• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Donate
  • Start
    • Contact
    • We Need Your Support (Donate)
    • Newsletter Signup
      • Daily
      • Weekly
    • Into the Storm (Hosted by Justin Deschamps)
    • Follow Our Social Media
    • Best Telegram Channels & Groups
    • Discernment 101
    • Media Archive (Shows, Videos, Presentations)
    • Where’s The Hope
  • Browse
    • Editor’s Top Content (Start Here)
    • Best Categories
      • Consciousness
      • Conspiracy
      • Disclosure
      • Extraterrestrials
      • History
      • Health
      • NWO Deep State
      • Philosophy
      • Occult
      • Self Empowerment
      • Spirituality
    • By Author
      • Justin Deschamps
        • Articles
        • Into The Storm (on EdgeofWonder.TV)
        • Awarewolf Radio (Podcast)
      • Adam AstroYogi Sanchez
      • Amber Wheeler
      • Barbara H Whitfield RT and Charles L Whitfield MD
      • Chandra Loveguard
      • Conscious Optimist
      • Marko De Francis
      • Lance Schuttler
        • EMF Harmonized (Cell Phone, Wi-Fi, Radiation Protection
      • Ryan Delarme
      • Will Justice
  • Products
    • EMF Harmonized (Cell Phone, Wi-Fi, Radiation Protection
    • Earth Science & Energy
    • Free Energy
    • AI and Transhumanism
    • Space
    • Nikola Tesla
    • ET
      • Ancient Technology
      • Crop Circles
      • UFOs
    • Conspiracy
      • Anti NWO Deep State
      • Domestic Spying
      • Freemasonry
      • Law & Legal Corruption
      • Mass Mind Control
      • NWO Conspiracy
      • Police State and Censorship
      • Propaganda
      • Snowden Conspiracy
      • Social Engineering
    • Misc.
      • Council on Foreign Relations
      • Music Industry
      • Paranormal
      • Pedagate and Pedophilia
      • Q Anon
      • Secret Space Program
      • White Hat
  • Sign Up
  • Election Fraud
  • Partners
    • EMF Harmonized
    • Ascent Nutrition

Stillness in the Storm

An Agent for Consciousness Evolution

  • Our Story
  • Support Us
  • Contact
  •  Sunday, February 1, 2026
  • Store
  • Our Social
    • BitChute
    • CloutHub
    • Gab
    • Gab TV
    • Gettr
    • MeWe
      • MeWe Group
    • Minds
    • Rumble
    • SubscribeStar
    • Telegram
      • Best Telegram Channels and Groups
    • Twitter (Justin Duchamps)
    • YouTube

31,000 Scientists Say “No Convincing Evidence” On Climate Change

Monday, May 2, 2022 By Stillness in the Storm Leave a Comment

Spread the love

(Dr Leonard Coldwell) 31,000 scientists reject global warming and say “no convincing evidence” that humans can or will cause global warming? But polls show that of scientists working in the field of climate science, and publishing papers on the topic: 97% of the climate scientists surveyed believe “global average temperatures have increased” during the past century; and 97% think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures. What is the significance of these statistics?

Related Climate Scientists Admit Exaggerated Warming

Source – Dr Leonard Coldwell

by Staff Writer, April 15th, 2022

While polls of scientists actively working in the filed of climate science indicate strong general agreement that Earth is warming and human activity is a significant factor, 31,000 scientists say there is “no convincing evidence” that humans can or will cause “catastrophic” heating of the atmosphere.

This claim originates from the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine, which has an online petition (petitionproject.org) that states:

We urge the United States government to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind.
There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.

To participate in the petition one only needs to mark a check box to show that one has a Ph.D., M.S., or B.S. degree, and then fill in the fields. Unfortunately, that means that anyone can sign the petition, whether they have a degree or not.

The Oregon Global Warming Petition Form

Since the results are not verifiable, there is no way to know how many signers have actually earned a degree.

Do ‘31,000 scientists say global warming is not real’? Maybe. But more importantly what is the significance of these signatures? The majority of signatures are engineers (10,102). 3,046 are in medicine. 2,965 are in biology, biochemistry and agriculture. 4,822 in chemistry and chemical engineering.

Without formal training in climate science the level of understanding remains unknown among those that signed the petition. A key question is not how many of those that signed the petition know climate physics in sufficient depth, but rather how many of those that signed the petition work directly in the field of climate science.

Only 12% of those who signed…

According to the data on the petition site, only 12% of those who signed the petition are indicated to have affiliation with atmosphere, earth, and environmental science. But there is no indication how many work in the field of climate science?

WHAT DO SCIENTISTS ‘THAT WORK IN THE FIELD’ REALLY THINK?

What is notable is that the polls indicate there is a perspective difference between working climate scientists and scientists not working in the field of climate. When one examines the experts in the field, one sees a significant divergence from the general view. So the more important question for us is, what do ‘expert’ climate scientists think?

2009 – Examining the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change

1. When compared with pre-1800s levels, do you think that mean global temperatures have generally risen, fallen, or remained relatively constant?
2. Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?

  • 90% of participants answered “risen” to question 1.
  • 82% answered ‘yes’ to question 2.

Of those with expertise in climate science:

  • 96.2% (76 of 79) answered “risen” to question 1.
  • 97.4% (75 of 77) answered yes to question 2.

Source: EOS, TRANSACTIONS AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, VOL. 90, NO. 3, P. 22, 2009

2009 Pew Research Center Poll

  • 84% of scientists say the earth is warming because of human activity.

Asked if they regarded global warming as a very serious problem?

  • Scientists – 70%
  • Public – 47%

Source: Pew Research Center

2008 Poll

Scientists agree that humans cause global warming?

  • 97% of the climate scientists surveyed believe “global average temperatures have increased” during the past century.
  • 84% percent say they personally believe human-induced warming is occurring.
  • 74% agree that “currently available scientific evidence” substantiates its occurrence.
  • 5% believe that that human activity does not contribute to greenhouse warming; the rest are unsure.

Climate scientists are skeptical of the media

  • 1% of climate scientists rate either broadcast or cable television news about climate change as “very reliable.”

Source: STATS Poll (+/-4%), George Mason University

1991 Poll

Changing scientific opinion
In 1991 the Gallup organization conducted a telephone survey on global climate change among 400 scientists drawn from membership lists of the American Meteorological Association and the American Geophysical Union.

We repeated several of their questions verbatim, in order to measure changes in scientific opinion over time. On a variety of questions, opinion has consistently shifted toward increased belief in and concern about global warming. Among the changes:

  • In 1991 only 60% of climate scientists believed that average global temperatures were up, compared to 97% today.
  • In 1991 only a minority (41%) of climate scientists agreed that then-current scientific evidence “substantiates the occurrence of human-induced warming,” compared to three out of four (74%) today.

“I felt like I was getting a cold, but Agarikon stopped it in its tracks.”

Organic AGARIKON fights Viruses & Bio-warfare, and much more!

10 times more effective than ribavirin against Herpes (HSV1, HSV2), Swine flu (H1N1), Bird flu (H1N4), Pox (cowpox). Studied by the DoD for the Bioshield program. 

Get your Agarikon biodefense from Ascent Nutrition, one of the most pure and potent in the industry. 

Save 10% and get free shipping with a subscription!

Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?

The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world, which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom. The news also serves as a social connection tool, as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do. With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand, the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper.

– Justin

Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools.


Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammatical mistake? Send an email to [email protected], with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected]. Thank you for reading.

Source:

https://drleonardcoldwell.com/2022/04/15/31000-scientists-say-no-convincing-evidence-on-climate-change/

DIRECT DONATION

Support our work! (Avoid Big Tech PayPal and Patreon)

Filed Under: News, Science Tagged With: climate change, dr leornard coldwell, news, Scientists

Notices and Disclaimers

We need $2000 per month to pay our costs. Help us one time or recurring. (DONATE HERE)

To sign up for RSS updates, paste this link (https://stillnessinthestorm.com/feed/) into the search field of your preferred RSS Reader or Service (such as Feedly or gReader).

Subscribe to Stillness in the Storm Newsletter

“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.” – Aristotle

This website is supported by readers like you.

If you find our work of value, consider making a donation. 

Stillness in the Storm DISCLAIMER: All articles, videos, statements, claims, views and opinions that appear anywhere on this site, whether stated as theories or absolute facts, are always presented by Stillness in the Storm as unverified—and should be personally fact checked and discerned by you, the reader. Any opinions or statements herein presented are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, or agreed to by Stillness, those who work with Stillness, or those who read Stillness. Any belief or conclusion gleaned from content on this site is solely the responsibility of you the reader to substantiate, fact check, and no harm comes to you or those around you. And any actions taken by those who read material on this site is solely the responsibility of the acting party. You are encouraged to think carefully and do your own research. Nothing on this site is meant to be believed without question or personal appraisal.

Content Disclaimer: All content on this site marked with “source – [enter website name and url]” is not owned by Stillness in the Storm. All content on this site that is not originally written, created, or posted as original, is owned by the original content creators, who retain exclusive jurisdiction of all intellectual property rights. Any copyrighted material on this site was shared in good faith, under fair use or creative commons. Any request to remove copyrighted material will be honored, provided proof of ownership is rendered. Send takedown requests to [email protected].

What is our mission? Why do we post what we do?

Our mission here is to curate (share) articles and information that we feel is important for the evolution of consciousness. Most of that information is written or produced by other people and organizations, which means it does not represent our views or opinions as managing staff of Stillness in the Storm. Some of the content is written by one of our writers and is clearly marked accordingly. Just because we share a CNN story that speaks badly about the President doesn’t mean we’re promoting anti-POTUS views. We’re reporting on the fact as it was reported, and that this event is important for us to know so we can better contend with the challenges of gaining freedom and prosperity. Similarly, just because we share a pro/anti-[insert issue or topic] content, such as a pro-second amendment piece or an anti-military video doesn’t mean we endorse what is said. Again, information is shared on this site for the purpose of evolving consciousness. In our opinion, consciousness evolves through the process of accumulating knowledge of the truth and contemplating that knowledge to distill wisdom and improve life by discovering and incorporating holistic values. Thus, sharing information from many different sources, with many different perspectives is the best way to maximize evolution. What’s more, the mastery of mind and discernment doesn’t occur in a vacuum, it is much like the immune system, it needs regular exposure to new things to stay healthy and strong. If you have any questions as to our mission or methods please reach out to us at [email protected].

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Search Our Archives

FUNDRAISER!

Latest Videos

Guarding Against Bio Tech and EMF - Fix The World Project | Just In Stillness

From around the web

News “they” don’t want you to see

Newsletter

You can unsubscribe anytime. For more details, review our Privacy Policy.

Thank you!

You have successfully joined our subscriber list.

.

We Need Your Support

Support our work!

Weekly Newsletter Sign UP

Only want to see emails once a week? Sign up for the Weekly Newsletter here: SIGN UP. (Make sure you send an email to [email protected] to confirm the change or it won’t work).

Latest Videos

Footer

  • Menus
  • Internship Program
  • RSS
  • Social Media
  • Media
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2026 · Privacy Policy · Log in · Built by

This website wouldn't be the same without the ethical web hosting provided by Modern Masters. Modern Masters ethically serves small businesses in metaphysical, paranormal, healing, spirituality, homesteading, acupuncture and other related fields. Get the perfect website for your sacred work at Modern Masters.