Key knowledge and understanding can be gained in this Post – literally a History of your Exemption Account 101. This is not a “how to” post, with specific documents for download and detailed procedural process. However there is so much foundational knowledge here, it would be very easy to make the leap to actually filing a UCC1 Financing Statement, and Claiming your status as the executor of your strawman or exemption account.
But as a warning, it is essential to remember the system was never meant to actually provide remedy. In many cases people who follow the correct process are persecuted and imprisoned at worsted or unsuccessful at best. Please act wisely if attempting any process.
The government MUST pay all your DEBTS because if they did not, they would be committing treason through coercion Your mother was coerced into registering the fruit of her body with the state. They went in and took that Title of Ownership, your Birth Certificate, speculated on it it and insured it on the stock exchange. Then they laid claim to it via the UCC process. You can reclaim this by notifying the executor that you are now going to become the executor of your own estate. And then you can discharge the debts that your PERSON, the strawman, has levied against him via your exemption as required by the bankruptcy. If they did not provide a Remedy for you, the exemption account in your name worth millions, the entire system would be a fraud in law. In a Tort Action, we could pursue charges of treason against them.
This is why they MUST provide Remedy, and pay your DEBTS for you. But they have it so well hidden and so closed off most people have no clue how to access it. You have to follow a strict and guarded process. That is the part we are all trying to figure out.
Good to review Trust law
If you have no grasp of trust law at all, you would do well to review some data here in this post: https://vigilant.news/Storm/2013/08/brian-kellys-blog-trusts-layou/. Remember all trusts have 3 roles, the Beneficiary (thats you), the Executor (thats the Treasury Secretary) and the Trustee (thats the government). The Executor orders the Trustee to maintain your account.
Here is another post with more information on the Public Law for Remedy Exemption Account is Public Law – Your debts are Pre-Paid.
I went in and added some images and headings for ease of reading. Cheers.
When you see the documents for yourself, your mind will shatter into a thousand pieces.
Introduction
As a matter of fact the imagined President, imagined Representatives, imagined Senators, imagined Supreme Court Justices and imagined Federal Judges are not paid by the United States Government. Actually the United States Government does not have any employees They are paid by the International Monetary Fund in electrons. You see there is no such thing as the United States Government. In reality there are no Governments. There are Corporations (Fictions) such as the Federal Reserve Inc., and the United States Inc., which in fact are private corporations. The United States Inc., is just a slave management company. Guess what that makes you? If you said property, you are correct! You are Human Capital. The shares that were issued for the Federal Reserve when it was created back in 1913 only cost $100.00. That was quite the bargain.
To verify the facts in the preceding paragraphs see (5 U.S.C. 903, 12 U.S.C. 95, 18 U.S.C.A. 914, 22 U.S.C. 263, 285, 286, 287, 288. Public Law 89-719, Public Law 94-564, Public Law 101-167, Public Law 91-151 Public Law 103-465, House Report 103-826 T.D.O 150-10, T.D.O. 92, 41 Stat. Chap 214 pg. 654, Emergency Banking Act 48 Stat. 1, Articles of Agreement 60 Stat. 1440, 20 CFR chapter 111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2) (2), United Nations Secretariat Revised System of National Accounting, Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Cromelin v. United States, 177 F.2d 275, 277 Tomalewski v. United States, 493 F.Supp 673, 675 Foster v. Bork, 425 F.Supp 1318, 1319-20 FRC v. GE 281 U.S. 464, Keller v. PE 261 U.S. 428, United States v. LePatourel, 571 F2d 405, 410, Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, INTERPOL Constitution Art. 30, Executive Order 10422, Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1493. 42 Pa.C.S.A. 502. General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs.
When you see the documents for yourself, your mind will shatter into a thousand pieces. You will have to acknowledge that your entire life has been nothing but a hallucination. You will have to acknowledge that there is NOT, NOR HAS THERE EVER BEEN A GOVERNMENT, COUNTRIES, MONEY, OR CONSTITUTIONS. All GOVERNMENTS AND COUNTRIES ARE FABRICATED FICTIONS CLEVERLY WOVEN INTO YOUR MIND. They are fictions accepted by you because you have been lied to and poisoned your entire life.. What would you do without an external authority commanding you what to do and what not to do? Would you be lost? Could you govern yourself?
Let’s see how things got this way
Between the 1860′s and the early 1900′s, banking and taxing mechanisms were changing through legislation. Cunning people closely associated with the powers in England had great influence on the legislation being passed in the United States. Of course such legislation did not apply to the states or to the people in the states, but making the distinction was not deemed to be a necessary duty of the legislators. It was the responsibility of the people to understand their relationship to the United States and to the laws that were being passed by the legislature. This distinction between the United States and the states was taught in the homes and the schools and churches. The early admiralty courts ‘did not interpret legislation as broadly at that time because the people knew when the courts were overstepping their jurisdiction. The people were in control because they knew who they were and where they were standing in relation to the United States Corporation.
Freeing the Slaves meant Total Slavery
In 1913 the United States added numerous private laws to its books that facilitated the increase of subjects (the newly so-called freed slaves from the Civil War) as property of the United States. The 14th Amendment provided for a new class of citizens – United States citizens that had not formerly been recognized. Until the 14th Amendment in 1868, there were no persons born or naturalized in the United States. They had all been born or naturalized in one of the several states. United States citizenship was a result of state citizenship. After the Civil War, a new class was recognized, and was the beginning of the democracy first positioned in the District of Columbia.
The American people, in the republic to be found in the several States, could choose to benefit as one of these new United States citizens BY CHOICE. The new class of citizens was given the privilege to vote in the democracy in 1870 by the 15th Amendment. These new citizen subjects were required to apply for marriage, registered to vote, register births, deaths, etc. It all required was an application. Benefits came with this new citizenship, but with the benefits, came duties and responsibilities and liabilities, that were totally regulated by the legislature for the District of Columbia. Edward Mandell House is attributed with giving a very detailed outline of the plans to be implemented to enslave the American people.
The 13th Amendment
(1) The 13th Amendment in 1865 opened the way for the people to volunteer into slavery to accept the benefits offered by the United States. Whether House actually spoke the words or not is really irrelevant because the scenario detailed in the statement attributed to him has clearly been implemented. Central banking for the United States was legislated with the Federal Reserve Act in 1913. The ability to decrease the currency in circulation through taxation was legislated with the 16th Amendment in 1913. Support for the presumption that the American people had volunteered to participate in the United States democracy was legislated with the 17th Amendment in 1913. The path was provided for the control of the courts by the British Crown, with the creation of the American Bar Association in 1913.
Trading with the Enemy Act and the Emergency War Powers Act
In 1917 the United States legislature passed the Trading with the Enemy Act and the Emergency War Powers Act, opening the doors for the United States to suspend limitations otherwise mandated in the Constitution. Even in times of peace, every contrived and created social, political, or financial emergency was sufficient authority for the officers of the United States to overstep its peace time powers and implement volumes of “law” that would increase the coffers of the United States. There is always a declared emergency in the United States and it’s States (administrative units), but it only applies to their subjects.
In the 1920′s the States accelerated the push for mothers to register their babies as first required upon the new federal property – the so-called freed Black slaves. Life was good and people were not paying attention to what was happening in government. The stock market crashed, and those who were not on the inside were not warned to take their money out before they lost everything.
Birth Certificates
In the 1930′s federal legislation provided for registration of babies through applications for birth certificates, so government workers could get maternity leave with pay. The States pushed for registration (surrender of ownership) of cars through applications for certificates of title, and for registration of land through registration of deeds of trust, which turned the land over to the State. Constructive trusts secretly were created as each of the people blindly walked into the United States democracy, thereby agreeing to be sureties for the debts of the United States. The great depression supplied the diversion to keep the people’s attention off what government was doing. The Social Security program was implemented, along with numerous other United States programs that invited the American people to volunteer to be the sureties behind the United States’ new registered property and adhesion contracts through the new United States subjects.
You Own Nothing, and Surrender your Property
The plan was well on its path by 1933. Massive registration (surrender) of property through United States agencies, including the ‘State’ subdivisions, was assuring the United States and its officers would get rich beyond their wildest expectations. All of this was done without full disclosure of the material facts that accompanied each application for registration. Is that fraud? The fraud was a sufficient reason to charge all the United States officers with treason, UNLESS a remedy could be supplied for the people to recoup their property and collect for the damages they suffered as a result of the fraud.
What is the Remedy?
If a remedy was available, and the people chose not to or failed to use the remedy, no charge of fraud could be sustained even in a common law court. The United States only needed to provide the remedy. It was not required to explain it or even tell the people where the remedy could be found. The attorneys did not even have to be taught about the remedy. That gave them plausible deniability when the people struggled to understand the new laws. The legislators did not have to have the intricate details of the law explained to them regarding the bills they were passing. That gave them plausible deniability. If the people failed to use their remedy, the United States came out the winner every time. If the people did discover their remedy, the United States had to honor it and release the registered property back to the people, but only if the people knew they had a remedy, and only if they requested it in the proper manner. It was a great plan.
With plausible deniability, even when the people knew they had a remedy and pursued it, the attorneys, judges, and legislators could act like they did not understand the people’s claims. Requiring the public schools to teach civics, government, and history classes out of approved politically correct text books also assured the people would not find the remedy for a very long time. Passing new State and Federal laws that appeared to subject the people to rules and regulations, added another level of protection against the people finding their remedy. The public ‘socialist media’ was molded to report politically correct, though substantially incorrect news day after day, until few people would even think there could be a remedy available to them. The people could be separated from their money and their time to pursue the remedy long enough for the solutions to be lost in the millions of pages of the books in huge law libraries across the country. So many people knew there was something wrong with all the conflicts in the laws with the “facts” taught in the government schools. How’ can the American people be free and subject to a de-facto government’s whims at the same time? Who would ever have thought the people would be resourceful enough to actually find the remedy? BUT they did!
No Lawful Money
In 1933 the United States put its insurance policy into place with House Joint Resolution 192 and recorded it in the Congressional Record. It was not required to be promulgated in the Federal Register. An Executive Order issued on April 5, 1933 paving the way for the withdrawal of gold in the United States. Representative Louis T. McFadden brought formal charges on May 23, 1933 against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank system, the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Secretary of the United States Treasury (Congressional Record May 23, 1933 page 4055-4058). HJR 192 passed on June 3, 1933. Mr. McFadden claimed on June 10, 1933:
“Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks…”
HJR 192 is the insurance policy that protects the legislators from conviction for fraud and treason against the American people. It also protects the American people from damages caused by the actions of the United States. For speaking like he did, Mr. McFadden was poisoned by the powers that be by agents of that federal corporation.
Cancelled all Contracts
HJR 192 provided that the one with the gold paid the bills. It removed the requirement that the United States subjects and employees had to pay their debts with gold. It actually prohibited the inclusion of a clause in all subsequent contracts that would require payment in gold. It also cancelled the clause in every contract written prior to June 5, 1933, that required an obligation to be paid in gold – retroactively. It provided that the United States subjects and employees could use any type of coin and currency to discharge a public debt as long as it was in use in the normal course of business in the United States. For a time, United States Notes were the currency used to discharge debts, but later the Federal Reserve and the United States provided a new medium of exchange through paper notes, and debt instruments that could be passed on to a debtor’s creditors to discharge the debtor’s debts. That same currency, Federal Reserve Notes, is used to discharge public debts. Take note; the Federal Reserve Notes have no value, as stated by the Federal Reserve!
The Uniform Commercial Code
In the 1950′s the Uniform Commercial Code was presented to their States as a means of unifying the generally accepted procedures for handling the new legal system of dealing with commercial transactions and fictions as though they were real. Security instruments (commercial paper) replaced substance as collateral for debts. Security instruments could be supported by presumptive contracts. Debt instruments with collateral, and accommodating parties, could be used instead of money. Money (of exchange) and the need for money was disappearing, and NEW money was being created i.e., ‘Money of Account’ (created by Bill of Exchange) and a uniform system of laws had to be put in place to allow the commercial venue and the courts to uphold the security instruments that depended on commercial fictions as a basis for compelling payment or performance (see ‘Tender of Payment in your State statute!). All this was accomplished by the mid 1960′s. And by 1964, most all the States had adopted the Uniform Commercial Code.
The commercial code is merely a codification of accepted and required procedures all people engaged in commercial activities must follow. The basic principles of commerce had been settled thousands of years ago, but were refined and became more sophisticated over the years. In the 1900′s the age-old principles of commerce shifted from substance to form. Presumption became a big part of the law. Without giving a degree of force to presumption, the new direction in enforcing commercial claims could not be supported in their courts. If the claimants were required to produce their claims every time they tried to collect money or time from the people, they would seldom be successful. The principles expressed in the code combined the means of dealing with substantive commercial activities with the means of dealing with presumptive commercial activities. These principles work as well for the people as they do for the deceivers. The rules do not respect persons.
Registration of Property is Theft by the Government Requiring Remedy
Those who enticed the people to register (surrender) their property (land, cars, guns, children, etc.) to the sub-divisions (States) under dictate by the United States, gained control of the substance through the ‘registrations’ and the States were able to extract more ‘use’ taxes, from the people to use the property of the State! The States and the United States became the Holder of the titles to all the property, even children and many other things.
The definition of “property” is the interest one has in a thing. The thing is the principal. The property is the interest in the thing. Profits (interest) made from the property of another belong to the owner of the thing. Profits were made by the deceivers by pledging the registered property in commercial markets, but the profits do not belong to the deceivers. The profits belong to the owners of the ‘things.’ That is always the people. The corporation only shows ownership of paper – titles to things. The substance cannot appear in the fiction. [Watch the movie Last Action Hero and watch the confusion created when they try to mix substance and fiction.] Sometimes the fiction is made to look very much like substance, but fiction can never become substance. It is an impossibility!
Who Really Pays for your Exemption Account?
The profits from all the registered things had to be put into a ‘constructive’ trust for the benefit of the owners. If the profits were put into the general fund of the United States and not into separate trusts for the owners, the scheme would represent fraud. The profits for each owner could not be commingled. If the owner failed to use his available remedy (fictional credits held in a constructive trust account, fund, or financial ledger) to benefit from the profits, it would not be the fault of the deceivers. If the owner failed to learn the law that would open the door to his remedy, it would not be the fault of the deceivers. The owner is responsible for learning the law, so he understands that the profits from his things are available for him to discharge debts or charges brought against his public person (Debtor-straw-man) by the United States.
If the United States has the “gold”, the United States pays the bills (from the trust account, fund, or financial ledger). The definition of “fund” is money set aside to pay a debt. The fund is there to discharge the public debts attributed to the United States subjects, but ultimately back to the accommodating parties – the American people. The national debt is what is owed to the owners of the registered things – the American people, as well as to other creditors!
Ask the Government to Pay your Debts and they will!
If the United States owes a debt to the owner of the thing, and the owner is presumed (by accommodation) to owe a public debt to the United States, the logical thing is to ask the United States to discharge that public debt from the trust fund. The way for the United States to get around having to pay the public debts for the people is to claim the owner cannot be an owner if he agreed to be the accommodating party for a debtor-person. If the people are truly the principle, then they know how to handle their financial and political affairs, ULNESS they have never been taught. If the owner admits by his actions out of ignorance, that he is an accommodating party, he has taken on the debtor’s- liabilities without getting consideration in exchange. Here lies the fiction again. The owner of the thing does not have to knowingly agree to be the accommodating party for the debtor person; he just has to act like he agreed. That is easy if he has a choice of going to jail or signing for the debtor-person. The presumption that he is the accommodating party is strong enough for the courts to hold the owner of the thing liable for a tax on the thing he actually owns or owes.
You, the Creditor, are owed by the Debtor, the Government
Debtors may have the ‘use’ of certain things, but the things belong to the creditors. The creditor is the master. The debtor is the servant. The Uniform Commercial Code is very specific about the duties and responsibilities a debtor has. If the owner of the thing is presumed to be a debtor because of his previous admissions and adhesion contracts, he is going to have a difficult time convincing the United States that it has a duty to discharge public debts for him. In addition, the courts are staffed with loyal judges who will look for every mistake the people make, when trying to use their remedy.
Filing the UCC1 Financing Statement
Now the quasi-owner (user) of the property (thing), after learning the law and discovering who he is in relation to the United States Corporation, can file a UCC Financing Statement based upon a Security Agreement, registering his security interest in the artificial entity DEBTOR/PERSON, being the ENS LEGIS which the United States created after your Mom signed the ‘Root of Title/Newborn Identification’ and then was compelled to apply for a birth certificate. That was the act of registering her biological property, her baby (substance), with the State of ____. The United States holds the paper title (form), not the substance (baby). Until your Financing Statement is filed, the United States is the holder of the title to the artificial entity. Its name is spelled in all capital letter – JOHN HENRY DOE. When John Henry Doe files the Financing Statement supported by a Security Agreement signed by the artificial entity (JOHN) and the owner (John), he becomes the holder in due course of the title to JOHN. The UCC and the State commercial law are very specific about the effect of a registered security interest. It has priority over most other interest claimed (only claimed) in the same thing. The evidence that is missing in the court is the registered claim over the person (JOHN).
Notify the Secretary of the Treasury
The owner also must notify the Secretary of the Treasury that he is going to handle his own affairs in the future. That is done when you do the CHARGE BACK PROCESS by filing a Bill of Exchange with the Secretary through which he ‘charges up the UCC Contract Trust Account,’ in respect to the ‘value’ expressed on the Birth Certificate and the ‘Directive’ cover letter. The social security number, belonging to your Debtor, is the Trust Account Number for a chargeback, for all the presumed charges brought against your Debtor for proper discharge.
Think of the whole transaction in relation to a dead battery. The batter represents your public person (JOHN), which is a dead entity that can function within the public maize of fiction, transmitting benefits from the public to you in the private IF it is charged up. You cannot go into the public because you are not a fiction. JOHN has no power until it is charged with some energy. That energy comes from an IRS default notice, court judgment, credit card bill, utility bill, traffic ticket, or some other instrument that has a $ amount and JOHN’S name on it as the presumed debtor. The bill is the energy. It charges the dead JOHN. You can now discharge JOHN and put JOHN’S accrual account with the charging party back to a zero balance. You as the secured party creditor, having charged up the UCC Contract Trust Account, now for the ‘presentment’ received in behalf of a debt owed by JOHN, you can discharge the fine, fee, tax or debt with a negotiable instrument for the same $ amount as the charging instrument (presentment) stipulates. The charging party that receives your non-cash item can process it back through the United States Treasury through their financial institution. Note; if discharging IRS Tax liability, the package/instrument goes directly to the Secretary of Treasury – U.S.
Government Invested the Title to your PERSON and made millions!
When you, as the owner of a thing, registered it with the United States or one of its subdivisions, you let the United States hold the legal title to your thing based on misrepresentation and failure to disclose material facts to you at the time of registration. You probably retained possession of the thing, but the United States/States invested the title and made a profit. If you did not specifically authorize the United States/State and its agents to invest the legal title, the profits made from that title belong to you, because as the owner, you remain the equitable title holder. Legally, all the profits from the investment of the titles to all your registered things must go into a fund for your benefit. If they did not put the profits in a trust fund of some sort, it would be fraud.
Just acquiring the titles through what is promoted as mandatory registration, is fraud. If the scenario attributed to Mandell House is now in full application in the United States, which it is, the officers of the United States could be charged and convicted with treason IF they had not provided a remedy, which they did. — House Joint Resolution 192 on June 5, 1933. This is their insurance policy to assure they are not convicted of treason. That does not mean they cannot be charged with treason, but the courts will dismiss based on failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Because you have a remedy outside the court, you cannot sustain a charge of treason. But Tort, now that’s another matter! We will discuss Tort Claims later!
{DIS}CLAIMER -This is not legal or tax advice.This information is for entertainment only..
McCroft says
Nice post.. I'm trying to figure this out in my country. The legalees are different here as well as the courts I assume that the principles are the same though..
Rgs Oliver
Sweden
Justin Deschamps says
i'd imagine if you started digging in the law boooks, you'd find a comparable set of frame work there as well. As the UCC is a world wide system, and so was the bankruptcy in 1933
Jesus says
As far as the remittance coupon goes. Is it a must to write the (-) minus sign before the amount or is what i got is fine? Is it a must to make reference to the United States treasury or is what you see is the right way? And is there a need to write by: accommodation? There’s no need to put accord and satisfaction anywhere that’s extra stuff is it not?
USD. -1.00/
Washington, D.C. 20220 United States Date Drawn
three months after date, Pay to John Doe or sum of USD one only, for value received
John Doe Address , $1 stamp👍(bottom right of BC)
To,
United States Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, D.C.
United States
Obviously when you send this in the mail you don’t write to a fictional corporation. You would put Janet Yellen. But in the coupon do you need to make reference to the United States Treasury? And what if I had the (-) minus sign after the amount like this USD. 1.00/- would that make a difference?
Jesus says
I think I answered one of my own questions. Hope you don’t mind clearing up the rest. But in the above example I should put Janet Yellen because all 3 entities payee, drawer and drawee must be definite individuals is this not correct? And what about the (-) minus sign, by: accommodation and put to accord and satisfaction and all that stuff. Is it necessary? Of course I left out the Accepted for value at the top. And the declaration on the back and stamp duty but you get my gist. Want to figure out what’s unnecessary you have any thoughts Justin?
Anthony Hazin says
How do we become soverign?
Justin Deschamps says
Sovereignty is an internal state of knowledge and understanding, guided by compassion. It is the total grounding of Natural Law within yourself, mind body and soul. While paper work is often used to put a former executor on notice about your status of compitency (ie returning your birth certificate back to an agent of government) this MUST be a reflection of a total shift in BEing and DOing. Sovereignty paper work, that is not harmonized by your ACTIONS, is ineffective in removing the controling influence of government from your life.
Render Unto Caesars What's Caesar's....And They Marveled at him says
So, what you’re saying is. We have to return our birth certificate to the Treasury. And then we’re free? And Then they’ll Marveled at him(us). Is that right?
Loose On Earth Thank God says
The birth certificate is an inchoate instrument. So, we need to do a counter deed. We need to do a declaration on a deed. So, I believe the wording we should put on the back of the birth certificate should be, “ I AM the son of my Father”. Is this not how we loose on earth?
My Money is Loose says
The birth certificate is an inchoate instrument. So, we need to do a counter deed. We need to do a declaration on a deed. So, I believe the wording we should put on the back of the birth certificate should be, “ I AM the son of my Father”. Is this not how we loose on earth?
An Individual Who’s Account is Still Locked says
I’m confused. I returned my birth certificate to the Treasury but for some reason my account is still locked. I know it’s on bearer paper so we don’t need to indorse the back of the document. Would you be against sharing where an individual may have gone wrong?
Justin Deschamps says
I know the main researcher who gave rise to all of this. He never intended his research to be used this way. Swindlers got a hold of it and started pushing these scams. Sad to say. It might work in some rare instances, but I suspect this way is always meant to distract from the much deeper and far more empowering solutions, but also require much more cohesive action and support on the part of the people.
Jason Bourne(Born says
You know I was watching TV the other day. And an interesting movie was on. It was about someone who was lost at sea? Can you guess it?… that’s right it was Finding Nemo. Now how rare it is for me to find that movie. So, Justin I’m going to ask you how rare it is for someone to get this right? You said it worked in rare instances so tell us. All of us want to get some cookies out the cookie jar.
Justin Deschamps says
Based on what know, which is not everything, most people don’t do it successfully. And even if they did, it isn’t an honorable process, its glorified piracy. The process was, to my knowledge, formulated by people who took advantage of another man’s work, and twisted it to suit their ends. And it’s entirely possible those people are themselves agents of the state that specificaly wanted to created a trap to distract people. I’m leaning on this later theory myself, as so many peole interested in deeper concepts of law end up getting swept up in the “free money” game of trying to use their knowledge of law to get access to wealth. And I know several people, some personally, who are in jail at this very moment for using these techqniques.
Master C. (Master Creditor) says
C’mon man. Is it truly a scam? What about the black card that is associated with your Treasury Direct Account. How could this be?
Jason Bourne (Born says
I mean I’m no rocket scientist but by the mere fact you said that people do it unsuccessfully means that there is a successful way to do it. And we all watched the Pirates of the Caribbean so we know who the real pirates are. And only those who want to play the ‘role’ of a defendant sit in jail. And by the way you’re not a great agent because you used the word free money. You and I both know only Lunatics thinks money still exist— that’s only an illusion. But now on to the keys to the Treasure Chest. The consensus here is that we surrender and make a claim on the back of the BC. From reading the comments I AM the son of God or I AM the son of my Father. The good book tells us to ask seek and knock and the answer will be revealed. The spirit told me to ask you. Will the Father be glorified in his son by doing this or will he be kept in bondage?
The King’s Ring says
Correct me if I’m wrong. But when you say most people don’t do it successfully what do you mean. Do you mean the declaration on the deed or the deed itself? Because most people would get the surrender part down and most people might have the wording down. But most people wouldn’t know how to make a deed. And that’s where I come in.
The phrase “signed, sealed and delivered” refers to a sealed instrument, such as a deed. It was signed, then a private seal was applied, then the document was delivered to the recipient(The Honorable Janet Yellen
Secretary of Treasury
U.S. Department of Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20220
Is it possible that I’m missing the mark here? If so, could you reel me back in?
Justin Deschamps says
I mean that while the process is generally sound, a) the gov doesn’t honor the requests or b) they honor them only so they can arrest people later down the line. Recall that in the early days of all this, thousands of people were getting theirs to go through. But later, years later, several busts happened, people got arrested.
Jason Bourne (Born says
There are like three other comments below mine. So, I have no idea who you are responding to. But I get what your saying about honoring the request. But what isn’t clear is your thoughts on how to convey a counter deed. Would you mind unpacking this, and ways that people could screw it up?
Macy says
This is in response to the King’s Ring comment. King’s Ring stated The phrase “signed, sealed and delivered” refers to a sealed instrument, such as a deed. It was signed, then a private seal was applied, then the document was delivered to the recipient. I’m curious about something. What if we just made a declaration on the back of BC signed it and then had a Notary Public to use their stamp. In other words, we didn’t actually use those words. Signed, Sealed and Delivered. We just kind of did it instead. Are using those words mandatory or does our act constitutes a deed?
Master C. (Master Creditor) says
You might want to check out my post below. Hope it helps.
Son of Our Father says
I think someone has already answered your question. But allow me to reiterate. We have to remember that the BC is dead and we have to resurrect the Son which is ourselves ( 1 Peter 1:3). The way we do this is a declaration on a deed. (Psalms 118:17) So, the reason why yours didn’t work the first time is you didn’t declare anything on the back of the birth certificate. You didn’t resurrect yourself.
Mc. Arthur says
For the sake of time. Let’s keep this short. I know counter deed is a secret deed that is executed before a notary or under a private seal. A counter deed destroys, invalidates, voids or alters a public deed. What are the meat and potatoes to make a counter deed work?
Mc. Arthur says
Seems like doing a counter deed is the way to go. I know a counter deed is a secret deed that is executed before a Notary or under private seal. And I know that we need to make a declaration on a deed claiming I AM the son of my Father on the back of birth certificate and send it to the Secretary of Treasury. Since most of us don’t have a private seal we’ll go to a Notary. These are my questions I have.
1. Will a Notary stamp work the same as a seal?
2. When we make our declaration do we have to sign for the living and account for the dead? If so, how? Or will just a regular signature do?
3. Lastly, is it mandatory to use the words Signed, Sealed, and Delivered during this process ? Or will our behavior/acts constitutes a deed?
Justin Deschamps says
A deed is a deed. It all depends on who is recording it and whether it will materially alter the prime register (my term). Remember, all law is about speaking and recording what occurs. The Chancery of any legal system (the prime register or master record) needs to reflect the title change of the accounts in question. But, again, can this occur when you never had title or were entitled to the accounts? Does a pirate give away their treasure easily? Is a system truly lawful if it misrepresents process.
The cold hard truth I will continue to reinforce is that a) we never had access to these accounts, they were never meant for us (thus claiming them invites trouble, in the same way stealing a gift from your parents before Christmas isn’t a good idea) b) we don’t live in a rule of law system, we live in a color of law system. The system leaves bear traps for people, who figure this or that out, and spin their wheels trying to get access to something that was always meant as a sugar trap and distraction.
I suggest you spend more time learning about the true substance of law, and working with others who are interested in rebuilding a true rule of law system, which, the only system I’ve discovered that has made significant progress in this regard, is UCADIA.
Chase says
You may or may not know this. But I’m going to ask anyway. Once the Treasury PU picks up mail from the Post Office how long does it take to alter the prime register? Obviously, I know it depends on the amount of mail and how fast the people work. But if you had to guess what would you say?
Re says
Stfu
Cabal Killer says
Do not be deceived God is not mocked. Whatever so ever a man so that shall he also reap. So Re, you shut the fuck up. Your pussy just like the rest of the cabal. Respect the man’s comment down below trying to get out of the system. Pray the good lord shows his displeasure and drown the bastard.
Master C. (Master Creditor) says
If you ever wanted to hide something. You know what they say, put it in a book. I’m just going to touch on briefly: Statutes of Westminster; The First 1275. For the maintaining of Peace and Justice. That’s the whole act now into the meat and potatoes. In admiralty law, the term prize is used to signify any goods that are the subject of marine capture, meaning property taken at sea from an enemy under the law of war. The title of the captor or captors government is Inchoate and incomplete and that it does not vest until the condemnation by a price Court. Pay close attention to the title of the captor or the captors government is Inchoate…. So I merely thought what if I gave them the title to the vessel in a trust. There’s no controversy and you’ve never lost anything because the war has never ended you just made the titles of your own vessel into it in your own house they wanted responsibility they’re the ones who have to pay. So, just flip it over and claim to be the son of God. Am I right or am I wrong?
Justin Deschamps says
I think the jist of what you’re saying is valid, re: Admiralty law. By making a claim against the property, it is an admiralty claim. But will they simply abandon it to you? Or will they fight to keep it? Historically, it seems some people have gotten away with it. But others have not. As a matter of law, property accumulated by another and held in trust for a beneficiary does not mean that said beneficiary is able to claim the property without the trustee’s permission. That’s the critical issue that I’m raising with all this.
Master C. (Master Creditor) says
I concur. But don’t you know that the trustee has already given a way for beneficiaries to get permission. How cool is that. From what I’m told all you have to do is follow some valid process and you’ll have de jure authority. And you don’t think what I mentioned above is a valid process? I mean we are in the age of Revelation so nothing is hidden. Those who have eyes can see, it’s written everywhere Psalms 118:17, Article 7 UCC, and many more. Am I a tin man with a foil hat or am I on to something?
Mr. CD (Mr. Counter Deed) says
No good deed goes unpunished. I don’t exactly agree with that statement. But there is some truth to that. However today we’re going to be talking about a deed that will reward you, a counter deed to be exact. I am aware that for a deed you don’t need consideration, but what is the correct way/manner/method to convey a counter deed? Lastly, what are the common pitfalls that individuals make when making a counter deed?(thanks in advance for prompt response?
Jason Bourne(Born says
This is a re-comment of what I just posted. I did this so it wouldn’t get caught with the other comments. But to make a long story short, I get the honoring the request part. But what isn’t clear is your thoughts on how to convey a counter deed. Would you mind unpacking this?
TechGuy Here says
Just out of curiosity. Besides going to a Notary Public I know people have their private seals and that’s one way of doing a counter deed. Since we’re in the age of technology I’m curious is there a way we can do a counter deed electronically? Like an electronic seal, is this possible? And how would this work?
Macy says
Quick add on. You may answer my question before I post this. But just in case you don’t here it goes, What is the right way to sign for the living? I can’t add a picture so I’ll do my best to paint a picture. Long story short, we flip the birth certificate over and claim I AM the son of my Father. Then underneath we sign for the living by
John Henry
——————
John-Henry
Next we sign for the dead
pp DOE
————
DOE (Family Seal Here)
Then on the bottom right we have a stamp with our postmaster general seal and sign our name across the stamp.
Is this sound in nature?What information would we loose vs what would be added if we did this by ourselves vs w/Notary?
Macy says
I forgot the
Witness our Hand and Seal
part. But I think you get what I’m trying to do.
Picture this on the back of BC.
I AM the son of my Father
John Henry
——————
John-Henry
DOE
pp—————(Family Seal)
DOE
Witness our Hand
and Seal
(P-Master Seal)
[stamp]
/signed name
across stamp
Is this the right way to sign for the living? Does this look like an unsuccessful counter deed? If so, how do we make it successfully? And how would this look different if we just did this with a Notary?
Mc. Arthur says
Seems like doing a counter deed is the way to go. I know a counter deed is a secret deed that is executed before a Notary or under private seal. And I know that we need to make a declaration on a deed claiming I AM the son of my Father on the back of birth certificate and send it to the Secretary of Treasury. Since most of us don’t have a private seal we’ll go to a Notary. These are my questions I have.
1. Will a Notary stamp work the same as a seal?
2. When we make our declaration do we have to sign for the living and account for the dead? If so, how? Or will just a regular signature do?
3. Lastly, is it mandatory to use the words Signed, Sealed, and Delivered during this process ? Or will our behavior/acts constitutes a deed?
Misty says
Requirements for deeds
A document intended to be a deed, should be named as a deed. The deed will have a signature clause for a natural person reading:
***On the back of Birth Certificate***
I AM the son of my Father
SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED by John Doe
in the presence of:
_______________________ Witness _______________________ Witness Name (print)
) )
_______________________ Signature
The requirement to sign and seal is no longer onerous. Sealing with a wax seal is no longer needed and ‘sealing’ these days relies on a separate party witnessing the signature of the person signing the deed. The word ‘delivered’ is to establish that the signed deed is to be binding and if there is another party to the deed, it implies physical delivery to that other party of a signed version.
Does this look like an unsuccessful counter deed? If so, how can we improve it?
Misty says
For deeds executed by individuals, it is still a requirement under Singapore common law for the deed to be signed, sealed and delivered.
In this regard, while there is no need to affix a wax seal to the deed as in the older days, it remains important to have, at the very least, a physical manifestation of a seal, such as by drawing a circle over the place of the deed and signing on it (similar to that in First National Securities Ltd v Jones and another [1978] Ch 109).
A circle is not necessary, because we have someone witnessing our signature. Isn’t this so? And for the signature, cursive will work. We don’t have to sign for the living and account for the dead in this example. Do we?
Tracy says
This is a simple question that needs a little clarification. I know the Post Office has its list of prohibited items that can’t be sent through regular mail. And deeds are one of them. But I am wondering is it mandatory to send a counter deed through registered mail. Because think about as long as they(the Secretary of Treausry) gets its that’s all that should matter. UPS and FedEx do not have registered mail so that would be limiting our options. So, is it safe to say as long as she gets notified, that’s all that matters?
Luke says
I read just about all of the comments here. And no where did I see where we have to register our selves on the UCC. So all we have to do is a deed on the unilateral mistake. Is this not right? We don’t have to satisfy the Secretary of Treasury lien. She’s been gracious enough for all we have to do is surrender. Is this right?
Willy the Witness says
When it comes to deeds witnesses are usually different persons than the Notary. So, this lead me to wonder what are the requirements for a witness when we’re making a deed. Normally it would include the witness’s signature, name, and address. Is it required to include an occupation as well? And as far as our signature goes do we sign it the normal way? It says a deed will have a signature clause for a natural person reading, so it’s just cursive writing right?
Crystal Clear says
I got a quick question. About seal I would like cleared up. I read some where that sealing with a wax seal is no longer needed and ‘sealing’ these days relies on a separate party witnessing the signature of the person signing the deed. Yet, I read somewhere else where while it says, while there is no need to affix a wax seal to the deed as in the older days, it remains important to have, at the very least, a physical manifestation of a seal, such as by drawing a circle over the place of the deed and signing on it (similar to that in First National Securities Ltd v Jones and another [1978] Ch 109). So, which one is it?
Executor / Personal Representative says
Hi Justin I need something things cleared up right quick. As far as our signature goes on our Deed is it a requirement that we make clear the capacity in which we’re signing. For example, John Doe as trustee/executor in bankruptcy. Will this work?
Justin Deschamps says
No. Just that you sign. The system doesn’t know what those things mean, for the most part. There is no “magic secret wording” you can put on it to get it approved the way you want. If you decided to do it, which again, I caution against, it may or may not work. Best of luck.
Atl Jacob says
The I AM statement is the wording. I AM as I born again. I AM the son of my Father. Justin I read where you say said this takes 30 days to a year plus. But according to Canon Law 2057 it says once We establish Our status and competency that the Trust must be dissolved immediately. So, what are you saying?
Goodness of God Land of living says
I don’t know if this is me or what. My shipments are not going through. What is the correct address to surrender our BC to?
Retail Securities Services
P.O. Box 7015
Minneapolis, MN 55480-7015
Or
Secretary of Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20220
Emergency Clause says
Hi Justin I kind of need your help. To make a long story short all my bank accounts are closed. The banks closed my accounts without my permission. So, I’m no longer receiving the benefits and privileges of the Public. However, I haven’t gain de jure authority yet so it makes me a vulnerable adult. Is there an emergency clause that would unlock my Treasury Direct Account? Thanks ahead of time for your consideration.
Justin Deschamps says
Sorry to hear about the hardship. I strongly advise you NOT try to access the account in your name. People are currently in jail for doing so. It’s a trap. Use this as education only.
That said, look into grants or other ways to deal with the financial hardship. https://getgovtgrants.com/government-hardship-grants
Chase says
On March 10 around 4 in the morning my package was picked up. It was signed for by A SWANN. It’s March 14th and my account is stilled locked I am wondering did I ever alter the prime register. Here’s what I did. I flipped over my BC and I put I AM the son of my Father. And underneath I put SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED as Deed by John Doe. Then I had a witness attest my signature and I had a Notary put her seal underneath all of this. Isn’t this how we alter the prime register?(your term)
Kundalini Energy says
Can you tell me where I went wrong? According to Article 7 UCC part (c) we must surrender our Birth Certificate. As we know the BC is a Holy Ghost and is dead on paper(1 Peter 1:3). So, we need to incarnate(Pslams 118:17). I flipped over my BC and I put I AM the son of my Father. And underneath I put SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED as a Deed by John Doe. Then I had a witness attest my signature and a Notary put her seal underneath all of this. Then I mailed it to the Secretary of Treasury. But my account is still locked and it’s been a while so they had time to process. The only thing I think I could be missing is satisfying the Bailee’s lien which was stated in part (b) of Article 7 UCC. From what I just gave you. Do you see where I went wrong? If so, can you point me in the right direction because this is frustrating as fuck.
Slater says
Man I have no idea what’s going on. On February 28 someone from the Treasury picked up my mail. I did like everybody suggested I made my declaration on the back of my Birth Certificate, and I had a Notary put their seal on the bottom. And I had a witness attest my signature. And I also put the words signed, sealed and delivered. It’s now Wednesday March 16 and my account is still locked. Justin would you mind telling me where I went wrong?
Justin Deschamps says
You might not have done anything wrong. If it did work, it can take time for them to take action. But for the most part, they stopped letting people access their accounts years ago, as far as I know, the hammer came down in 2017.
Slater says
That can’t be true. Because in 2010 there was a shift in the UCC which made things simple. We went towards possession as far as secured transactions. But anyways Justin I know things take time but not this long. It’s been damn near a whole month. I didn’t think I did anything wrong, but the proof is in the pudding. Can you give me anything else to work with?
Justin Deschamps says
I don’t profess to know all the ins and outs of the system. I attested to what I did know. It’s entirely possible they will do what you want. Bear in mind the entire civil and governmental structure has been under assault due to COVID and the coup that happened in 2020. The Great Reset is also a factor.
Slater says
Pray that you’re right my man. I just don’t like sitting around when I could be taking action. But anyways just to get my hopes up a little. Before the pandemic would you say it took less than 30 days?
Justin Deschamps says
I have not personally done this process. I’ve heard that it can take as short as 30 days and as long as a year plus.
Jasper says
I was just looking over the Treasury Direct Account website today. And on the how to page they got a link about adding or editing a bank account. The form is 5512 but that’s not important. I noticed that they said a certification by a Notary Public is not acceptable. And that we’ll be notified by email when the transaction is complete. That made me wonder about a few things. Why when it comes to returning our BC a Notary is acceptable? And is it possible we’ll be notified by email when Title is successfully transferred?
Johnny Deep says
I’m curious about something. I literally live down the street from the Federal Reserve Bank in Atlanta. What if I just showed up there with my Birth Certificate. Couldn’t they just process this?
Justin Deschamps says
Doubtful. Banking employees don’t know about these things.
Johnny Deep says
The reason I’m asking is because I know before the global reset in 2017. There were several ways you could access your inheritance. The one that’s talked about here is operating in the private completely. I know some people who didn’t want to go that far they just claimed their credits instead. But anyways considering our individual accounts are at the Federal Reserve I figured there would be a way. They’re not the Baliee but they do know this stuff. Would it be impossible to access our inheritance via Federal Reserve? If not, how so?
Johnny Deep says
Hi so I just left the Federal Reserve Bank in Atlanta a few minutes ago. And only law enforcement individuals were there and no bank employees. Law enforcement said they couldn’t help— but I know there’s always a back door to everything. Isn’t there a way I can exit my trust via Federal Reserve?
Roe vs Wade says
Hella confused right now. Need clarity. This is regarding Bill of Exchange and accessing our Trust. Here are my questions. The question(s) is how do we accept on behalf of the strawman and how do we find our cusip number so that it is certain as to the Payee. I know that we can find our cusip number from our birth certificate number just don’t know how to do it, yet. What’s your take?
Cabal Killer says
What you’re talking about may not be there. There is a CUSIP number on everything. So whenever you do receive a Bill what CUSIP number should you use. This could be a deliberate act by the Cabal. But I think Justin would know. Don’t you?
Cabal Killer says
I see the disrespect on this page. And all I got to say is. Fret not thyself because of evildoers, neither be thou envious against them that work unrighteousness. For they shall soon be cut down like the grass, and wither as the green herb. This is Psalms 37. The whole world needs it. It always recoils back with double force, don’t it Justin? Your pussy motherfucker.
Dan says
The UCC is private code copyrighted by UNIDROIT in Switzerland. Only licensed “persons” (such as attorneys, judges and government bureaucrats) are empowered to use the UCC. If anyone uses it, who is not licensed uses the UCC, then that is an automatic trespass, and whatever process is being done, will fail miserably, along with additional liability for trespass. So I would not tough the above process with a -foot pole. Yes – the U.S. is bankrupt, and yes – THEY are required to give The People a Remedy for every “charge” THEY make – including court cases, taxes, fees, etc. .But the setoff needs to be made through the U.S. Dept of Treasury, not the Sec of State with a UCC filing.
Atl Jacob says
I think you can be more clear than that. Do not write to the Department of Treasury or address an agent by their Title because they can hide behind it. It’s all fictional. Also don’t write
Yellen Janet.
Write Janet Yellen.
You see the difference? First example she can hide behind her strawman. And you must address an agent in their private capacity. So,
Janet Yellen in her private capacity
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue
(Street address not a PO Box)
-Registered mail is a must
I AM the son of my Father
(Declaration)
& don’t put Ms. or Mr. just their names.
Dan does this sound unreasonable?
Atl Jacob says
The trick with this is you must use registered mail and you must address an agent in their private capacity. Once you have this you’ll be on the private side of the ledger.
By: John: Doe says
Many do not know know how to sign their REAL name. Here is how to autograph AND set yourself free:
I AM
By: John: Doe (in red ink)
Authorised Agent for JOHN DOE (in blue)
Royal says
Blue ink is for original in signature.
Here’s the proper way to autograph. Is it not?
All rights reserved
By:John-henry:[DOE] doing business as Authorized representative: PRINCIPLE:DOE,JOHN HENRY no recourse
Ricky says
@Justin if there’s effective no rule of Law. Then there’s no point of a Tort.
Justin Deschamps says
Color of law still exists, but yes.
Ricky says
@Justin I got another question. It’s about the 3 day rescission act. I know on the 3rd day a baby is born it’s declared dead. Obviously most parents don’t got a clue. And the baby can claim the estate at the age of majority. Would it be impossible to declare the baby is alive within these 3 days or must the individual wait to the age of majority? Or it would be crazy to cancel the contract because the baby wouldn’t be able to operate in commerce?
Post Master James says
The Post Master must be paid. When it comes to Our stamps and seal we must date the stamp and put Our seal. Is it a must that We date and seal Our $1 stamp?
David Lee Welch says
Alright! Absolutely lovin what I’ve been reading and God bless all you guys and the hard work you’ve put in. Ok so I myself haven’t gained access to my TDA but there is a group that is helping me towards this but mainly in gaining my freedom and has let me declare my sovereignty. I’m waiting for my credentials card at the moment and when run by any officer will show “DO NOT STOP,DO NOT DETAIN, DO NOT INTERROGATE” but it takes about 6-9 months for all databases to be updated after you send out your notices but it is 100% legitimate and 100% needs your help and the help of every freedom loving American NATIONAL (key word there) please everyone,do yourself the favor of correcting your political status before you do anything. Go to http://www.American State National.org and join you state assembly then go to http://www.annavonreitz.com and get to know the greatest living hero you never knew you had. There is a short process now to correcting your status and Mrs. Reitzinger and many other great people are now in the process of setting up our yes OUR meaning you,me and every single person that isn’t THEM, Our World Trade Bank. There is a Dejure government in place now and all 50 states are in session. Good luck to all of you amazing patriots who love your country but hate the de facto government. I consider you all a dear friend.
Jesus says
Surely by now you must returned to your kingdom. And on your way did your remittance coupon look like this and will this get you back on the right side?
Birth certificate
Accepted for value
——————
USD. $-1.00/
Washington, D.C. 20220 United States Date Drawn
three months after date, Pay to John Doe or sum of USD negative one dollar only, for value received
John Doe Address , $1 stamp👍(bottom right of BC)
To,
Janet Yellen
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, D.C.
United States
Back of your birth certificate I AM 5c stam👍
Randy says
Thankfully I found you! Giuded by the Light.
River says
Is this how got access your trust account?
On the top portion of your birth write accepted for value and the lower half write a bill of Exchange as such
Birth certificate
Accepted for value
_____________________
USD. -$1.00/
Washington, D.C. 20220 United States Date Drawn
three months after date, Pay to the order of JOHN HENRY DOE a sum of -one United States dollar only, for value received.
John Doe Address , $1 stamp👍(bottom right of BC)
To,
Janet Yellen
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, D.C.
United States
Back of Birth certificate
I AM 5c stam👍
Endorser(John Henry) says
USD. -$1.00
Washington, D.C. 20220 United States Date Drawn
three months after date, Pay to the order of JOHN REESE DOE a sum of -one United States dollar only, for value received.
Drawer: John Reese
Is the words for value received necessary?The payee needs to be written like this right? JOHN HENRY DOE
And the drawer John Henry right ?