Whenever talking on the point of environmental protection, it is always a good idea to consider any political agenda which may be behind it. We have heard that there is some political agenda behind the narrative of global warming. On the other side of the fence, we have those who are claiming that the anti-global warming narrative shows little or no concern for the environment. Though there may be some truth to both sides of this debate, there may be more to this debate than initial appearances reveal.
Entire Solar System Is Heating Up! Scientists Blame Solar Warming
Just as most “debates” in the United States seem to last forever without making any progress, the debate over climate change seems to be formulated to distract more than it is designed to actually helphumanity and the planet progress. The typical situation is that both sides hold a valuable component to the truth, but in order to keep the country divided, the media sells half of the truth to one side of the fence, and gives the other side of the truth to the other.
Then to fan the flame of disagreement, the corporate media continually twists the science, twists the appearances of corporate agenda so that both sides continue blaming one another for the problems in the world. Meanwhile the true cause of the problem—that being elitist greed and corporate corruption—continue raking in billions by preventing technological progress from solving the issue entirely. This is the typical method of the Hegelian dialect.
The truth to the situation seems to be that both sides of the debate hold a valuable piece to the puzzle. These are the facts that overuse of fossil fuels combined with elimination of the Earth’s forests throw off the homeostasis of the biosphere. Over-carbonation is very bad for the present state of life on Earth. It is bad for humanity and destructive to both land and oceanic life. However, this over-carbonation does not seem to be causing the majority of the heating issue.
According to astronomers, global warming is not caused by over-carbonation of the Earth’s biosphere alone. It is likely that the warming of the entire solar system has been a large contributor to the heating of the Earth, and that fossil fuels only effect a portion of it. However, instead of presenting both data sets together, every news outlet seems to fan the flame of the pointless, age-old argument—attempting to portray to one side of the argument that the opposite side as worthless.
Again, both sides of the debate seem to be missing the entire story, believing that only their own side holds any value. Yet neither side of the conversation seems to have caught on the this very strong possibility. Consequently, the debate has digressed from being a productive endeavor, and has instead, become little more than a squabble between two opposing cult followings. This is not the way mature adults operate. Nor is it the way any productive society progresses.
In order to solve these problems, it seems necessary to kick the corporate media narratives to the curb, and look at both sides of the situation with an objective eye. This may be the only way to make actual progress toward solutions in our world instead of letting the greed of corporate media dictate our opinions to us.
CONTINUE READING @ discerningthemystery2000plus.blogspot.com/
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Do you think this article needs a correction or update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected]. Thank you for reading.