Stillness in the Storm

An Agent for Consciousness Evolution

Where’s the Hope Newsletter #14: Deep State Lie Machine Exposed by Trump, Pelosi Guilty of Insurrection?

By Leave a Comment

Spread the love

(Ryan DeLarme) The 2nd Impeachment of Donald Trump played out this week, and despite some world-class acting and many dramatic attempts to play on people’s emotions, justice prevailed once again leaving Donald J Trump acquitted for the second time. Is that all the Deep-State had planned, or are there other tricks still hidden up their sleeve?

Related Where’s the Hope Newsletter #12: World Awakens From Wall Street Slumber, Burmese Military Says NO to Election Fraud, Climate Alarmism for Zero Energy Red Pills

by Ryan Delarme & Justin Deschamps, February 17th, 2021

“Revolutions never go backward“

-William Henry Seward

These words ring true today, no one is going back to sleep.

Inevitable ET (IET) recently made a good point in the increasingly popular/attacked Telegram Channel We The Media:

Happy Love Day
Fun Facts:

We fight because we love
They fight because they hate

When the going gets tough and you get knocked down the only way you get back up is if the reason you fight is worth more than the consequences of getting knocked down.

Quick maths
Love = positive
Hate = negative
Getting knocked down = negative

Negative + Negative = more negative
Negative + positive = more positive

Eventually and inevitably – Love Wins bc the longer we fight the more negative it is for the haters.
It’s math and it’s Science.

Always remember that love is stronger than hate, no matter how hard the opposition pushes you, we are all cells in the same body, the human family, by working together we make an optimal future possible. That is why those who seek to control us would have us all fighting amongst ourselves.

By now you all know that the impeachment plan has failed, and even appears to have backfired on the establishment Democrats and Republicans. There were a number of points raised in such a manner that undermined Trump’s defense by playing on the emotions of the less discerning in a way where President Trump’s words and actions were taken out of context and painted inaccurately (IE Charlottesville, Inciting the “capitol siege”, etc), but this would be their undoing.

Trump’s Defense Team Exposes One of the Biggest Deep State Weapons Against the People

The sheer hypocrisy is what sunk the establishment’s attacks on Trump. In the end, despite the many Oscar-worthy performances, the prosecution ended up back-peddling in circles to the point of embarrassment. The lies, doctored evidence, and media spin were plan to see on the part of the anti-Trumpers trying to impeach Trump. The American people, by and large, watched all this play out in the same way a bad guy in a movie is exposed, bolstering Trump’s underdog status in a grand way.

What might have been one of the best moments was when Trump’s attorney, Michael van der Veen called out the fake news media during a CBSN interview. The CBSN anchor attempted to downplay the egregiousness of doctoring evidence and he made it clear that this is not only unacceptable but criminal.

Take a look at the viral clip below.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=el4O9pSpX6U

This is one example of the doctored evidence alongside the full clips. The tactic is simple: take Trump’s statements out of context so they sound horrible. The full context dispels the lie.

The victory here is that one of the key methods the deceivers of this world use to manipulate the people employ the same method of half-truths and out-of-context information. The people are now a little wiser when it comes to identifying fake news.

The key is: anytime you see a news story, ask yourself, what is the full context? Do some research and you can fact-check the truth yourself but getting the full picture. Now that the people got to see a lie of this scale exposed, like an immune system boosting shot, the people will be a lot harder to deceive. Another massive victory for the patriots.

Case in point, look at what one citizen journalist put together, exposing the manufactured event on the 6th. Day by day the truth is becoming clear: it was one out of many false flag style events. But this time, it’s been exposed for what it is and the people are all the wiser from it.

In retaliation to the carefully edited montage of clips taken out of context to paint this picture of “Trump inciting Violence”. I’m sure it’s not hard to see why so many people, young people especially, have been triggered and weaponized against a single man with such a hateful vigor. The deep state has been planting and nurturing the seeds of hate under the guileful pretense of “fighting hate” for well over 4 years now and this impeachment was a public display to enlarge that hate, all the while putting up this false mantle of “unity”.

There has been a very clear double standard when it comes to the establishment politician and their proxy radicals (BLM, ANTIFA) versus Trump supporters. On that note, there seems to be a trend of pretending to be Trump Supporters and creating groups that no honest trump supporter aligns themselves with, such as the Boogaloo Boys, the Proud Boys, etc. The LIE is that they always wanted Trump and his supporters to be labeled with all the Neurolinguistic branding of “toxic masculinity”, insisting that aligning yourself with the first non-establishment president in most of our lifetime is equated to supporting all the “isms”: Racism, sexism, etc.

This week’s newsletter focuses heavily on the Impeachment charade, and we will be bringing up as many points of interest as possible to support a hopeful perspective.

Trump Legal Team Plays Devastating Video of Democrats “Inciting” Violence, Challenging Election Results

We’ve already mentioned the video montage made to stir up rage in the less discerning, which would have gone without a hitch if it weren’t in a trial where the defense is actually being given a chance to make a proper defense (something you don’t see on the propagandized corporate news outlets). In response to their “trump incited violence” montage, the defense played a very simple counter montage of what the Left has done over the last 5 years:

The Trump defense team also showed a video of Democrats’ challenging election results. That’s right: it’s been normal for Democrats for years. And Trump’s lawyers brought the receipts.

Here are the Democrats who objected to election results when Trump won in 2016:

And another one:

In just 3 short videos, the Trump defense team showed how the Democrats are not only being hypocritical but how they are on the record trying to destroy Trump no matter what.

Compare this to the Democrats.

They had to play a 16 minute — highly edited — video of the capital “insurrection.”

Zero Hedge has more details, including that Trump’s legal team has used up 3 of their allotted 16 hours:

Trump’s legal team wrapped up their case in just over three of the allotted 16 hours.

The next phase will consist of up to four hours of questions from senators to both the House managers and Trump’s legal team – though several senators have said they don’t think it will take that long.

“Our country needs to get back to work. I know that you know that. But instead we are here. The majority party promised to unify and deliver more Covid relief. But instead, they did this,” said Trump attorney Bruce Castor in closing remarks.

Castor called Trump “the most pro-police, anti-mob president’ in US history – suggesting that Democratic lawmakers turned a blind eye to BLM protests. He also said that the attack on the Capitol was in no way an “insurrection.”

“Insurrection is a term of art. It’s defined in the law,” argued Castor. “It involves taking over a country, a shadow government, taking the TV stations over and having some plan on what you’re going to do when you finally take power. Clearly this is not that.”

After spending much of the morning laying out their case for why the impeachment is a sham, former President Trump’s legal team proceeded to play several montages of Democrats doing the exact same thing they’ve impeached Trump over – namely, calling for violence against Republicans. Interspersed throughout are clips of leftists committing violence against conservatives following the ‘incitement.

Many were outraged at the use of time and money, especially before the Senate goes on vacation. I suppose that means those still awaiting the stimulus promise had better sit tight!

There was no small amount of criticism directed at the impeachment debacle:

In regards to the “very fine people” which has been used for years to convince well-intentioned people that Trump is a nazi, the House impeachment managers were scorched for manipulating evidence.

A defense attorney for President Trump in the Senate impeachment trial on Friday refuted the oft-repeated “Charlottesville lie” that Joe Biden says prompted him to run for president. House impeachment managers played a selectively edited video of Trump’s 2017 remark on Thursday, claiming he referred to neo-Nazi rioters as “very fine people.” But David Schoen was ready with the full video, which shows the left has been dishonestly manipulating Trump’s words to back their claim that he is a white supremacist.

“There’s that famous quote, like one of the house managers said, ‘A lie will travel halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to put its shoes on,’” Schoen began.

“Well, this lie traveled around the world a few times, and made its way into the Biden campaign talking points, and ended up on the Senate floor. The Charlottesville lie, ‘very fine people on both sides.’ Except that isn’t all he said, and they knew it then, and they know it now. Watch this.”

Schoen played the video, which can be seen here:

https://youtu.be/IHc3-gPxRw0

The attorney said after playing the video to senators that it could be that today was “the first time the news networks played those full remarks in the context”, which is absolutely true.

“And how many times have you heard President Trump has never denounced white supremacists? Now you in America know the truth.”

Schoen charged House impeachment managers manipulated other evidence, noting that in a court of law they would be sanctioned for such actions.

Conclusion: Not only were the anti-Trump lairs finally outed but so were the dozens of fake news media outlets (CNN, MSNBC, et al) that went along with the criminal deception of the American people.

Ask yourself: How many people took to the streets in 2020, incurring billions of dollars in damages, were incited to violence by the fake news pushing the Charlottesville lie?

Biden’s Call to Action’

Biden, in one of many occasions in which he repeated the lie, said during his acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention last summer that Trump’s words in 2017 were “a wake-up call for us as a country” and, for him, “a call to action.”

“At that moment, I knew I’d have to run,” Biden said.

In fact, during his remarks on Charlottesville, Trump immediately made it clear he was not talking about “the neo-Nazis and white nationalists,” explicitly declaring “they should be condemned totally.”

His reference–as a CNN contributor pointed out in a rebuke to his network colleagues–was to the people on both sides of the issue of whether or not to maintain statues of Robert E. Lee and other Confederate figures. When Kamala Harris repeated the lie during the vice-presidential debate in October, then-Vice President Mike Pence rebutted her and delivered a word to media who have peddled the lie.

“You know, I think this is one of the things that makes people dislike the media so much in this country. That you selectively edit, just like Sen. Harris did, comments that President Trump and I and others on our side of the aisle make,” Pence said. “Sen. Harris conveniently omitted after the president made comments about people on either side of the debate over monuments, he condemned the KKK, neo-Nazis, and white supremacists, and has done so repeatedly.”

Biden, for his part, weighed in on the controversial Confederate flag issue in a 1993 Senate session declaring that “many fine people” display it.

Take a moment to let that sink in. Biden used almost the exact same phrase to refer to confederate flag-wavers, who to this day many people believe is a racist flag. And Trump used the phrase in 2017 at Charlottesville. Is it possible that Trump used the phrase knowing that the media would take it out of context and use it against him, also knowing that some 4 years later he would be vindicated and it would come back to bite Biden in the butt? Can you say “future proves past?” Is this all just a coincidence or was this yet another brilliantly planned blow to the deep state lie machine?

Falsehood Persists in the Mainstream

In March 2019, CNN contributor Steven Cortes chastised his colleagues for continuing to promote “the Charlottesville lie.”

In a RealClearPolitics column, he cited CNN’s correct contemporaneous reporting and the transcripts of the Trump Tower presser after the deadly protest.

“Excuse me, they didn’t put themselves down as neo-Nazis, and you had some very bad people in that group,” Trump said at the time. “But you also had people that were very fine people on both sides. You had people in that group – excuse me, excuse me, I saw the same pictures you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name.”

Cortes noted that after another question by a reporter, Trump became even more explicit.

“I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally,” the president said. Yet, the “falsehood” persists, Cortes wrote, pointing to CNN contributor Keith Boykin stating the previous week: “When violent people were marching with tiki torches in Charlottesville, the president said they were ‘very fine people.’”

When Cortes objected, arguing Trump’s “fine people on both sides” observation clearly referenced those on both sides of the Confederate monument debate, anchor Erin Burnett insisted Trump “didn’t say it was on the monument debate at all.”

“No, they didn’t even try to use that defense,” the CNN anchor said. “It’s a good one, but no one’s even tried to use it, so you just used it now.”

Cortes also cited MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace saying Trump had “given safe harbor to Nazis, to white supremacists.” Her NBC colleague Chuck Todd claimed Trump “gave me the wrong kind of chills. Honestly, I’m a bit shaken from what I just heard.” The New York Times ran a headline saying “Trump Gives White Supremacists Unequivocal Boost.”

In March 2019, Fox News host Chris Wallace pressed White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney on why Trump had not given a speech “condemning … white supremacist bigotry.” Mulvaney responded that the president has done so several times, including after the death of Charlottesville victim Heather Heyer.

“Racism is evil,” Trump said, “and those who cause violence in its name are criminals and thugs, including the KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and other hate groups that are repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans.”

Cortes said, “the only explanation for such a repeated falsehood is abject laziness or willful deception.”

Just in case you need a reminder, here is a compilation of times Trump disavows racism.

Dems Used A Fake Blue Checkmark On Tweet During Impeachment Trial

Based solely on the information above you could start to see why this impeachment is a complete sham, but that’s not all of the deceit revolving around this trial. A senior impeachment aide has come out and confirmed that a tweet used by Democrat Rep. Eric Swalwell in the impeachment trial had a fake blue verification checkmark. This is the same Eric Swalwell who was caught romancing a Chinese spy.

Fox News added their two cents to the story:

A senior impeachment aide said the inclusion of a fake blue check verification mark on tweets that were presented at the Senate trial was an accident.

The tweets showed comments from Jennifer Lynn Lawrence who was retweeted by former President Trump. The two tweets that were exhibited included blue check marks next to Lawrence’s name.

Blue checks show the user’s identity has been verified and also connote a certain status.

“The final graphic accidentally had a blue verification checkmark on it, but the substance of it was entirely accurate,” the aide said.

The Washington Examiner chipped in too:

House impeachment managers “accidentally” added a blue-check verification to a pro-Trump tweet used in the Senate trial of the former president, but aides condemned the charge by defense lawyers that they manipulated video evidence.

Senior House Democratic aides for the managers acknowledged a graphic they displayed during the trial showing a pro-Trump tweet “accidentally had a blue verification check mark” but said the content of the tweet was “entirely accurate.”

“If anything, it is further evidence of President Trump’s attention to and knowledge of what was being openly planned on January 6 by his followers, even those without Twitter verifications,” a senior Democratic aide said.

The tweeter, Jennifer Lynn Lawrence, this week said her Twitter account does not have the blue checkmark that the social media giant uses to indicate a “verified” account.

Is it a Crime To Doctor or Tamper with Evidence? Will Trump Use this Against the Deep State?

What you might not have heard about yet is the fact tampering with evidence is a crime.

From Criminal Defense Lawyer:

A person commits the federal crime of tampering with evidence when he or she knowingly alters, conceals, falsifies, or destroys any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to interfere with an investigation, possible investigation, or other proceedings by the federal government. (18 U.S.C. § 1519.) State laws also make it a crime to tamper with evidence in officials proceeding and investigations.

It’s a federal crime. Here’s the Federal Statute:

18 U.S. Code § 1519.Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in Federal investigations and bankruptcy

Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States or any case filed under title 11, or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter or case, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

Do you think Trump knew the DS Dems would try to use their doctored evidence against him?

Do you think he knew they would use it in the shame impeachment?

Do you think he’s just going to let this go?

This is what Trump said after the acquittal.

“In the months ahead, I have much to share with you…”

These don’t sound like the words of a man who’s going to sit back and do nothing.

Now that he’s not in office, and he has the unofficial title of underdog champ that defeated the deep state bullies in court, he has a lot to gain by coming out full swing, and almost nothing to lose.

Justin spoke to this in his Livestream last night.

Democrats Flipped the Script, Attempted to Change Rules, and Decide to Call Witnesses as Their Case Collapsed

According to the Seattle Times — Rep. Jaimie Raskin, lead impeachment manager, called Saturday morning for Republican Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler of Washington to be subpoenaed for the Senate trial, saying her corroboration of a Jan. 6 phone call between House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy and former President Donald Trump was critical. Beutler, one of the 10 Republicans who voted to impeach Trump.

Van Der Veen was furious:

Of course, in response to this Raskin makes as quick a statement as possible and they move right along with the show. which eventually DID get to the part where the defense showed that the alleged “Trump supporters” storming the capitol wasn’t exactly what they seemed.

Support this site so we can continue to tell you the truth.

DONATE HERE

Defense Brings up Leftist Extremist Presence at the Capitol “Siege”

In regards to what was quite possibly the most low-energy “siege” of anything ever. The firey Van Der Veen was quoted saying “One of the first people arrested was a leader of Antifa”.  Finally bringing these facts to the public consciousness in a way that they literally can’t avoid, broadcasted live on national television and not simply relegated to pro-conservative news sources.

Pelosi Lashes Out

Two-time Impeachment loser Nancy Pelosi was none too thrilled about her second failure to Impeach Donald Trump. Upon the finalization of her defeat, Pelosi decided it would be a good idea to lash out at Mitch McConnell and Senate Republicans after she became the first House Speaker in US history to bring two failed impeachments.

Seven Republican Senators voted with Democrats to convict Trump. McConnell, who many Trump supporters have begun to view with disdain, voted to acquit Trump, but he still trashed Trump from the Senate floor. Despite this, Pelosi lashed out at McConnell and called Republicans ‘cowards’ for voting to acquit Trump.

“What we saw today was a cowardly group of Republicans,” Speaker Pelosi said.

WATCH:

Trump’s Post-Victory Statement

Former President Donald Trump made a statement after the Senate voted to acquit him in his second impeachment trial with a vote of 57-43.

Read the full statement here:

I want to first thank my team of dedicated lawyers and others for their tireless work upholding justice and defending truth.

My deepest thanks as well to all of the United States Senators and Members of Congress who stood proudly for the Constitution we all revere and for the sacred legal principles at the heart of our country.

Our cherished Constitutional Republic was founded on the impartial rule of law, the indispensable safeguard for our liberties, our rights and our freedoms.

It is a sad commentary on our times that one political party in America is given a free pass to denigrate the rule of law, defame law enforcement, cheer mobs, excuse rioters, and transform justice into a tool of political vengeance, and persecute, blacklist, cancel and suppress all people and viewpoints with whom or which they disagree. I always have, and always will, be a champion for the unwavering rule of law, the heroes of law enforcement, and the right of Americans to peacefully and honorably debate the issues of the day without malice and without hate.

This has been yet another phase of the greatest witch hunt in the history of our Country. No president has ever gone through anything like it, and it continues because our opponents cannot forget the almost 75 million people, the highest number ever for a sitting president, who voted for us just a few short months ago.

I also want to convey my gratitude to the millions of decent, hardworking, law-abiding, God-and-Country loving citizens who have bravely supported these important principles in these very difficult and challenging times.

Our historic, patriotic and beautiful movement to Make America Great Again has only just begun. In the months ahead I have much to share with you, and I look forward to continuing our incredible journey together to achieve American greatness for all of our people. There has never been anything like it!

We have so much work ahead of us, and soon we will emerge with a vision for a bright, radiant, and limitless American future.

Together there is nothing we cannot accomplish.

We remain one People, one family, and one glorious nation under God, and it’s our responsibility to preserve this magnificent inheritance for our children and for generations of Americans to come.

May God bless all of you, and may God forever bless the United States of America.

Media Busted Pushing Misinformation: Breaking Down All of the Holes in the Capitol Siege Narrative

While the media has touted five casualties stemming from the Capitol protest, an analysis of the deaths finds obvious Capitol police involvement in violence and clear false narratives surrounding the deaths stemming from the protest.

National File breaks it down:

False Talking Point #1: Capitol police officer Brian Sicknick: 

The New York Times retracted the fire extinguisher hoax. Julie Kelly points out for American Greatness how the Times was forced to change their story. Here is what The New York Times initially pushed on January 8 following the January 6 protest:

“Mr. Sicknick, 42, an officer for the Capitol Police, died on Thursday from brain injuries he sustained after Trump loyalists who overtook the complex struck him in the head with a fire extinguisher, according to two law enforcement officials.”

Here is what The New York Times has changed their story to:

“Law enforcement officials initially said Mr. Sicknick was struck with a fire extinguisher, but weeks later, police sources and investigators were at odds over whether he was hit. Medical experts have said he did not die of blunt force trauma, according to one law enforcement official.”

The New York Times has also appended the following note: “UPDATE: New information has emerged regarding the death of the Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick that questions the initial cause of his death provided by officials close to the Capitol Police.”

The New York Times is not alone in having to confess the false narrative surrounding Sicknick’s death. CNN has been forced to admit that fallen Capitol police officer Brian Sicknick did not die from getting hit with a fire extinguisher by pro-Trump protesters. Sicknick’s lack of blunt force trauma puts to rest a left-wing narrative on his death. NATIONAL FILE was weeks ahead of CNN in reporting this fact. At this time, the mainstream media cannot credibly point to Trump supporters killing anyone during the Jan. 6 Capitol protest, whereas the Capitol Police shot and killed Air Force veteran and protester Ashli Babbitt.

CNN reported: “According to one law enforcement official, medical examiners did not find signs that the officer sustained any blunt force trauma, so investigators believe that early reports that he was fatally struck by a fire extinguisher are not true. One possibility being considered by investigators is that Sicknick became ill after interacting with a chemical irritant like pepper spray or bear spray that was deployed in the crowd. But investigators reviewing video of the officer’s time around the Capitol haven’t been able to confirm that in tape that has been recovered so far, the official said. The case could also be complicated if Sicknick had a preexisting medical condition. It could not be learned if he did.”

The U.S. Capitol police officer who died following the Jan. 6 Capitol invasion is believed to have suffered from a pre-existing medical condition that contributed to his death. This fact complicates the mainstream media’s narrative, which seeks to pin the officer’s death on supposedly violent pro-Trump protesters. The media is trying to forge resentment against Trump and conservative activists in the eyes of Middle America, using the fallen officer as a cause celebre. But even the officer’s family is pleading with the public not to politicize his death as narrative-busting details emerge.

Brian Sicknick was reportedly “injured” during the Capitol protest and media and activists ran with the story that Trump protesters hit him with a fire extinguisher. But Propublica reported that Sicknick told his brother he was merely pepper-sprayed. Where did the fire extinguisher story come from? ProPublica also noted Sicknick’s blood clot and stroke and use of a ventilator, according to Western Journal.

“He texted me last night and said, ‘I got pepper-sprayed twice,’ and he was in good shape. Apparently, he collapsed in the Capitol and they resuscitated him using CPR,” the officer’s brother Ken Sicknick told ProPublica.

ABC reported that sources said Sicknick died from “medical condition” complications while being unable to retrieve video of anyone hitting him with a fire extinguisher, as noted by Western Journal.

“Many details regarding Wednesday’s events and the direct causes of Brian’s injuries remain unknown and our family asks the public and the press to respect our wishes in not making Brian’s passing a political issue. Please honor Brian’s life and service and respect our privacy while we move forward in doing the same. Brian is a hero and that is what we would like people to remember. Thank you,” stated the Sicknick family statement.

The U.S. military is currently guarding the U.S. Capitol ahead of Joe Biden’s disputed inauguration to the presidency on January 20. The mainstream media is pushing the narrative that Trump supporters are domestic terrorists, and of course, the FBI and members of the political class including Lindsey Graham are vowing to prosecute the patriotic protesters.

Mainstream media pushed sickening disinformation during the course of the Capitol riot. For instance, a Huffington Post reporter named Matt Fuller falsely claimed that Trump supporters were firing gunshots into the U.S. Senate chamber, despite the fact that this was not true. “They’re shooting into the chamber,” Fuller tweeted. That tweet, now deleted, went viral. Did it incite tensions? In reality, Capitol Police shot and killed Ashli Babbitt, a protester and Air Force veteran who did not fire at the cops.

False Talking point #2: Trump supporter Kevin Greeson

NATIONAL FILE’S GABRIEL KEANE reported: An witness of the Capitol Hill protests on January 6 reveals that Kevin Greeson, an unarmed pro-Trump protester who died of a heart attack during the day’s events, was struck in the eye by high-velocity paintball-style projectiles fired by Capitol Hill police prior to his death.

National File Citizen Journalist Roger Farina obtained an interview on January 6 with a witness who was standing directly next to Greeson at the time of the latter’s death, and National File is now exclusively releasing this interview on Thursday.

“So we’re all marching down… we’re just walking up, just walking around the nice little Reflection Pool, and all of a sudden you just hear crazy stuff, paint balls start flying, they’re pepper ball paint balls, and then all the sudden people are breaking over the barriers, and people who are sitting there, peacefully demonstrating, they just get lit up with the paint ball,” the witness, who asked National File not to reveal his name, recounted.

“One of the guys who got hit, he couldn’t start breathing, he collapsed, and that’s when we [were] just like, ‘Paramedic, paramedic!’ No paramedics are going to come in,” the witness said. “We had to make a hole and try to drag him out. Some other paramedics went in, the DC police were firing on them, and anybody else who was in the area. Flash bangs were going off, a minimum of 30 flash bangs, and people are getting hit.”

The witness confirmed that the protests leading up to Greeson’s death were wholly peaceful in nature, stating, “It was definitely peaceful, and I’m like, ‘Wait that was a fence’, and that’s when I realized the dude next to me [was hit] square right in the eye with a paint ball pepper ball, he just dropped.”

“You could smell it in the air, you could feel the balls just going everywhere,” the witness added. “Peaceful dude, he wasn’t stealing or nothing. Dropped, heart attack. They did CPR there, and then we made a hole.”

Greeson, 55, was a resident of Athens, Alabama. His family described him in a statement as “an advocate of President Trump” who “attended the event on January 6, 2020, to show his support,” noting that “He was not there to participate in violence or rioting, nor did he condone such actions.”

Despite media claims that the Capitol Hill protests were an “insurrection” that intended harm against elected officials, no members of Congress or the Secret Service were injured, while four pro-Trump protesters were killed or died as a result of physical trauma incurred during the day’s events, and one police officer is believed to have died after an allergic reaction to the same type of pepper ball projectiles that our witness says led to Greeson’s death.”

2020 Republican U.S. Senate nominee in Delaware Lauren Witzke reported:

False Talking Point #3: Ashli Babbitt Was A Pro-Trump Protester Who Was Shot And Killed, Reportedly By Capitol Police

Frank Salvato reported for NATIONAL FILE on January 12: “Authorities have suspended several US Capitol Police officers as the facts begin to emerge regarding the chaos and violence in the Capitol Building on January 6, 2021. The bedlam that ensued on the day of the Electoral College vote certification resulted in the deaths of five Americans and the shooting death of one.

According to one congressional aide, eight separate investigations into the events that happened before, during, and after the shooting death of Ashli Babbitt have been launched, including probes into several officers’ actions in managing the protesters that breached the Capitol Building.

In a raw video that has gone viral, Babbitt, a 14-year US Air Force veteran who had deployed on multiple tours to the Middle East, was shot by a US Capitol police officer. Babbitt was unarmed. She died at the scene.

Sunday, former US Capitol Police chief, Steven Sund – who resigned after his department’s dismal performance at the Capitol Building on January 6, told reporters that congressional security officials denied his requests to put the DC National Guard on standby before the joint session of Congress.

Acting US Capitol Police chief Yogananda Pittman issued a statement Monday night saying “several” officers had been suspended.

“The Department also has been actively reviewing video and other open-source materials of some USCP officers and officials that appear to be in violation of Department regulations and policies,” Pittman said. “Our Office of Professional Responsibility will investigate these behaviors for disciplinary action, up to, and including, termination.” (Frank Salvato’s passage ends)

Meanwhile, Trump supporter Benjamin Phillips has been listed as a fatality of the protest despite the fact that other protesters said he had a stroke and possibly never even went into the Capitol. While there’s no evidence he was part of the storming of the Capitol, evidence merely exists that he was last spotted “looking for parking.” A woman named Roseanne Boyland died from “medical emergencies” but there is a dispute about how it happened. A cop told her sister that Boyland “collapsed while standing off to the side in the Capitol Rotunda” according to the AP, which disputes Boyland’s friend’s assertion that Boyland was trampled on by the protest mob. Bodycam video footage allegedly shows Boyland being trampled according to the Daily Mail.

THE MEDIA PUSHED FALSE INFORMATION ON VIOLENCE DURING THE PROTEST IN REAL TIME

Huffington Post congressional reporter Matt Fuller wrote a viral tweet during the U.S. Capitol protest in which he falsely accused President Donald Trump’s supporters of firing guns into the body of the United States Congress. The tweet remained live for many hours after Fuller’s narrative was debunked. By that time, Fuller had been retweeted by top political figures. Will the mainstream media face scrutiny for pushing disinformation during a time of crisis? Fuller currently remains employed with the Huffington Post.

“They’re shooting into the chamber,” Fuller tweeted during the Capitol protest on January 6. Low-rated MSNBC host Chris Hayes drew attention to the false narrative by jumping in to exclaim in reply, “shooting what!?!?!?!” The construction of Fuller’s sentence made clear that he was accusing patriotic protesters of shooting into the chamber. In actuality, no protesters fired guns in the protest. Capitol Police shot unarmed protester and Air Force veteran Ashli Babbitt in the neck and killed her, but that shooting did not take place in the Chamber. The photo Fuller shared showed law enforcement pointing guns but obviously no evidence of protesters firing shots.

Read more Media BUSTED Pushing Misinformation As Evidence Disputes Narratives on Capitol Casualties

Why the Democrats Didn’t Want Trump’s Legal Team to Call in Pelosi to Testify, Is She Guilty of Insurrection?

They were set to bring in hundreds of witnesses but the House impeachment managers folded Saturday morning and backed off witnesses after Trump’s legal team announced that Speaker Pelosi would be called in to testify. The fear of what questions might be asked led to the folding most likely, the Democrats went straight to closing arguments because they have no case and they wanted to protect Nancy Pelosi.

The Hope we crave is all around us if we only dare to embrace the truth with a whole heart and discerning mind. 

Read more Where’s The Hope Newsletters

 – Ryan and Justin

Please consider becoming a $10 a month donor. 

(Donate HERE)

The preceding is a Stillness in the Storm original creation. Please share freely. 

About The Authors

Ryan DeLarme is a creative writer, Journalist, Poet, and self-described “fool”, Founder of the Underground Newswire, and managing editor @ Stillness in the Storm

Justin made contributions to this article.  

Justin Deschamps has been a truth seeker all his life, studying physics, psychology, law, philosophy, and spirituality, and working to weave these seemingly separate bodies of information into a holistic tapestry of ever-expanding knowledge. Justin is a student of all and a teacher to some, sharing what he has discovered with those who are ready and willing to take responsibility for making the world a better place. The goal of his work is to help himself and others become better truth-seekers, and in doing so, form a community of holistically minded individuals capable of creating world healing projects for the benefit of all life—what has been called The Great Work. Check out his project Stillness in the Storm to find some of his work. Follow on Twitter @justinstillness, Follow on Parler, Facebook Stillness in the Storm, and minds.com.

Like our work? Support this site with a contribution via Paypal, cryptocurrencies, or Subscribestar.

This article appeared first on Stillness in the Storm. 

This article (Where’s the Hope Newsletter #14: Deep State Lie Machine Exposed by Trump, Pelosi Guilty of Insurrection?) originally appeared on StillnessintheStorm.com and is free and open source. You have permission to share or republish this article in full so long as attribution to the author and stillnessinthestorm.com are provided. If you spot a typo, email [email protected].

Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?

The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world, which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom. The news also serves as a social connection tool, as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do. With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand, the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper.

– Justin

Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools.

Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammatical mistake? Send an email to [email protected], with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected]. Thank you for reading.

Source:

Embedded Throughout This Article

Notices and Disclaimers

We need $2000 per month to pay our costs. Help us one time or recurring. (DONATE HERE)

To sign up for RSS updates, paste this link (https://stillnessinthestorm.com/feed/) into the search field of your preferred RSS Reader or Service (such as Feedly or gReader).

Subscribe to Stillness in the Storm Newsletter

“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.” – Aristotle

This website is supported by readers like you.

If you find our work of value, consider making a donation. 

Stillness in the Storm DISCLAIMER: All articles, videos, statements, claims, views and opinions that appear anywhere on this site, whether stated as theories or absolute facts, are always presented by Stillness in the Storm as unverified—and should be personally fact checked and discerned by you, the reader. Any opinions or statements herein presented are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, or agreed to by Stillness, those who work with Stillness, or those who read Stillness. Any belief or conclusion gleaned from content on this site is solely the responsibility of you the reader to substantiate, fact check, and no harm comes to you or those around you. And any actions taken by those who read material on this site is solely the responsibility of the acting party. You are encouraged to think carefully and do your own research. Nothing on this site is meant to be believed without question or personal appraisal.

Content Disclaimer: All content on this site marked with “source – [enter website name and url]” is not owned by Stillness in the Storm. All content on this site that is not originally written, created, or posted as original, is owned by the original content creators, who retain exclusive jurisdiction of all intellectual property rights. Any copyrighted material on this site was shared in good faith, under fair use or creative commons. Any request to remove copyrighted material will be honored, provided proof of ownership is rendered. Send takedown requests to [email protected].

What is our mission? Why do we post what we do?

Our mission here is to curate (share) articles and information that we feel is important for the evolution of consciousness. Most of that information is written or produced by other people and organizations, which means it does not represent our views or opinions as managing staff of Stillness in the Storm. Some of the content is written by one of our writers and is clearly marked accordingly. Just because we share a CNN story that speaks badly about the President doesn’t mean we’re promoting anti-POTUS views. We’re reporting on the fact as it was reported, and that this event is important for us to know so we can better contend with the challenges of gaining freedom and prosperity. Similarly, just because we share a pro/anti-[insert issue or topic] content, such as a pro-second amendment piece or an anti-military video doesn’t mean we endorse what is said. Again, information is shared on this site for the purpose of evolving consciousness. In our opinion, consciousness evolves through the process of accumulating knowledge of the truth and contemplating that knowledge to distill wisdom and improve life by discovering and incorporating holistic values. Thus, sharing information from many different sources, with many different perspectives is the best way to maximize evolution. What’s more, the mastery of mind and discernment doesn’t occur in a vacuum, it is much like the immune system, it needs regular exposure to new things to stay healthy and strong. If you have any questions as to our mission or methods please reach out to us at [email protected].

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.