Money Out Of THICK Air & Hidden Financing Statements

All accounts, chattel paper, inventory, equipment, instruments, investment property, general intangibles, documents, and all assets, now owned or hereafter acquired, that are identified, from time to time, by Debtor, to Secured Party in writing, by electronic means (including by CD Rom) or by any other means agreed by the parties, as collateral securing the obligations of Debtor to Secured Party under a written agreement between the parties, and all proceeds thereof; and all collateral, guarantees, letters of credit, surety bonds, and other supporting obligations pertaining to the foregoing, and all proceeds thereof.

The magnitude of the Collateral that is secured by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York is essentially everything.  How massive is the loan that requires registration of that much collateral?

When you apply to borrow money, record is made against your credit report. You’d be expected to record those borrowings on any ‘Statement of Financial Position’ if being assessed for another loan.

So it would seem logical that these financing statements from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York , or the obligations they depend upon, would be reported to shareholders of these banks?

Auditors were contacted for one of these Australian banks requesting assistance on locating where in the banks’ annual reports the obligations could be found.  Silence confirmed they were unreported.

Exploration Of The Secured Collateral

So what is it about such large amounts of secured collateral that they remain unreported… like a black budget out of US Congress? Perhaps further investigation into this collateral is warranted.

Most items within the secured Collateral are common terms… except Chattel Paper. Are there any coincidences that ‘Chattel’ traces back to CAPUT, CAPITALIS, CAPITALE? Is this similar to the ALL CAPS name illustrative of an artificial person?

Compare with CATTLE..? Any alarm bells ringing yet?

Chattel Paper is defined within the UCC as:

“Chattel Paper” means a record or records that evidence both a monetary obligation and a security interest in specific goods, a security interest in specific goods and software used in the goods, a lease of specific goods, or a lease of specific goods and software used in the goods. In this paragraph, “monetary obligation” means a monetary obligation secured by the goods or or owed under lease of the goods and includes a monetary obligation with respect to the software used in the goods. Article 9, Part 1, 9-102 (11)

No points for guessing the keyword in that definition… Goods are defined as:

“Goods” means all things that are moveable at the time of identification to a contract for sale. The term includes future goods, specially manufactured goods, the unborn young of animals, growing crops, and other identified things attached to realty as described in Section 2-107. Article 9, Part 1, 9-102 (44)

Seems odd farmers would rush to their accountant to advise there are more goods on the way once the bull has come back from visiting the cows…?

These goods do not exist yet – they are a future ‘value’. They may or may not eventuate, yet they are treated as goods.

An Example of Pledging Future ‘Value’

As wrong as it sounds… humans have been regarded as CAPITAL – just ask Bill Clinton – and pledged as Collateral. Notice in this linked Financing Statement – it records the Collateral “As all real men with hands and legs…”

Count the number of zeros in the amount of the Secured Interest – that’s a big number.

Many have written about this too; e.g. Judge Dale and David Robinson. Judge Anna von Reitz writes:

At the March 6, 1933, Conference of Governors meeting, the Governors — merely corporate officers of franchises of the bankrupt United States of America, Inc. — pledged the “good faith and credit” of “their States and the citizenry thereof” to stand as sureties for the debts of the United States of America, Inc. during its bankruptcy reorganization.

People are being pledged as Collateral. So what is the mechanism for recording this collateral and when? If a future value is pledged, wouldn’t it make sense to begin recording this future value as early as possible… maybe in the registration of birth process?

Google ‘Birth Certificates printed on Bond Paper by the American Bank Note Company’ and see for yourself.

Seemingly people’s future value is registered at birth, recorded on bond paper and pledged as security. Worse, a new entity seems to be created and you are conned into acting as that entity for the rest of your life.

What Happens To Birth Certificate Bonds?

If the Birth Certificate becomes a bond, registered with ‘government’… what happens next? Let’s consider two topics:

1. Buying ‘government’ bonds, and
2. The National debt

‘Government’ Bonds are sold as an investment… broadly, people pay money to the ‘government’ – the ‘government’ pays them back plus interest. Sounds like the ‘government’ is borrowing money at interest.

When borrowing takes place, there’s a debt. Is it too logical to assume that the National Debt is created by borrowing money at interest? Contrast this to money printed through the people’s treasury where the people retain ownership of the infrastructure it is spent on. When the premise of borrowing is accepted as the only way ‘government’ gets money, it’s no wonder people are married to the idea of paying taxes.

What if banks buy ‘government’ bonds as an investment? Is this the paper trail from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York through to the ‘governments’ around the world… all backed by the future value of the cattle… oops chattel, sorry, people?

Hypothesis For Collateral Backing Loans

Is your future value, registered and recorded at birth, acting as a form of collateral used to back the money created by banks “in the act of lending“? This is why I’ve termed the phrase “money out of THICK air” – there appears to be more to the money creation story than first appears.

If that’s how it works, it’s all based on unearned value and an inverted monetary system. Far from sanctioning today’s money creation process, this article is intended to stimulate thought on the subject.

Consider the consequences of pledging 7 billion people’s worth of future value.

Whether it’s money from THIN air or money from THICK air… if the original concept of money; being a token representing energy and effort expended in the production of something of value, is corrupted, who benefits?