In a controversial presentation produced by the well-respected ufologist and researcher Dr. Steven Greer, allegations were levied against two persons, Corey Goode and William Tompkins, claiming they could be disinformation agents or fraudsters. Dr. Greer also mentioned the former front man of the popular musical band Blink 182, Tom Delong, and the news media sites Gaia and Collective Evolution. He said each could be sharing inaccurate or intentionally fabricated information about the nature of secret government projects, extraterrestrials, and hidden technology that could be used by certain nefarious forces to foment an interstellar war.
The following article will detail the core aspects of Dr. Greer’s presentation and philosophy, to include video excerpts of the presentation, and assess and analyze the plausibility of such accusations against the collective store of data available in the public record. It will also evaluate whether such a cosmic false flag is possible if secret space programs exist, and if a shadow government uses hidden technology for nefarious ends, drawing from resources for support whenever possible. Whether one is a newcomer or well versed in these topics, the data contained herein is replete and can be used to educate oneself further.
Dr. Greer is a retired medical doctor turned ufologist who claims to have briefed sitting Presidents of the United States, members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, congressmen, and other figures in government. He is known for the Disclosure Project hearings that took place in 2001 and 2013, as well as the widely successful film Sirius, which has played a major role in revealing the UFO and extraterrestrial phenomenon to the public. In November 2016, he gave two lectures in Las Vegas, Nevada, on the topics of ET contact and what he termed the Cosmic False Flag.
First, an overview of what he discussed will be presented with supportive data added. Second, an analysis of his overarching premise of a cosmic false flag will be made. And finally, his statements in reference to Corey Goode and William Tompkins will be assessed, along with a summary of the methods used to discern a claims truthfulness.
Before diving into the content, let it be said that the goal of this work is not to take sides or discredit Dr. Greer in favor of other figures in the field of ufology, such as those mentioned above. It is meant to be an objective, neutral assessment of the data and perspectives he offers as compared to other sources, and the total store of information available, as much as it is possible to do so.
What should become apparent through the course of this writing is that Dr. Greer, Goode, and Tompkins, all provide information that is largely in agreement. They each discuss the Secret Space Program or Military Industrial Complex, secret government projects, UFOs, extraterrestrials, and they agree that full disclosure is the best course of action. The knowledge that has been hidden from humanity to maintain oppression, enslavement, and energy dominance of corporate interests (along with the Earth’s complete history) is something they each are passionate about releasing to the public for the good of all. Dr. Greer’s intentions appear to be good and non-duplicitous, although he may not have a complete comprehension of the full body of knowledge available, as will be revealed.
In general, Dr. Greer’s concern is related to the details about this full body of information—offering some conflicting opinions about certain specific data points that will be itemized in detail during the course of this writing. And that these data points, in his view, could be used by nefarious forces to cause a global war by capitalizing on the ignorance of the masses to stage a false alien invasion. He worries the public, who has been conditioned to fear extraterrestrials via the media and works of fiction, could be swept up into hatred and radicalism if they are led to believe negative extraterrestrials exist.
On this score, Dr. Greer’s concerns are supported by historical evidence, as the masses are heavily programmed through years of propaganda and social engineering to be used in such a way. But Dr. Greer’s assertion that Goode and Tompkins (and anyone else that isn’t in agreement with his belief that nefarious space-fairing ETs don’t exist) are sharing untrue information is an unproven theory.
As will be discussed later, such a contention is largely ideological on Dr. Greer’s part, and he provided no direct evidence to substantiate the notion they are disinformation agents. That being said, his warnings about exercising discernment are quite poignant, something that Goode and others have emphatically said as well. Blind belief or adherence to dogma, in any capacity, is a serious problem that leads to radicalism and is arguably what allows tyranny and oppression to flourish. Thus, if humanity is to rise above the darkness of the past, each individual is beholden to find within themselves the courage to face reality and learn the skills of discernment, so the people won’t be fooled again.
Watch for FREE the first episode of False Flags with Richard Dolen. (Click Image below)
Shadow Government, Secret Space Programs, and False Flags
Here is a synopis of information within the existing body of researcher to support Dr. Greer, Goode, and Tompkins narratives.
Government projects since the early part of the 20th century, and likely before, can be categorized as either overt and open to public scrutiny, or covert and hidden in nature. It is this latter category that has been a field of intense interest for many years, as whistleblowers, documents obtained from Freedom of Information Requests (FIOA), and anecdotal testimony from the public suggests that a shadow government or clandestine organization has advanced an agenda of great interest to all of humanity. The scope of these activities is vast beyond the limits of what can be enumerated in this writing, but it involves UFOs, advanced technology that is hidden from the public, and an insidious agenda that would probably shock the average person.
The Shadow Government
The FBI investigation into the Hillary Clinton scandal in 2016 revealed a document that referred to “The Shadow Government” or “The Seventh Floor Group.” It could be a reference to the same shadow government that some claim managed secret projects related to UFOs and extraterrestrials.
The nature and scope of this shadow government is not revealed above but other sources the public would find credible suggest that it has existed for a very long time and has developed technological assets that would seem like science fiction to most people.
Here are excerpts from an article entitled Asgardia — an Open Recruitment for a Breakaway Civilization Begins | A “Second Brain Drain” and the Disclosure of Secret Space Programs?, lending credence to the notion a shadowy group does exist.
“There exists a shadowy government with its own Air Force, its own Navy, its own fundraising mechanism, and [has] the ability to pursue its own ideas of the national interest, free from all checks and balances, and free from the law itself.” (Source)
And President Theodore Roosevelt’s comments on a shadowy group within the government also suggest that a breakaway society had gained control over the United States government as far back as the turn of the 20th century.
“Behind the ostensible Government sits enthroned an invisible Government, owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people. To destroy this invisible Government, to dissolve the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics, is the first task of the statesmanship of the day….” — Theodore Roosevelt (1858–1919). An Autobiography. 1913. (source)
The organization appears to be connected to high finance and banking, which many researchers agree helps fund their activities. But it is also heavily compartmentalized and is more so a losse association of criminal syndicates as opposed to a singular body or entity.
Here is another excerpt discussing President Eisenhower and his warning against the Military Industrial Complex (MIC).
Consider that President Eisenhower warned of the power and might of a military industrial complex that answers to no nation or public authority whatsoever and is capable of advancing an agenda hidden from the public eye—much like what President Roosevelt and Senator Daniel K. Inouye referred to.
This warning went out in 1961 after Eisenhower learned of what had been developed behind closed doors under the direction of what are called Special Access Programs and Unacknowledged Special Access Programs, also known as deep-black government projects. These are highly secretive projects with no government oversight, possessing the capacity to advanced technology that is completely hidden from the public eye.
According to released FBI documents as well as recovered pages from former assets within some of these programs, a group known as Majestic 12 or MJ12 was in charge of some of these programs—a multinational group of high-ranking business figures with ties to what has been called the secret government. When Eisenhower learned of these projects—realizing that he was not only unaware of their activities but completely incapable of overseeing them for the safety of the American people—he was furious and made efforts to regain control of the situation.
Dr. Michael Salla is one researcher who presented the following account as provided by Richard Dolan in relation to a former CIA operative turned whistleblower who was ordered to deliver a message to one of the secret facilities known as S4 or Area 51. The whistleblower testified before a panel of six former US members of congress during the Citizens Hearing on Disclosure in 2013.
In response to questions from UFO historian Richard Dolan, the former CIA agent went on to explain how in 1958, he and his boss – the CIA operative – were summoned by President Eisenhower to the Oval Office. The President, who was accompanied by Vice-President Nixon, told the agent and his boss that he was trying to get information about efforts to learn about extraterrestrial life and technology. The agent said that according to President Eisenhower: “MJ-12 was supposed to find out, but they never sent reports to him.” The CIA agent said he and his boss were called into the Oval Office”. President Eisenhower said:
We called the people in from MJ-12, from Area 51 and S-4, but they told us that the government had no jurisdiction over what they were doing…. I want you and your boss to fly out there. I want you to give them a personal message…. I want you to tell them, whoever is in charge, I want you to tell them that they have this coming week to get into Washington and to report to me. And if they don’t, I’m going to get the First Army from Colorado. we are going to go over and take the base over. I don’t care what kind of classified material you got. We are going to rip this thing apart.”
If these accounts are to be believed, it would provide some backstory for Eisenhower’s infamous warning regarding the out-of-control status of the military industrial complex. And given that these programs were well established during the mid-20th century, it also suggests that incredible advances have taken place, which is—to this day—completely hidden from the public.
Unacknowledged Special Access Programs (USAPs) is a term referring to government and independently financed activities that are allegedly for the purpose of national security but are completely devoid of public oversight. These programs are authorized to lie to the public and government officials using cover stories that are often very elaborate in nature, as an excerpt from a supplement to the DoD manual related to special access programs states.
Program Cover stories. (UNACKNOWLEDGED Program). Cover stories may be established for unacknowledged programs in order to protect the integrity of the program from individuals who do not have a need to know. Cover stories must be believable and cannot reveal any information regarding the true nature of the contract. (Source)
Secret Space Programs
Evidence in the form of whistleblower testimony, as well as declassified documents, suggests that secret space programs have been in operation alongside the public space program for decades—if not far longer. Its activities include the control and exploitation of all life on Earth and beyond—so it is claimed by many researchers.
The Secret Space Program (SSP) is an unofficial term referring to a conglomerate of government and corporate interest projects with overarching activities in space exploration, often dealing with extraterrestrials and/or spacecraft of some kind—whether in joint operations or reverse engineering projects. While there has been no “official” disclosure in this regard, an enormous body of evidence by way of whistleblower testimony, declassified documents, and eyewitness testimony suggests such programs exist.
Richard Dolan is a ufology researcher who uses the term Breakaway Civilization when discussing these activities, as described in the below excerpt from the above mentioned Asgardia article.
Richard Dolan is a researcher who spoke at the Citizens Hearing on Disclosure at the National Press Club event organized by Dr. Steven Greer in 2001. He said that evidence assembled via declassified documents and whistleblower testimony suggests that indeed a breakaway civilization has existed alongside common place societies for decades, if not far longer. It is this same covert group that was responsible for promoting and maintaining the UFO cover-up and silencing anyone who dared speak about advanced technology that could threaten the status quo of the energy industry, according to Dolan.
But what is a breakaway civilization?
According to researchers, a breakaway civilization is a term referring to a secretive group within a nation or society that furthers a hidden agenda often involving technological advancements that eventually lead to resource independence from the parent community. These resources would include but are not limited to, financial, social, or material demands that are one day transcended as a result of an agenda’s success. (Source)
Before the program of official secrecy and cover-up began in the 1950s, research of UFOs and extraterrestrials was a valid field of research. After the Trinity nuclear bomb tests in the 1940s, the number of flying saucers seen by the public exploded and an official military investigation took place called Project Blue Book between 1952 and 1970, preceded by projects Sign (1947) and Grudge (1949).
As Dr. Greer mentions in his presentation, also echoed by countless other researchers, the infamous 1947 Roswell UFO crash apparently provided the MIC with an extraterrestrial spacecraft that was so advanced it took decades to understand fully. From this and other recovered ET vessels, the information age was born.
But prior to this development and World War II, the Germans and other nations were advancing antigravity technology and what are called scalar weapon systems based on Nikola Tesla’s advances—that were not fully understood during the peak of the Serbian-American inventor’s career at the turn of the 20th century. It would take teams of engineers decades to comprehend what Tesla seemed to divine intuitively, and from these hidden projects, a host of incredibly deadly and disturbing technologies was produced. These systems include scalar-based electromagnetic induction apparatus that can affect weather systems and trigger earthquakes (known popularly as HAARP technology), and also has the ability to interface with consciousness via electromagnetic entrainment. It is the latter application for altering human perception that was a central point in Dr. Greer’s presentation.
MKULTRA is a mind-control program developed by the CIA beginning in the 1950s and officially ended in 1964. However, many contend that it was classified and went deep black (an unofficial term referring to USAPs). In 1977 FOIA requests revealed to the public certain aspects of the program, specifically related to trauma-based and chemical mind-control techniques, but the electromagnetic methods were never fully disclosed. Dr. Greer and others contend that these scalar mind augmentation systems were used, and still are, by the shadow government against people all over the world. The alleged Russian Woodpecker experiments are another example of mass mind-control using similar technology.
What is of interest in relation to Dr. Greer’s presentation is what is popularly known as a false flag, or as it is apparently known in the military, Deceptive Indication and Warning operations, or Deceptive I & Ws. As the name implies, these are missions intentionally designed to cause confusion and deceive the public (or those within the government or military) for the purpose of compartmentalization, inciting war, drawing attention away from classified projects, or garnering support for a political venture of some kind. When partnered with disinformation or distract, decoy, and trash (discredit) campaigns, it is very easy to manipulate the masses, especially since critical thinking and discernment skills have been almost completely purged from the public arena.
All that need be done in distract, decoy, and trash campaigns is to implant a false whistleblower or insider into a community doing valid research, like alien abduction. Then the insider is revealed to be a fraud and the undiscerning masses assume anything that person said—whether true or not—is also untrue. They paint anyone mentioning alien abduction with the same brush, which is a tactic that is actively used by debunkers and the propaganda media to this day. This is why personal discernment and analysis is an essential to avoid deceiving oneself.
Here is the definition of an I & W from The United States Department of Defense:
Indications and Warnings
Those intelligence activities intended to detect and report time-sensitive intelligence information on foreign developments that could involve a threat to the United States or allied and/or coalition military, political, or economic interests or to US citizens abroad. It includes forewarning of enemy actions or intentions; the imminence of hostilities; insurgency; nuclear/nonnuclear attack on the United States, its overseas forces, or allied and/or coalition nations; hostile reactions to US reconnaissance activities; terrorists� attacks; and other similar events. Also called I&W. See also information; intelligence. (JP 2-01)
When the term deceptive is added to the term indications and warnings, it becomes clear that any operation with the purpose of promulgating false intelligence or information, sponsored by the government, military, or clandestine entities, falls into this category. This is a term Dr. Greer referred to several times in his presentation as something high-level operatives within the MIC are aware of.
A notable example that Dr. Greer mentioned during his presentation was the Gulf of Tonkin incident.
The NSA admits that it lied about what really happened in the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964 … manipulating data to make it look like North Vietnamese boats fired on a U.S. ship so as to create a false justification for the Vietnam war. (Source)
What is a Cosmic False Flag?
Dr. Greer proposes that a Cosmic False Flag is an elaborate deception of global import and scope. The military industrial complex (MIC) and shadow government would employ the use of three different categories of technology to deceive the public to accept an alien threat has invaded the Earth: Alien Reproduction Vehicles (ARVs), EM mind control technology, and manipulated/fabricated witnesses and whistleblowers. The false flag would unite humanity in ways that have heretofore only been revealed in science fiction films like Independence Day.
Here is an introduction to the Cosmic False Flag presentation.
Instead of bringing humanity together in an age of freedom and recognition of individual rights and sovereignty, it would be a despotic fascist coup that would give the hidden powers that be an excuse to claim total control over humanity. Most of the population of Earth would be exterminated in a “war against the aliens,” which would, in reality, be the shadow government and the psychotic elite behind it.
Ronald Reagan spoke of an extraterrestrial threat uniting humanity in a speech to the United Nations General Assembly, the 42nd General Assembly, on September 21st, 1987:
“In our obsession with antagonisms of the moment, we often forget how much unites all the members of humanity. Perhaps we need some outside, universal threat to make us recognize this common bond. I occasionally think how quickly our differences worldwide would vanish if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world” (Source)
What the former president just suggested is the essence of the cosmic false flag scenario described by Dr. Greer—that people would be completely overwhelmed and galvanized by an alien threat, setting aside their differences to fight the invaders.
According to Dr. Greer and several others, this is exactly what the darkest parts of the shadow government have been advancing. Realizing that the plot would arguably be the grandest and far-reaching deception in human history, the proponents of such a scheme began using anything and everything at their disposal for the endeavor. This includes the use of false extraterrestrial contacts beginning as early as the 1950s, spacecraft designed to appear non-terrestrial but are in fact human in design, and finally media of all kinds that would begin to prepare humanity for accepting an alien threat.
Dr. Greer’s presentation discussed each the above-mentioned facets in detail, which will now be outlined.
A central facet of the cosmic false flag is what Dr. Greer says is alien propaganda, specifically the belief that scores of extraterrestrials are negatively oriented and have the intention of enslaving or taking over the human race. The use of all three categories of assets discussed above is employed to promote the idea that aliens are here to conquer humanity against humanity, something he thinks is untrue.
Dr. Greer had this to say in regard to the notion that negative ETs exist, calling it a form of alienism.
Alienism, as I’m going to define it tonight, is the proclivity to view anything that is non-human, but an intelligent life-form, as a potential threat, and the threat is directly proportional to how different they either appear or behave from us.
With many of these people you’ll hear that the ones that the look Nordic, shall we say. I’ve spent three or four hours with Bill Tompkins, the ones that kind of look like us but are pretty, those are GROOD [great/good] the ones that look some other way those are bad ones. Isn’t that interstellar racism? … Take a step back. Aren’t the good ones always the pretty blond ones with the big breasts… I find it appalling … are we really going to stay on that cycle of taking racism and turning it into alienism? (Source)
The notion that only positive ETs exist is a hotly debated point within ufology and other circles. Dr. Greer seems to believe that any claim of nefariousness on the part of contactees and experiencers is part of a false agenda or hoax to deceive the public. He seems to think that if such negative groups existed, they would have taken over long ago, as he shares in the below excerpt in reference to a conversation he had with Monsignor Corrado Balducci.
Others state that the alien invasion already happened long ago, and that the human race was taken over by negative entities before modern history began and that the monetary system itself is part of a subtle program of mass control that was perfected by extraterrestrials on other worlds eons ago. Within this perspective, the negative beings, whether extraterrestrial or human, want society to believe it has not been taken over, a kind of free-range slavery, which is easier to maintain and produces more fruit than one of overt oppression. If you can get people to believe they are free, even though they are not, they won’t try to identify or gain freedom from oppressors.
While the average person might think the idea of money being used as a tool for self-policing enslavement is a wild conspiracy, the logic behind it is not unfounded, and scores of researchers have put forth information detailing how this works.
The theory of financial enslavement seems to be so widely accepted by a growing body of researchers it is openly revealed in pop-culture like the TV series Rick and Morty, as depicted in the below segment.
And, of course, there is the infamous film They Live, which is one of the most revealing presentations of hidden control forces in popular works of fiction.
Specifically, Corey Goode and countless other researchers contend that nefarious races of extraterrestrials have maintained underground facilities on the Earth, particularly in Antarctica, for thousands of years, well before modern human history. And that some of these races use artificial life extension technology that requires the consumption of life force energy produced by fear and trauma, called looshe. While some dismiss this as yet another wild conspiracy theory, when one considers biophotons and how fear states alter brain and heart coherence, there is empirical data to support this assertion.
Emotion has been shown to alter the shape of DNA, which according to Fritz Albert Popp stores biophotonic light, and thus if one is in a state of fear, excess life force energy is released that parasitic entities can feed on.
To continue the discussion of the cosmic false flag, an examination of advanced secret spacecraft is in order.
Alien Reproduction Vehicles
Dr. Greer claims that secret programs were involved in developing antigravity technology and spacecraft that— by the mid-1950s—was apparently so advanced that many civilians could and did confuse them for extraterrestrial vessels.
Here is an excerpt from his presentation discussion manmade UFOs and what he calls stagecraft or the methods used to deceive the public.
And here is an extensive presentation about ARVs by Mark McCandlish.
Dr. Greer says the shadow government wanted the public to believe extraterrestrials were frequently appearing in the skies over the world, all while maintaining an official policy that they don’t exist. And while Dr. Greer contends there were genuine ET sightings and contacts, he says there were also staged encounters that are intentionally designed to confuse those researching the topic—a point that Goode and Tompkins assert as well.
Alien Reproduction Vehicles is a term specifically referring to the creation of craft that mimics non-terrestrial vehicles. Many research groups to this day contend that all such sightings are ET in origin only, saying that “humans aren’t allowed to make them, so all UFOs are ETs.” But proponents of such viewpoints often ignore and even suppress any evidence that implies the contrary, acting more like religious zealots than earnest researchers seeking the whole truth.
Here is an excerpt wherein Dr. Greer discusses the difference between genuine ET spacecraft vs. ARVs spacecraft.
In addition, behind closed doors, through the use of scalar-based technology, the MIC developed weaponry capable of targeting and downing genuine extraterrestrial spacecraft for reverse-engineering projects. The fruit of such a program was a state-of-the-art grade of technology that—according to Dr. Greer and others—was well established by the beginning of the cold war.
Here is an excerpt from the presentation discussing this technology.
Dr. Greer mentions in his presentation Dr. Fred Bell who allegedly was the victim of EM mind control that was used to convince him the military needed to target and take down any ET craft in the skies. Allegedly, Dr. Bell helped produce, test, and perfect these weapons as early as the late 1950s.
Sergeant Clifford Stone is a whistleblower who claims to have worked in UFO crash retrieval programs during the mid-20th century, further supporting the notion that the MIC was advancing technology by reverse engineering genuine ET craft—while at the same time—using their own advanced vehicles to confuse ufologists and contactees.
Holographic Projection Devices
Project Blue Beam is a popular term referring to technology that would be used in a fake alien invasion, which Dr. Greer did not mention by name but did discuss aspects of. It has all the same components as his cosmic false flag scenario, such as holographic projectors and the use of EM mind control devices—generally known a Voice of God or psychotronic weapons—to lead people into thinking they are having a religious experience with whichever deity they personally believe in.
Dr. Greer discusses this technology along with false or scripted memories in the next excerpt from his presentation.
Benenson Strategy Group allegedly produced a document entitled “Salvage Plan” that mentioned Project FIRESIGN—a false alien invasion scenario that almost perfectly matches the infamous Blue Beam plan. However, the documents authenticity is hotly contested, and it was dismissed by some as a hoax, citing discrepancies with the logo.
Many elements in the Salvage Program document appear to be based on an accurate analysis of prospects of the Clinton campaign succeeding as distrust in mainstream media and polling reaches unprecedented heights. The FIRESIGN technology has been well known to many UFO/exopolitics researchers who over several decades have described it as Project Blue Beam.
Nevertheless, there are a number of issues from the document that raise doubt about its authenticity according to the popular blog author, Kauilapele. These include the document using an old 2012 logo for the Berenson Strategic Group, and an incorrect street address being used for its Washington Office. These discrepancies may be indicative of a hoax, or included in order to introduce plausible deniability in case of any unintended leak. (Source)
Whether an authentic document or not, the plan calls for the use of holographic projection technology that would be used in addition to ARVs to make people believe an alien invasion is taking place.
In the presentation by Dr. Greer, he refers to holographic projectors that were revealed during a Snoop Dogg concert in 2012.
Dr. Greer states that the above demonstration is only a partial disclosure of what is far superior technology and could easily convince people that the projections are real.
Thus, there are several corroborating points to draw on to support Dr. Greer’s claims, whether anecdotally or technologically regarding “stagecraft” and ARVs used for psychological warfare purposes.
EM Mind Control and Voice of God Technology
Dr. Michael Persinger is a cognitive neuroscientist who studied the effects of electromagnetic signals on the brain, supporting the idea it is possible to produce incredibly vivid hallucinations that mimic real experiences. He developed a device popularly known as the “God Helmet” for this purpose, which some researchers assert is proof of concept that psychotronic technology exists and can be used as a mind-control weapon against the public.
Briefly, the human brain and biology produce an electromagnetic field that is capable of coupling with the Earth and other human beings via sympathetic resonance or entrainment. The EM fields produced by the earth, known as the Schumann resonances, seem to act as a baseline frequency for upper-level harmonics used by the body and measured by scientists as brain waves.
Using various forms of electromagnetic field generators, such as radar and scalar wave antenna (HAARP), but also localized devices that can target single individuals, one can induce all types of experiences and phenomenon on the body and mind. Disease or healing can be affected, as well as false encounters—that to the person experiencing them are almost indistinguishable from the reality they perceive. They can even produce disembodied voices that mimic discarnate entities (spirits, angels or ETs) that mediums or channelers claim to have made contact with for most of human history.
In summary, according to Dr. Greer and others, over the past 70 years, the MIC has perfected technology that can hijack what is commonly referred to as extrasensory perception mechanisms within the human body and mind. This suggests that any experience, whether mundane or extraordinary, could be artificially induced via advanced mind-control technology. But Dr. Greer doesn’t claim everyone experiencing such things are all false experiences. Instead, he says that many are genuine but that the MIC has the ability to track these bonafide encounters and quite often targets these individuals for a false experience to confuse the situation.
Enter the Military Abduction Program or MILABs.
Dr. Greer states that the Military Abduction Program (MILAB) is another facet of this cosmic false flag agenda. But he is hardly the only one who discusses this topic. It is a complex and vast subject that often involves the following scenario.
An individual having genuine extraterrestrial contact experience, sometimes involving abduction is identified by the military. The MIC through the use of advanced surveillance technology can track and target anyone who has such an encounter and often performs a secondary abduction that uses EM mind-control technology, ARVs, and what Dr. Greer calls Programmed Lifeforms—entities that look like real ETs but are either humans in makeup or robotically controlled fakes. The purpose of such a program, Dr. Greer says, is to confuse the experiencer, often involving horrific testing or probing procedures that lead the individual to conclude the beings encountered are negative and insidious. But this is just one perspective on the situation.
Here is an excerpt from the presentation wherein Dr. Greer discusses false abduction and MILABs.
Volumes have been written on the topic of extraterrestrial abduction. But focusing on Dr. Greer’s perspective, one goal of the MILAB program is to implant a false experience that leads many to believe all extraterrestrials are negative. Arguably there are many other aims for this program, such as reconnaissance and research of real extraterrestrial encounters. The individuals abducted by the military and given false memories will form a growing body of witnesses that can further cloud the field of ufology so that they—according to Dr. Greer—bear false witness and state that negative extraterrestrials are trying to harvest human DNA or learn about humanity for an eventual invasion.
It should be noted that Goode has discussed the MILAB program in precisely the same fashion as Dr. Greer, saying these projects have the purpose of gathering information and confusing ET abductees, but does not go as far to also say that all negative ET encounters are false, as Dr. Greer claims.
He also says that cattle mutilations are fabricated, citing a Dr. John H Altshuler’s research as a reference.
Whistleblowers and MILABs
Dr. Greer states that another aspect of the cosmic false flag agenda is that the field of ufology—via the growing body of abductees with false experiences, must be seeded into the consciousness of humanity to support the plausibility of an extraterrestrial invasion scenario. Again, whether or not Dr. Greer’s claim that all negative experiences are false is unproven as there are scores of people that say they had horrific abduction experiences. Whether all of these experiences are false is unclear, but if Dr. Greer and others are to be believed some of them could be psychological warfare operations to confuse abductees and by extension ufologists.
Until recently, the topic of alien abduction was considered too taboo to discuss seriously, but since the 1950s, science fiction has exploded onto the scene, often providing a venue to reveal hidden activities and realities to the public. Subject matter that seems to be of keen interest to the MIC involving USAPs often appears on TV shows, movies, and other forms of media that are disclosed through such mediums. In other words, science fiction in almost every respect has become focused on promulgating a prejudice that all extraterrestrial life is evil or nefarious. This is in agreement with Dr. Greer’s assertions about creating a public bias that will one day lead to the population of Earth being galvanized against an alien threat.
On the issue of whether or not whistleblowers are providing false testimony, it is not only theoretically possible, but arguably essential to consider. As was mentioned above, USAPs have the authority via codified policy to distribute disinformation. And if one performs a comparative analysis on the complete totality of whistleblower testimony available, there are glaring inconsistencies. This suggests that the MIC can and does use false whistleblowers to confuse researchers and the public at large. Historically speaking it seems any field of research that advances towards the truth is subject to coordinated disinformation attacks.
As an example, consider the topic of super soldiers, which is a hotbed of activity at present. Certain individuals claim to have been recruited into assorted secret projects, and enhanced using various means, such as DNA augmentation, electromagnetic fields, age-regression, and sometimes are the product of alien-human hybrid programs. But often there is no evidence provided other than anecdotal testimony. The lack of evidence does not necessarily mean anything related to the topic is untrue, but it does make it very easy for false whistleblowers to come on the scene and befuddle genuine research. Initially, there are a handful of alleged super soldiers emerging to discuss their experiences, but as of the time of this writing, there are hundreds of people coming forward and in many cases, the testimony provided is divergent on the whole.
Still, other insiders claim that some of these people professing to be super soldiers are either outright frauds, or were given false experiences that made them perfect disinformation agents. For the growing body of researchers attempting to make sense of the situation, it is increasingly confusing, and many have abandoned the whole topic due to a handful of obvious fraudsters.
For the MIC, the more confusion that is created, the greater the likelihood the actual truth will not be revealed or make it into the hands of researchers. And in effect, this is what Dr. Greer has also asserted. But he goes a step further to state that anyone who has testimony that suggests negative extraterrestrials exist—or that nefarious activity is taking place outside the Earth, such as Mars bases populated by slaves taken from Earth—is a disinformation agent, either by conscious intent or scripted memory manipulation.
MILABs are another aspect of manipulation, which is less contested. Through hypnotic regression therapy techniques, the scripted or screen memories given to abductees can be identified and carefully dismantled to reveal what is hidden beneath. In some cases, secondary abductions have revealed that human beings are nearby while so-called aliens are performing the abduction, which Dr. Greer cites in his presentation. Other whistleblowers have also stated that the military does abduct individuals who have genuine ET encounters in order to debrief them and cause confusion, as was mentioned earlier. So while Dr. Greer’s contention that all negative ET experiences are a product of disinformation is not confirmed, there does exist other testimony and evidence to suggest fabricated experiences are occurring.
Screen or Scripted Memories
The work of Dr. Persinger provides an empirical basis for understanding that it is possible to manipulate consciousness via electromagnetic means. And other researchers in the mainstream dealing with criminal investigations and eyewitness testimony have demonstrated that memory is much more fluid than one might think, as the below-linked article reveals.
Corey Goode is a whistleblower and SSP insider who claims to have participated in the MILAB program and worked to undo the effects of screen memory implantation. His testimony is too vast to detail here completely, but it essentially describes what is a fairly typical experience within MILAB cases. As a young child, he was targeted by the MIC for having special intuitive or psychic abilities and would often go to “special classes” at school. In 1986, he claims to have participated in the Solar Warden SSP for 20 years. He was then age-regressed and deposited back in time to moments after he left. To many, these claims are so wildly fantastic that they are dismissed without research but for avid researchers of ufology and secret government projects, there is much to lend credence to them.
Goode says that upon his return after a 20-year tour of duty, his memory was wiped and he had a screen memory implanted that for many years prevented him from recalling what happened. But one day he began to remember aspects of his SSP service, and through a trusted regression therapist, finally experienced total recall. Since then, he has been abducted on two more occasions, taken by the MIC SSP, had his memory wiped, and was given more screen memories. And while he says he was confused for a time, he is now able to determine when these technologies are used against him. If his accounts are true, then it suggests that while the unaware public might not be able to tell the difference between genuine and real memories, it is possible to differentiate scripted from genuine experiences.
Dr. Greer also stated that he was subjected to this technology years ago, and that he too is able to discern the difference between screened and real memories. Although he did not indicate how this was done, it presumably requires discernment skills and the use of one’s mental faculties, like critical thinking, keen observation, and inquisitiveness.
Science Fiction and Media
Drawing from popular works of fiction, there are countless examples like The Bourne Trilogy, Dollhouse, and others—all of which have memory wiping and screen or scripted memories as a key facet of the storyline. There is a clear pattern of portraying seemingly real aspects of hidden programs in popular works of fiction, arguably to cause the uninitiated public to dismiss them as fiction if they are ever encountered in life.
Here is another excerpt from the Asgardia article of citing how the media seems to be used as a way to hide or disclose information to the public.
As one possible example of disclosure through fiction, Jack Kirby is a comic book artist who produced many widely successful works during the mid to late 20th century. Kirby wrote The Face on Mars depicting a giant human visage on the surface of the red planet in 1958.
But it wasn’t until 1976 when NASA’s Viking Missions sent back photos of the Cydonia site that the public learned of a landform that some believe is a clear-cut case of an extraterrestrial civilization.
Image Source. Viking image of the Cydonia site on Mars
Image Source. The “face on Mars.”
Although NASA and the media were quick to refute claims that this image was proof of the existence of non-terrestrials, it fueled a storm of interest in the notion that humanity is not alone in the universe. Ufologists would spend years trying to solve this mystery, all while most of the public remained completely unaware of this staggering correlation.
Did Kirby know that the face on Mars existed? If so, how did he come to gain this knowledge?
Some researchers contend that Kirby was provided the data by certain figures within a secretive space program that had already made the voyage to Mars decades before NASA would set its sights there.
If true, then this suggests what breakaway civilization and secret space program researchers have asserted for years—that there is indeed a hidden agenda to explore space that was successful beyond the wildest dreams of many who subscribe to NASA’s contemporary plans for Mars exploration.
One whistleblower claims that the Germans developed a hidden program to produce antigravity flying saucers as early as 1930, some 30 years before Kirby would pen his infamous comic book work. But again, for the average person, these claims are so controversial that many dismiss them out-of-hand, without a second thought that they might actually be true.
The 1953 CIA sponsored Robertson Panel release the Durant Report recommending debunking the flying saucer phenomenon by using the mass media in what was the beginning of a psychological warfare program against the general public. (Source)
What this small data point out of a large body to choose from suggests is that the media in general seems to be playing a major role in manipulating the extraterrestrial and USAP narrative, whether it is to “debunk” genuine UFOs and extraterrestrial encounters or it is to promote propaganda that serves the agenda of the MIC.
Comparative Analysis of Dr. Greer’s Presentation
Dr. Greer originally publicized his talk by specifically referring to Corey Goode and William Tompkins. And during the presentation, he alluded to the fact they could be disinformation agents but did not explicitly state that they were. He did respond to a question asked from the audience wherein Greer stated that people should be highly skeptical of their accounts.
When comparing Dr. Greer’s data to both Goode and Tompkins accounts, there is almost total agreement insofar as histoical narrative, with some differences that will now be listed.
Early German SSP
Dr. Greer contends that the Nazis developed antigravity commonly known as the Nazi bell but they was not successful in perfecting the technology. It wasn’t until the end of World War II, after German scientists came to the U.S. through Project PAPERCLIP that they were able to finish their designs, with the help of the American shadow government and the MIC.
Goode and Tompkins, working independently, contend that Dr. Greer’s version of events is only partially true and that it is itself a cover story and an aspect of a partiald disclosure agenda—a kind of deceptive I & W in its own right.
They say that the Germans had several different antigravity research projects, one involving the Nazi Bell and another that was greatly advanced through extraterrestrial contacts made with a race of reptilians called the Draco. Still another civilian project that the Germans only learned of later was headed by the Vril Society and Maria Orsic. According to Goode, Orsic made contact with several different non-terrestrial races that helped her team develop a fully functional spacecraft capable of traveling to the stars. And both Tompkins and Goode claim that another program assisted by the reptilians went to the Moon setting up a base there, as well as visiting Mars and other planets in the solar system. They also say that this more advanced faction of the German government was advised by their ET contacts to go to Antarctica, where they built under-ice facilities. All of these advances occurred before the Second World War came to a close.
Another point provided by Goode and Tompkins is that the MIC learned of the German Antarctic bases after the war and sent a large naval contingent there to deal with them, under the code name Operation HIGHJUMP. Instead of destroying the base, they were attacked by highly advanced saucer craft as well as large cigar-shaped vessels, that Tompkins claims were reptilian allies of the Germans.
According to Goode and Tompkins, the Americans were developing their own SSP and learned of the German advancements during the war. Germans were brought over to the U.S. MIC during Operation PAPERCLIP and provided their less advanced antigravity craft as a decoy to satisfy American curiosity. Eventually, the Germans in the U.S.—assisted by their Antarctica compatriots, strong-armed the MIC into signing treaties that effectively merged the German and American MICs. This latter aspect Dr. Greer did allude to when he said that the U.S. is effectively the Fourth Reich.
Goode and Tompkins state that the level of compartmentalization used by the MIC and these USAPs is such that it would be very easy for personnel working within them to believe they were being told the whole truth, when in fact, it was only part of the story. And it appears that the lower-level aspects of the SSP are what Dr. Greer draws forms as the basis of his knowledge, especially regarding German advancements. It is highly likely that as part of the compartmentalization protocol, personnel would be led to believe they were the most aware and had access to the whole truth, and in doing so, they would be compelled to reject anything that doesn’t fit within their worldview.
Reach of the MIC and SSP
While Dr. Greer did not spend much time focusing on the scope of the programs developed by the MIC, he has stated in the past that positive extraterrestrials maintain a kind of quarantine that prevents aggressive human projects from leaving the Earth. He also asserted that the slave colonies operating on Mars or elsewhere were probably not true, presumably because of the belief they would not be allowed by positive ETs. But he did not offer any evidence to support this conjecture.
On the other hand, Goode and Tompkins state that the SSP did travel to the Moon and beyond. Goode in particular claims there are five different factions or compartments of the SSP, Solar Warden, the Interplanetary Corporate Conglomerate (ICC), the Global Galactic League of Nations (GGLN), the Military or MIC faction, and the Dark Fleet. Each is heavily compartmentalized and only higher-level operatives within the ICC have some working knowledge of the other programs. The MIC faction operates mostly in low-earth orbit and has access to technology that is only about 30 or 40 years ahead of today. But the other factions have traveled all around the solar system and beyond. The ICC seems to be the commercial branch of the SSP, trading with over 900 different extraterrestrial groups and maintains production facilities on Mars, the Asteroid Belt, and elsewhere using human slaves taken from earth as a labor force. The GGLN and the Dark Fleet operate largely outside of the solar system.
If these claims by Goode are true, it means that Dr. Greer’s insiders are mostly from the lower-level MIC space program, and as such, would not be read-in or have a need to know about the outer space programs, and were provided cover stories that supported this narrative. It also means that most people working in these programs operating largely in outer space would not have contact with the Earth and thus cross contamination is greatly limited. In essence, the secrecy mechanism of the whole SSP and MIC is an extremely well oiled machine of deception that only a few small cracks have allowed drips of the truth to come through.
But it should be noted that there is no direct evidence supplied by Goode to confirm his claims, only anecdotes and personal experienes. Tompkins on the other hand, has provided a vast body of documented evidence suggesting he did participate in the designing of spacecraft that eventually became the vessels used by Solar Warden. Yet Tompkins also has no direct evidence (other than his personal experiences) to support the notion that there are in fact programs operating outside of Earth orbit, or that reptilians and other races of a nefarious nature are interacting with humanity.
Conclusions Regarding the Cosmic False Flag
While the focus of this writing is partially to assess and analyze whether Goode and Tompkins are in fact disinformation agents, as Dr. Greer claims, the overall premise of a cosmic false flag should also be considered. There is substantial indirect evidence to support this idea. And there may well be direct evidence if the FIRESIGN documents from the Benenson Strategy Group are authentic.
Furthermore, the human population’s ability to think critically and assess reality from a moral and ethical standpoint, as Dr. Greer states, is shockingly low. One need only look at the past one hundred years of history to see false flag agendas—that could have easily been seen for what they are if they had not be blindly accepted as true—deceived millions if not billions of people and were used as a pretext to start wars and issue draconian policies in the U.S. and all over the globe.
Therefore, the spiritual awakening discussed by Dr. Greer is a valid point, which is also echoed by Goode. Humanity needs to set aside groupthink and dogma in favor of personal discernment and learning the skills of assessing reality first hand. In addition, the social programs of division based on racial, ideological, and religious beliefs have been used as a pretext for war for the past 6,000 years. Only by gaining the skills to think for oneself and not allow the deceptions and machinations of the shadow government to work can humanity finally set aside the plague of madness that has enabled untold harm and suffering to flourish. If humanity can do this, even if a cosmic false flag did occur, the call to unite in a campaign of interstellar war would fall on deaf ears.
Finally, Goode said that the cosmic false flag plan is real but that it was abandoned in favor of a partial disclosure agenda that has been actively moving forward for years.
The Cabal’s grand deception plan is no longer to bring about a mass fake alien invasion. That was exposed heavily decades ago and is no longer a viable program to execute. This holographic technology is however still viable to use in smaller “theaters of war”.
The plan now is to introduce humanity to an “Angelic and Human-Like” ET group and have people worship these so-called “angelic ET’s” who bring us a “New Cosmic Esoteric World Religion.” (Source)
If one looks over the past two years in regard to the release of disclosure-related material, there is much to substantiate this claim by Goode.
Here is an excerpt from the article Boeing’s “You Just Wait” Ad Reveals 100 Year Partial Disclosure Timeline — Analysis | Disproving Partial Disclosure, Insider Testimony, and Steering Collective Consciousness Toward the Full Disclosure Timeline, which details some examples of partial disclosure.
Under this limited disclosure agenda, only some of the truth will be revealed to the public and even that will take 100 years. According to Goode and his contacts in the SSP Alliance, the Cabal-run groups, and their allies, have brokered an agreement with certain Earth-based alliances to begin this partial disclosure effort. Apparently, this agreement was made in late 2015 and bolstered in 2016, but this plan was most likely developed much earlier.
In a report issued in June of 2015, Goode stated that he attended a Super-Federation Council meeting wherein the first public allusion of a limited disclosure plan was mentioned:
The person at the podium then asked that there be no more Alliance Disclosures through myself or the people I am talking to including David Wilcock until after an agreed-upon date in late November of 2015. They said that a well-known public servant would be sacrificed in the operation to implement their plan for an incremental disclosure. (Source)
Whether or not the “well-known public servant” was sacrificed remains unclear. On the other hand, partial disclosure efforts have continued to pour out into the public domain. These take on the form of entertainment media, such as films, television shows, and video games, as well as innuendo from science-related propaganda outlets like NASA.
For example, the initial discovery of exoplanets several years ago was a complete paradigm shift in the way science deals with the search for extraterrestrial life. Prior to this development, it was widely accepted in academia that humanity would most likely never find extraterrestrials—at least not anytime soon. Anyone searching for ETs with seriousness was quietly ridiculed and maligned—but not anymore. This is in part due to the discoveries of the Kepler Mission focusing on the search for habitable exoplanets.
Revised Drake Equation
To exemplify this shift, consider that the Drake Equation was “updated” recently.
This mathematical model from the mid-20th century was a boon for those unwilling to acknowledge the possibility of life evolving elsewhere in the cosmos. In its original form, the equation asserted that it was a statistical certainty that life doesn’t exist in the cosmos. But for those in the know, clearly, this isn’t true. Earlier this year, a team of scientists proposed changes that completely shifted how we look at the universe.
Adam Frank is a professor of physics and astronomy at the University of Rochester who helped co-author a paper proposing changes to the Drake Equation, which incorporate Kepler’s exoplanet observations. The team revised the framework of several factors so that instead of asking how likely is it that ET civilizations exist, it instead asks how likely is it that our civilization is the only one to have existed. (Source)
The new form of the Drake Equation suggests that it is now a mathematical certainty that ancient ET cultures evolved and then went extinct many times over. Isn’t it interesting what changing some of the factors can do to shift the results? This new conclusion is almost a 180º shift from the previous view. Take a moment to appreciate that within 10 years time, humanity went from “we are totally alone in the universe” to “extinct ancient ET cultures probably existed everywhere.”
And it just so happens that in the partial disclosure plan put forth by the Cabal, a central part is the admission of ancient ruins from ET cultures being found throughout the solar system and beyond. This item of information was supplied by Goode and Wilcock during their weekly online series Cosmic Disclosure.
Related Drake Equation Updated with Kepler Exoplanet Data | Scientists Say ET Life Probably Exists, but it’s All Extinct – Matches Partial Disclosure Narrative Discussed by Corey Goode
To be clear, Goode and other insiders have confirmed that true ancient ruins have been found all throughout the solar system and local star cluster. However, there are also countless extraterrestrial civilizations that have made contact with humanity in the relatively short time the SSP has been active, within the past 100 years. Goode states that there are 40 to 60 extraterrestrial groups with longstanding outposts within the solar system that have maintained a Super Federation alliance to ensure their agendas come to fruition. This federation has been actively conducting 22 genetic, social, and spiritual experiments on Earth for thousands of years.
The point being is that the partial disclosure narrative only reveals extinct ancient ET cultures and makes no mention of contemporaneous non-terrestrial activities—a half-truth with the power to espouse many false impressions in the minds of the unaware masses.
Ceres Bright Spot
The Ceres bright spot is another point of soft disclosure laying the foundations for a limited disclosure event, as presented by David Wilcock. The planetoid captivated extraterrestrial enthusiasts when, in 2015, the Dawn spacecraft captured images of incredibly bright objects in one of the craters on the desolate surface.
|Image Source. Ceres Bright Spot.|
|Image Source. Ceres Bright Spot seen as it moves from the sun-facing side. Here the luminosity doesn’t appear to be reduced as one would expect if it was reflecting sunlight off a surface, leading some to conclude these lights are artificial in nature.|
Although mainstream science tells us these bright spots are nothing but reflective ice fields, certain analysts have suggested that the luminosity is too great to be a natural reflection.
The discovery of thousands of exoplanets, the revising of the Drake Equation, and the Ceres bright spot are each playing a part in preparing humanity for disclosure.
And while these items will certainly be a part of a disclosure event, without the whole truth, it may not be the full disclosure experience many have been waiting for. These points alone provide a basis for the Cabal-run media to push the limited disclosure plan, and as was mentioned earlier, it involves the divulgence of ancient ruins left by ET races. Another element involves a narrative in which human beings were created from an ancient race of ET giants known in the SSP as the progenitors or the Ancient Builder race.
To be clear, these elements are a part of the story, but not the whole truth. As such, gaining an understanding of what the whole picture looks like is essential to discerning the limited disclosure effort from the complete or full one.
Analysis of Evidence Provided to Substantiate Claims about Goode and Tompkins
Both Goode and Tompkins are whistleblowers and given that Dr. Greer’s assertions are largely based on whistleblower testimony, the magnitude of veracity provided by Dr. Greer as compared to Goode and Tompkins is functionally equivalent. In other words, it is one man’s word against another, and thus, no objective dismissal of claims can be effected.
Here is an excerpt of Dr. Michael Salla’s article discussing Dr. Greer’s presentation, citing a response he gave to a question about Goode and Tompkins’ testimony.
What am I skeptical of about things that have come our recently from Bill Tompkins and others [Goode]? A lot! Here’s the issue for me. You’ve got to have multiple points of corroboration, and the bigger the tale the more the proof you got to have. Now what I would say is it that I believe that these men are sharing what they believe to be true. I also know how easy it would be to provide information that is scripted about that, and that is seductive and interesting. (Source)
Dr. Greer’s assertion and subsequent dismissal is nebulous at best. He seems to conclude that because his perspective is coherently logical within the data set he draws upon that this—in and of itself—is enough to dismiss the testimony of Goode and Tompkins. But a logical argument, in order to have substantial bearing, must be supported by objective evidence or observation.
One who rests their conclusions on logical arguments alone succumbs to what could be called rationalization bias, a form of confirmation bias, wherein one assumes because they have devised a rationale to explain away a theory, premise or idea that this is all that is required to disprove something or a phenomenon. This explanation bias is a fallacious set of logic that many armchair intellectuals and skeptics suffer from, supposing that because an explanation can be devised that it must be the truth. But such modes of thought—if not substantiated by investigation—is a form of ignorance rationalization, and overzealous intellectualism.
Dr. Greer has no tangible reason to dismiss Goode’s claims and believe the claims of another, based on substantiated proof of what is presented during his talk. For example, Dr. Greer has—to this writer’s knowledge—never been provided with hard proof or evidence that says the MIC doesn’t have spacecraft operating in space, such as scans of space. He even admits that he cannot prove a negative at the 15:20 mark of the video excerpt discussing Corey Goode.
Thus, his choice to believe one person over another is largely subjective. He said during his presentation that it is largely his fear that such testimony could be used to advance the cosmic false flag agenda, and that on this basis he is very leery to entertain their testimony—which is an ideological rationale, not one based on objective analysis or proof.
But, as was presented above, there is a great deal of evidence already in the public record to suggest that ARVs and antigravity technology exists, that EM mind-control weapons have been developed, and that false whistleblowers can and have been used to befuddle the public. Further, the shadow government or MIC has a long history of using Deceptive I & Ws or false flags to further their hidden agenda. But none of these points of evidence provides a basis to substantiate that Goode and Tompkins are pushing disinformation.
Yet, Dr. Greer’s concerns that the MIC and shadow government can take advantage of the public’s lack of discernment is a valid. And all the other work he has done to reveal the truth to the people should be commended.
Credibility, Discernment, and Corroboration
Possibly Dr. Greer might believe his whistleblowers are more credible than some others in the field.
Credibility is a term referring to a person’s likelihood of speaking the truth, based on various indirect sources of appraisal. For example, if a whistleblower comes forward who claims to have worked for a secret government project and offers a document that substantiates their testimony, this person would have more credibility than one who does not have such evidence.
Corey Goode has no such documentation, whereas William Tompkins does, and thus from a credibility standpoint, Tompkins is said to be more credible than Goode—using the strictest definition of the word. But with respect to the general usage of the term credibility—a reference to if someone can be trusted to tell the truth—there is no appreciable difference between Goode and Tompkins. This sense of credibility is an indirect, hazy, and nebulous way of assessing veracity—how true something is. In other words, credibility is like wondering around in the dark, whereas an assessment of objective evidence specifically addressing claims is like a spotlight cast into that same darkness. The quality of discernment gained by analsys of direct evidence is far superior to a credibility measure alone.
As an example, false whistleblowers can come forward with documentation saying they worked for this or that government project and then proceed to offer false testimony. In this case, the credibility assessment provided by documentation is nullified by the fact they didn’t actually speak the truth—even though they provided a valid document that they worked for a secret program. Direct evidence is always superior to credibility from an empirical standpoint, which is essential to keep in mind.
In other words, while credibility can be used as an imprecise or hazy measure of if someone is telling the truth—a kind of first step—it cannot definitively measure or determine if a person’s testimony is true or not. Consider that a known liar can tell the truth sometimes, and in these cases, the truth they do tell is not in the least reduced by their past fallaciousness. Conversely, one who has always told the truth could tell a lie, and their past authenticity would not have any bearing on their false statement.
When there is only verbal testimony available, often credibility is what outsiders (researchers) rely on to help draw conclusions or vett testimony. And this raises a point that is beyond the scope of what Dr. Greer presented in his talk, something all those seeking the truth would do well to contemplate.
From an empirical point of view, no concrete conclusions can be drawn to deny or accept without a reasonable doubt any claim, unless objective evidence exists to do so. In the absence of objective or direct evidence, all one can do is make conclusions on assumptions that something might be true, given a set of parameters. And while this is less reassuring in that one doesn’t have a definitive answer, it is a more honest and open minded approach.
In practice, researchers can assess everyone’s claims and in doing so gain a perspective and consciousness expansion that comes from that process. As long as rigid conclusions are not formed, the researcher can explore all possibilities equally and thus gain tremendous personal insight into each perspective.
Using an example, if a weather forecaster says that there is a 50% chance of heavy rain, it would be more prudent to consider that it could rain or not, and develop a plan of action that accommodates both possibilities, preparing for rain, even though one might prefer none. Thus, to close one’s mind to a possibility, based purely on a personal or subjective preference, greatly limits that individual in facing reality when it actually emerges or collapses from the field of probabilities. The person who hates the rain, and chooses to ignore the weather forecast, may find themselves in the rain anyway, except they will be ill prepared for the experience. Discernment for all people is operationally the same and the fallacy to avoid is to let one’s personal preferences blind them from seeing reality as a whole.
Discernment is defined as the practice of judging well and can be further refined as an honest appraisal of objective reality (observations) that could support a subjective conclusion (theory). But just because there is a probability that one theory may be more true than another, doesn’t mean one can completely ignore other possibilities.
The end result of discernment is often not a definitive yes or no answer it is a possible answer that has a probability of being true measured by objective data to support it. In this sense, discernment is the science of exploring uncertainty—entertaining each possibility by assessing how likely it is of being true. And discerning well is the ability to properly assess all possibilities that arise out of uncertainty. And given that no one is omniscient, everyone, including Dr. Greer, would do well not to discount any potential truth, purely based on ideological biases, gut feelings, or personal desires.
Finally, corroberation of whistleblower testimony is often the most heavily relied upon method of vetting or validating claims, a kind of “democratic approach” where majority rules. And while this can provide a guess as to if testimony is valid, it’s not fool proof. It is vulnerable to contamination from false whistleblowers and it relies on the assumption that what has already been determined to be authentic can be used as a baseline to judge new insider information. This means whistleblowers with testimony that diverges greatly from the established narrative could, and often are, labeled as false.
The MIC operatives, who according to Goode, know nothing about outer space operations in Solar Warden, the ICC, and GGLN, will assume any testimony coming from those areas is false because it is so different from what they are familiar with. Similarly, society in general succumbs to a similar type of corroberation bias in that people only generally believe something to be true if it fits within “accepted” forms of truth (e.g. the hallmark of most armchair skeptics is that if it isn’t peer-reviewed it isn’t real). This ensures emergent information will be dismissed out of hand and labeled as false, usually never earning an honest investigation.
As an example consider a group of people watching an illusion of a magic trick, like a woman being cut in half on stage. Most of the audience will believe they are seeing a real example of dismemberment, and thus a majority of people agree that what they observed is true. However, the magician has information the audience does not, but due to his minority position, he will be dismissed as it doesn’t agree with the majority viewpoint.
But the truth is not democractic, it simply is. It doesn’t matter how many people believe something, it doesn’t change the truth in the slightest. Only coherence with truth determines veracity, which requires objective means of assessment.
Similarly, if researchers only use corrobration and credibility as a means of vetting whistleblowers, and do not keep an open mind and assess claims objectively, they will dismiss genuine testimony as false. In doing so, researchers might paint anything genuine whistleblowers have brought forward with a brush of falseness, preventing them from gaining access to the greater truth.
Quite possibly Dr. Greer has made the error of what can be called corrobration bias, and thus the data that Goode, Tompkins, and others provide is assumed to be false because it doesn’t fit the established narrative.
Conclusions about Goode and Tompkins
With respect to Dr. Greer’s assertion that Tompkins and Goode are not telling the truth, it is possible (based on the EM mind-control data) that they could be victims of electromagnetic mind control, or they could be outright fraudsters. Yet there is just as much indirect evidence available to say they are genuine. But more to the point, there is no evidence to definitively suggest their testimony is false. Goode admits he has had EM mind-control technology used on him but that does not unequivocally support the claim that his testimony is fabricated. Especially since, like Dr. Greer, he claims to be able to know the difference between scripted and real experiences.
Given that Dr. Greer has no personal accounts to offer, other than a lucid dream that even he implies might be fabricated, Goode and Tompkins’ claims—insofar as being first hand accounts—are superior to Dr. Greer’s claims, as Dr. Greer is only an analyst in this respect.
In the following excerpt, beginning at the 7:00 mark, Dr. Greer says people should question everything, including his lucid dream experience.
Further, the objective data to prove Dr. Greer’s claims about Goode and Tompkins has not been provided, if it exists at all. These are unproven claims on Dr. Greer’s part—but that doesn’t mean they are necessarily untrue. They are one possibility to explore, but not the only one.
Finally, Dr. Greer’s assertions are, as he admits, based more on the fear that Goode and Tompkins’ testimony could be used to further the cosmic false flag agenda. Therefore his assertions are more so operating out of an ideological belief than one founded on objective analysis. He states as much in the following excerpt at the 26:50 mark when he says, he would rather stop the work of disclosure than let it become used to push an agenda he does not agree with—specifically the cosmic false flag agenda.
The substance of Dr. Greer’s presentation is largely in agreement with Goode and Tompkin’s testimony when looking at the historical overview of factual data related to SSP history. And what Goode said about the new plan to use the holographic technology and partial disclosure is actually completely substantiated by Dr. Greer’s presentation.
Furthermore, it appears that most of the data and perspectives offered by Dr. Greer paint a picture that could actually be part of the partial disclosure agenda. His insiders may in fact be using Dr. Greer to promulgate the partial disclosure agenda—and there’s more indirect evidence to support this theory than there is to substantiate Dr. Greer’s claims that there are no negative ETs or nefarious SSPs.
But as outsiders seeking to make sense of the morass of insiders, whistleblowers, and theories, it would be far more productive to work together than to become zealots of one public figure or another.
At the end of the day, no one seems to have access to the whole truth. And the overarching message Dr. Greer provides is in almost total agreement with Goode—to set aside violence, bigotry, and fanaticism once and for all to unite as a people. In this regard, whether or not it is apparent to Dr. Greer, they are working together towards the same goal of freedom for humanity and releasing the full truth.
It’s time to set aside our differences, stop fighting each other over beliefs that ultimately we are all uncertain of, and step arm in arm towards a brighter future for all. Arguably, Dr. Greer’s work has greatly advanced the progress of full disclosure and the age of prosperity that it has the potential to bring. We as a people have the power to continue this work even and there seems to be no valid reason to suppose we can’t do so.
Here is the complete excerpt compilation of the cosmic false flag presentation.
The preceding is a Stillness in the Storm original creation. Please share freely.
About The Author
Justin Deschamps has been a truth seeker all his life, studying physics, psychology, law, philosophy, and spirituality, and working to weave these seemingly separate bodies of information into a holistic tapestry of ever expanding knowledge. Justin is a student of all and a teacher to some, sharing what he has discovered with those who are ready and willing to take responsibility for making the world a better place. The goal of his work is to help himself and others become better truth-seekers, and in doing so, form a community of holistically minded individuals capable of creating world healing projects for the benefit of all life—what has been called The Great Work. Check out his project Stillness in the Storm to find some of his work. Follow on Twitter @sitsshow, Facebook Stillness in the Storm, and minds.com.
Read more articles by Justin Deschamps.
This article appeared first on Stillness in the Storm.
This article (Uniting The People For Full Disclosure | Steven Greer’s Cosmic False Flag Presentation: Review, Commentary, Analysis and Assessment of Claims Against Goode and Tompkins) by Justin Deschamps originally appeared on StillnessintheStorm.com and is free and open source. You have permission to share or republish this article in full so long as attribution to the author and stillnessinthestorm.com are provided.If you spot a typo, email corrections@
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Send an email to email@example.com, with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at firstname.lastname@example.org. Thank you for reading.
November 22nd, 2016: Minor grammar corrections were made to this article.