(Biblioteca Pleyades) Monday, March 15, 1999, an AP article titled “Trilateral Commission reaches out to others,” was published on the Tampa Bay Tribune website. The article is about the Council on Foreign Relations — the real story is hidden between the lines.
Related Justinformed Talk: What Are THEY Trying To Hide?
by Staff Writer
The Trilateral Commission is a Council on Foreign Relations front organization, established to influence American foreign policy, and facilitate Council on Foreign Relations expansion into Europe, Canada and Japan. The Council on Foreign Relations uses front organizations to protect it from connection to illegalities that could lead to a Congressional investigation.
Recent economic upheavals in the Far East and Russia have made them ripe for Council on Foreign Relations expansion. Chinese, Korean, Russian, and Ukrainian movers and shakers were invited to the Trilateral Commission meeting to participate in “discussion-groups.” The material generated will be used to prepare propaganda designed to influence United States national policy makers to support foreign policy favorable to Council on Foreign Relations controlled corporate expansion into those nations, and manipulate United States public opinion to favor those policies.
The Trilateral Commission was not the first front organization used to cover-up Council on Foreign Relations manipulation of U.S. foreign policy concerning Russia and the Far East. In 1951 a Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Internal Security, known as the McCarren Committee, investigated another Council on Foreign Relations front organization, the American Institute of Pacific Relations, for its role in controlling and coordinating actions favorable to the Soviet Union, the expansion of international communism, and the loss of China to the Communists.
The Council on Foreign Relations established the American Institute of Pacific Relations in 1925. Morgan and Rockefeller controlled Wall Street interests, foundations , and corporations closely allied to them (including Standard Oil, International Telephone and Telegraph, and Chase National Bank) provided the funding. The Institute influenced United States policy towards Russia, China, and Japan, and helped establish Council on Foreign Relations controlled corporations in these areas.
The McCarren Committee never investigated the Council on Foreign Relations. The investigation created a battle between the “Left” and the “Right” over communism, that still serves to confuse Americans to this day, and divert attention from the organization responsible for the problems– the Council on Foreign Relations.
The article quotes Paul Volcker. The article tells us the Trilateral Commission was founded by David Rockefeller. The article doesn’t mention Volcker and Rockefeller are Council on Foreign Relations members. Or, that Council on Foreign Relations members Zbigniew Brzezinski, and Jimmy Carter helped Rockefeller found the Trilateral Commission.
The article tells us,
“The commission, founded 26 years ago by banker David Rockefeller, includes more than 300 mostly private citizens from the United States, Canada, Europe and Japan.”
The article warps the truth by failing to mention that over 90% of the members are American citizens that belong to the Council on Foreign Relations.
Council membership is by invitation only, and restricted to American citizens. The Trilateral Commission is an inner circle of Council on Foreign Relations members. The RoundTable website contains a 1992 list of Trilateral Commission members. It contains 337 names, 316 are found on various Council on Foreign Relations (1992, 1990, 1988, 1987, 1985, and 1984) membership lists. The other 21 people are either Americans not found on these Council on Foreign Relations rosters, or are European and Japanese members.
The Council on Foreign Relations operates by influencing public opinion. Well planned psycho-political operations are focused at influential decision makers. The operations manipulate decision makers to influence national policy to maximize Council member controlled industry profits. Council member controlled medicine, munitions, media, banking, energy, and food industries profit most during periods of unrest and war.
The current plan to bomb Serbia, is the latest example of this sort of Council on Foreign Relations psycho-political operation. On March 18th, Council on Foreign Relations member Madeleine Albright announced,
“..if Belgrade doesn’t reverse course the Serbs alone will be responsible for the consequences and I would like to remind President Milosevic that NATO stands ready to take whatever measures are necessary.”
As we all know, in Council on Foreign Relations members Albright and Clinton’s book that means bombing the Serbs. Increasingly, it appears, key members of Congress are beginning to suspect that they have been lied to by the Clinton White House and are showing signs of real concern that the entire nation is about to become perpetrators of an attack upon a sovereign nation that could involve not peacekeeping but guerrilla warfare. Council on Foreign Relation member Clinton’s Whitehouse contains 300 or more Council on Foreign Relations members he appointed to the CIA, NSC, State Department, and other agencies. Whose orchestrating the lying, Albright, Clinton, the Clinton Whitehouse, or the Council on Foreign Relations?
The psycho-political operations are developed through “discussion-groups.” Council members attending the “discussion-groups” study different policy issues exploring and presenting divergent views. The discussion is recorded and a digest of the discussion is produced. The material is used to create news articles and essays designed to appeal to well targeted influential decision makers in diplomacy and international relations.
The Council on Foreign Relations member controlled media industry broadcasts the propaganda. “Discussion-group” sessions are closed to news coverage, but are attended by Council on Foreign Relations members who are prominent news and media figures. Security is usually tight, keeping the general public and news media out of the discussion, and identifying, photographing, adding as many “outsiders” as possible who do show up, to a list of potential “security” threats.
Any connections to the Council on Foreign Relations are edited out of the “news.” Council on Foreign Relations success is largely due to keeping its identity a secret. Adopting an organization of overlapping circles helps them do this. The Trilateral Commission is one inner circle of Council on Foreign Relations members used to extend its influence abroad and to act as a cover to protect it from the scrutiny of a congressional investigation.
The Council on Foreign Relations evolved from the Institute of International Affairs. British and American branches of the Institute of International Affairs were established on May 30, 1919, at a meeting in the Hotel Majestic in Paris, by American and British Paris Peace Conference delegates who belonged to the American and British branches of a secret-organization founded by Cecil Rhodes.
“Discussion-groups” were a Rhodes’ Secret-Society instrument developed and used to influence public opinion. The Institutes of International Affairs adopted their use. “Study-Groups” are formalized “discussion-groups” used by the Council on Foreign Relations and its branch organizations in other nations; Council controlled think tanks such as,
- Council for Strategic International Studies
- John Hopkins Nitze School of Advanced International Studies
And, Council controlled governmental agencies like,
- the Central Intelligence Agency
- the State Department
The meetings are limited to a small group experts. Tight security is provided. Discussions and material generated are often classified. The material is used to produce classified reports and digests meant to influence select groups of high-ranking public officials, as well as articles, essays and stories meant to influence the public to accept the proposed national policy decisions.
By 1936 Institutes of International Affairs were established in,
- New Zealand
- South Africa
Each Institute , under the guise of world peace, concentrated on influencing national-policy to achieve unity of all nations under one world government. By controlling public opinion tension is created between nations wary of losing their national identity, mores, and cultures, resulting in a state of perpetual warfare used to justify peace-time National Security Emergency measures and large military budgets. The groups goal was to maximize Institute member industry profits by selling both guns and butter. Could the reason famous economist John Kenneth Galbraith has never written a book exposing the Council on Foreign Relations effect on the economy because Galbraith , is a Council on Foreign Relations member?
In 1918 a group of international lawyers and high-ranking officers of banking, manufacturing, trading and financing companies, headed by Theodore Roosevelt’s Secretary of State Elihu Root, founded the Council on Foreign Relations. Its purpose was to promote commerce through contact with distinguished foreign visitors.
After returning from the Paris Peace conference the American Institute of International Affairs approached the Council on Foreign Relations and proposed a merger. On July 29, 1921, the American Institute of International Affairs merged with the Council on Foreign Relations adopting their name. The new Council on Foreign Relations adopted the American Institute of International Affairs policy — unity of all nations under one world government.
In 1925 ten independent national councils holding territory in the Pacific Area were created to extend the influence of the Royal Institute of International Affairs and Council on Foreign Relations into Russia and the Far East. Institutes of Pacific Relations were established in an interlocking fashion with four existing Institutes of International Affairs (Britain, Canada, Australia, New Zealand) and the Council on Foreign Relations in the United States.
Institutes of Pacific Relations were established in five additional countries:
- the Netherlands
- the Soviet Union
By 1939 the Institutes of Pacific Relations in the four British areas had merged with the local Institutes of International affairs. The American Institute of Pacific Relations remained a Council on Foreign Relations front organization until it was eventually dissolved after the McCarren Committee investigation in 1951. The Institutes of Pacific Relations held joint meetings every two years.
The Pacific Council was a seven member Institute of Pacific Relations inner circle set up in 1927. Members of the four Commonwealth Institutes of Pacific Relations (Britain, Canada, Australia, New Zealand) also belonged to the Institute of International Affairs. The other three members belonged to the Chinese, Japanese, and American Institutes of Pacific Relations. Greene had attended the Paris Peace Conference, and after the conference was one of the early figures in the establishment of the Council on Foreign Relations. The Pacific Council planned and coordinated psycho-political operations designed to achieve the unity of all nations under one world government. One operation focused on extending the organizations influence and control throughout the League of Nations.
The annual Trilateral Commission meeting in Washington DC, is nothing more than a Council on Foreign Relations discussion group. Influential European, Canadian, and Japanese citizens were invited to join the Trilateral Commission so that they could help shape United States Foreign policy and participate in the profits of Council on Foreign Relations controlled Companies in their nations. Now, the Trilateral Commission is inviting Chinese, Korean, Russian, and Ukrainian movers and shakers to join in discussions that will be used to create psycho-political operations to influence United States Foreign policy allowing the Council on Foreign Relations to establish and control corporations is their countries.
If any wrong-doings resulting from the psycho-political operations are discovered Congress will focus their investigation on the Trilateral Commission and not the Council on Foreign Relations. If such an investigation does take place, you will find, as in past congressional investigations, such as the Rockefeller Commission , the Church Committee, the Warren Commission, and the Tower Commission, that many of the Congressional investigators are members of the Council on Foreign Relations.
When the investigators, and those investigated, are closely connected, and the investigators don’t disqualify themselves because of prejudice or personal interest, hasn’t a crime called conspiracy to obstruct justice been committed? If the investigators are high-ranking public officials aren’t the crimes high crimes, that call for impeachment and trial before Congress? Have you requested your elected representatives to call for a Congressional investigation of the Council on Foreign Relations?
FYI: Can any of you speak Greek? A friend sent a link to a website about Athanasios Strigas. The website seems to be a work in progress. The website says,
” Athanasios Strigas is an agent of NATO and the Trilateral Commission and has written more than 8 big books about the Trilateral Commission and the politics in general…His books are written in Greek and are related mainly to the connection and the involvement of the Bilderberg Club in the Greek politics and political events (Turkish invasion in Cyprus, Military junta etc.). Nevertheless they give very much information on the Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Club, NSA, NATO and the secret agencies.”
Athanasios Strigas has studied:
Political and Economic Sciences in the University of Heidelberg
Foreign Relations and International Strategy in the University of Georgetown in Washington D.C.
Propaganda in Patris Lumumba of Moscow
He started his career as an assistant and nowadays as professor consultant of the supreme military commander of NATO. Most of his time he is in Brussels and the last 1.5 years he has written 4 books which had big success.
We all know that countries are being guided from its political and military leaderships. Big countries and small do exist and also the small countries have dependency from the big ones. Despite this in your books you mention two international decision making centers which in your opinion are above the countries and ideologies. Could you be more specific at that point?
It may sound exaggerated but the people in our days are being guided by our political and military leaderships according to the orders of the two global centers-Trilateral Commission and the renowned Bilderberg Club. This marks a new status and it is not something that happened in the past, in which the world was ruled by the ideologies. It is known that the ideologies were being used every time as a way to control the people. But the conflicting ideologies were creating also many warfare. Therefore until some time we had alliances between countries. The last years we have seen a change in the global scenery. Everything has been globalize. The world has become a global neighborhood.
Therefore it urged the necessity for global decision making centers. From this point of view the planetarchy, if we call it like this, will be the politics of the 21st century. This necessary margins the governments of the various countries which are now dependent from those international centers. Today we see that the profits are now the ones that determine the destinies of the countries. The world is already being ruled by substitutes of those two centers. The task of the today’s governments is to keep safe the 93% of the international wealth. This means the wealth that those two centers manage.
What is exactly the Bilderberg Club and what the Trilateral Commision?
The Bilderberg Club is an international decision making center which took its name from the hotel of the Dutch town Oosterberg where its first convention took place in 1954.It does have as headquarters Hague in Holland. In its conventions we would say that take part the protagonists and the supernumary. The supernumary are something like visitors-speakers and they are only allowed to speak a few minutes and always in the first day of the convention. The Guidance Committee of the Club is consisted by Americans and Europeans from the developed countries, never has joined a person from the Third World.
The Club is consisted by persons with conservative aberrations such as Giovanni Agnelli, Luns, Rothschild etc. The president of the Bilderberg Club is today James Callahan ex-prime minister of England and his assistant is the ex-General Secretary of NATO, Lord Carrington. You must remember that in 1993 the Club has met in Greece, in “Asteras” hotel of Bouliagmeni. The Bilderberg Club controls today 33% of the global wealth.
Some members of the Bilderberg Club without having departed from it officially have established in June of 1973 a more developed part the Trilateral Commission with leader the president of the Chase Manhattan Bank, D. Rockefeller. From that time the members of the Trilateral Commission do operate parallel but somewhat above the Bilderberg Club as a Center of Research and Analysis. From the founding members of the Trilateral Commission are Cyrus Vance and Warren Christopher. President is D. Rockefeller and executive manager is Zbigniew Brzezinski. The Trilateral Commission manages the 60% of the international wealth.
From where do those centers have such power?
It think that it is obvious that they take the power from the international wealth they have in their hands and from the appointive presidents or prime ministers -which are in the majority technocrats- which they do control and until some point do guide.
But how is possible the selection of the proper persons? Are there any persons that accept to be the dependent leaders of their countries?
This is a reasonable question but the human ambition does not have any limits. There exist skillful people that in order to rise from the rank at the top of their country’s leadership do not mind for the means that will be used and also for the consequences. The selection for the suitable persons to serve the two centers is being made after checked information which have collected analysts of the NSA with the help of organizations such as CIA, DIA and DEA. The deductions which have extracted the analysts of the NSA are being transferred in the end to the Guidance Committee of the Bilderberg Club. The Committee does meet secretly and the conclusion is sealed in a special envelope which is then given to the presidency of the Bilderberg Club and the Trilateral Commission. Almost 99% the presidencies do approve the decision. The qualifications of the candidates are very fluid, I mean at first elastic consciousness or if you want plasticity to comply to the international decision making center. Another element which is being controlled is that they must not disturb the global balance. This must because it has nothing to do with the balance of the world but from the balance of the profit rates. Virtually they globally prefabricate the income of the two international centers funds.
But didn’t that happen also in the past?
In the past if someone was a prime minister or a president would have come to a conflict with the great powers he would have been characterized as ’troublemaker’ and underminer of the liberty and then would have been vanished politically or biologically. Today the politicians are dependent of some needs which do not allow them to commit any independent moves. You have seen in the recent Germany elections-which happened together with our council elections-that the French were the ones that were celebrating the victory of Kohl. And this because the Mark is supporting the French franc. There is no more any freedom in the leaders. As you likewise are probably obliged to some friends that you have to take into consideration in your moves and plans.
Could you give as an example?
Let’s make an hypothesis that for example this or the next Greek government had the will the Albanian and Turkish problem and the dispute of Greece with Skopje for the name Macedonia. What would they do? Just 300 men are enough to invade into the Aktio base in Preveza which belongs to the NSA and then every problem would be solved. Because if this base would be occupied every electronic control in the Balkans and Turkey would be paralyzed. But such a movement needs much courage.
Which are the methods the structure and the groups of the global decision making centers?
The methods that are being used are simple: I promote you as a president, prime minister, military leader; you satisfy your vanity and have ethical and economical profits, in return you have to blindly obey us. If not we destroy you with the method of corruption or the forced resignation or the assassination. At least this is what happened till now.
What tendencies do appear those centers today?
In our days you can see a tendency for renewal. And therefore it was decided in the last Bilderberg meeting to give to the people 2% percent more from the international wealth, something that the old ones did not accept. There are conflicts
between the groups of the conservative and the more liberals. But i believe the last will in the end dominate.
The last years humanity watched anxiously the falldown of the Soviet Union. Which dynamics have lead to this falldown and what is its deepest meaning?
The falldown of the Soviet Union is a case that started virtually in 1973 from the Trilateral Commission and a part of the Bilderberg Club. The members who left the Bilderberg Club and formed the Trilateral Commission used the tactics of shock and have enforced with their will the breakup of the Soviet Union to the Bilderberg. This was made possible because in the Summer of 1973 ,in the 30 July specifically the Trilateral Commission was controlling the 60% of the global wealth with their its bank which is the World Bank. So it became the dominator of the game.
The meaning of the Soviet Unions falldown is to prove internationally the failure of the Communistic ideology and present it as a system that is inhuman. Besides this because the population of the earth is growing the extra 2% that will be given to the people will be granted to the Soviet Union from the mining of their geological wealth. The soviet people must be educated as a consuming citizen like the western one. In order to control those people many new countries will be created that will not have constant peace.
What is the role of the International Numismatic Fund?
The International Numismatic Fund is a branch of the World Bank. Today the majority of the countries are obligated to borrow mounts of money that they cannot get from private capital or from other countries. This necessity occurs either because the management of the public resources was not successful either because the 5 years plan did fail or because there is interior turmoil etc. There exist of course also politicians that redeem the sympathy of the people by offering them temporal material comforts and asking from them the minimum of their possible efforts. They do this of course with money they take from the national budget that should be normally given to development projects. In any way the point is that sometimes countries reach to a dead end.
On this occasion the INF does exploit the circumstances and acts like this: it grants a pre-approval of the loan to those countries but with its own conditions. This means that you will get the loans from the banks, that all are controlled by the World Bank, if you take these and these measures which are almost every time unsociably. This has as a result turmoil in the society. The government are in a phase of delirium. In order to calm down the turmoil even more money must be given. In this way that do finally get totally controlled from their loaner.
Let’s take for example the Greek education system. 60% of the Education Ministry outlays are coming from loans of the INF. So it is not at all odd that from the 150.000 kids only 40.000 do enter the public universities. All the above explain also why the public works in our country always begin but never end.
What are the global decision making centers most afraid of?
One is the soft spot of the global leaders-even if this sounds impossible-and this lies in their constant fear whether someday the people wake up and demand the wealth that they hold. The same happened in the ex-Soviet Union. The NSA had information that some persons lead the millions of soviets to a revolution in order to get the deducted of more than 70 years money. They were informed about this movement in time and they prevented it by dismembering the country.
You mentioned before an enormous in power organization, the NSA.
Yes, exactly. The NSA (National Security Agency) was founded in the 4th November of 1952 by the president Truman and it has its headquarters at Fort Mead of USA. It has more than 2.000.000 agents and scientists from all over the world. There is no committee in the Congress, not even any laws that control their activities. In reality there is not even an act that confirms its establishment. There exist only documents to protect her. The security rate is very high and its electronic equipment is unique in the world and it has the most perfect computer center in the world. Its computers are gathering and analyzing daily all the information from the hundreds of monitoring stations that are on the whole planet and in this way they oversee the telecommunications of both the friendly and enemy countries.
The Greek part of the NSA network is the american base of Aktio. It is equipped with tenths of satellites which are for example monitoring the movements of the Serbs or of Sadam and in little seconds they inform the headquarters of the organization.
If you ask someone which is the biggest secret service in the world, he will mention the CIA, DIA or KGB. On purpose the NSA has cultivated the impression for long time that the secret services of USA that do everything are CIA and DIA.
An enormous amount of books and articles have been used to write for these secret services. But for the NSA no one has ever written something. In reality those services are executive organs of the NSA which from its side is the executive organ of the two global decision making center that we mentioned before the Bilderberg Club and the Trilateral Commission.
Moreover the NSA is the politicians manufacturer (of presidents and prime ministers) always according to the orders of the two global centers. It does redeem geniuses from all over the world, it is said that it is the inventor of the infections of the today world and of many more things that is impossible to hold the simple human mind.
How can somebody manufacture politicians?
Well to construct or the opposite! There is a committee of politician manufacturing whose president is D. Rockefeller with vice president Richard Foren whose is the leading consultant of General Electric. Members of this committee is Henry Kissinger, Alexander Haig , Toshio Nakamura, Edmond Rothschild, Giovanni Agnelli, Cyrus Vance, Charles Dunkan ex-president of Coca Cola and Helmut Schmidt. The politicians that are going to be presidents or prime ministers are being approved or disapproved by the above council which meets once a month in the central building of the NSA. When the candidate person gets approved or disapproved the brainwash from the Mass Media begins. Money is being given from the Central Banks to establish a party etc. On the same time the other secret services take orders so that the plan of the NSA is carried out.
What do you see in the near future? Will the status remain as it exists or will there be changes in the world?
I think that the changes will begin from the area of Saudi Arabia, changes that will have an effect on the whole international scene. In this occasion the fragile balance of the oil cartels will be altered because 3-4 oil wells of Aramco’s cartel will be bombed. This will mean a raise in the prices of petroleum products. The cartels for one or two years will have a problem in their profit rates.
In this occasion Greece with its oil can play a leading role. Here we will have a repeat of the Onasis phenomenon which came recently in public with all its twisted situations. This time Greece can play a leading role in Europe because its economic strength of oil will allow it to be the 3rd power in the European Union. I mean that England will loose its oil wells in the Black Sea, which belong to BP and Shell, at the same time with the coup d’etat in Saudi Arabia. It is very possible that the geographic borders of Greece with Turkey, Skopje and Albania will change and also the borders of Germany and Poland (Oderneisser line). England will loose Scotland because the Scottish autonomists will be the ones that will blow its oil wells. From the time IRA has made an agreement with England a part from it will go to the Scottish autonomists. Being in high pressure and after having passed the economic convulsion which will lead to the global shock we mentioned before the world’s economy will make an opening to China. China of course will ask something for return.
An exchange could be India. What does this mean? It means that it will be allowed to China to invade with an artificial subterfuge to in India. The Bilderberg Club will supply India and the Trilateral Commission will renew the armor of China. In this war ,in order to reduce the world’s population, the neutron’s bomb will be used. Something that the general of the once NATO’s Army Alexander Haig was fighting off and therefore in 29th June of 1979 they tried to assassinate him. If things happen like this the consequences will drag along Pakistan and Turkey, which will split up in two pieces, Eastern and Western part. In this occasion Tansu Ciller will put Turkey in the European Union.
Taking this opportunity i should tell you that within the vast changes that will happen in the near future is a step-up of the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople. I mean that it will play a more important role than today. Already Ciller has ready a draft of law for the Turkish parliament if the conditions allow it, according to it the Patriarchate will become a separated state, something like the Vatican for example.
Except of exploiting the global wealth where else do target the two global decision centers? Isn’t it a little bit unreasonable to say that a small group of humans does affect and control almost all the countries on earth? How do they manage not to loose the control from their hands?
Let’s make something clear. Everyone that is in either the Bilderberg Club or in the Trilateral Commission is just representative of the global cartels. Allied cartels choose some persons to represent them in the above decision making centers. Their opinion for the international trend they will follow is determinant according to the the cartel they represent. Besides cartel people the only thing that they understand is profit rates. The people that consist those decision making centers just bring gold to those cartels. Few exceptions of members such as Rockefeller, Mitsubishi etc. are just bright exceptions or as it was before in the Trilateral Commission Pol Ostin the boss of Coca-Cola that during all talking and resolutions was sleeping !
Therefore the Bilderberg Club and Trilateral Commission propose to the people of the cartels such as Rockefeller, Hunt etc. the international politics that they will follow.
The second part of your question has this answer. In 1963 the Kennedy’s tried to reduce the tension between USA and the USSR and to stop the war in Vietnam. But the cartels had budgeted that they would collect a large amount of billions of dollars with the continuation of the investments in armor and the war. John Kennedy knew that they would kill him. He decided to get sacrificed because of his illness (an old injury in the back bone which caused horrible pains) and believed that they would stop there. They took out of the hook also Robert Kennedy that would certainly win the next elections and would stop the war. Nixon dared to reduce the dispute this means that he did not continue the war till 1978 but did stop him at 1973.Therefore they involved him in the Watergate scandal and they sent him home. So the control and the guidance is in their hands.
The two global centers except from the ’legal’ governments do have also persons involved in matters that have nothing to do with politics. They are bankers, ship-owners, industrialists and higher state officials. They collect every information they get and they transmit it to the centers. There the resolutions and the proposals follow. After the proposals the falldown and as a last solution the death.
How can the humans react to this totalitarianism? What hopes do exist?
The only thing that the two global centers are afraid is the World’s public Opinion. If the citizens of the countries get informed and realize that they are not governed by their politicians they will maybe learn to react. This reaction can take many variations. For example if they deny to work for specific circles of interests. Then the pressure is obvious. They do take it seriously in mind. Then they will take governments up and down. Bring the army in the sidewalk but if they make sure that there is no solution the Leading Committee is directly being resolved which must give new guide lines. It is obvious that the previous Leading Committee must resign immediately and a new one must be elected.
Are there opponent groups that want the people to wake up?
There are secret groups which came out from the global decision making centers themselves am paid by the NATO to be against monopolies against the big bosses themselves. This luxury does allow the proselytism of other colleagues or people from the cartels so that they finally get persuaded that instead of having profits 1 trillion dollars a year to have something lower. But this bare difference can give good to thousands of families. A few such persons do exist and act against those two global centers. One of them is Oppenheimer the son, that is at this time in Moscow and lives in the eastern part of the city.
His father lives in the western part. The son Oppenheimer is against the power structure. He agrees to reduce (very barely of course) his profit rates. His father doesn’t. Let us note here that his father convinced the Bilderberg Club and the Trilateral Commission to bring down Gorbachev that sold the Russian diamonds for 468 dollars the karat. Then he promoted Boris Yeltsin that does sell them for 69,7 dollars a karat. If the people of Russia does not react they will have to wait for the Oppenheimers death because else they will not prosper.
The AP article, modified to identify Council on Foreign Relations members, follows:
>Trilateral Commission reaches out to others
> WASHINGTON (AP) – The Trilateral Commission, long an exclusive club of
>influential citizens from the world’s most powerful nations, is reaching
>out to other countries to help find ways to foster democracy and economic
>While leading figures from nonmember countries like China, Korea, Russia
>and Ukraine cannot become members of the commission, which meets annually
>to discuss the future of the world, they sat at the table for this year’s
>meetings in Washington, which ended Monday.
>“We have taken steps importantly to extend the range of the discussion
>… to people outside the traditional trilateral areas,’’ said former
>[COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS MEMBER ] Federal Reserve Chairman Paul
>Volcker, leader of the U.S. contingent in one of the world’s most
>prestigious gatherings. The commission, founded 26 years ago by banker
>[COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS MEMBER ] David Rockefeller, includes more
>than 300 mostly private citizens from the United States, Canada, Europe
> [COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS MEMBER ] Volcker, at a closing news
>conference that attracted only a handful of journalists, said three days
>of discussions that involved about half the council’s membership reached
>no conclusions. Sessions are closed to news coverage, although security is
>not tight and some media figures belong to the commission.
>Membership includes academics and industrial and former political leaders.
>Current members of national governments are excluded.
>”The Trilateral Commission doesn’t make any recommendations on
>anything,’’ Volcker said – particularly not on reform of exchange rates or
>the world financial system, which were among topics briefly discussed at
>Otto Graf Lambsdorff, European chairman and former German Bundestag
>member, said China was the focus of much discussion, again with no
>consensus reached. He said, however, that no one opposed cooperation with
>China and no one said China should not respect human rights.
> [COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS MEMBER ] Volcker said the participation of
>representatives from several nonmember countries enhanced the discussions
>and will continue at future annual sessions, held alternatively in the
>United States, Japan and Europe.
>”You have the opportunity of changing thinking,’’ said [COUNCIL ON
>FOREIGN RELATIONS MEMBER ] Volcker, assessing the value of the meetings.
>”I would hope that there is some kind of changing in thinking, a
>convergence of thought, because people are affected by the discussions,
>but it’s not directed deliberately towards a particular end, other than
>the fostering of democracy and economic development around the world.’’
>The Japanese commission chairman, Yotaro Kobayashi, head of Fuji Xerox
>Co., Ltd., said, “Having more participants from outside … has only
>enriched the course of the discussions.’’
Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world, which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom. The news also serves as a social connection tool, as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do. With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand, the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper.
Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools.
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammatical mistake? Send an email to email@example.com, with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at firstname.lastname@example.org. Thank you for reading.
Leave a Reply