(Ethan Huff) A family in Arizona is having to endure the wrath of the medical police state after a doctor decided to call the Department of Child Safety (DCS) on them for not vaccinating their children – resulting in an armed SWAT team raiding the family’s home and violently seizing their three children, all of whom were placed in temporary foster homes.
Related Why the Global Elite Avoid Vaccinations (And You Should Too)
by Ethan Huff, March 29th, 2019
It all started when one of the children, a two-year-old, developed a fever that exceeded 100 degrees Fahrenheit, prompting the child’s mother to take him to see the doctor in question. Because the child hadn’t been vaccinated, the doctor assumed out of nowhere that he probably had meningitis and needed to be taken to the emergency room right away.
While the mother initially agreed to the doctor’s extreme and unusual recommendation, her child’s fever broke not long after leaving the doctor’s office, having stated that he was “laughing and playing with his siblings” like normal. After taking the boy’s temperature and seeing that it was now normal, the mother called the doctor and said she would no longer be taking him to the emergency room, to which the doctor responded that she should still go anyway.
The mother verbally agreed to this, though she didn’t end up going to the emergency room after all. But because the doctor had previously notified the hospital, for some unknown reason, that a mother would be coming in with her child, she later received a call from said hospital explaining that mother and child never actually arrived – and that’s when the insanity began.
Unless parents fight back, the state will continue to assume custody over as many children as it can get its hands on
Upset that the mother didn’t follow the doctor’s recommendation, the doctor immediately called DCS, which then called local police to have them “check” on the family – which is similar to what happened to a Michigan mother who refused to give her daughter antipsychotic medications based on doctor recommendations. Two police officers arrived at the home and claim they knocked on the family’s door and received no response.
Officers further claimed they heard someone “coughing” inside, before being approached by a neighbor who, after being told what was going on, responded to say that the person they were looking for “was a good mother.”
The officers asked the neighbor to call the mother, which she did, and during this time a DCS case worker arrived, who updated the police on the status of the child, which no longer had a fever. One of the officers then called the doctor, who once again repeated her recommendation that the mother take the child to hospital.
At this point in time, the case worker reportedly informed officers that DCS was planning to obtain a “temporary custody notice” from a judge to remove the child in question from the home for “emergency medical aid.”
Buy Book Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and The Forgotten History by Dr. Suzanne Humphries
A court order was later issued, and the police officers decided that, if the family didn’t respond to their knocking, which was after midnight at this point, then they were going to engage in “forced entry” of the premises. At around 1 am, officers busted down the family’s door, one with a shield in hand and the other outfit in “lethal coverage,” and proceeded to remove all of the children from their parents’ custody.
The children were quickly placed in separate foster homes, and 10 days later the case went to court – and all the while DCS was doing everything it possibly could to make the situation as difficult as possible for the family.
Despite arguments from the family’s lawyer that they did what they believed to be the best thing for the child who had the fever, the judge ultimately sided with the state and DCS, telling the parents that they needed to “remember” that the state had a “family-reunification plan” in place, whatever that means.
“The children’s grandparents are undergoing a DCS review, and hope to be permitted to temporarily shelter the kids once that’s approved,” writes Lenore Skenazy for Metro Voice News about the case. “But there’s no telling how long it will be before the kids can just go home to mom and dad.”
Buy Book Police State: How America’s Cops Get Away with Murder
Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?
A police state is a term describing an enforcement institution designed to protect an autocratic government—the Deep State. Such organizations employ the color of the law as opposed to the rule of law to justify their actions. In such cases, the people suffer injustice as a matter of everyday life, so much so, that most assume it’s simply a part of modern society. The preceding information reveals some aspect of the existing police state. This information is vitally important to understand so as to dispel the false reality of color of law justice pushed by the Deep State. The problem being, most people don’t understand the true rule of law, real justice, and proper jurisprudence. As such, they succumb to groupthink mass mind control, turning a blind eye to injustice, or worse, openly using these unethical institutions to their selfish advantage. But accepting the reality of injustice often activates the justice-seeking urge deep within the human heart. Once done, such justice-led individuals can begin their training in law, rights, and jurisprudence, eventually becoming defenders of the realm in their own right, capable of acting against the Deep State and it’s minions who operate the Police State.
– Justin
Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools.
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Send an email to [email protected], with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected]. Thank you for reading.
Source:
I live next door to Chandler, so this one hits close to home.
I’m trying to figure out what happened here, and all I can say after some careful research is that it is unclear.
A local news station interview of the parents does not raise any red flags for me. But there is conflicting info that makes this hard to have a clear understanding.
1. A naturalpath saw the child first, and found temp to be 105. That is very very dangerous. Immediate attention should be given a child if: A fever over 105 rectally, 103 armpit, 104 orally. This fits the bill for immediate attention. If I were that naturalpath, that child would not have left my office without being in the care of an ambulance crew. Observing the child for 1/2 hour or so, and taking multiple temps, with two different thermometers would have been wise. Did the doc do that? Did the doc make a mistake in taking the temp? Was it ever actually 105?
2. Assuming the initial measurement was correct, without knowing the underlying cause for a 105 temp, just hearing from mom later that it had gone down would not be enough for me to feel mom was doing all she needed to do. Something pretty bad caused that 105, and there was no reason an hour later to believe that that underlying cause was gone. Kids do not get to 105 with a typical flu or cold.
3. It is unclear if the naturalpath or the hospital called DCS, but one article says it’s the naturalpath, who most definitely would not be discriminating against the parents due to lack of vaccinations.
4. The hospital is a little bit on the hook for taking care of the child. Especially since the naturalpath is not regarded by traditional allopathic medicine types as being a “real” doc. So given that they had to assume the 105 temp was correct, their response to call DCS was probably correct when they did not see the child.
5. There has been no news of the child actually having been treated by the hospital later for something severe such as meningitis. I think, therefore, that the naturalpath might have made a mistake and the temp was never 105, but that we will never know. If the mom made a correct measurement later when she said she found it to be 102, that would support the idea that the 105 reading was in error. However, if the parents, as would seem to be the case by their using a naturalpath instead of an MD, did indeed distrust medicine, why would they bring the child to a doc if things were not pretty bad for the child. They have several kids. They’ve seen a lot of sickness – all parents of 3 kids do. So it seems there is conflicting evidence for what likely happened.
6. There’s really no evidence to suggest that DCS made the decision they did because of a lack of vaccinations, (I personally am very biased against vaccines and anything to do with big Pharma, so I’m not in any way defending those who promote vaccines). They arrived at the home and knew two things, that a 105 had been reported by a health care professional, and that the parents were not letting them or police talk to the child and observe the child.
7. Chandler PD tried for a long time to talk to the parents, who refused to come to the door. Remember, from police perspective a doc had called this in to DCS. They should be very concerned as the only things they know for sure is that, and the two points in (6.) above. They were worried for the child, and, they had good cause.
8. Dad told the police via phone the child’s temp was down and he was doing better. Maybe he was. My feeling is he probably was. But police had an obligation to give the information they had from a doc, DCS, and the hospital a higher weight in assessing the situation.
9. Chandler PD breached the home in what looks like, to me, an appropriate manner. The number one way that cops get killed is entering homes in domestic issues, so a shield and kevlar protection was absolutely called for. This was not, however, a SWAT operation. They have not released the video from inside the home so it’s hard to say how bad the home was inside.
9. I’ve seen some comments on the local news station article that suggests someone with inside knowledge reported that the home was very dirty and it gave the police reason to think the parents might have been neglectful. Perhaps, but, this is unsubstantiated. Apparently both the police and the father agree there was an unlocked shotgun in their bedroom. Father says its inert. But if so, you gotta be some kind of dumb to have it out at all, as you make yourself a target of anyone that does have a gun that works, if you aim it at someone. Does not make sense. Just really dumb. Why did he have it out? Because the cops were at his door? That’s a really bad thing. Or because he always leaves it there next to his bed? That’s bad too, because there’s 3 kids in the house. Even if it does not work. It’s still really dumb. Really, really dumb.
10. I’ve seen one claim the parents were charged for child abuse, another saying they were not.
11. The judge in this case has seen the video of the inside of the home. The judge did not allow the kids to be returned to the parents as of this date.
This looks to me like a serious distrust of authority by the parents, along with the doc most likely making a mistake recording a 105, and some very unwise choices by the parents.. I have reason to suspect that the DCS and judicial system is highly infiltrated by deep state pedos, so I would not rule out the possibility that they are just trying to get more kids into foster homes that are well-known for many being a channel for the pedos. This is, after all, the land of John McCain, an offender right up there with the Clintons on that score. However, lacking real evidence this is the case, it would be grossly unfair to those involved to assume that is true here. From what I have been able to learn, it is pretty unlikely that lack of vaccinations had anything to do with it. It seems pretty clear the father is not a smart person, and made some really bad judgements. But should that, and a dirty house, be sufficient reason to take their kids? Perhaps more of the true story will come out. But from what I can see so far, it’s difficult to know what really happened. Certainly the headline of this article is inappropriate in that lack of a vaccinations probably had little to do with it, and it was not a SWAT operation.
Steve.