Body for Awareness Project: Your Body. Your Clothes. Your Truth. On Sale Now.
(Stillness in the Storm Editor) Is the experience of making contact with God, a deity, or spiritual force real or imagined? Are these experiences hallucinations or are they representative of a genuine paranormal phenomenon? These are the questions raised by data gathered through the work of Dr. Michael Persinger and Stanley Koren who invented what is popularly known as “The God Helmet,” yet its actual name is the Koren Helmet. But unlike the name suggests, it cannot produce experiences of God on demand. In fact, only a small percentage of participants in the study actually experienced what they claimed was a god-like figure. So what could be happening?
As the title of this article implies, there are no easy answers. While experiences of deity do not seem to be readily manufactured by the device, what seems clear from the research is that paranormal experiences of all kinds can be easily produced using various applications of the Koren helmet. These include out-of-body and near-death experiences, visitor states, a tunnel of white light, personality dissociation, the experience of demonic presences, hallucinations, and more. What this suggests is that the human brain and biology seems to effect for paranormal states, and that with the right technological tools, almost anyone can be triggered. But what they end up seeing appears to be largely subjective, presumably based on their personal biases and beliefs.
To materialists, the Koren helmet and its ability to induce quasi-spiritual experiences is proof that everything society thinks of as metaphysical is actually a figment of the imagination, a mere product of biology and psychology. But to the spiritualist, the fact that the brain has these innate abilities and that all people will eventually experience them through their own death encounter, suggest that there may indeed be a spiritual realm that one can make contact with.
But the fact that people seem to be able to gather information about their environment even when the physical body is dead, in a coma, or during brain death, suggests that biology alone cannot account for awareness and consciousness. Despite the fact that modern psychology has existed for well over 200 years, there has yet to be any serious study into what consciousness is and how it interfaces with biology—although many scientists dogmatically assert that it is merely a function of biology. Consequently, there exists a host of bias on the part of scientists to suppose that consciousness is nothing but a secondary effect of biology, whereas, within religious circles, there is an equal level of indoctrination into the spiritual essence that animates physical things. In either respect, there seems to be very little genuine scientific study to actually answer what could arguably be some of the most fundamental questions about human existence and consciousness.
But whether you are a spiritualist or materialist, the fact that magnetic fields can profoundly influence human perception should not be overlooked.
The frequency ranges of the human brain are resonant with the Earth’s geomagnetic field, potentiated as the Schumann Resonances. When geomagnetic activity changes, the magnetic soup that people swim through is altered and has a marked affect on human consciousness. Furthermore, over the past 20 years, a host of telecommunication and computer technology has been added to the broth—using the same set of frequency ranges that affect the brain. At no other time in modern history has humanity been so profoundly influenced by the gadgetry used. And while most contend there are no effects of such devices, this seems incredibly short-sighted to assume given how powerful the Koren helmet is.
On another note, and what may be thought of as a rather fringe topic, is it inconceivable to consider that technology that has the capacity to alter human consciousness would be of great interest to many different organizations? Would not the military, government, for-profit institutions, and even political groups want to explore how to influence people using subtle energetic fields? While many might say that such an idea is a wild conspiracy theory, it should be noted that psychotronic research and mind control technology is hardly a science fiction concept.
Recall that during the 1950s and all the way up to the late 1960s, the CIA spent a great deal of money and resources studying how to control perception and the mind in the MKULTRA program. While the declassified documents refer to chemical means of affecting a person’s mind, there is other evidence to suggest that secret government projects, known as Unacknowledged Special Access Programs, most definitely advanced psychotronic warfare devices. Some of these inventions have been patented and can be found in the below-linked article.
Dr. Persinger, in a 2007 talk he gave at Laurentian University, presented research and theorems that suggest the human mind is capable of interfacing with the Earth’s magnetic field, and in doing so, can access other minds and the data therein. He also suggested some 10 years ago, that the introduction of artificial EM signals that operate in frequency ranges of the brain have greatly affected metaphysical phenomenon, saying that increased usage of these devices seems to limit or reduce paranormal activity.
In short, humanity’s ignorance of subtle energy and information processes may have accidently or intentionally caused a severe degradation of potential. People born after the year 2000 are being entrained with electromagnetic energy fields that may adversely affect their capacity to tap into metaphysical realms of consciousness. By comparison, the turn of the 20th century, some 100 years ago, was dominated by mediumship and paranormal study, with many great scientific figures taking the metaphysical and often peculiar realities of life very seriously. But amid the white noise of modern technology, an individual’s sensitivity to such things is greatly reduced—if acknowledged at all.
Humanity finds itself on the edge of an age where the unforeseen effects of modern technology could completely cut off newer generations from the subtle realms of consciousness that are quickly becoming regarded as complete fantasy—despite the vast amounts of evidence and historical anecdotes suggesting otherwise. And there are still more questions left unanswered about what effect this technology has on the human organism and whether the people of Earth should blindly trust the institutions that promote them as completely safe.
by Staff Writer, 2006
The God Helmet (buy it here) is a popular name given to a laboratory apparatus originally called the “Koren Helmet”, after Stanley Koren of Laurentian University’s Neuroscience Department, who built it according to specifications provided by Dr. M.A. Persinger, it’s director.
Used as a research tool to investigate the brain’s role in religious and mystic experiences, the Koren Helmet has been given the name God Helmet. A few Journalists gave it this name when they learned that some people had visions of God while participating in Koren Helmet experiments. The name has stuck.
The Koren Helmet applies complex (having an irregular shape) magnetic signals to the head of the person who is wearing it. The fields don’t work by inducing current in the brain. They have patterns that bear information, and magnetic fields that appear around electrical activity in the brain pick it up.
|It’s a field-to-field interaction, and not current induction. The fields pass into the brain, unaffected by the scalp or skull, because there is no such thing as a magnetic insulator. Nothing can block a magnetic field 1 2. Some psychologists, not understanding this, have mistakenly claimed that the fields used in the God Helmet aren’t strong enough to reach the brain. Magnetic fields pass “through all head structures with no attenuation and can stimulate the brain without discomfort”reference. The mechanism where low-intensity magnetic fields influence the brain has been known for years. reference (Further Discussion)
|An independent God Helmet study found that its effects are not from suggestibility, and that they do indeed have an influence on the brain. The subjects (in this recent and independent study) who received the magnetic fields spoke about their experiences in different ways than those who received no fields. The apparatus used in this new study was not identical to the Koren Helmet, but it still produced measurable effects in spite of its limitations. (Research Publication) Further replication is found in a recent experiment where researchers were able to artifically induce the sense of a presence using robotic stimulation, and concluded that this sensation is the result of activity in specific brain areas, and not actual ghosts, just as Persinger concluded from his experiments. There are a few points of agreement, in spite of their very different research methods.|
|The Koren Helmet is connected to a PC computer through a ‘black box’ that cycles the signals through four coils on each side of the head, above over the place where the temporal lobes of the brain meet the parietal lobes. This is the area of the brain many researchers feel is the source of spiritual and religious experiences link.|
|This illustration shows how the signal shifts from one coil to the next. This is a side view. There is also another set of coils working on the other side. The two coils at the top are no longer used.
The sessions are done in an Acoustic Chamber – a completely silent room. A large part of the temporal lobes ongoing activity is dedicated to monitoring ambient sound. The temporal lobes are the source of religious and mystic experiences, so that silence helps a great deal in creating them in the lab. The same chamber also has a layer of electromagnetic insulation, so that the ambient energy emitted from lab equipment, cell phone towers, and computer monitors is screened out. Because magnetic fields can still pass through this screen (a Faraday Cage), the God Helmet research has included some interesting discoveries about the earth’s magnetic field.
I asked Dr. Persinger how many people had seen God using the Koren Helmet, and this is what he said in reply:
“The problem is producing an environment in which people will report what they experience without anticipating ridicule on the one hand and not encouraging this type of report (demand characteristics) on the other.
Thus far, about 20 or so people have reported feeling the presence of Christ or even seeing him in the chamber (The acoustic chamber where the experimental sessions took place). Most of these people used Christ and God interchangeably. Most of these individuals were older (30 years or more) and religious (Roman Catholic). One male, age about 35 years old (alleged atheist but early childhood RC (Roman Catholic) training), saw a clear apparition (shoulders and head) of Christ staring him in the face. He was quite “shaken” by the experience. I did not complete a follow-up re: his change in behavior. Of course these are all reports. What we did find with one world-class psychic who experiences Christ as a component of his abilities was we could experimentally increase or decrease his numbers of his reported experiences by applying the LTP pattern (derived from the hippocampus) over the right hemisphere (without his awareness).
|The field on-response delay was about 10 to 20 sec. The optimal pattern, at least for this person, looked very right hippocampal. By far most presences are attributed to dead relatives, the Great Forces, a spirit, or something equivalent.
The attribution towards along a devil to angel continuum appears strongly related to the affect (pleasant-terror) associated with the experience. I suspect most people would call the “vague, all-around-me” sensations “God” but they are reluctant to employ the label in a laboratory. The implicit is obvious. If the equipment and the experiment produced the presence that was God, then the extrapersonal, unreachable and independent characteristics of the god definition might be challenged.”
||The experiences of those who have come face-to-face with God might just be an example of a very rare brain activity. If they actually met the true God, then why did they do so in this experimental setting, but not at other times? Can one control God by controlling someone’s brain?
The implications for theology are obvious. Perhaps God exists, but has been waiting until humanity developed enough to find him in the brain before he would appear under any circumstances humans could control. Perhaps God exists only in our brains. Perhaps he exists, and chose to bless 1% of Dr. Persinger’s research subjects with visions of him, because these people were beloved to him.
|There is much more to the God Helmet than just the Koren Helmet alone. There is also a computer program called complex, authored by Stanley Koren, which allows the computer to create the signals. These signals are derived from EEG traces that appear in certain parts of the brain. Just as the brain responds to chemicals with specific shapes, it also responds to magnetic signals with certain shapes. Because these signals are complex, irregular things, it takes a special computer program to produce them.
A third component is the acoustic – completely silent – chamber where the sessions take place. The last component is the ‘black box’ which converts output from the computer into input for the Koren Helmet. This box (not shown) is a specialized DAC (digital-to-analog converter). It’s the core of the technology. The rest of the components of the God Helmet are quite common.
|Another part of the experiment is that the subjects are told they’re going to participate in a relaxation experiment. This makes them expect to relax, but without telling them what’s going to happen. The God Helmet doesn’t work as well when the subjects are tense.|
|The DAC produces the signals that are fed to the magnetic coils (called “solenoids” in the scientific papers). First, one signal is fed to the right side of the brain, and then another signal is fed to both sides. When the signals are changed halfway through the experimental session, the corresponding shift in brain activity can create a religious experience.
The God Helmet is a misleading name. It gives the impression that it can produce the experience of God on demand. In fact, only one percent of the subjects had the experience. In contrast to the one percent who saw God, 80% of the subjects felt a presence of some kind, but did not call it God. Of course, there were probably some subjects who experienced an appearance of God, but were shy about saying they had seen God in a laboratory. That kind of thing is not only intensely personal, but can also get you ridiculed.
If you saw god, would you tell your story, just as it happened, if you thought you weren’t going to be taken seriously? A lot of people assume that, just because someone wears a lab coat, they won’t believe such a vision can happen, or that they’ll think it’s a sign of mental illness. Nothing could be further from the truth in this laboratory, but how would these subjects know that? They had been told they would be participating in an experiment to study relaxation response, and the experimenters were very careful not to encourage glamorous reports.
||The Koren Helmet has also produced visions of demonic beings, out-of-body experiences, visions of other realities, and a range of other paranormal experiences. It could have been named after any of them, but journalists prefer more sensational names, and you can’t get more sensational than God.
One question that comes up often about the Koren Helmet is whether it’s possible to obtain one. The Koren Helmet is found only in the laboratory where it was made, and is not available to the public. However, a PC version of the God Helmet, The Shiva Neural Stimulation System, does exist.
The Koren Helmet has more coils than are actually used in experiments. The two on the top are no longer in use, and the one in the center – between the four over each temporal lobe – is also no longer used. They are still on the helmet, but they no longer output anything.
A Few Lab Reports:
Examples of dialog (from audiotape) from subjects participating in these experiments. Source
“I see shadows along my left side . . . there is someone touching my left side . . . there is a flash of light . . . a tunnel experience. I feel as if I am shrinking and expanding. There is a tingling inside of my thigh . . . sexual excitement. There’s a cold rush (subject shivered; EEG showed paroxysmal activity). I see a visual… it’s an apparition.”
A 21-year-old female with history of diabetes. Amygdala signal applied over both sides
“I felt a presence behind me and then along the left side. When I tried to focus on its position, the presence moved. Every time I tried to sense where it was, it moved around. When it moved to the right side, I experienced a deep sense of security like I had not experienced before. I started to cry when I felt
“I feel detached from my body. I am floating up . . . there is a kind of vibration moving through my sternum . . . there are odd lights or faces along my left side. My body is becoming very hot. . . . tingling sensations in my chest and stomach . . . now both arms. There is something feeling my ovaries. I can
“I feel as if there was a bright white light in front of me. I saw a black spot that became a kind of funnel . . . no tunnel that I felt drawn into. I felt moving, like spinning forward through it. I began to feel the presence of people, but I could not see them; they were along my sides. They were colorless, gray-looking. I know I was in the chamber but it was very real. I suddenly felt intense fear and felt ice cold.”
Reporter from the British Independent.“During the second session, about 10 minutes later, things really began to move. This time a little background sound was played in by Persinger and his team, some vaguely New Age, Eastern temple bell sounds. Appropriately suggestible, my mind set off on a whole new tour, this time with a distinctly Eastern, Tibetan feel. This gradually increased in intensity and conviction, until suddenly, with a kind of booster rocket of realism, I was actually in a temple, in a line of solemn, Tibetan monks, grave-eyed, brown cowls around their heads, the bells tolling loudly now, echoing in my head – in fact I, too, was a Tibetan monk… But then I always had been, I realised – what had happened was that, for the first time, I’d understood this obvious truth. We were off to make our observances as we had, day after day, since time immemorial: bells, high seriousness, magisterial pacing, solemn, monkish eyes… At which stage Pauline’s pert voice came bursting in over the intercom again, and that session was over too.” Link
Common Themes in God Helmet Reports.
The most frequent themes and events reported or displayed by subjects who were asked to press one of two hand buttons when they felt a presence while being exposed to successive sequences of different magnetic field patterns over the right hemisphere or periods of no field. These themes occurred when the fields were present.
1. A dark, ominous force looming right above the person (as if it was going to descend).
2. A feeling of suffocation or pressure on the chest.
3. The sensation of “blacker than black” during brief periods within a minute of the onset of a specific pattern.
4. Re-experiencing previous altered states, such as haunts, kundalini, and psychotropic drug experiences. (These individuals had not experienced the unusual events again until they were exposed to the fields.)
5. About 20% of the participants who clicked one or two buttons indicating they were experiencing a sensed presence had no memory of the experience about 15 to 20 min later.
6. Religious figures, images of “priests,” and, human skeletons, occurred as “flickering” but repeated phenomena.
St-Pierre LS, Persinger MA. “Experimental facilitation of the sensed presence is predicted by the specific patterns of the applied magnetic fields, not by suggestibility: re-analyses of 19 experiments.” International Journal of Neuroscience. 2006 Sept;116(9):1079-96. Link
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Send an email to [email protected], with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected]. Thank you for reading.