Stillness in the Storm

An Agent for Consciousness Evolution

Implanting False Memories is Real, says Psychologist | A ‘Memory Hacker’ Explains How to Plant False Memories in People’s Minds

By Leave a Comment

Spread the love
Image Source.

(Stillness in the Storm Editor) Is it possible to manufacture memories or distort existing ones so that they no longer reflect reality? The criminal psychologist, Julia Shaw, says yes; and it is a lot easier than one might think. She also says false memories can be implanted with such ease that criminal investigators might do so without realizing it. This implies that any type of memory recall work could produce the same distorting effect unless a careful, non-suggestive process is used. 

Within certain fields of research, especially whistleblower testimony, memories are often the only thing available to lend credence to a claim. But if memories can be so easily implanted or distorted, how much of what has emerged in the fields of Ufology, for example, can be accepted as fact?

This is one point that truth-seekers should take seriously. And while we need not dismiss information purely because of the potential for distortion or fabrication, we cannot reject the possibility either. A healthy amount of doubt is always advisable. 

From a psychological point of view, an imagined or fabricated memory and a real one are essentially equivalent except that one is based on real events. The more time that passes and the frequency with which a memory is recalled increases the likelihood that distortions can take place, especially if there are underlying traumas that mask historical events. Emotional residue also seems to be a factor, according to research. The biases of the conscious mind in its desire to recall memory in a favorable fashion influences what is recollected. The conscious mind tends to remember things the way it wants—but not in all cases. 

However, there is a way to bypass the conscious mind’s tendency to distort memory. 

Regression therapies employ different hypnotic techniques wherein a subject is placed in a trance and a therapist extracts memories, which in some cases, the conscious mind never had access to. It is well established that the subconscious and unconscious mind has the capacity to store an enormous amount of data, whereas the conscious mind tends to remember things through the lens of personal desires, whims, and emotional states. Incredible details about an event can be precisely recalled using these techniques, but it is also quite easy to manipulate memories if not carefully done. 

One particular field of research that is gaining popularity in the alternative media are MILABs or Military Abductions. Victims are taken by secret programs, used for a ranging number of purposes and then their memories are wiped and often replaced with what are called screen-memories—false memories specifically designed to prevent recall of what really took place. 

All of this suggests that for those investigating the claims of insiders, abductee’s, extraterrestrial contactees and so on, the recognition that memory distortion can occur should not be overlooked. Since memory distortion or fabrication like what is described below occurs at a subconscious level, normal means of lie detection cannot be used to detect if a witnesses testimony is invalid. 

Within fields of research that rely chiefly on anecdotal evidence there tends to exist divergences of testimony collected from witnesses, which could be explained by memory distortion or false memory implantation. This reality would not invalidate claims, merely broaden the scope of investigation and would ideally incorporate hypnotic methods performed by skilled practitioners. 

– Justin

Source – Motherboard 

by Kate Lunau, September 14th 2016

We tend to think of memories as perfect little time capsules—important records of past events that matter to us and made us who we are, as unchangeable as a dragonfly stuck in amber. Well, they’re anything but. I recently met with Julia Shaw, a criminal psychologist who specializes in the science of memory. “I am a memory hacker,” Shaw told me. “I use the science of memory to make you think you did things that never happened.”
Implanting a false memory, it turns out, is alarmingly easy to do.
Watch more on Daily VICE:

Shaw, a Canadian now living in London, was in Toronto to promote her new book, The Memory Illusion. In it, she describes how false memories can be deliberately placed in people’s brains—leading to false police confessions that could send the wrong person to jail, or detailed accounts of alien abductions that (almost certainly) never happened.
“A memory is a network of brain cells,” Shaw explained to me. That network, which stretches across different regions of the brain, is constantly being updated. It’s an important function that allows us humans to learn new things and to problem-solve, among other skills. But as a result, it “can be manipulated,” she continued. “Each time you tell a story, you change the memory,” maybe dropping in new details, weaving in tidbits you really heard from somebody else, or forging new, and possibly inaccurate or misleading, connections.
For example: If you think you remember anything before you were about two-and-a-half years old, Shaw said, that’s a false memory. (Before then, our brains aren’t developed enough to store memories, a phenomenon called childhood or infantile amnesia.) A memory from earlier that “was either given to you through photos, you saw a picture, or maybe your parents told you a story,” she explained. “You can internalize them quite readily.”

“I think that reality is purely your perception”

The fact that memories are so changeable has important implications for, among other things, the criminal justice system, Shaw pointed out—and that’s the focus of much of her work. “In the lab, I convince people through memory hacking that they committed crimes that never happened,” said Shaw, senior lecturer and researcher in the Department of Law and Social Sciences at London South Bank University. “I do it to show that the interrogation process can really distort memories, in consistent ways.”
To implant a false memory, “you try to get someone to confuse their imagination with their memory,” she said. “That’s it: Get them to repeatedly picture it happening.”
She’ll start off by letting them know they committed a crime, and then claim to have insider information. For example: “Your parents told me that, when you were 14, you stole something, and the police were involved,” she said, adding that she’ll say she called the parents, and give details of their talk, “and then you believe me. You know I contacted your parents, and you trust them,” she continued. That gives her credibility.
She’ll keep going and layer in detail—the person’s age, hometown, the name of their childhood best friend, and get them to repeatedly imagine the crime happening, over and over again, even if they never did it. Over the course of a couple of weeks, maybe even a shorter timespan than that, “it gets harder to decipher imagination, versus a memory coming back,” Shaw said. “By the end, it’s easy to think, this actually happened.”
Julia Shaw with her new book, The Memory Illusion. Image: Chet Tilokani
Of course, false memories produce disastrous consequences within the criminal justice system, sending innocent people to jail. But they could also help explain so-called “impossible memories,” Shaw said, like someone who’s certain they were taken by aliens. Once mental illness or another explanation has been ruled out, “it’s possible that some have false memories,” she said. “They’ve pictured it repeatedly, or it’s been suggested to them. Or they watched a movie, and dreamt about it,” and then start believing it’s true.
So when will we be able to do the opposite of implanting a false memory—deleting a real one, that’s possibly painful and unwanted, from our minds?
“Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind,” Shaw nodded when I brought it up. Because memories are made up of networks across the brain, it doesn’t seem likely we’ll be able to pluck away an entire recollection anytime soon. What seems more likely, she said, is that we’ll be able to remove the piece of it that matters most: the emotion that’s tied up in it.
Read More: Scientists Zapped Mouse Brains With Lasers to Bring Back Lost Memories
With optogenetics (a technique that uses light to switch various parts of the brain on and off), scientists are capable of erasing the fear associated with bad memories, in rats. This hasn’t yet been done in humans, of course. (Optogenetic techniques currently require cutting a big old hole in the rats’ skulls.) But it hints at what could be possible.
So, if our memories are so easy to manipulate, and constantly in flux, pulling in new details and dropping others, is anything we remember really a true record of the past?
“I think that reality is purely your perception. And it’s a completely personal experience. The world as you know it only exists to you, [as you are] right now. Every day you wake up a new person,” with a different brain, and a different set of memories to guide you.
“I like to say that all memories are essentially false,” Shaw said. “They’re either a little bit false, or entirely false. There are entire experiences that never happened.”
_________________________

Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Do you think this article needs a correction or update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected]. Thank you for reading.

_________


 Source:

http://motherboard.vice.com/read/memory-hacker-implant-false-memories-in-peoples-minds-julia-shaw-memory-illusion

Notices and Disclaimers

We need $2000 per month to pay our costs. Help us one time or recurring. (DONATE HERE)

To sign up for RSS updates, paste this link (https://stillnessinthestorm.com/feed/) into the search field of your preferred RSS Reader or Service (such as Feedly or gReader).

Subscribe to Stillness in the Storm Newsletter

“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.” – Aristotle

This website is supported by readers like you.

If you find our work of value, consider making a donation. 

Stillness in the Storm DISCLAIMER: All articles, videos, statements, claims, views and opinions that appear anywhere on this site, whether stated as theories or absolute facts, are always presented by Stillness in the Storm as unverified—and should be personally fact checked and discerned by you, the reader. Any opinions or statements herein presented are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, or agreed to by Stillness, those who work with Stillness, or those who read Stillness. Any belief or conclusion gleaned from content on this site is solely the responsibility of you the reader to substantiate, fact check, and no harm comes to you or those around you. And any actions taken by those who read material on this site is solely the responsibility of the acting party. You are encouraged to think carefully and do your own research. Nothing on this site is meant to be believed without question or personal appraisal.

Content Disclaimer: All content on this site marked with “source – [enter website name and url]” is not owned by Stillness in the Storm. All content on this site that is not originally written, created, or posted as original, is owned by the original content creators, who retain exclusive jurisdiction of all intellectual property rights. Any copyrighted material on this site was shared in good faith, under fair use or creative commons. Any request to remove copyrighted material will be honored, provided proof of ownership is rendered. Send takedown requests to [email protected].

What is our mission? Why do we post what we do?

Our mission here is to curate (share) articles and information that we feel is important for the evolution of consciousness. Most of that information is written or produced by other people and organizations, which means it does not represent our views or opinions as managing staff of Stillness in the Storm. Some of the content is written by one of our writers and is clearly marked accordingly. Just because we share a CNN story that speaks badly about the President doesn’t mean we’re promoting anti-POTUS views. We’re reporting on the fact as it was reported, and that this event is important for us to know so we can better contend with the challenges of gaining freedom and prosperity. Similarly, just because we share a pro/anti-[insert issue or topic] content, such as a pro-second amendment piece or an anti-military video doesn’t mean we endorse what is said. Again, information is shared on this site for the purpose of evolving consciousness. In our opinion, consciousness evolves through the process of accumulating knowledge of the truth and contemplating that knowledge to distill wisdom and improve life by discovering and incorporating holistic values. Thus, sharing information from many different sources, with many different perspectives is the best way to maximize evolution. What’s more, the mastery of mind and discernment doesn’t occur in a vacuum, it is much like the immune system, it needs regular exposure to new things to stay healthy and strong. If you have any questions as to our mission or methods please reach out to us at [email protected].

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.