Updated 3.29.2014 9:33pm: I have been getting a lot of questions about how these documents are supposed to be used. See this post How to Defeat Admiralty Courts And the Law of the (Holy) See – by Judge Dale for a detailed explanation of what the 12 presumptions are. Heather’s documents help remove any Tacitusly Procured consent and rebut the 12 Presumptions.
The only presumption I am not sure of is Presumption of Public Record, which usually requires filling a statement of Non Consent or Refusal to Contract on the Public Record section of the News Paper.
– Justin
By Heather Ann Tucci-Jarraf, originally published on http://heatheranntuccijarraf.info
I AM EXPERIENCING AND EXPANDING I AM:
Former Systems, thank you for your service to I AM so that I AM could experience not BE’ing I AM.
WHO claimed I AM “Lost at sea”? WHO claimed I AM a “thing” to “salvage”? WHO do you think could have possibly created and implemented a series of systems that could effectively limit I AM and “hide it in plain sight”…hhhmmmm?…and, better yet, hide the KEYS to undo it all… “in plain sight”? LOL! WHO do you sense donned the roles and costumes… in every perceived reality… knowing, yet still choosing to play them out?WHO do you imagine is inforcing the BE’ing and DO’ing I AM? Love, WHO do you sense the “former systems” is? WHO do you sense is “undoing” those “former systems”?
I AM ALL THAT IS. All is perfect and perfectly done…by all the inbodyments I AM. The “former systems”, in all its guises, shapes and forms since the beginning IS I AM experiencing “not being I AM”…in particular frequency, and that has completed the service intended, willed and worded by I AM. The allusion has successfully served its purpose. NOW ALL I AM IS VISIBLE! I AM TRANSPARENT IN FORCE AND DO’ING THE WILL AND THE WORD I AM! ~ I AM
All the perceived “hard work” is DONE! The KEYS “hidden in plain sight” within the “former systems” by I AM, for this NOW moment:
~ I AM
~ WITHOUT PREJUDICE
~ WITHOUT PREJUDICE
….it is that simple 
=98….I AM takes care of “the rest”…all ways, always. ~ I AM
=98….I AM takes care of “the rest”…all ways, always. ~ I AM
I AM: The “former systems” I AM were pre-frequencied by I AM to respond to The Will and The Word of I AM and the original currency I AM~ I AM
Download DECLARATION WILL AND WORD OF IAM-HATJ click here
Download DECLARATION OF DEPOSITORY DEPOSIT-HATJ click here
Download DECLARATION OF RECEIPT-General click here
Download DECLARATION OF RECEIPT-General PDF click here
Download DECLARATION OF PROJECTION-BA click here
Download DECLARATION OF PROJECTION-BA click here
Download DECLARATION OF PROJECTION-apa_Gnosis_Multi click here
Download DECLARATION OF PROJECTION-apa_Gnosis_Multi PDF click here
Download DECLARATION-OF-APPLICATION-OF-I-AM_BA_cps click here
Download DECLARATION-OF-APPLICATION-OF-I-AM_BA_cps PDF click here
AND…
Download DECLARATION-OF-PRIVATE-ACT-OF-I-AM_perfect-obligation-of-I-AM click here
Download DECLARATION-OF-PRIVATE-ACT-OF-I-AM_perfect-obligation-of-I-AM PDF click here
DO you recognize each of the “former system” functions reconciled in pure love within the above I AM Documents…? In pure love and original currency…I AM. Wait ’till you see the affect…LOL!!!
If ONE has identified Value within numerous depositories, and decides to transfer or reconfigure the identified Value within ONE’s own depositories…are functions of the “former systems” even applicable? …hhhhhmmmmmmm? =98
=98
WITHOUT PREJUDICE: The “former systems” I AM were pre-frequencied by I AM to respond to
the signature of I AM without prejudice ~ I AM
Howard Freeman did a beautiful explanation of ”without prejudice” during the era of the UCC: “When you see ‘Without Prejudice’ UCC 1-308 in connection with your signature, you are saying: ‘I reserve my right not to be compelled to perform under any contract, commercial agreement or bankruptcy that I did not enter knowingly , voluntarily , and intentionally . And furthermore, I do not and will not accept the liability of the compelled benefit of any unrevealed contract or commercial agreement or bankruptcy.’” ~ absolute context can be found here. (Oh my gosh! I am getting so much better at this website thing!!! I just did like Dani does!!! Btw, Love, did you know that “Ego” is Latin for I AM?….Seriously! Tee hee! Ok…focus now!)
The numerous investigations of the “former systems” done around the globe are filled with many funny, and not funny, stories of the “without prejudice”. As I was wrapping up the last case of the investigations and readying to go to Morocco and then on to Europe, a sheriff put his hand on his gun hoping it would stop me or influence me not to write my signature “without prejudice Heather Ann Tucci-Jarraf”….I signed with my signature while explaining to the (court bailiff), Audrey, and the judge that a signature is mark or writing I intend to use to authenticate the document….the next (court hearing) the sheriff was not present and Audrey handed me the document and told me to sign any way that I chose….I giggled and asked her “so someone talked to you about that law? I notice the sheriff and his gun aren’t here…” She giggled and winked. (I AM gives a “shout out” to Jack Nevin and the boys at the Pentagon! I loved DO’ing the Absolute Plan!!)
For more absolute context, you can read here or here, or better yet….”google it!” (See Dani! I did it again! LOL!!): “Signatures also form the legal basis of negotiable instruments. Section 3-401(2) of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) provides that “[n]o person is liable on an instrument unless his signature appears thereon.” The UCC defines the term signature as any name, Trade Name, assumed name, word, or other identifying mark used in lieu of a signature (§ 3-401(2)). The term signed is defined by the UCC as any symbol executed or adopted by a party with the “present intention of authenticating a writing” (§ 1-201(39)). Thus, commercial instruments, such as checks and promissory notes, may be signed by affixing any symbol that an individual intends to represent his signature. Consequently, courts will enforce commercial contracts signed with an X without regard to an individual’s mental or physical ability to sign her full name, though mental or physical incapacity may be relevant if a particular contract is alleged to be the product of overreaching, Undue Influence, or coercion.”
NOW, in the era of IS, I AM without prejudice, gets real fun: Regardless of any particular inbodyment’s “reaction” to an inbodyment of I AM signing “without prejudice, I AM, [enter given name]“, I AM does the rest….and all the inbodyments I AM, visibly know and experience I AM, in absolute context. For the Apa Gnosis example in the I AM Documents, above, we also lawfully and intentionally created an application for using the “former system” bank application, without prejudice, for devices (The Value is I AM, BE’ing and DO’ing…and devices can be used in that BE’ing and DO’ing for as long as devices exist….but they are only devices. All devices, regardless of the identity of the device is always 1 unit…10,000USD is 10,000 units of device, 10,000Euro is 10,000 units of another device, 10,000Yen is 10,000 units of yet another device, and so on…).
Source:
http://i-uv.com/heather-ann-tucci-jarraf-i-am-without-prejudice/
I'm assuming that these documents are created to once again present them to the banks, (who previously refused to play along and give us our rightful value) to try once again to see if they'll consider these new and improved documents and will be persuasive enough to change the bankers minds/perceptions of what value is and that we all have an unlimited amount waiting to be unleashed? I'm certain you'll all forgive me if I choose not to hold my breath on this again.
But by all means though, please go right ahead and try them out on some bankers, if it'll make you feel better. Heather did a great job on them and they really look complete and professional and it looks as thought they took her a lot of time and work to get all that finished. The cabal may seem down and out to many who have claimed as much, but do not doubt their resolve and bitterness to win at any cost. The cabal can outlast us all because they've been accumulating our value for centuries and seeing as we still need that "redundant" money/currency to pay a bill or fill a tummy they still have us by the short hairs and so now expect them to start pulling on them really, really hard. They have everything to gain and nothing to lose by yanking us into oblivion.
Thanks, Joe. My thoughts exactly. She's been saying that the cabal has been foreclosed upon for nearly two years now, and they don't seem to be in on this information or seem to care one bit.
I don't think these documents are necessarily for banking (right now) they are more for existing Alleged judicial cases and Alleged debt since the systems seems to be ignoring the filings. I have studied the docs since their arrival and they are perfect in every way and should be effective, BUT the same ole problem exists of corrupt judges and attorneys (No one to stop them) that will not act in honor and may render the docs useless. I entered the Will and Word, DODD, 2 of the declaration of rejections and the Praecipes into my current court case so I will see first hand.
I'd be interested in seeing what kind of results you have. Here in Canada, our courts passed a "legal law" that allows the judge to ignore any evidence brought forth by the plaintiff that may show criminal or fraudulent actions on the behalf of a bank in a foreclosure case, (Deryl Zeleny was kind enough to show us that was true), so we have what is known a "rubber stamp" method for foreclosures in Canada. The banks have our judicial courts in their back pockets and it continues to be so to this day.
Yes Please let us know, I think your assessment of the documents usage is spot on. they are not for depositing value or walking into banks, they are for dispelling tacitusly procured consent by your person in the fraudulent system. I am curious to see if the presumption of private court will be dispelled, as this normally requires posting a statement of non-consent or recession on the public record with copy of the original offer to contract.
edit; I am also a little disappointed that Heather did not offer brief explanations on the use of the docs such as the filing process with the court, if there are time limitations, etc…
I have done extensive research for answers and they are hard to find.
Just keep signing "without prejudice" along with your signature when or if you decide to sign anything at all in a court of "injustice" friend.
UPDATE from Anonymous above: I just found out a default judgement was entered on me for credit card default. The only DOCS I filed with the court was Heathers DODD, I AM, Declaration of Rejection for Summons, and the Praecipes.
I did not show up for the court because I had ordered the clerk to enter the praecipes, apparently she did not. An explanation of the processes sure would be welcomed. I searched and searched for those answers on line and found none.
See this post here, it details the 12 presumptions, which are mostly dispelled by heathers doc.s The only one I am not sure of is the presumption of Private Court, which normally requires filling a statement of non consent on the public record.
http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/2014/03/how-to-defeat-admiralty-courts-and-law.html
let me know if this helps!
Thank You for responding Justin. Heather's docs address the 12 presumption beautifully! She did a great job on them. I have at an earlier date viewed the post you list above, it is nice and helpful. I did not know how to do the Pracipes. I didn't know if the Clerk was to go at them time I presented them and have the judge render the decision then or if they were just to be entered on the case. The Clerk did not take them to the judge, she threw them in the file and the rest is history. I am seriously considering hiring an attorney to open the case back up and take care of it, I also know where that will probably go since he/she will not be working for me. Anyway, Thanks again Justin. Kim Phillips