Stillness in the Storm

An Agent for Consciousness Evolution

The 7 Worst Lies Told by Liberal SCOTUS Justices at the Biden Vaccine Mandate Hearing

By Leave a Comment

Spread the love

(Kyle Becker) When Supreme Court Justices lie this openly and brazenly about one of the most pivotal cases in modern times, America might be in a bit of trouble.

Related WATCH: Vax Taskforce Chief Says Mass Vaccination ‘Pointless’, Time to Stop Counting Case Numbers.

Source – Becker News

by Kyle Becker, January 7th, 2022

During open arguments on a critical case regarding Biden’s vaccine mandate, the liberal wing of the nation’s highest court espoused shameless untruths about Covid-19 and the mRNA shots marketed as “vaccines.”

Justice Sonia Sotomayor was the leading offender when it came to misinforming the public in a crude attempt to justify her preordained conclusion that the federal vaccine mandate should be enforced. As reported by Fox News, Sotomayor was objecting to several points made by Ohio Solicitor General Benjamin Flowers, who was arguing on behalf of GOP-led states opposing mandate.

The most glaringly false claim Sotomayor made is that the “vaccines” stop the spread of Covid-19 — and particularly, the Delta and Omicron variants.

“Many Supreme Court Justices have falsely stated today that the Wuhan coronavirus vaccine ‘prevents disease’ and transmission in the work place,” Katie Pavlich pointed out. “This is absolutely false and highly alarming they’re using that point as fact to make their decision.”
While many are refuting this false claim by pointing to statements by CDC Director Rochelle Walensky that the vaccines can no longer “prevent transmission” (in fact, they cannot, as Becker News reported earlier), it is even worse than that. Higher vaccination rates correlate with higher transmission rates, according to a Harvard-led study. So, the vaccines are useless when it comes to stopping the spread of Delta or Omicron. That’s what the data say.

Sotomayor doubled down on deception with an easily disprovable statement on child hospitalizations. It’s like the left-wing of the court is actively seeking to discredit America’s highest legal institution.

“We have over 100,000 children, which we’ve never had before, in serious condition, and many on ventilators,” she claimed.

Phil Kerpen, who writes extensively on Covid issues, pointed out how this is egregiously wrong.

“This is just absolutely astonishing,” Kerpen wrote. ‘100,000 children in serious condition,’ per Sotomayor. ‘Where do these people obtain their misinformation? The current national pediatric COVID census per HHS is 3,342. Many/most incidental.’”

Exactly. And you don’t have to take his word for it, Dr. Faustus Fauci recently revealed the sleight-of-hand trick that there is a difference between child hospitalizations with Covid and hospitalizations for Covid.

“But the other important thing is that if you look at the children who are hospitalized, many of them are hospitalized with COVID as opposed to because of COVID,” Fauci said. “And what we mean by that — if a child goes in the hospital, they automatically get tested for COVID. And they get counted as a COVID-hospitalized individual. When in fact, they may go in for a broken leg or appendicitis or something like that. So it’s over-counting the number of children who are, quote, ‘hospitalized with COVID,’ as opposed to because of COVID.”

So, that was a lie. Then Sotomayor claimed the Omnicron variant is just as deadly as the Delta variant. This is easily disproven. A state-by-state analysis shows Omicron is a fraction as deadly as the wild or Delta variants. Furthermore, Fauci admitted Omicron was substantially milder.

“Fauci cited a study from Ontario, Canada, that found the risk of hospitalization or death was 65% lower among people infected with omicron compared with individuals who caught delta. The risk of admission to an intensive care unit or death from omicron was 83% lower, according to the study,” CNBC reported.

A South African doctor who first discovered a patient with the Omicron variant attested that it was “mostly mild,” and that “nothing I have seen about this new variant warrants… extreme action.” Another doctor who appeared on CNN backed up this assessment and said it is  “generally mild” and that “there are no red flags.”

There were more lies. Justice Stephen Breyer claimed “hospitals are full almost to the point of the maximum.” This was debunked in short order by Kerpen.

Kerpen also debunked Breyer’s claim of increasing hospitalizations.

It gets worse. Breyer actually suggested that mandatory vaccination could conceivably prevent 100% of US cases. Obviously, this is complete rubbish, for the reasons cited above.

Sotomayor also claimed that Covid-related deaths are at an all-time high. This is way, way off. Cases may have recently breaking an all-time high (due in part to the pointless, asymptomatic testing craze in blue states), but Covid-related deaths? Way down.

Not even close, Breyer. The doddering fool was so far off, he claimed there were “750 million new cases yesterday.” Umm, there are 330 million people in the United States.

That is a Biden-worthy bit of absurd commentary. Of course, the cherry on top would be Sotomayor’s claim that the federal government can mandate vaccines using its “police power.” She apparently has never heard of informed consent, nor the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution.

In addition to the liberal wing’s blatant misstatements is that they fail to note the least harmful remedy would be to recognize natural immunity from prior infection. New research shows that the Omicron variant has a transferability of natural immunity to other variants. Over 200 million Americans have a form of natural immunity from prior infection, according to CDC data.

Then again, the Covid pandemic response has never been about “the science,” just like the liberal wing of the Supreme Court’s rulings are not about Constitutional law. Since the left cannot justify their vaccine mandates based on the data or the science, they have to justify it with lies. That should tell Americans everything they need to know about the vaccine mandates, which are authoritarian and illegitimate, regardless of how the Supreme Court rules.

Please consider becoming a $10 a month donor. 

(Donate HERE)

Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?

The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world, which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom. The news also serves as a social connection tool, as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do. With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand, the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper.

– Justin

Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools.

Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammatical mistake? Send an email to [email protected], with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected]. Thank you for reading.

Source:

https://beckernews.com/the-7-worst-lies-told-by-liberal-scotus-justices-at-the-biden-vaccine-mandate-hearing-43668/

DIRECT DONATION

Support our work! (Avoid Big Tech PayPal and Patreon)

Notices and Disclaimers

We need $2000 per month to pay our costs. Help us one time or recurring. (DONATE HERE)

To sign up for RSS updates, paste this link (https://stillnessinthestorm.com/feed/) into the search field of your preferred RSS Reader or Service (such as Feedly or gReader).

Subscribe to Stillness in the Storm Newsletter

“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.” – Aristotle

This website is supported by readers like you.

If you find our work of value, consider making a donation. 

Stillness in the Storm DISCLAIMER: All articles, videos, statements, claims, views and opinions that appear anywhere on this site, whether stated as theories or absolute facts, are always presented by Stillness in the Storm as unverified—and should be personally fact checked and discerned by you, the reader. Any opinions or statements herein presented are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, or agreed to by Stillness, those who work with Stillness, or those who read Stillness. Any belief or conclusion gleaned from content on this site is solely the responsibility of you the reader to substantiate, fact check, and no harm comes to you or those around you. And any actions taken by those who read material on this site is solely the responsibility of the acting party. You are encouraged to think carefully and do your own research. Nothing on this site is meant to be believed without question or personal appraisal.

Content Disclaimer: All content on this site marked with “source – [enter website name and url]” is not owned by Stillness in the Storm. All content on this site that is not originally written, created, or posted as original, is owned by the original content creators, who retain exclusive jurisdiction of all intellectual property rights. Any copyrighted material on this site was shared in good faith, under fair use or creative commons. Any request to remove copyrighted material will be honored, provided proof of ownership is rendered. Send takedown requests to [email protected].

What is our mission? Why do we post what we do?

Our mission here is to curate (share) articles and information that we feel is important for the evolution of consciousness. Most of that information is written or produced by other people and organizations, which means it does not represent our views or opinions as managing staff of Stillness in the Storm. Some of the content is written by one of our writers and is clearly marked accordingly. Just because we share a CNN story that speaks badly about the President doesn’t mean we’re promoting anti-POTUS views. We’re reporting on the fact as it was reported, and that this event is important for us to know so we can better contend with the challenges of gaining freedom and prosperity. Similarly, just because we share a pro/anti-[insert issue or topic] content, such as a pro-second amendment piece or an anti-military video doesn’t mean we endorse what is said. Again, information is shared on this site for the purpose of evolving consciousness. In our opinion, consciousness evolves through the process of accumulating knowledge of the truth and contemplating that knowledge to distill wisdom and improve life by discovering and incorporating holistic values. Thus, sharing information from many different sources, with many different perspectives is the best way to maximize evolution. What’s more, the mastery of mind and discernment doesn’t occur in a vacuum, it is much like the immune system, it needs regular exposure to new things to stay healthy and strong. If you have any questions as to our mission or methods please reach out to us at [email protected].

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.