by Shem El-Jamal, November 23, 2017
How many times have we seen the corporate media report what seem to be blatant teasers of ET disclosure? Over the past five years, these media sources have continually hinted at revelations of non-terrestrial life, interstellar travel, and alternative Earth history. Yet, none of these mainstream sources ever openly state the significance of these disclosures or the profound truths which they reportedly have in common. Why?
Many of those in the truth community already know about the existence of special access projects, advanced technology, and extra-planetary operations. We know of the existence of not only the various secret space programs, but of the possibility of numerous ET races being in contact with the personnel within these programs. To modern truth’ers, it has become clear that disclosure extends much farther than extraterrestrial life or alternative energy technology. However, the corporate media seems to have trouble even starting the conversation on these matters.
The process known as soft disclosure has been taking place for decades now. This is the slow introduction of formally-hidden truths into the minds of the general public through corporate media. This process is typically accomplished using entertainment in order to communicate these concepts without disturbing the sense of normalcy of audience members.
It does not take much effort to see the subjects of soft disclosure presented to us by mainstream media. These disclosures have come in a variety of subjects, but many of them cover the topic of the numerous discoveries of water-bearing exoplanets by NASA, both within our solar system and in distant systems in outer space.
During the year 2015, there seemed to be dozens of disclosures coming forward about newly-discovered planets in some distant system which could possibly support life. Over and over again, NASA and various corporate sources produced these reports—all while hinting at the possibility of ET life which up until this point, has been blindly ridiculed by the scientific establishment as being completely invalid.
Combined with these disclosures of exoplanets were the numerous discussions of an alternative history of the solar system. These came in the forms of Buzz Aldrin’s talk about a monolith on the Martian moon, Phobos, as well as the stunning disclosure that Mars was once covered with oceans. Keep in mind that these concepts are being disclosed by established corporate sources. Also, just months before these reports took place, these concepts were simply laughed at and dismissed by the establishment.
It wasn’t a decade beforehand that it was basically decreed by the establishment that Mars had never housed life at all, and anyone who said otherwise was ridiculed. This has been the controlling climate of the Western scientific establishment for the last century. However, Western science seems to combine valid science with pseudo-science and dogmatic half-truths. Instead of true and open progress toward new scientific discovery, elitist interests have reportedly prevented the scientific establishment from progressing to any significant degree.
This is said to be due to the elitists’ desire to prevent the obsolescence of the present technological, corporate, and monetary establishments. Consequently, we the public have received manicured sideshow displays of what the financial powers behind science (as well as scientific publications) deem suitable for the public eye.
Another NASA disclosure came with the mission of the space probe, Dawn, which was sent to explore the planetoid, Ceres. Part of the goal of the Dawn mission was to solve the mystery of the Ceres lights—two very bright, self-luminescent lights that were seen on the surface of the planetoid. However, NASA’s publication on this issue seemed to fall short of any complete explanation.
The Ceres disclosure seemed to only be another soft disclosure which was most likely intended to hint at other, more significant truths about the history of our solar system. To add, the explanation which NASA and other reporting sources offered made virtually no logical sense whatsoever, yet these explanation were published by multiple corporate media sources.
Explanation such as “salt deposits” were handed to the public by corporate media—dismissing the facts that these lights were extremely luminous like stars in the sky. No salt I have ever seen gave off that much light unless it was physically exploding in some violent reaction, but that is not what we see from the Ceres planetoid. On Ceres we see two steady and extremely luminous light sources, and these have been dismissed by scientific publications with clearly unscientific explanations.
It is substandard explanations such as this which make it more clear that the establishment is hiding some greater aspect of the truth from public view. So when we hear about an asteroid drifting through our solar system, we know the likelihood that there is more to the story.
When we look at the shape of the proposed “asteroid” reported by NASA, we see something interesting. This shape seems very similar to the classic cigar-shaped UFOs many have reported seeing on Earth. This shape is also similar to one of the ship configurations which the late William Tompkins testified to designing. Tompkins was a child prodigy in technical drawing and was drafted by the U.S. Navy at a very early age. While serving, he was commissioned to design ships and space carriers for interplanetary and interstellar travel.
It could very well be that this supposed asteroid discovered by NASA is yet another attempt by corporate media to preface the narrative of some “new discovery” of advanced technology or ET life. The media might claim that the asteroid has microbial life from another star system. They might also say that it has ruins on it or that it contains signs of intelligent life. It may even be that this object is actually one of Tompkins’ space carrier designs which is deliberately being misrepresented by the median until an opportune time. Some sources believe that NASA may be using this news in order to position themselves to disclosure interstellar travel at some point in the near future.
The consistent mentioning of concepts of ET life, UFOs, and alternative version of Earth history make it likely that the testimonies of many whistleblowers were valid. These testimonies spoke of slow disclosure efforts by corporate media to acclimate the general public to the truth which had been kept hidden until now. The powers behind media have maintain secrecy for all of this time, but have also rationed out various half-truths in news and entertainment in an effort to soften the blow of bigger disclosures.
It seems from the intensity of efforts by certain parties to silence those who promote complete disclosure, that some organizations are still interested in maintaining secrecy to some degree. These interest may be attempting to maintain their own financial superiority over the rest of humanity. They may also be attempting to hide their own crimes against humanity which they have committed under the cover of secrecy. According to reports, both of these cases apply.
A complete and thorough disclosure would bring an end to the exploitation of the human race by wealthy elitists. It would also require the entirety of the past actions of these elitists to be exposed so that we know how to stop other parties from possibly doing the same in the future. A full disclosure would reveal the truth behind free energy, interplanetary and interstellar travel, stop human trafficking, and it would open the door for contact with other non-terrestrial races.
Most of all, a complete disclosure would mean the liberation of the planet from debt slavery and exploitation by greedy elitists. If knowledge is truly power, then our learning is directly proportional to the degree of liberation we will achieve upon disclosure. This gives us a new look at the slow and insubstantial disclosures which NASA divvies once every few months. We could continue to put up with this censorship for a years on end, but I think we can all agree that most of us are ready for something more.
* * * * *
Source: Daily Mail
Published: November 20, 2017
By: Mark Prigg
A newly discovered object from another star system that’s passing through ours is shaped like a giant cigar with a reddish hue, astronomers have revealed.
The asteroid, named ‘Oumuamua by its discoverers, is up to one-quarter mile (400 meters) long and highly-elongated – perhaps 10 times as long as it is wide.
That aspect ratio is greater than that of any asteroid or comet observed in our solar system to date.
The asteroid, named ‘Oumuamua by its discoverers, is up to one-quarter mile (400 meters) long and highly-elongated—perhaps 10 times as long as it is wide.
Video – DailyMail.co.uk
WHERE DID IT COME FROM?
Most comets follow ellipse-shaped orbits around the sun.
But this comet appears to orbit at an angle, and doesn’t circle the sun.
Its orbital path suggests it entered our solar system from the direction of the constellation Lyra, looped around the sun, and will never return.
But others have suggested that the comet did come from Earth, but interacted with Jupiter or another planet, which changed its orbit.
While its elongated shape is quite surprising, and unlike asteroids seen in our solar system, it may provide new clues into how other solar systems formed.
The observations and analyses were funded in part by NASA and appear in the Nov. 20 issue of the journal Nature.
They suggest this unusual object had been wandering through the Milky Way, unattached to any star system, for hundreds of millions of years before its chance encounter with our star system.
‘For decades we’ve theorized that such interstellar objects are out there, and now – for the first time – we have direct evidence they exist,’ said Thomas Zurbuchen, associate administrator for NASA’s Science Mission Directorate in Washington.
CONTINUE READING @ discerningthemystery.com/
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Do you think this article needs a correction or update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected] with the error, headline and url. Thank you for reading.