The first part of this series is listed below, and embedded within the preamble of the Event Chronicle’s compilation.
I found Crayford’s statements discussing who the wealth really belongs to quite interesting. He suggests that the wealth held in the Collateral Accounts is not the people’s, it is “GOD’s.” He further claims that those people who worked to pull it out of the ground were “paid a fair wage” and the wealth is not theirs anymore. This suggests that those who were defrauded to accept such paltry payments have no recourse in law, which is a fallacy.
But, the basis for the wealth belonging to the creator is actually fairly sound, for in truth, all ownership is only temporary. When we die, what we had returns to the Earth. On the other hand, the creator has no need for money, gold, or any other representation of value. This means the wealth is held in trust for humanity, which Crayford only makes a small reference to.
Crayford goes on to say that the people can’t be trusted with this wealth. So one question I have is, if the wealth is not the people’s, and it is God’s, where do the trustees of the accounts factor in?
A trustee is beholden to a executor of a trust, the originator in most cases. The creator made the gold, and deposited in the Earth, the people pulled it out of the ground, and the elders held it in trust—at least this is the foundation for the Collateral Accounts in law. But I think it is safe to say at this point that the elders haven’t held up their end of the bargain.
Crayford’s statements suggest that God is the executor, and certain intermediaries on Earth were entrusted with the wealth to uplift humanity, to actually do God’s will—which is in harmony with a trust structure in law. But since, in most cases, these same intermediaries to God are also intimately connected to the Cabal, such as the Vatican, what makes them anymore trusted than your average human being? Are not these people who claim powers over the Collateral Accounts human as well?
These so-called elders were responsible for helping humanity climb out of darkness, but instead, there are more institutions on Earth that promote ignorance and dependency than arguably any other time in history. The very beings who were responsible for assisting humanity have enslaved it by promoting ignorance and dumbing down the people. And then these same people point to humanity’s current state as proof we can’t be trusted—this sounds like a con job.
Of course, while humanity continues to labor under paradigms of false scarcity imposed by despotic elites, who claim to be custodians over humanity, these same elites continue to enjoy the benefit of maintaining the Collateral Accounts. And humanity continues to suffer under their defunct custodianship.
Simply put, Crayford’s statements sound like a good excuse to maintain the status quo, and further the paradigm of illusory authority which has ravaged the planet for eons. Those he represents get to enjoy power while holding up their hands to say humanity hasn’t got its act together.
Of course, there are probably elements I am not aware of, but I wanted to offer some frank commentary on the overarching basis of Crayford’s position.