(Stillness in the Storm Editor) The following article exposes an attempt by YouTube to control content on their platform, specifically how they can limit “alt-right” content from spreading, and how they can’t stop paying content creators who produce content the it deems unsavory. Keep in mind, the alt-right is a term that means different things to different people. Some consider the alt-right to be racists who have ethno-nationalist agendas, like Nazism. Others deem that anyone not supporting the globalist agenda is alt-right. Translation: anyone going against the Deep State could be labeled alt-right. To the unaware, once you’re labeled alt-right, you’re now a Nazi, a bigot, a misogynist, and a climate change denier—essentially someone the state encourages you to hate. Don’t fall for this divide and conquer tactic. This information is important to understand how the mind wars of information control work on our world.
– Justin
(Zero Hedge) According to a lengthy investigation by Bloomberg on Google’s struggle to maximize profit while addressing calls to censor ‘toxic’ material, a rogue employee decided to ignore the advice of corporate attorneys and created a new “vertical” category to internally track so-called “alt-right” content – described as “the political ensemble loosely tied to Trump.”
Related Beyond Censorship: Destroying Free Thought Online
by Staff Writer, April 3rd, 2019
What they found was fascinating; alt-right videos are an absolute monster category for the video-hosting platform, right up with “music, sports and gaming” as the most popular.
One telling moment happened around early 2018, according to two people familiar with it. An employee decided to create a new YouTube “vertical,” a category that the company uses to group its mountain of video footage. This person gathered together videos under an imagined vertical for the “alt-right,” the political ensemble loosely tied to Trump. Based on engagement, the hypothetical alt-right category sat with music, sports and gaming as the most popular channels at YouTube, an attempt to show how critical these videos were to YouTube’s business. –Bloomberg
Three days after the 2016 US election, YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki and her staff convened for their weekly meeting, where one employee “fretted aloud about the site’s election-related videos that were watched the most,” as they were “dominated by publishers like Breitbart News and Infowars, which were known for outrage and provocation.”
Obviously providing a watering hole for conservatives – which Bloomberg and Google can’t help but associate with ‘toxic’ content – is highly profitable. On social media platform Reddit, pro-Trump forum “The_Donald” is roughly the 264th largest “subreddit” by size, while ranked #3 in terms of user activity on the site, according to “redditlist.”
YouTube, meanwhile, has been trying to figure out how to properly pay content “creators” who were growing frustrated over the pay structure. To meet the challenge, the company would pitch an overhaul of their entire business model which would revolve around “engagement” – how many people watched a video, and for how long. They called it “Project Bean.”
Wojcicki and her lieutenants drew up a plan. YouTube called it Project Bean or, at times, “Boil The Ocean,” to indicate the enormity of the task. (Sometimes they called it BTO3 – a third dramatic overhaul for YouTube, after initiatives to boost mobile viewing and subscriptions.) The plan was to rewrite YouTube’s entire business model, according to three former senior staffers who worked on it.
It centered on a way to pay creators that isn’t based on the ads their videos hosted.Instead, YouTube would pay on engagement—how many viewers watched a video and how long they watched. A special algorithm would pool incoming cash, then divvy it out to creators, even if no ads ran on their videos. The idea was to reward video stars shorted by the system, such as those making sex education and music videos, which marquee advertisers found too risqué to endorse. –Bloomberg
Watch Pre-Crime Documentary
YouTube’s ambitious overhaul had some unintended consequences; by rewarding videos that achieved popularity by outrage – someone like Alex Jones would become one of YouTube’s highest paid stars.
Ultimately, Google CEO Sundar Pichai ditched project bean because “he felt it could make the filter bubble problem worse,” according to Bloomberg.
More highlights from the investigation:
- Susan Wojcicki and other YouTube executives were either unable or unwilling to act on internal warnings about extreme and misleading videos because they were too focused on increasing viewing time and other measures of engagement. Wojcicki would “never put her fingers on the scale,” according to one person who worked for her.
- When Wojcicki took over YouTube in 2014, she embraced a target of one billion hours of daily watch time. The service hit that goal in October 2016.
- A privacy engineer at Google suggested to YouTube’s policy chief that videos deemed “close to the line” of the takedown policy should be removed from recommendations. The proposal was turned down and YouTube doubled down on an AI-powered strategy to use recommendations to keep people watching.
- YouTube recently replaced engagement with “responsible growth” as its core metric. But the company has yet to explain publicly what that metric entails and how it will affect its business.
- YouTube dissuaded staff from being proactive. Lawyers advised employees not assigned to handle moderation to avoid searching on their own for questionable videos.
- Exclusive data from Moonshot CVE, a London research firm, shows that less than 20 YouTube channels pushing anti-vaccination theories built an audience of more than 170 million people over a decade. YouTube recommended those viewers more conspiracies in the last year.
Buy Book Masters of Deception: Escher, Dalí & the Artists of Optical Illusion
Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?
Censorship of information is critically important for the Deep State to maintain their false reality paradigm, which is the foundation of the mind control system used to enslave the individual and society at large. The preceding article reveals one such method the powers that be are using to censor information. Properly understood, one can begin the process of liberating their mind from false conceptions of reality, particularly those incomplete bits of knowledge that if contemplated fully, would activate the truth-seeking urge and result in the development of mental autonomy—critical thinking and discernment skills.
– Justin
Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools.
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Send an email to [email protected], with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected]. Thank you for reading.
Source:
Leave a Reply