(Shem El-Jamal) The President’s address to the American people following his extended international trip, was long anticipated by many of us. This speech followed what could easily be considered one of the largest strategic moves toward world liberation in decades. The numerous international developments—such as the destruction of major ISIL targets, and the arrest of several Saudi princes and officials was nothing short of world-changing.
by Shem El-Jamal, November 15th, 2017
The President’s address to the American people following his extended international trip, was long anticipated by many of us. This speech followed what could easily be considered one of the largest strategic moves toward world liberation in decades. The numerous international developments—such as the destruction of major ISIL targets, and the arrest of several Saudi princes and officials was nothing short of world-changing.
On top of all of these major moves, the revelation of major outings and arrests of elitist pedophiles in the United States pretty much made history in a matter of weeks. These public accusations and revelations were the first of their kind and verbalized the epidemic of pedophilia in government and entertainment. These revelations shifted the view of thousands of Americans who once believed the propaganda that Donald Trump was the only problem in government. Following these revelations, many of the former deniers of child rape are taking a second look.
Due to all of these occurrences, most of those who are aware of our current national and world situation expected to hear much more from President Trump on the newly-disclosed issues. However, we were left with the average, official jargon we have always heard from the administrative office. This left audiences feeling curious and even disappointed.
However, before getting too far into the subject, let’s give those who have not yet heard, a chance to watch the speech in its entirety.
I had a feeling that the big announcements that we have been waiting for would not necessarily happen immediately after Trump’s return, even though this was the proposed plan. With all of the covert strategies that the current administration—along with the efforts of a multi-national alliance—has accomplished to overthrow the criminal Cabal, it would not seem fitting that they would simply lay out their own plans for further action. Effective plans do not typically succeed when they are openly stated. They are simply executed and reported later.
It could also have been that the original plan was to disclose much more information during this speech. The administration and security may have been using this speech as a litmus test to see what the reaction might be. It was a subjective decoy to test what any remaining opposition might do. There are other theories they may apply, but in the case that I guess correctly, I do not want to give anything away.
According to multiple sources, many arrests have already taken place. Some of the sealed indictments that were reported to be waiting in different courts around the country may have been opened and served. It would make sense that just in case these indictments were not able to be completed—or if they were completed, but those in custody were not fully cooperative—that the Trump administration would not go forward with any unorthodox announcement. In this case, the administration might wait until all of the people of interest were in custody before proceeding with abnormal narratives.
In his speech, President Trump covered multiple topics—topics which sounded familiar in many ways. However, I am curious to know if there was double meaning in any of the terminology he used. For instance, he spoke about honoring the people of America and the world, about jobs and workers, and maintaining human rights and security for the people. He also spoke about the multiple nations he visited and the comradery his administration attempted to bolster on his recent trip. Most significantly, he talked about the issue of North Korea and the ways which he and multiple nations aimed to disarm and stabilize this country with peaceful results. It could very well be that these statements were literal and there was nothing more to them. However, what if there were more to the situation? What if more was meant by what was openly stated?
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Do you think this article needs a correction or update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected] with the error, headline and url. Thank you for reading.