often speak about people of this community as if we’re a product used to depopulate the world rather than actual Human Beings! As a note about the mention of “promoting homosexuality,” there is a difference between promoting and actually educating people to lower stigma ALONG with giving people of such equal rights to everyone else.
Also, please stop placing the subject of paedophilia directly after speaking about homosexuality. It appears a calculated move which anyone with half an education knows paedophilia is in no way related or similar to homosexuality.
I would like to hear your response in these regards/concerns.
Yours sincerely,
DU
Hi D,
First of all, let me say up front, I am not homophobic and furthermore, I have personally had, and enjoyed, same-sex experiences.
My problem is not with the LGTB community and people wanting to live alternative lifestyles. They deserve to be treated as a normal part of the social spectrum and given the same rights as others.
My problem, in the case of Canada and many other countries, is that alternative lifestyles like polygamy that produce lots of children are criminally punished, while all forms of sex that do not produce children (masturbation, prostitution, homosexuality, etc.) are actively promoted. Yes, this same Canada whose Prime Minister is actively promoting homosexuality is criminally punishing people who practice polygamy. This is true in other countries as well.
The other problem is the historical practice of simultaneously promoting and prohibiting homosexuality in organizations like the U.S. military and the Catholic Church. In the U.S. military, Nazi groups affiliated with the Bush clan, for example, forced people to have homosexual experiences in order to be promoted and then used the threat of exposure of these experiences to blackmail the same people into obedience or else face court-martial. The U.S. military put an end to this by ending the ban of same-sex love, which was what I recommended they do.
The Catholic Church needs to do the same thing, but so far, they refuse.
In Canada, during the Cold War, there was an interior decorator working in the Department of External Affairs who was suspected of being homosexual by the Security Department. They worried that he would be blackmailed by the Soviets because of this. For this reason, they confronted him and asked him if he was homosexual. He said, “Of course I am.” Since he was open about it, they decided he could not be blackmailed and so was not a security risk and let him be.
In the UK, former Prime Minister Edward Heath was filmed by the Soviets having sex in a London hotel room with a 14-year-old boy. He was blackmailed by this and as a result, signed over British sovereignty to the Communist EU. That was a security risk.
A big issue that still needs to be addressed is the whole issue of older men having sex with teenage boys, a widespread but highly taboo practice. In many cases, older men use a position of power to sexually abuse young boys. In other cases, it is completely consensual. Society needs to openly discuss this and figure out what sort of stance to take on this issue.
—BF
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Send an email to [email protected], with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected]. Thank you for reading.
Source:
https://benjaminfulford.net/2018/09/01/stance-on-alternative-lifestyles/
What a true and honest answer from Ben, humanity can never to shed their skin (unconsciousness) if we refuse to embrace the entirety, as judgement is the main reason that keeps us from achieving full consciousness . I believe we have to allow and be open about our sexual or other seemingly negative aspects which turns into a taboo and be used as a tool or to imprison our consciousness.
I appreciate the honesty of Ben Fulford, but if you are implying that Heath having sex with a fourteen year old is consensual, you are absolutely off your rocker. You and Ruth Ginzburg are additional anomalies I do not care for.
Whoa… the nitpicking dualistic judgemental nature of this question to Ben is just that. Surprised it was given this important post space (or maybe it was due to Ben s great addressing of it,
From a female-
Consciousness is not emotional gratification, it is a state that allows all experiences. The Soul carries the emotional charge via ‘memory’ and thus allow the human to bring forth manifestation into ‘mass’.
the Spirit-Primary Consciousness/Source has no judgement or emotional charge- merely Observation. Observer theory- the Observer creates the quantum reaction.
Thus- alternative lifestyle is a human conscription that subsumes identity or choice of separation or oneness. One or the other.
Just BE.
Does it matter if homosexuality is propagated to reduce human population? Its all an illusion.
Its the pendulum swinging the other way from polygamy, Religious fervor to propagate for God etc. Is one way more correct than the other? I would offer its all a social conscious turn of the Wheel of Samsara and program. the sooner we get off the quicker we evolve.
Let’s get rid of the dogma- whether religious, political or social and let humanity evolve naturally rather than artificially.
Don’t pretend to follow the whole argument, but I do like the conclusion. If we exist as Soul on Earth to learn about love and to have every kind of experience in one or more of countless incarnations, any form of judgement of others would seem to be a form of hypocrisy. Discrimination is needed as we make our own choices and exploitation of power over others is clearly, imo, wrong, but that’s just a distillation of my own accumulated experiences. The rest, they say, is karma.