The Moon is one of the most perplexing objects in the solar system, ascribed to many strange phenomenon.
The fact that it is almost exactly the same size as the sun in the earth’s sky gives rise to eclipses, and is an oddity in and of itself.
The below article outlines many odd facts about the Moon which have baffled scientists for ages. But what if the moon wasn’t a naturally occurring, what if it was ‘parked’ in Earth’s orbit by an ancient and advanced race?
Below the list of strange facts I am going to include an excerpt from a Dr. Salla and Corey GoodETxSG Q and A, Multiple Moon Bases & U.S. Military Space Shuttles As Cover Programs where we describe how this theory could work, and the science to support it.
Corey claims to be involved with the Sphere Being Alliance, a group of ET’s and Humans working to end Cabal rule and prepare humanity for an energetic shift of the Earth and solar system.
This is an extensive story, summarized here by David Wilcock History of ‘Old One’s’, Draco’s, SSP, Plan for Disclosure in 2015, Cabal Surrender, Sphere Beings, and Much More.
Ultimately the theory behind what the Moon is and if there are in fact bases, and ET instillations remains a mystery until more evidence is brought to light. The below list is a series of data points suggesting the Moon is far stranger than most of us realize.
by Ronald Regehr
“The moon is the Rosetta stone of the planets.”
First Chairman, NASA Lunar Exploration Committee
1. Moon’s Age: The moon is far older than previously expected. Maybe even older than the Earth or the Sun. The oldest age for the Earth is estimated to be 4.6 billion years old; moon rocks were dated at 5.3 billion years old, and the dust upon which they were resting was at least another billion years older.
2. Rock’s Origin: The chemical composition of the dust upon which the rocks sat differed remarkably from the rocks themselves, contrary to accepted theories that the dust resulted from weathering and breakup of the rocks themselves. The rocks had to have come from somewhere else.
3. Heavier Elements on Surface: Normal planetary composition results in heavier elements in the core and lighter materials at the surface; not so with the moon. According to Wilson,“The abundance of refractory elements like titanium in the surface areas is so pronounced that several geologists proposed the refractory compounds were brought to the moon’s surface in great quantity in some unknown way. They don’t know how, but that it was done cannot be questioned.”
4. Water Vapor: On March 7, 1971, lunar instruments placed by the astronauts recorded a vapor cloud of water passing across the surface of the moon. The cloud lasted 14 hours and covered an area of about 100 square miles.
5. Magnetic Rocks: Moon rocks were magnetized. This is odd because there is no magnetic field on the moon itself. This could not have originated from a “close call” with Earth—such an encounter would have ripped the moon apart.
6. No Volcanoes: Some of the moon’s craters originated internally, yet there is no indication that the moon was ever hot enough to produce volcanic eruptions.
7. Moon Mascons: Mascons, which are large, dense, circular masses lying twenty to forty miles beneath the centers of the moon’s maria,“are broad, disk-shaped objects that could be possibly some kind of artificial construction. For huge circular disks are not likely to be beneath each huge maria, centered like bull’s-eyes in the middle of each, by coincidence or accident.”8. Seismic Activity: Hundreds of “moonquakes” are recorded each year that cannot be attributed to meteor strikes. In November, 1958, Soviet astronomer Nikolay A. Kozyrev of the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory photographed a gaseous eruption of the moon near the crater Alphonsus. He also detected a reddish glow that lasted for about an hour. In 1963, astronomers at the Lowell Observatory also saw reddish glows on the crests of ridges in the Aristarchus region. These observations have proved to be precisely identical and periodical, repeating themselves as the moon moves closer to the Earth. These are probably not natural phenomena.
9. Hollow Moon: The moon’s mean density is 3.34 gm/cm3 (3.34 times an equal volume of water) whereas the Earth’s is 5.5. What does this mean? In 1962, NASA scientist Dr. Gordon MacDonald stated,“If the astronomical data are reduced, it is found that the data require that the interior of the moon is more like a hollow than a homogeneous sphere.”Nobel chemist Dr. Harold Urey suggested the moon’s reduced density is because of large areas inside the moon where is “simply a cavity.”MIT’s Dr. Sean C. Solomon wrote,“the Lunar Orbiter experiments vastly improved our knowledge of the moon’s gravitational field… indicating the frightening possibility that the moon might be hollow.”In Carl Sagan’s treatise, Intelligent Life in the Universe, the famous astronomer stated, “A natural satellite cannot be a hollow object.”
10. Moon Echoes: On November 20, 1969, the Apollo 12 crew jettisoned the lunar module ascent stage causing it to crash onto the moon. The LM’s impact (about 40 miles from the Apollo 12 landing site) created an artificial moonquake with startling characteristics—the moon reverberated like a bell for more than an hour.This phenomenon was repeated with Apollo 13 (intentionally commanding the third stage to impact the moon), with even more startling results. Seismic instruments recorded that the reverberations lasted for three hours and twenty minutes and traveled to a depth of twenty-five miles, leading to the conclusion that the moon has an unusually light—or even no—core.
11. Unusual Metals: The moon’s crust is much harder than presumed. Remember the extreme difficulty the astronauts encountered when they tried to drill into the maria? Surprise! The maria is composed primarily illeminite, a mineral containing large amounts of titanium, the same metal used to fabricate the hulls of deep-diving submarines and the skin of the SR-71 “Blackbird”. Uranium 236 and neptunium 237 (elements not found in nature on Earth) were discovered in lunar rocks, as were rustproof iron particles.
12. Moon’s Origin: Before the astronauts’ moon rocks conclusively disproved the theory, the moon was believed to have originated when a chunk of Earth broke off eons ago (who knows from where?). Another theory was that the moon was created from leftover “space dust” remaining after the Earth was created. Analysis of the composition of moon rocks disproved this theory also.Another popular theory is that the moon was somehow “captured” by the Earth’s gravitational attraction. But no evidence exists to support this theory. Isaac Asimov, stated,“It’s too big to have been captured by the Earth. The chances of such a capture having been effected and the moon then having taken up nearly circular orbit around our Earth are too small to make such an eventuality credible.”13. Weird Orbit: Our moon is the only moon in the solar system that has a stationary, near-perfect circular orbit. Stranger still, the moon’s center of mass is about 6000 feet closer to the Earth than its geometric center (which should cause wobbling), but the moon’s bulge is on the far side of the moon, away from the Earth. “Something” had to put the moon in orbit with its precise altitude, course, and speed.
14. Moon Diameter: How does one explain the “coincidence” that the moon is just the right distance, coupled with just the right diameter, to completely cover the sun during an eclipse? Again, Isaac Asimov responds,“There is no astronomical reason why the moon and the sun should fit so well. It is the sheerest of coincidences, and only the Earth among all the planets is blessed in this fashion.”15. Spaceship Moon: As outrageous as the Moon-Is-a-Spaceship Theory is, all of the above items are resolved if one assumes that the moon is a gigantic extraterrestrial craft, brought here eons ago by intelligent beings. This is the only theory that is supported by all of the data, and there are no data that contradict this theory.
1. Ages of Flashes: Aristarchus, Plato, Eratosthenes, Biela, Rabbi Levi, and Posidonius all reported anomalous lights on the moon. NASA, one year before the first lunar landing, reported 570+ lights and flashes were observed on the moon from 1540 to 1967.
2. Operation Moon Blink: NASA’s Operation Moon Blink detected 28 lunar events in a relatively short period of time.
3. Lunar Bridge: On July 29, 1953, John J. O’Neill observed a 12-mile-long bridge straddling the crater Mare Crisium. In August, British astronomer Dr. H.P. Wilkens verified its presence,“It looks artificial. It’s almost incredible that such a thing could have been formed in the first instance, or if it was formed, could have lasted during the ages in which the moon has been in existence.”4. The Shard: The Shard, an obelisk-shaped object that towers 1½ miles from the Ukert area of the moon’s surface, was discovered by Orbiter 3 in 1968. Dr. Bruce Cornet, who studied the amazing photographs, stated,“No known natural process can explain such a structure.”5. The Tower: One of the most curious features ever photographed on the Lunar surface (Lunar Orbiter photograph III-84M) is an amazing spire that rises more than 5 miles from the Sinus Medii region of the lunar surface.
6. The Obelisks: Lunar Orbiter II took several photographs in November 1966 that showed several obelisks, one of which was more than 150 feet tall.“. . . the spires were arranged in precisely the same was as the apices of the three great pyramids.”
|Mass (Earth = 1)||1.2298e-02|
|Equatorial radius (km)||1,737.4|
|Equatorial radius (Earth = 1)||2.7241e-01|
|Mean density (gm/cm^3)||3.34|
|Mean distance from Earth (km)||384,400|
|Rotational period (days)||27.32166|
|Orbital period (days)||27.32166|
|Average length of lunar day (days)||29.53059|
|Mean orbital velocity (km/sec)||1.03|
|Tilt of axis (degrees)||1.5424|
|Orbital inclination (degrees)||5.1454|
|Equatorial surface gravity (m/sec^2)||1.62|
|Equatorial escape velocity (km/sec)||2.38|
|Visual geometric albedo||0.12|
|Mean surface temperature (day)||107°C|
|Mean surface temperature (night)||-153°C|
|Maximum surface temperature||123°C|
|Minimum surface temperature||-233°C|
Q17. The famous remote viewer Ingo Swan said that he saw naked looking humans/ETs walking on the moon’s surface. Is there a breathable atmosphere in some parts of the moon?
There are many dozens of ET groups based in “Embassy Zones” on/in the Moon. He could have been “Viewing” any number of them. Their uniforms/suits may have given the appearance of them being naked (As a RV practitioner myself I have an understanding of how some of the imagery language translates at times). There is an extremely thin atmosphere that is very near to the surface of the moon (down in craters) and away from the Sun facing side (So it is not constant as the Earth/Moon rotate around the Sun). It is not breathable at all and filled with a fine dust that would rip your lungs apart of you were unwise enough to try (the dust and ice crystals do make for some interesting light phenomena at times). Many people who do Remote Viewing or OBE’s have an experience of being brought to a place on the moon, a sort of gathering place before they travel further out into the Sol System and beyond. This is fairly common and I have experienced it myself. It is not in the physical realm, nor is it a physical place.
The Remote Viewing and OBE experiences that Corey refers to is echoed by some of the data offered by Rauni Kilde, the former Chief Medical for Lapand Finland, who published the book There Is No Death after receiving letters for people who had OBE (Out of Body Experiences) and NDE (Near Death Experiences) during her tenure. Miles Johnston‘s youtube channel has a wealth of anecdotal information, whistle-blower interviews and more, much of which relates to the Secret Space Program and Secret Government narratives coming out of late
Here is the interview with Rauni Kilde wherein she discusses this information:
Generally speaking, Remote Viewing it is not a branch of pseudo science as the general population believes. The Star Gate Project was (or is, if wasn’t actually shutdown) a US led project to use Remote Viewing for various purposes. The science is valid, and is supported within the Reciprocal Systems theory interpretation of Mind; see the post Precognition Explained: Science Shows How Our Body Reacts To Events Up To 10 Seconds Before They Happen for a detailed explanation.
Because the mind operates within the time-space sector of the Universe (3 dimensions of time and 1 dimension of space), we can navigate through the so called multi-verse, with increasing degrees of clarity as one develops true mental mastery, or more accurately reflects reality within as knowledge; holistic intelligence. This is accomplished by focusing our conscious mind on a image or symbolic representation corresponding to a location, like a photograph. Because this photograph is similar to the actual location, there is a resonance between the two, allowing for data from the remote location to synchronize or entrain into our minds. The quality of the data received depends on how accurately the image developed in the mind represents reality, how well the viewer is able to receive the data free from bias. The channeling process of contacting personalities and drawing information from them, like in the Law of One series, is the same general mechanism.
In a more everyday example, when someone we know is about to call us on the phone or send us a text message, we can sometimes think of them before hand, only to have them contact us moments later. Rupert Sheldrake is a researcher who has put together an extensive body of information demonstrating this phenomenon, also known as telepathy, clairvoyance or precognition.
I suspect that the Moon is a ‘mental’ focal point for our planet, and acts as a type of point of reference for many of the ‘soul level’ processes on Earth. NASA and presumably Electric Universe scientists, have measured that the Earth’s magnetic field or magnetotail enshrouds the Moon once a month causing various effects on its surface. Dan Winter also provides a breathtaking amount of data to suggest that consciousness in our level of reality is intimately connected to electromagnetism, as such it is possible that anyone attempting to view or leave the Earth using stargates or portals, (governed by electromagnetic interactions which also govern mental processes) would need to pass through this ‘gate’ on the Moon. We could think of this as a form of ‘astral travel’ and as such is not a physical place like we would normally think of, hence Corey’s statement “This is fairly common and I have experienced it myself. It is not in the physical realm, nor is it a physical place.”
Q18. In a famous radio intercept during the Apollo 11 mission, Neil Armstrong said that there were two large menacing looking UFOs watching the astronauts, was that a genuine incident?
The moon is divided into Embassy Zones (much like maps of Antarctica) that belong to dozens of different off world (and ancient break away human groups) groups that do not get along. Many of the worst enemies are based only a few kilometers away from each other and have done so for thousands of years in peace. The Moon is a diplomatic zone and conflict is not tolerated on or around it. Diplomatic territory is highly respected and not trespassed on by other groups. If the Apollo landings chose to land in some of these diplomatic zones (which is just about every square inch of the moon) they more than likely landed on territory of a group that did not appreciate it. They were most likely given a stern request to leave and not return to this location by whatever group they were trespassing on.
The debate about whether or not the Moon landings were genuine is still a major point of division within the awakening community, and has even spawned a revivification of Flat Earth theories, which are largely based on the premise that ALL of the data which NASA puts forth is CGI or ‘bogus.’ I can not confirm with absolute certainty what data is accurate or not, but I can say with a fair degree of certainty that they do Photoshop images, and manipulate information.
Related ET Colonies, Pyramids and Structures on the Moon Photoshop out by NASA
Assuming at least some of the Moon landings were valid, the notion that it is a ‘neutral zone’ for diplomatic activity has been shared by several researchers in connection with the Majestic 12 group. This could possibly explain the sudden departure from lunar exploration by NASA, as well as some of the more dubious films and images from other ‘Moon landings’ often held up as evidence there was never any Moon landings at all.
Q19. Who warned NASA and the Apollo astronauts from the moon?
I do not know specifically which group gave a warning or what exactly what that warning specifically was.
Q20. What can you tell us about the other shared human moon base used by the dark fleet?
It is a Heavily Guarded and Secret Base that is at about the 10 o’clock position, on the Back Side of the Moon. The portion that is visible is a “Trapezoid Shape”. It is only accessible to the Dark Fleet and some ICC Personnel as well as the Draco Allied Forces. Some amateur astronomers have caught video of swarms of craft leaving from this base location on a couple of occasions. It is presumed to go far beneath the surface of the Moon just as the LOC does.
Q21. What do you know of other bases on the Moon that are controlled/populated by non-human extraterrestrials?
Other than what was explained above about the diplomatic zones and embassies I do not have much more information. There are quite a lot of ancient ruins from previous disasters and wars that are left on the Moon as a memorial both to the “Ancient Builders” and to the long term peace that has been maintained on the Moon. At times these ancient ruins are open to be visited but are mostly “Protected” and off limits. I do not fully understand why this is the case but these ruins are spectacular and highly respected.
David Wilcock discussed in his talk from early February of this year, that ‘highly respected’ structures on the moon are most likely the remnants of an ancient and extremely tall race of beings. He shared that the facilities found on the Moon were very old and seemed to be designed for beings about 80 to 90 feet tall.
Daniel, from Conscioushugs, claims to be a have worked for the Montauk Project and is an avid Reciprocal Systems researcher who provides a great deal of evidence for the notion that the Moon could be an “ark” or hollowed out Star fragment, which had anti gravity properties, and can be used as a massive spaceship. The supportive data for this understanding can be found in the article The Energetic Evolution of The Solar System | At the Earth’s Core: The Geophysics of Planetary Evolution.
Briefly, the Universe can be fundamentally divided into two sectors or regions of physical motion, space-time (3 dimensions of space and one dimension of time) operating below the speed of light, and time-space (3 dimensions of time and one dimension of space) operating above the speed of light.
During the course of solar evolution, stars accumulate material as they pass through the galactic disc, becoming more dense and thermally active, eventually going nova or exploding. This is a reverse process to the present day theories which posit they begin as very hot blue stars eventually fizzling out into gas giants due to loss of stellar fuel.
If there is enough energy in this stellar nova, the interior of the star accelerates beyond the speed of light, moving into the time-space sector, creating a white dwarf of extremely dense material with a companion star forming from the debris of the outer shell thrown off during the explosion. Eventually the companion star also goes nova, and this shatters the white dwarf into fragments, which become the inner cores of all the major planets. This forms a solar system like our own, with inner rocky planets and outer gaseous planets, and a central sun which continues to accumulate material as it moves through the galaxy, becoming hotter and brighter.
Over the planet’s life, the material ‘cools,’ condensing into the space-time sector, producing planetary expansions, correlating with Expanding Earth theory, which has a great deal of supportive evidence behind it. The cores of all the planets, and most likely some of the moons around other planets, have a core which is in time-space and this core has anti-gravity properties which are harmonically resonant with the solar system as a whole. This produces very organized solar system, which can be observed as the planetary periods in orders of the phi ratio. See All Solar System Periods Fit The Fibonacci Series And The Golden Ratio | Why The Phi?.
As the sun becomes more energetic, it shifts intensity in quantum leaps, reorienting the planets further out in their stellar orbits once complete, making the cycle around the sun longer in duration (lengthening the years). Prior to a stellar shift, the sun ‘gets quiet’ deviating from its normal solar cycles, much like what has been occurring over the past 10 years. When it has accumulated enough mass and energy the shift will occur, and the sun will ‘go dark’ as the coronal mass is pushed into time-space loosing its luminosity for a short period of time (this could explain the legends and myths regarding 3 days of darkness). The Sun is about to go through one of these solar shifts, or quantum leaps, and each of the staller fragments within the cores of each planet are synchronized to the central sun, which are being infused with energy; exactly like the metronome synchronization we mention so often. This explain why volcanic activity has increased and why the entire solar system seems to be going through ‘global warming.’ And this also explains why the Sphere beings are here, the spheres act as a sort of stabilization and ‘downstepping’ mechanism, slowing the process down, which allows humanity to ‘catch up’ before the big shift. David Wilcock mentioned in his talk, that some of his insiders say the Cabal has known about this shift for a long time, forecasting it to occur in or around 2017.
With all that theory and evidence in place, the following excerpt from Daniel’s Paper Geochronology will hopefully paint an intriguing picture about the Moon potentially being a ‘dead ark’:
As previously mentioned, the early planets had no moons because all the fragments of the white dwarf destroyed in the supernova explosion would have predominant, ultra-high speed motion—anti-gravity—and therefore would move away from each other. The outer planets would experience nova-like explosions over the course of their cooling down, ejecting both planetary rings and many smaller moons. But what of the inner planets? Mercury and Venus have no moons, Earth has an exceptionally large one, for the size of the planet, and Mars has a couple of very small moons that don’t behave properly, orbiting in the wrong direction and faster than the planetary rotation.
Immanuel Velikovsky had some interesting perspectives with his rogue planet theories, but the difficulty with them is that planets, containing white dwarf cores and subject to the properties thereof, are not able to leave their orbital positions and go wandering about the solar system. Even the moon-sized ejecta from the outer planets would be unlikely to get past the neutral zone of the asteroid belt to reach the inner worlds. Asteroids and comets, containing no intermediate or ultra-high speed matter, operate solely on gravitational principles and can drift all over the solar system, but because they lack those very motions, they can never form a stable orbit around a planet.
The moons of Earth and Mars have no apparent, natural origin. In The Case for the UFO, Jessup writes:
In the Varo annotations of the book, it is noted that the the Martian moons are “Also an old ‘Dead-Ark’ S-M MAKE.”
Noah! I Want You to Build… an Ark! Right! What’s an Ark?57
An “Ark” is a term used by both the LMs and SMs to refer to the large, interplanetary “motherships” that they use as colonies and transportation between solar systems. They are constructed from asteroids that have intermediate speed motion (small, planetary “cores”) and therefore an inverse density gradient to their structure. With all the heavy, hard metals on the outside providing protection from the ravages of space and a “soft, chewy center,”58 of lighter elements and atmospheric gases at the core, they are essentially a “prefab spaceship” ready for interstellar travel; being a smaller application of a Dyson shell.59 All that is required is a navigation system to orient the scalar magnetic field, already present from the intermediate speed motion, into either paramagnetic(attractive) or diamagnetic (repulsive) modes.
Also noteworthy in these Ark designs is that if ultra-high, anti-gravity motion is still present, as it is in planetary cores, the center of the atmospheric cavity will contain a small, sun-like object representing that “inner core” construct; a structure that exactly matches the “hollow Earth” theories. When the intermediate speed motion of the Ark finally slows to sub-light speeds, the ark “dies” and is no longer functional as a spacecraft. This is what the Varo annotations are referring to concerning the Martian moons as “Dead Arks.” (Montauk had references of there being a large number of “dead arks” scattered throughout the solar system, as they don’t last forever and are abandoned.)
If the Moon were an Ark, then there should be references to times when it was not in orbit, or missing altogether, in mythology. In his paper, “The Earth Without the Moon,”60
With all that being said, it is possible that these large structures which are so well respected, are the remnants of when the Moon was a Space Ark, and could have actually been parked in Earth’s orbit a very long time ago by a highly advanced civilization. It is well known that the Moon is an oddity in the solar system, being very large yet light for it’s size, and even ‘rings like a bell.’
Continue Reading more from this interview about the moon here.