(Stillness in the Storm Editor) Anna von Reitz perspective on the following topics, in my estimation, appears to be worthy of consideration and study. Some of what she presents below I’ve been able to confirm in my own research over the years. As always, it is best to do your own research to gain a comprehensive understanding of these highly obscured topics.
by Anna von Retiz, July 2017
Donation of Assets: Forty Aces and a Mule — Swissindo and Bondage in America
July 23, 2017
From: Anna von Reitz [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 2:08 PM
Subject: Forty Aces and a Mule — Swissindo and Bondage in America
[From Doreen: I inserted a new offer at the end of Anna’s message. Thanks to ‘Judy’ for bringing it to our attention.]
First, I want a “Red Alert” to everyone that Cindy Kay Currier has a bunko record as long as my arm and many different aliases. One of my readers (a retired private investigator) got interested enough to delve into her background and boy, what an eye-opener that was! She’s an honest-to-goodness professional crook.
[These opinions about Cindy Kay Currier are solely those of Anna von Reitz. I cannot confirm or deny them.]
Very unscrupulous parties are at work in America, trying to do to us what they did to the freed plantations slaves after the Civil War.
They are trying to re-enslave us almost at the moment that we break free.
Look carefully at the UN-SWISSINDO paperwork. What do you see? Do the words “Human Obligation Bonds” jump out at you? They should.
A bond is a promise. There are many, many kinds of bonds. A “human obligation bond” means that you are agreeing that you are a “human” — legally meaning: “monster, animal, color of a man” — basically, that you are not a man or woman, but “something like”— and that you are being obligated.
In this case, if you sign up for the Swissindo “giveaway”, you are in fact being obligated to donate your estate — name, copyrights, labor, land, estate in sum total— for the benefit of UN–SWISSINDO in exchange for the pittance $1200 a month they agree to provide.
Not really “free money” is it? Especially since they never inform you about what you are giving up “in exchange”. No, they don’t come out and tell you that your estate is worth millions, if not billions, and that you are giving it to them for a bowl of porridge.
The Dutch East India slave traders were the ancestors of the Swissindo bankers today. They made their money on slavery then and they are still making their money off of slavery now, even though it has been outlawed since 1926. How do they do that? By getting your to sign paperwork you don’t understand. [The Great con of man … consent! Doreen]
After the Civil War there was a similar program. Freed plantation slaves were offered “forty acres of good land and a mule” which sounded pretty good to most of them. So they signed up and they started farming their little plots and building small homes and barns and little communities. All was well until the “obligation” part of the unseen bond kicked in. The new landowners couldn’t pay all the taxes they were obligated to pay. The government came back in and took everything, but the bond didn’t change.
Most of the former slaves were re-enslaved within three years, only this time the new owner was The United States of America, Inc.
If you sign up tor the UN-SWISSINDO bonds, you and everything that is rightfully yours will be owned by two foreign corporations, and you will be stuck with a “lifetime residual lease income” of $1200 a month on an estate that is worth anywhere from a few million to a few billion.
Wake up, America.
Start demanding your due— your real due.
Start complaining about these foreign corporations operating on your shores to bilk the unsuspecting public. This is an international law enforcement issue. The UN-SWISSINDO operation needs to be recognized for what it is, and it and all similar scams promoting slavery and undisclosed “donation” of assets need to be shut down as organized crime syndicates. [ END]
Source: Our Greater Destiny
Cautioned And Corrected – Email From Judge Anna
July 23, 2017
Judge Anna von Reitz,
There are different people pretending to be David Robinson of Maine Republic fame— putting stuff out on the Internet. Last time I checked to confirm such misinformation, you were supposedly young and black, instead of 80 and white, as I know you are — so how is this young David Robinson sending out “alerts”?
And why are you promoting all this TDA and Swissindo crap—or are you? I am very confused.
Those TDA accounts are for federal employees to discharge their bankruptcy debts. Americans are owed discharge of their debts AND return of their estate property– which is a probate action.
Any American using those TDA accounts is providing evidence that they aren’t an American, and also evidence against their claim to have and to hold their own land and homes and everything else.
Last but not least these Swissindo creeps are bunko artists trying to get people to sign up and re-enslave themselves to “Human Obligation Bonds”— to sell their souls to the slavers for a bowl of porridge.
Cindy Kay has a bunko record as long as my arm.
Why are you promoting anything to do with Swissindo or her?
This is what they did to the freed plantation slaves, too.
Our AMERICAN STATE AND NATIONS BANK is an International Trade Bank. Our bank has nothing to do with any domestic program— TDA’s are federal domestic accounts, and all that they are part of — (the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Retail Securities Service) — is domestic to the Municipal and Territorial United States. It’s jurisdiction is strictly limited to the federal government.
So in order to have one of these accounts, one must be submitting to the State as a federal PERSON.
Source: Maine Republic Email Alert
TDAs — NOT for Americans
July 23, 2017
Judge Anna von Reitz
All those TDA offers? Well, the verdict is in.
I was right. TDA’s are only for federal employees and dependents and federal corporations. American state nationals who have been misidentified as federal citizens are not eligible for this remedy, but they are eligible for another better remedy.
In 2012 the Bureau of Public Debt was merged into what is called the Bureau of the Fiscal Services, located primarily in Parkersburg, West Virginia. Its jurisdiction is strictly limited to the federal government.
The Treasury Direct program is being administered under their Retail Securities Services subdivision, and all of this is being run under the auspices of the Under Secretary of the Treasury for Domestic Finance.
Whenever you see the word “domestic“ in federal publications, they are talking about “domestic with respect to the federal enclaves“ — not domestic with respect to the states and people.
This is their foreign program for their foreign citizens— for JOHN MICHAEL DOE.
If you sign up like a good little sheep, you admit to being a federal franchisee — and that means you can’t possibly own any copyrights or land or children or any of the other assets owed to a natural man or woman.
In claiming one– that is, by authorizing a “Treasury Direct Account” — you deny the other far greater claim.
Here is the rest of the story— as I have also been saying all along, you are owed discharge of all debts and payment of your assets— simply by a different process.
What you, Joe Average American, need to do is to claim back your whole estate which the Federales have seized upon and held and invested to benefit themselves for several generations.
That “legacy trust” is listed at 31 USC 1321, and the allowance for the beneficiary to reclaim it is listed at 31 USC 1322.
When you investigate this whole TDA thing, you go to 31 CFR 363 and start reading about different kinds of savings bonds and how to convert them from investment use to payable status and all the various ramifications of doing so.
Remember how I told you that whenever the government corporation pulls one of its shady deals, it has to provide remedy for its actions? —Like the “income tax”contains the provision allowing you to “revoke your election to pay”?
When you look for the remedy in this whole pile of worms, you find this in 31 CFR 363.126:
§ 363.126 Under what circumstances will payment be made?
We will make payment:
(a) Upon your request for redemption prior to maturity; (This is what people are doing with the TDA accounts)
(b) When the bond reaches final maturity; (This is what the government does when you die and never claim the bonds.) and
(c) If a person who becomes entitled to the bond is unable, unwilling or ineligible to open a TreasuryDirect ® account.
This last part— 31 CFR 362.126 (c) —is your remedy.
Not being a federal employee or dependent in fact, and being owed the entirety of your actual estate, you are ineligible to take part in the foreign TDA process, but you can instead invoke pay out to a bank account of your own choosing.
So why are they offering TDA accounts? (1) To keep control; (2) to reduce their interest payment obligations (note that when you pull the plug and make the bond payable, it stops accruing interest); (3) to get you to “admit” and give them evidence that you are in fact a voluntary federal employee or dependent — a franchisee — having no further claim to all the rest of the assets you are owed as an American state national.
This last part is the crucial one.
They desperately need to stem the tide of American claims coming at them. They need your land to pay their debts. They need your house as an asset yielding them property taxes. They need you to “voluntarily” agree to be their whipping boy— and they are willing to release you from debts you never actually owed“in exchange”for your “admission” to being a slave.
That allows them to claim your whole ESTATE forever.
And gives you a bowl of porridge.
Source: Maine Republic Email Alert
appear anywhere on this site, whether stated as theories or absolute
facts, are always presented by SITS as information for your consideration (food for thought)—and should be
personally vetted by you, the reader. Any opinions or statements herein
presented are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, or agreed to by SITS,
those who work with SITS, or those who read SITS. Any belief or
conclusion gleaned from content on this site is solely the
responsibility of the reader to verify and substantiate. And any actions
taken by those who read material on this site is solely the
responsibility of the reader or acting party. You are encouraged to
think carefully and do your own research. Nothing on this site is meant
to be believed without question or personal appraisal.
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Do you think this article needs a correction or update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected] with the error, headline and url. Thank you for reading.