I think about the possibility that shows such as theCosmic Disclosure series will one day become historical references. When full disclosure occurs, people will be looking for supporting material, and as many reliable references as these shows provide, they can be quite a helpful resource for future truth-seekers.
Cosmic Disclosure: Viewer Questions Part 4 – Show Transcript
David Wilcock: All right. Welcome to “Cosmic Disclosure”. I’m your host, David Wilcock. We’re here with the insider’s insider, Corey Goode. And in this episode, we’re taking your questions. So this is the chance where, if you’ve been participating in the discussion forums, writing comments in the comments section, we go through and we find things that look interesting to discuss here on the show.
So Corey, welcome to the program.
Corey: Thank you.
David: The first question that we have is: “How can one find out if he or she has been infected by the AI?”
Corey: Well, that’s not something that they’re really going to know unless they get tested by a particular instrument that is used by the SSP. They use it . . . They put it close to your . . . by your electric field, and if it measures more than one signature, then they know you’re infected. It’s not something you can test for anywhere down here.
David: I think to double-click on that question a little bit, what they’re really asking too is, how prevalent is this AI infection in regular humanity? Is this more of a Space Program problem? Is this something happening to people here on Earth?
Corey: People will have the infection, but if they’re of no operational value to the AI, then it’s not going to stay dormant in them. It’s going to move on.
David: So the AI isn’t just going to inhabit someone if it doesn’t have a reason to?
Corey: Unless it’s biding its time until . . . using them as a host . . . until it can get into some technology or another person that’s its real target.
David: Why might a person on Earth be useful to the AI? What would be an example? Because some people are going to think they’re involved in a huge cosmic drama, and that they’re very important to this thing and the AI’s going to be in them.
Corey: Well, the AI may use a person as a host just to hang out in their bio-neural field until they find a better host that’s going to get them into the electronics that they want to be in. Let’s say an aborigine happened to find a piece of a ship, and they messed with it, and they got infected. Then it would hang out in their bio-neural field until they passed it along to other people. And eventually, it got into someone who uses technology, and then that person is their conduit into technology.
David: So it sounds like what you’re saying is that the AI would only even be interested in people here on Earth if they could get into the right technology.
Corey: Right. You’re more of a vehicle.
David: Is there going to ever be a case in which the AI could use someone other than to pass itself into technology here on Earth?
Corey: Well, if people have key positions, a lot of times they’ll be infected with actual nanites. And these nanites can either be programmed, or they can be remote-controlled by the AI signal.
David: The next one we have is from Alsion Bell. A-L-S-I-O-N Bell. I think I’m pronouncing that right. Inner Earth peoples and the harvest. Now, just for the context of the question, if you haven’t read “The Law of One”, when they use the term ‘harvest’, they mean ascension. It’s the term used in the Book of Matthew for ascension.
“If the Inner Earth people have been here for 17 to 18 million years, have they never been harvested? Have they escaped being harvested? Do they not also want to progress?”
Corey: Well, they are actually fourth density already. And they have remained on the planet to assist the planet and us.
Cosmic Disclosure: Inner Earth: The Library – A Synopses Plus a Premonition of a Monumental Testimony
David: So fourth density meaning they are ascended beings?
Corey: Right. And they’re basically . . . They’re supposed to be stewards of the planet and all of its inhabitants.
David: And given the fact that they’ve been here for this long, I just want to reconfirm that time changes when you go from density to density, right?
Corey: Yeah, they experience time differently than we do. They perceive and experience time differently.
David: What would that equate to in our conventional understanding?
Corey: Like, we may refer to time in decades, and a decade to us seems like quite a long time. In a decade, we’ll see wrinkles and gray hairs appear.
Corey: That’s not the case for them. So 100 years to them could be easily like maybe one to five years for us.
David: So you’re saying that their lives, the way they actually perceive their life, 100 years could be like a year?
Episode – Cosmic Disclosure: Inner Earth
David: Isn’t it strange, though, that they could talk to you and then the time of the conversation is the same?
Corey: Well, yeah. You’d think that maybe there would be a time dilation effect, but I guess with them being a higher density being, they’re able to reach lower a lot easier than we can reach higher.
David: So they could alter their flow of time to be able to speak to you, potentially.
Corey: And possibly alter our flow of time, or our perception.
David: So it’s possible that you could be going into an accelerated time field, but then you’re just regressed back when you are returned.
Corey: Right. But that’s speculating because I’m not exactly sure of the particulars of, you know, how they were phasing me in and out of time.
David: Now, part of the ascension is the solar flash, and I think another thing this person was asking about is how have they avoided these big solar flashes, these solar energy releases?
Corey: Well, I don’t know if they have, necessarily. They’re affected by all the same energies that we are, . . .
Corey: . . . and all of the beings that are trapped here in our solar system are going to be affected by them.
David: All right. Are you ready for another one?
Corey: I am.
David: Okay, this one’s from Azgard123. “When Corey came back 20 years in time and was debriefed, did the authorities in charge get the full debriefing of his service that was yet to come?” And then the question goes on to basically say, “Did they know what was going to happen to you after they brought you back?” In other words, if you’re up there in space, and you do 20 years into the future, do they also see the timeline of what’s going to happen to your life once they bring you back to Earth for the ensuing 20 years?
Corey: Well, I know they have the capability, but logistically, for every single person, I don’t know if that’s practical to look . . . but you know, you’d think that this being such an important secret to keep, that they would. So I really don’t know the answer to that. But when I did return, and after my debriefing, they did know that they were going to be observing me very closely, and they did call me back for recall work from time to time.
They would call me back and have me work with other people, blank slate me, and put me back in my normal life that I had built post 20-And-Back.
Cosmic Disclosure with David Wilcock and Corey Goode: Age Regression and Time Travel Technology
David: I think what this person is also just trying to find out is, how much is the Cabal aware of what’s happening in the future? How much do they get to plan it all out, map it all out? In other words, why didn’t they know, for example, that you’re doing this show? Why couldn’t they see that?
Corey: That’s a good question, because they use a type of AI technology to look at probable futures. And that’s . . . We’ve heard all these things about the Cabal’s about to fall, the Cabal’s about to fall, mass arrests are coming. Well, they’ve used this technology to stay one step ahead of all these programs that were meant to take them down.
So honestly, I don’t know why they didn’t intervene or see this previously, unless there was another intervention preventing them.
David: Is it possible that the mere act of trying to look at the future changes the future?
Corey: Yes. It’s just like when scientists observe an experiment, they change the experiment. They affect the experiment by observing it.
In this case, Corey Goode is referring to what is known as “The Observer Effect”. This is a scientific effect which, in mainstream terms, is the tendency of an individual being studied in an experiment, to change their behavior when they know they are being observed. Until this was proven to be a fundamental principle within quantum physics, it was thought that this phenomenon only occurred during studies on people and human behavior. However, this effect is proving to be much broader in scope. Here is Science Daily with the details.
When a quantum “observer” is watching Quantum mechanics states that particles can also behave as waves. This can be true for electrons at the submicron level, i.e., at distances measuring less than one micron, or one thousandth of a millimeter. When behaving as waves, they can simultaneously pass through several openings in a barrier and then meet again at the other side of the barrier. This “meeting” is known as interference.
Strange as it may sound, interference can only occur when no one is watching. Once an observer begins to watch the particles going through the openings, the picture changes dramatically: if a particle can be seen going through one opening, then it’s clear it didn’t go through another. In other words, when under observation, electrons are being “forced” to behave like particles and not like waves. Thus the mere act of observation affects the experimental findings.
This is a phenomenon which is still new to mainstream science. It is not every day that mainstream-minded people find out that the quantum universe has an observatory element to it. It may also be said that human consciousness extends beyond the physical body. This is not likely new to audiences of the Cosmic Disclosure series, but to mainstream science, this represents a paradigm shift.
CONTINUE READING @ discerningthemysery2000plus.blogspot.com
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Do you think this article needs a correction or update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected]. Thank you for reading.