by Justin Deschamps
After winning the U.S. election on Tuesday, Donald Trump is being associated with economic turmoil and civil unrest. Is he another puppet or a patsy for a new phase of globalist control?
Mike Adams is a Trump supporter who produced a video in October that seems to have predicted several things, which are now playing out after the Republican nominee won the election on Tuesday. While you may not be a fan of Trump, what Adams has to say is worthy of consideration.
Some contend that Trump is just another Cabal puppet, but as Adams asserts below, he could be a patsy to take the fall for the destruction of the U.S. and global economy, as a result of intentionally destructive policies.
Money had this to say on the day of the election:
Market turbulence won’t be over soon.
Prominent economists warned investors the day after the U.S. presidential election to brace for a recession; possibly, in the words of one, “a global recession, with no end in sight.”
With overseas markets thrown into upheaval overnight as election results came in showing that Donald Trump had won the presidential race, Nobel prize-winning economist and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman warned late last night that the economic fallout could be unprecedented, calling the election results “the mother of all adverse effects” on the still-fragile U.S. economy. “What it brings with it is a regime that will be ignorant of economic policy and hostile to any effort to make it work,” he wrote. (Source)
While it has only been two days since Trump was elected, and has yet to take office, the media is already working tirelessly to blame him for civil unrest, and the economic fallout continues to escalate.
To be clear, this site is not pro-Trump. Nor do I contend, that Trump is some white knight. However, there are many points presented by Adams that are worthy of consideration.
As the days and weeks unfold we should see more indications that will either confirm or deny the supposition that Trump is a patsy.
The globalists may have wanted Clinton to win but as Rahm Emanuel said:
You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it’s an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before. — Rahm Emanuel
Here’s another article released today from Money:
How Trump Could Make It Easier for Wall Street to Screw You
The forecast is grim for new consumer protections.
In the wake of the financial crisis, the Obama administration spent eight years fighting for new rules that would protect consumers and their money from a repeat disaster. But under President-elect Trump, these safeguards may soon be a thing of the past.
Trump has repeatedly said if elected, he would roll back financial regulations and issue a temporary halt on new rules. The specifics have been hard to pin down — and many consumer advocates say it will be tough to repeal many of the existing rules in one fell swoop. Yet with Republicans controlling the White House, the House of Representatives, and the Senate, consumer advocates fret that nothing is out of the question. (Source)
Obviously, Trump did make these statements about relaxing regulations, but that isn’t to say these policies ever had a positive impact on the average person.
The “safer policies of Obama have seen an unprecedented rise in the national debt; Wallstreet has continued to get fat off the backs of the working class, and people all over the globe are struggling harder than ever just to survive. It appears the globalist agenda has moved forward by leaps and bounds during the previous administration, and now a new phase of development could be underway.
Whether or not Trump’s intentions make the situation worse isn’t clear—given he is cut from the cloth of Wallstreet. But the media is painting the picture that he will make things worse for the economy, and the past two days of market upset agree with that assertion.
The question is, was this by design? Was Trump meant to take office, create civil unrest, and be the fall guy for the collapse of the economy? Or are the globalists just using a crisis to their advantage, rolling out contingency plans that have likely been in place for a long time?
The preceding text is a Stillness in the Storm original creation. Please share freely.
Justin Deschamps is a truth seeker inspired by philosophy and the love of wisdom in all its forms. He was formally trained in physics and psychology, later discovering the spiritual basis of reality and the interconnected nature of all things. He strives to find the path of truth while also walking it himself, sharing what he knows with others so as to facilitate cooperative change for a better future. He is a student of all and a teacher to some. Follow on Twitter @sitsshow, Facebook Stillness in the Storm, and steemit @justin-sits.
This article appeared first on Stillness in the Storm.
This article (Economists Warn of Global Recession After Trump Win | Taking Blame for the Economic Collapse as a Patsy for Globalist Policies?) by Justin Deschamps originally appeared on StillnessintheStorm.com and is free and open source. You have permission to share or republish this article in full so long as attribution to the author and stillnessinthestorm.com are provided. If you spot a typo, email [email protected].
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Do you think this article needs a correction or update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected]. Thank you for reading.
November 10th, 2016: Minor grammar corrections were made to this article.
Embedded within this article.