(Stillness in the Storm Editor) I wrote the following preamble to an update by Ken, and will include this in future posts as a disclaimer for his content.
I am sharing this article from Ken of Redefining God—as always—for your consideration.
He has many views and conclusions which are contrasted by those accepted by the awakening community. As such, reviewing his perspectives helps expand our own vision and facilitates greater discernment and comprehension.
Note: This is clearly marked in the About Us section of SITS, yet when posting these updates from Ken, I often receive feedback from readers who assume I wrote the article or that I am endorsing his views.
To be clear, I share information and data on this site from many different sources, and in some cases, there are conflicts with the data.
My primary goal for this site and the work I do in general is to help myself and others become better truth seekers, which is essential so as to gain self-mastery, sovereignty or enlightenment. These are the qualities I feel we need to develop in everyone so that an awakened population can restore harmony and justice to this darkened world as well as simply living happy productive lives. Therefore, in order to constantly test and expand our knowledge of the truth, considering seemingly divergent perspectives is advantageous.
This being said the reader should not assume anything hosted on this site is my belief.
I usually offer commentary in green but even this does not fully account for what I am personally concluding in relation to content shared on this site. And frankly, what I believe or think has no bearing on how you—the reader—processes and absorbs information. In short, ignore the messenger, focus on and think about the message.
In my understanding, the act of thinking about something is the process of expanding consciousness to further individual evolution. Whether or not the thing contemplated is reflective of reality isn’t as important as the act of considering it.
Meditate on the idea that a fable, myth or parable need not be true in order to impart wisdom. In this way, reviewing opposing perspectives is often a powerful way to gain greater clarity and insight into what we think is true; or it helps us let go of false beliefs we maintain because of our attachment to them.
Related Globalist Agenda Watch Updates
In less than a month comes the golden dawn, and it will rise over the September 4-5 G20 Summit…
Whilst I was rolling my son to the grocery store yesterday morning, some questions came to mind…
With their Olympic ISIS operation fully exposed, what happens if the globalists back off – is there another way to get the September war started?
And with their war and prophecy plans fully exposed, what happens if they cancel the war – is there a “peaceful path” to getting the NWO operationally launched this year?
As I pondered it all, I realized that the answer to both questions is “yes,” and that I’d already written about how they’d do it in an entry from February of last year…
>>> I just came across a Zerohedge article titled “Is Russia Planning A Gold-Based Currency?” To give a simple answer to the question posed by the title, “yes,” both Russia and China (and possibly other BRICS allies) are planning to go to a partial gold backing for their currencies. And once they do, the globalist propaganda organs will laud the move as “the masterstroke that peacefully defeated the Western banksters.”
The (globalist orchestrated) BRICS move towards a partial gold standard goes beyond their own national currencies, though. To “save the international financial system from cataclysm,” they will also offer a portion of their gold reserves to back the IMF’s SDR, and they will receive a large allotment of SDRs in return. This “gold for SDRs” strategy was hinted at in a (UK) Royal Institute of International Affairs paper titled Adding Gold into the Valuation of the SDR…
According to the globalist script, in return for “saving the IMF and the international financial system” with their gold, the BRICS (particularly China) will demand sweeping governance reforms of the IMF and the rest of the UN Complex, as well as a Chinese IMF head. The Chinese would then “own” the New World Order system in the way that George Soros described back in 2009. – From Globalist Agenda Watch 2015: Update 14 – The coming BRICS gold standard, Ron Paul, and the Rockefellers <<<
Once I got home, I started searching through propaganda pieces from Russian and Chinese news sites, and I realized they might be setting up to play the gold card at the upcoming G20 Summit. So over the next day or two, I’ll be showing you what I found and why they’ll do it.
[+ A note on the Putin – Erdogan meeting on the 9th – 7 August 2016]
Will Erdogan repent and be saved?…
…Only the globalist scriptwriters know. From Sputnik
In the globalists’ NWO transition script, ISIS is playing a “bad guy” role. And Putin, the “ultimate good guy” is determined to vanquish them. So there is no way in hell than anyone who supports ISIS (like Erdogan has in the past) is going to survive the Transition.
That being said, Christ is forgiving, so if Erdogan confesses his sins to Putin and repents, he will be washed clean by Putin’s grace.
So there are two ways the Turkey situation could go, and it depends on what Erdogan is seen doing after the meeting…
1) If he is seen continuing his support for ISIS, he will be swept from office and replaced by Gulen, and Turkey will be offered up as an example of “the Lord’s wrath.”
2) If he is seen cutting off all support from ISIS and commanding US forces (and their nukes) to leave Turkey, he will remain in office and the globalist propaganda organs will proclaim Gulen a “color revolution” agent. Turkey will then be offered up as an example of “the Lord’s grace.”
It’s important to note that this meeting is a departure from the previous flow of the transition script: Erdogan is an Islamist who was scripted to be taken down with the rest of them. So what changed? Well, their plans for Gulen were exposed on July 16, and ten days later on July 26, they suddenly announced this bilateral summit. Rest assured that no matter how much they squirm, they’re not getting past us.
Should the globalists opt for Erdogan’s “redemption,” it could mean that they’re backing off from the war scenario and choosing the “peaceful path” (in which “masterful” geopolitical and financial moves by Putin and his allies will defeat the “Western imperialists” without military conflict). Will the “Prince of Peace,” Vladimir Putin, save us from war?
Quite possibly, but Putin isn’t all he’s cracked up to be.
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Do you think this article needs a correction or update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected]. Thank you for reading.
Send this to a friend